Environmentalists Oppose Every
Practical Source of Energy
because they abhor capitalism and industry

There is no source of energy that is endorsed and approved by environmentalists.  Oil and gasoline are their biggest enemies, even though these are the most convenient and potent sources of energy for cars, trucks and locomotives.  Environmentalists don't like nuclear energy — the cleanest source of electricity — because they say they are worried about proper disposal of spent fuel.  They don't like coal, even though we have lots of it here in the U.S., because they fear air pollution, and more recently, carbon dioxide emissions.  Windmills are out, because the environmentalists say they are unsightly and they kill birds.  Hydroelectric dams are out, because eco-extremists are willing to weaken the power grid to save a few fish.*

Not only are the energy sources opposed, environmentalists also oppose transmission lines, which carry electric power to the cities; and again, the opposition is for the sake of the birds and the aesthetics.  Environmentalists opposed the construction of the Alaska Pipeline in the mid-1970's.

Why do left-wing environmentalists oppose energy?  That's easy.  Leftists can't stand it when capitalism, industry and "big business" succeed.  When that happens, it takes power away from big government.  When liberal activists speak about solar and wind power, they claim they want the U.S. to achieve energy independence, but these are the same people who oppose oil drilling in Alaska.  The stated concern for plant and animal life is primarily a cover story, although there are people who genuinely believe that animals have rights equal to those of humans.

Be sure to read The Causes and Effects of High Gas Prices, where you will see it's the environmentalists who are driving up the price of gas.

Related topic:  Pipelines.

Another related topic:  The abolition of natural gas.

New EPA Rule Is a Death Sentence for American Energy.  The Environmental Protection Agency plays judge, jury, and executioner — and its newest-issued rule is a death sentence to American energy and energy-producing states.  Meanwhile, states like Pennsylvania, which will be disproportionately harmed by the rule because of our abundant natural gas production, hold the key to America's increasing energy needs, generating immense economic development and reducing the very emissions targeted by this heavy-handed agency.  The EPA unilaterally issued a final rule establishing draconian emission standards that target existing coal and new natural gas power plants nationwide.  It requires 90% carbon capture for power-generating facilities by 2032.

Biden EPA Rules Will Cause Blackouts for Millions of Americans, Study Warns.  President Joe Biden's aggressive climate regulations targeting fossil-fuel-fired power plants will create widespread electric grid instability and lead to mass blackouts impacting millions of Americans, according to a recent study commissioned by North Dakota's state government.  The research, conducted in May by the firm Always On Energy Research, concluded that the Environmental Protection Agency's recently finalized regulations are not technologically feasible and will foreseeably lead to the retirement of coal power generation units.  Intermittent and weather-dependent green energy sources, such as wind and solar, will replace such retired generators, leading to unreliable conditions, the study found.  The study largely echoes concerns that have been voiced by the U.S. grid watchdog, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation; regional grid operators; and power utility companies.  Four regional grid operators that oversee the infrastructure supplying power for 154 million Americans warned after the EPA regulations were first proposed last year that grid reliability would "dwindle to concerning levels" under the regulations.

Climate Alarmism is the existential threat to humanity.  First and foremost, climate alarmists are hellbent on ending the use of affordable and reliable energy in the form of fossil fuels.  This alone is a horrendous stance that puts millions of lives at risk.  Like it or not, the advent of fossil fuels, namely oil, coal, and natural gas, has been the biggest boon for humanity in all of history.  The harnessing of these resources to supply virtually unlimited energy in cost-effective terms has raised billions of people from abject poverty.  Without ample access to fossil fuels, our modern way of life would literally cease to exist.  Not only do fossil fuels provide abundant and affordable energy.  As the U.S. Department of Energy notes, "Petrochemicals derived from oil and natural gas make the manufacturing of over 6,000 everyday products and high-tech devices possible."

Vermont effectively criminalizes oil production.  Vermont recently passed legislation that will punish oil companies for producing oil, by forcing them to pay a share of damages allegedly caused by "climate change."  In doing so, the Green Mountain State has effectively criminalized the extraction and production of petroleum — and therefor petroleum products. [...] To say this is insane is to seriously understate things.  Assuming that greenhouse gases are in some way detrimental, how could it be possible to apportion "blame" amongst companies, industries, individuals, groups, organizations, vehicles, appliances ... and the government?  Nonetheless, typically timid GOP Gov. Phil Scott managed to be missing in action long enough for the bill to become law without his signature.

Biden's War On Natural Gas Will Deprive America of Affordable Energy.  Even as the Biden administration's regulatory agencies are moving to render the building of new natural gas power plants too costly to build, a consensus has formed in the analyst community that the added power demands from AI will require a big expansion of natural gas generation to ensure grid stability.  Over a span of less than 20 days in April and May, Biden regulators at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) published new regulations that, according to grid expert Robert Bryce, add more than 1 million words targeting natural gas to the federal register.  On April 25, the EPA finalized new power plant emission rules that will sentially force the retirement of America's remaining coal-fired power plants by 2030 by rendering them too costly to continue operating.  Most media reports focused on that aspect of the new regulations, which had been anticipated.

What Energy Transition?  The press, and many politicians, constantly assure us that the world is in the midst of a transition from fossil fuels to "green" energy, which means wind turbines, solar panels, and mostly fictitious batteries. [...] No such transition is taking place in the U.S.; on the contrary, last year natural gas-fired electricity generation increased 9.5 times as much as wind and solar combined:  [Illustration]  But that's nothing!  The U.S. is rich enough to waste absurd amounts of money on pitifully inadequate wind and solar developments.  Less developed countries can't afford to be that stupid.  Thus it is coal that contributes the most CO2 to the atmosphere.  But when it comes to coal, the U.S. is irrelevant:  [Illustration]  Worldwide, governments are spending absurd amounts of money to subsidize wind and solar, and that doesn't even count the mandates that are the most insidious form of subsidy.  Nevertheless, fossil fuel use is increasing 3.4 times as fast as "green" energy.  Why?  Because fossil fuels are vastly better:  cheaper, more reliable, and far more energy-intensive: [...]

Electrical Grid Operators Are 'Sounding Alarm' over EPA Rules.  Electrical grid operators have been "sounding alarm bells" that they will not be able to "meet the demand" of the amount of electricity needed under the Biden administration's Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) most recent regulations, Dave Walsh, former President and CEO of Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc. (MHPSA) said during an interview on Breitbart News Saturday.  The EPA released four final rules Thursday that would help to reduce the amount of pollution being produced from "fossil fuel-fired power plants."  The EPA's final regulations for coal-fired and natural gas-fired power plants "limit the amount of carbon pollution covered sources can emit."  "We've got the regional grid coordinators across the grids, PJM 13 states, MISO 15 states, CAISO, which is California, ERCOT, which is Texas, and now added North Carolina and Tennessee, 32 states now impacted by grid operators telling us that they're running out of electricity," Walsh said, adding that we are not "generating enough baseload constant duty electricity to support demand."

Biden's Power Plant Crackdown Raises More Questions Than Answers.  The Biden administration's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued final regulations to cut power plant greenhouse gas emissions and pollutants Thursday that could raise more questions than answers in a time of rising demand and diminishing reliability on America's power grid.  Assuming it is upheld by the courts, the regulation will require both coal and natural gas power plants to invest millions in carbon capture and storage and other technology between now and 2032, or face being removed from the grid.  Much has been written in recent months about the electricity-gobbling nature of hundreds of new data centers and crypto-mining operations being installed around the country, along with the power needs of government-subsidized renewable energy and electric vehicle industrial plants.  The North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) stated in its current assessment that new demands on the grid during 2023 were more than triple those of 2022, and the pace only seems destined to accelerate in the years to come.

Biden's EPA Says Sweeping Power Plant Regs Won't Harm America's Grid — Experts Are Saying The Exact Opposite.  The Biden administration says that its new rules for fossil fuel-fired power plants will not cause grid reliability problems, but power grid experts are warning that the exact opposite could end up being the case.  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced final rules for fossil fuel-fired power plants Thursday, marking one of the most aggressive moves that President Joe Biden has made in an effort to fight climate change.  While the EPA says that the rules will not make the electricity that powers the economy less reliable, power grid experts are concerned that the rules will constrain the amount of affordable and reliable power available to meet expected increases in demand over the coming years.  Under the new regulations, America's existing coal plants will have to use carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology to control 90% of their carbon emissions by 2032 if they want to stay running past 2039, and certain new natural gas plants will also have to cut their emissions by 90% by 2032, according to the agency.

When did we vote on this?
Biden EPA Threatens to Shut Down Coal Plants Amid Energy Crisis.  Just last month, it was determined that the cost of electricity in the United States was still rising at a rate faster than the national average for inflation.  In other words, even if you are somehow managing to pay your rent or your mortgage in this economy and maintain a place to live, you might not be able to afford to heat it or keep the lights on.  So what has Joe Biden done in response?  He has ordered the EPA to issue new rules that will either make electricity more expensive or remove some of it from the power grid.  (Possibly both.)  Under the new rules, coal and natural gas power plants will be forced to capture nearly all smokestack emissions or... (wait for it) shut down.  What could possibly go wrong?

Biden Admin Finalizes New Rules to Restrain Fossil Fuel Power Plant Carbon Emissions.  The Biden administration has finalized an array of new regulations on fossil-fuel-fired power plants, including a rule requiring many power plants to prevent the release of 90 percent of their carbon emissions.  "The Biden-Harris Administration is announcing key actions to build on this momentum and deliver clean electricity to more homes and businesses, helping lower energy costs for American families and power the U.S. manufacturing renaissance driven by President Biden's Investing in America agenda, while providing cleaner air and water to communities long overburdened by pollution from fossil fuel power plants," the White House said on April 25.  The new carbon emission regulations, announced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), specifically call for fossil fuel plants to cut their carbon emissions and reduce other air and water pollutants.

The Editor says...
Carbon dioxide is not carbon, nor is it a pollutant.

These 11 Charts Show Why The U.S. Is A Natural Gas Superpower.  About 47% of all the homes in the country rely on natural gas furnaces for heating.  Heating with gas is far cheaper than heating with electricity.  Thanks to the shale revolution, private ownership of mineral rights, and hydraulic fracturing, the U.S. is now producing record quantities of gas, and because of that, we have a cost advantage over nearly every other country on the planet.  European consumers now pay more than four times as much for natty as their American counterparts.  Over the past few years, the U.S. has become a natural gas powerhouse, and the fuel has become an integral, irreplaceable part of our economy.  My pal, Doomberg, made that point back in February, explaining that a key reason the U.S. economy has not fallen into recession is because it's increasingly fueled by cheap natural gas.

Study grades natural gas as best source for reliability, affordability and environmental impact.  Anew study finds that natural gas is the most effective energy source meeting growing energy demands affordably and reliably, while balancing environmental and human impact.  The "Grading the Grid" study by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a pro-free market nonprofit, and Northwood University rates natural gas, coal, petroleum, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind, solar and geothermal generation sources on their reliability, environmental and human impact, cost, innovation and market feasibility.  Natural gas got an "A" grade, followed by nuclear, which got a "B+".  Wind and solar energy came in last, each receiving "F" grades, according to the study.

Org That Wants To Cut Carbon Emissions Sues To Close Zero-Emission Nuclear Power Plant.  An environmentalist nonprofit that seeks to cut carbon emissions and promote clean energy is suing to stop the Biden administration from funding a zero-emission power plant.  The Department of Energy (DOE) announced in January that it had approved a $1.1 billion credit payment to the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, a nuclear facility on the central California coast, to provide the plant with a path to avoid its planned shutdown in 2025.  Though nuclear power plants produce negligible carbon emissions, Friends of the Earth (FOE), a group seeking to reduce carbon emissions, filed a lawsuit Tuesday seeking to block the DOE's funding, arguing that climate change could make the plant unsafe to operate due to flood risks and that earthquakes in the area could cause accidents.  Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom had initially supported closing the plant, siding with environmental activists, the Associated Press reported.  The governor, however, now backs the plant, reportedly seeking to avoid a repeat of the widespread blackouts that hit the state in August 2020.

The Editor says...
[#1] Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, and CO2 emissions are not something to be avoided.  Blackouts are something to be avoided.  [#2] The opposition to the plant was due to the fear of earthquakes and the fear of floods and the fear of carbon dioxide.  Almost all of environmentalism is based on fear.

Corruption Is Treason.  When you look into it, it isn't because human activity can destroy the planet, but it does coincide quite nicely with the goals of the globalist/communists to maximize control over human activity.  The absurdity of their arguments, I thought, would keep them from achieving their goals, but I was mistaken.  The absurdity of their arguments only meant they had to enlist the governments and international organizations who rule over the people and buying off politicians and scientists is much easier to accomplish than convincing people that electric vehicles, powered by coal-fired power plants, somehow achieve zero emissions.  The one true clean energy is natural gas, but they are against that, too.  Why?  That's the question they are never able to answer.

It Seems Climate Extremism Knows No Bounds.  From blocking commutes by lying in traffic to vandalizing priceless pieces of art, it seems there's no conduct too low for the climate extremists[.]  The latest gambit came from a group called "Climate Defiance", which accused the head of Chevron of "killing people" during a disgraceful outburst in New York. [...] An alarming story from the Washington Post detailed that, "vast swaths of the United States are at risk of running short of power."  The rise of emerging technology like AI and data centers are two major drivers.  Power outages become even more frightening during bouts of extreme heat or cold that can quickly become life-or-death situations.  We need more energy from every direction.  Now is not the time to be taking the most reliable players off the board.  Then there is the issue of the environment.  American oil and gas companies are highly regulated and subject to strict standards.  They also are trying good faith partners in environmental stewardship.  Chevron has pledged $10 billion in lower 'carbon' investments and projects by 2028.  Other countries cannot say the same.

Berkeley Forced to Abandon Green Agenda Ban on Natural Gas after Court Battle.  A nearly four-year court battle has forced the City of Berkeley, California to abandon its landmark ban on natural gas hookups in new buildings.  Berkeley officials have finally agreed to stop enforcing the green agenda rule.  The decision ends a long court battle to beat the ban by industry groups.  The city said it would immediately stop enforcement of the Natural Gas Infrastructure Ordinance while repealing the policy through the regular legislative process.  The agreement was revealed in a legal settlement filed in federal court with the California Restaurant Association (CRA).

Even lefties now admit closing the Indian Point nuclear plant actually harmed the planet.  Those on the environmental left cheering the Biden administration's electric-vehicle mandates or Gov. Hochul's offshore wind farms would be wise to heed a painful and embarrassing lesson New York is learning from its not-so-distant past.  Not only do so-called "green" policies drive up consumer prices, decrease reliability and upend everyday life (say goodbye to wood-fired pizza ovens and gas-powered stoves), they often end up harming the environment they're supposed to be saving.

The Editor says...
Nonsense.  Closing one power plant did not, and cannot, "harm the planet" to any measurable extent.

Hey, Why'd It Go Dark?  Canadians have apparently resigned themselves to the fact that the people who run our country could create a sand shortage in Saudi Arabia or an ice shortage in Greenland[.]  No country on Earth has had better luck, from geography to resources to a peaceful history founded in constitutional liberty.  And, famously, ample rivers for hydroelectric dams, some of the world's biggest oil and gas reserves and a well-established nuclear industry using homegrown CANDU reactors.  And now we face self-inflicted electricity shortages.  It can't have been easy.  But given enough politicians and zealots, anything can turn from a dream into a nightmare.

Rumors of a Charcoal or Gas Grill Ban in New York.  Spring has arrived here in New York State, not that you would know it looking at the current weather forecast.  And that means that grilling season is once again upon us.  Those who follow my social media streams know that we have a spring ritual at my house where I load up the grill with charcoal and toss on some steaks.  This year, however, some disturbing rumors have been making the rounds.  New York tends to follow the trends set by states like California and the climate alarmists have been banning things like natural gas and other supposed carbon demons.  Some legislators in the state capital have been making noises about extending those bans to propane and even charcoal, which would be bad news for grilling fans.

Mandate for Leadership.  [Scroll down to page 363]  Access to affordable, reliable, and abundant energy is vital to America's economy, national security, and quality of life.  Yet ideologically driven government policies have thrust the United States into a new energy crisis just a few short years after America's energy renaissance, which began in the first decade of the 2000s, transformed the United States from a net energy importer (oil and natural gas) to energy independence and then energy dominance.  Americans now face energy scarcity, an electric grid that is less reliable, and artificial shortages of natural gas and oil despite massive reserves within the United States — all of which has led to higher prices that burden both the American people and the economy.  The new energy crisis is caused not by a lack of resources, but by extreme "green" policies.  Under the rubrics of "combating climate change" and "ESG" (environmental, social, and governance), the Biden Administration, Congress, and various states, as well as Wall Street investors, international corporations, and progressive special-interest groups, are changing America's energy landscape.  These ideologically driven policies are also directing huge amounts of money to favored interests and making America dependent on adversaries like China for energy.

"If You Want To Control People, You Have To Control The CO2".  As farmer protests rage across Europe, Dutch MP Rob Roos sits down with The HighWire's Del Bigtree to discuss the climate scam pushed by radical globalist elites in the Western world to seize more power and control.  "They [elites] go against family values.  They go against natural food.  They go against freedom — because if you have to buy an electric car.  They're almost twice as expensive — and people cannot buy that — it's not about the car — it's about you can't go anywhere and must depend on public transportation," Roos explained.  He said, "It's also digitalization — what we see is the digital identity and central bank digital currency — this is all about a new form of communism."  "If you want to control the people, you have to control the CO2 — because everything we do in life, breathing, living, traveling, eating, and everything we do in life leads to CO2 emissions.  And if you can control the CO2, you can control the people," Roos said.  He further explained that the ultimate control comes when globalists connect people's digital identities to the central bank's digital currency.

American Billionaires Bankrolled Activist Crusade Against Natural Gas Hubs Before Biden Signed Off On Approval Pause.  American billionaires bankrolled an activist campaign targeting liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals that influenced the White House's decision to pause new and pending approvals for the projects, according to The Wall Street Journal.  The philanthropic organizations of the Rockefeller family and Democratic megadonor Michael Bloomberg cumulatively provided millions of dollars to activists who pressured Biden administration officials to crack down on LNG export hubs over the past several years, according to the WSJ.  The activists ultimately got their way on Jan. 26, when the White House announced that the administration would pause new project approvals as the Department of Energy (DOE) widens the scope of its reviews to include climate impacts of LNG export terminals alongside considerations like national security and economic benefits.

Joe Biden eyes emissions crackdowns, media warns he is 'ignoring industry warnings' of financial collapse.  Today, Joe Biden is cracking down on manufacturing, but I bet he doesn't have the scientific data to give credibility to the new policies, but he doesn't care.  He is bending over for the green pushers. [...] I bet they also can't come up with scientific data that shows that CO2, a clean, non-polluting gas, at 420 PPM in the atmosphere, is any more dangerous than it was in the late 1800s, at 280 PPM. It's what makes plants and trees grow, and that is good.  Yet, we are spending massive amounts of money burying carbon.  There certainly is no data that shows that the 50% rise in CO2 over the last 150 years has anything to do with temperatures since they have risen and fallen for periods of time while CO2 was rising.  Last week he was cracking down on natural gas, which is a very clean form of energy.  The push for electric cars will also not change the climate, but it will surely make the poor and middle classes poorer and more restricted.  Something everyone should notice about all these regulations is that Biden never goes through Congress to inflict on America his radical agenda; the legislative process of the founding fathers is just too cumbersome for Biden.  The executive branch is also trying to enact a new natural gas tax, even though the Constitution says only the legislative branch can impose taxes.

An excellent Congressional challenge to "Environmental Justice".  I have long been a critic of the "environmental justice" movement.  Like so many aspects of the anti-fossil-fuel movement it ignores the benefits of fossil fuels and overstates their negative side-effects.  [Tweets]  Unfortunately, many in Congress have long been reluctant to challenge "environmental justice," for fear of being labeled as unconcerned about minority or low-income populations.  Happily, 11 Members of Congress just submitted and signed an excellent letter challenging the Biden Administration's most recent "Environmental Justice" initiative — and they specifically focused on the benefits of fossil fuels and other forms of cost-effective energy that EJ advocates ignore.

The stupidity of Biden's liquefied natural gas export pause.  Last week's White House announcement that it was pausing new permits for exports of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, is a desperate move by a desperate president.  Its principal beneficiaries are likely to be Vladimir Putin and Hamas-harboring Qatar, rather than Joe Biden's faltering re-election campaign.  The president's political calculation is overt.  "We will heed the calls of young people and frontline communities who are using who are using their voices to demand action," Biden says.  "The pause on new LNG approvals sees the climate crisis for what it is:  the existential threat of our time."

The Biden Administration Is Waging a Foolish War Against Abundant Clean Energy.  On Thursday [1/25/2024], the Biden administration announced it was invoking a hold on permitting processes for proposed new export projects for liquefied natural gas (LNG).  It was a nakedly partisan act designed to appease the Democrat party's climate alarmist funder base, one that will create ripple effects across the global economy and energy space.  It will also create uncertainty and alarm among consumers of US LNG, especially among European nations who are supposedly America's allies. [...] Fortunately for the United States and its LNG customers, an array of new export facilities already in the construction phase of development will add up to 12 billion cubic feet per day of new export capacity over the coming three years.  These projects would be unmolested by this latest authoritarian move by the White House, absent efforts to expand it.  One of the biggest of these is the Rio Grande LNG project being constructed outside Brownsville, Texas near the mouth of the Rio Grande River.

Biden Blocks Several Huge Natural Gas Projects.  Let's begin with an either-or question:  Does Joe Biden a) honestly believe that natural gas is an existential threat to mankind, as he regularly claims, or is he b) more concerned with appeasing — for political purposes — environmentalist alarmists?  Ponder the question if necessary — but I'm gonna go with "b."  While the professed fossil-fuel-loathing president has hysterically declared war on everything from residential gas furnaces to gas stoves to even gas dishwashers, his quest never ends.  In a Friday morning announcement, the White House and Department of Energy (DOE) revealed their next target — and it's enormous. [...] Facts, data, and science only matter to Democrats when they support the left's narratives.  We saw it with COVID-19.  When facts don't support the left's narratives, they are to be dismissed, lied about, or outright ignored.

Biden Pursues 'Functional Ban' on New Natural Gas Exports.  President Joe Biden appears to be looking to expand his war on American energy in 2024 with his administration's latest move delaying a decision on "what would be the largest natural gas export terminal in the United States."  From day one of the Biden administration, the president has used executive actions to pursue his radical "green" energy transition as part of his climate crusade to "end" fossil fuels, and his latest target is liquefied natural gas (LNG), specifically the terminals through which U.S. producers export their product.  As with many of his previous climate edicts issued by executive fiat because his policies wouldn't pass the people's representatives in Congress, Biden is citing "climate change" for this latest decision.  According to reports based on leaks to the New York Times by anonymous officials, the White House "is directing the Energy Department to expand its evaluation" of the Calcasieu Pass 2 proposal for a 546-acre terminal site in Cameron Parish, Louisiana.  The $10 billion project "would export up to 20 million tons of LNG per year" according to KPLC.

Civilization depends on 1 billion gasoline oil-fueled combustion engines.  There are over 1 billion gasoline-fueled combustion engines in cars, trucks, motorcycles, agricultural and garden machines, boats, snowmobiles, airplanes, power pumps, back-up and emergency electricity generators.  The final wave of globalization after WWII was due to High-compression, non-sparking, internal-combustion and Gas Turbines.  These engines can never be 100% efficient (Carnot's Theorem) because heat and friction cut their efficiency in half or more.  At best, well-maintained modern engines reach 32% efficiency, but those in typical everyday use are only 20-25% efficient. [...] Trains are at least 3 times as efficient as trucks energy-wise and move about 40% of cargo in the USA, a third of grain, two-thirds of all coal with extremely reliable, durable (up to 6 years before an overhaul is needed), and efficient diesel-electric engines.  The infrastructure cost of new railways versus highways is far far less — about $1-2 million per kilometer of railroad versus $9-10 million per kilometer of highway.  Each train can represent several hundred large trucks.

2024 Promises the Expansion of the Green Energy Scam.  Here in the West, we have people so spoiled by prosperity that they have the luxury of pining for a time when we weren't poisoning our earth with fossil fuels or risking apocalypse with nuclear power.  On both sides of the Atlantic, you have a perfect mix of brain-dead green energy cultists and fascist elites who seek to harness the power of that cult to control everyone.  That's a toxic combination because energy controls pretty much everything.  The reality is that inexpensive, reliable energy is the single biggest driver of prosperity in all human history.  And it's not even close.  Inexpensive, reliable energy drives virtually everything that we Westerners enjoy:  Our food, iPhones, transportation, heating and cooling of homes, televisions, hospitals, schools, movies, plumbing, video games, Starbucks, and the Zambonis at hockey games!  Everything.  It's not that energy didn't exist previously.  It did.  But the difference is that it was inefficient, hard to get, and expensive.

Engineering an Energy Crisis.  If the destruction of hydroelectric dams doesn't strike you as an act of war, consider it in the context of this:  ["]Mike Sommers, president of the American Petroleum Institute (API), issued a stark warning that the White House was dragging its feet on allowing energy firms to drill on federal lands, threatening the economy and jobs. [... "]  Sommers observes that the Biden Regime is "sowing the seeds for the next energy crisis."  Never let a crisis go to waste; if there is no crisis, create one.

Biden's 'America Last' Policy at Work.  A National Review article in November 2021 reported that, "Biden's approach to energy represents in microcosm his approach to the presidency in general."  There is absolutely nothing about Biden's contradictory approach to energy that makes any sense.  He wants the United States to reduce the production of fossil fuels, reduce the number of new pipelines in America, limit oil and gas drilling on federal land, and abandon the Trump administration's mission to maximize fossil fuels production.  He wants other countries, such as Venezuela, to produce more fossil fuels for American use.  He even asked the Saudis to increase production, but got snubbed.  He maintains that there actually isn't a supply issue at all, but that oil companies all got together to gouge customers, an issue that the FTC must immediately investigate.  He opposed new fracking, promised to 'make sure it's eliminated.'  He even appropriated Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's "Green New Deal."  Why did/does Biden behave in this manner?  Because he was/is trying to please the whacko far-left base of his party which is opposed to oil production because it's not 'green.'  For Biden, pleasing environmentalists means putting America Last.

Call To Defund The United Nations' Climate Cops.  This year's U.N. Climate Change Conference, known as COP28, was much like previous gatherings.  The original goal was to determine what effects human activities, especially 'fossil-fuel' use, might have on Earth's climate.  But that quickly mutated into an inquisition grounded in the absurd notion that those activities were the only factor in 'climate change'.  It then mutated even more grotesquely into demands that humanity quickly eliminate all 'fossil fuels' — 80 percent of the world's energy — despite the many negative consequences.  Every successive conference has exerted greater pressure on developed countries to abandon the oil, natural gas, and coal that make modern economies, health, living standards, and essential products possible; on poor countries to never use those fuels in the first place; and on all nations to rely on wind and solar energy that have never proved they can be the primary power source for even a small village.

Coming Soon:  Planned Electricity Shortage, Widespread Blackouts.  NERC is a nonprofit organization that oversees the reliability and security of the North American bulk power system.  It uses a results-based approach.  After conducting their ten-year assessment, NERC sent a grim warning of our energy future.  We face a serious electricity shortage beginning in the next few years that will exist for years to come.  This isn't news.  It has been clear for some time that the elimination of fossil fuels before there is an adequate power supply to take its place will endanger the safety and security of Americans.  It is also obvious that this has been engineered to happen this way.  The people planning a lack of supply ahead of replacement electricity sources are smart.  They know what they're doing.  Their policies will destroy our national security and will endanger the lives of our people.  It will seriously damage our wealth as a nation.

Can Climate Change Cause the New Economic World Order?  President Joe Biden has continued to pursue the agenda that President Obama developed during his administration.  On January 20, 2021, President Biden canceled the permit for the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline that would have delivered around 1 million barrels of Canadian crude oil a day to U.S. refiners.  In his executive order, President Biden stated, "Leaving the Keystone XL pipeline permit in place would not be consistent with my Administration's economic and climate imperatives."  On January 27, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order announcing a moratorium on new oil and gas leases on public lands and in offshore waters.  On April 16, 2021, at President's Biden's direction, secretary of the interior Deb Haaland revoked policies in Secretarial Order 3398 established by the Trump administration, including rejecting "American Energy Independence" as a goal.

Boom Boom:  Out Go the Lights!  Ruling like the dictator whom he says Donald Trump aspires to be, President Joe Biden has decreed restrictions, if not prohibitions, on gas stoves, gas furnaces, gasoline-powered cars and trucks, and other products.  Congress has passed no such laws for Biden to sign.  Instead, he has acted unilaterally, as despots do. [...] Biden's "Climate!" guru, John Kerry, attended the just-concluded COP28 global-warming hoe-down in Dubai.  Some of its 80,000 participants got delayed en route, as their private jets bogged down as 17 inches of snow closed Munich's airport.  Kerry soldiered forth and soon declared that "There shouldn't be any more coal power plants permitted anywhere in the world."  He added: "I do not understand how adults who are in a position of responsibility can be avoiding responsibility for taking away those things that are killing people on a daily basis."  When coal took a break from its homicides du jour, it also yielded 19.7% of U.S. electricity in 2022, according to Biden's own Energy Information Administration.  Biden's Environmental Protection Agency unveiled edicts on Dec. 2 that would clamp down on methane emissions from new and existing oil and gas wells.  Methane and natural gas are essentially interchangeable.  So, this bid to reduce 58 million tons of methane through 2038 is a barely disguised billy club to beat down the natural gas industry.  Never mind that, last year, 39.9% of U.S. electricity came from natural gas.

Americans Must Choose Between Civilization or Its Destroyers.  The United States can produce annually more natural gas and oil than any nation on earth.  It once pioneered nuclear power.  It has vast coal reserves and sophisticated hydroelectric plants.  The old idea was to use these unmatched resources to transition gradually to other cleaner fuels such as hydrogen, fusion power, solar, and wind.  That way, consumers would still enjoy affordable energy.  And the United States could remain independent of coercion by the oil-producing Middle East.  But that was not the nihilist way.  Instead, the left deliberately cut back on pipelines, new energy leases, and fracking.  It bragged of an upcoming ban on fossil fuels.  In drought-stricken, energy-short California, the state is blowing up, not building new dams.  Is the nihilist agenda to punish with bankruptcy the energy-using middle class?  Is the hope that Americans will have to beg the Saudis, Iranians, Venezuelans, and Russians to pump more of the hated goo for our benefit so we would not have to dirty ourselves helping ourselves?

U.N. Climate-Summit Nations Agree to 'Transition Away from Fossil Fuels,' Triple Green-Energy Infrastructure by 2030.  For the first time in the nearly 30-year history of the United Nations summit on climate change, all nations gathered unanimously agreed to a resolution that called for "transitioning away from fossil fuels" and committed member states to tripling existing green-energy infrastructure by 2030.  The nearly 200 member countries gathered at the COP28 Climate Summit in Dubai agreed to transition away from fossil fuels "in a just, orderly and equitable manner" before entirely eliminating carbon emissions by 2050.  While previous U.N. climate agreements committed member states to work toward slowing global warming, the deal announced Wednesday was the first to include an explicit commitment to do away with "fossil fuels."  As part of an effort to stop global temperatures from rising another 1.5 degrees Celsius in the next decade, member states agreed to triple their existing green energy infrastructure, including solar panels and wind turbines, by 2030.

Biden's new rule against methane becomes 'final'.  It's not really an exaggeration (if at all) to say that every single day we hear from Hillary Clinton, Liz Cheney, Joe Scarborough, the media, and others about how dangerous President Trump is — ad nauseam they declare how "like Hitler" he is.  And, it seems every single day, Joe Biden issues some new executive order or regulation assaulting our freedoms and our prosperity.  He knows he can't get his radical agenda through Congress so he just goes around them.  He violates his oath of office by not only refusing to enforce immigration laws that Congress passed, but sabotaging our sovereignty too.  It is a pure abuse of power, and yet most of the media just cheers. [...] Now, Joe Biden is dictatorially issuing another rule to handicap the coal, oil, and gas industries.  He clearly doesn't care about costs or the loss of tens of millions of jobs directly or indirectly related to those industries.  The costs of these green policies are already destroying Americans purchasing power but a power hungry politician like Joe clearly doesn't care.

President Biden just pledged to shut down 60% of America's electric power.  The Biden administration made two virtue-signaling proclamations at last week's COP28 conference in Dubai that it says will help save the planet from climate change.  The policies aren't likely to change the planet's temperature by even one-tenth of a degree, but they might just destroy the 21st-century American industrial economy as we know it.  First, Team Biden announced it will stop production of all new coal plants in the United States.  This comes on the heels of President Biden's Environmental Protection Agency saying this year it would impose new power plant emission regulations that are virtually impossible for coal plants to comply with.  The bottom line:  No more coal.  Period.  But the White House was just getting started.  Vice President Kamala Harris trumpeted the next day new rules to "sharply reduce methane from the oil and natural gas industry."  The administration calls methane a "super-pollutant" that it wants to eliminate because it's "many times more potent than carbon dioxide."  But methane is effectively a hydrocarbon that comes from natural gas.

The Editor says...
Methane is a naturally-occurring gas.  It is not a pollutant; it is beneficial; it is not something to avoid.  Climate change is not a crisis.  The climate will always change.  The climate does not respond to legislation.  You might as well burn all the hydrocarbons you need, because the earth isn't being ruined by your use of them.  The billions of people who live in China and India couldn't care less about methane or carbon dioxide, and if they don't care, you might as well use as much natural gas as you like, because it won't make any difference.

Will the Sierra Club Apologize If the Lights Go Out in Baltimore?  Frankly, there's little that would be scarier that comes to mind, Baltimore being what it is in broad daylight.  But a dark Baltimore not weather induced, but blacked out purely by a climate cult settlement?  Ho, boy.  That would raise some hackles.  Or at least you'd think it would.  There's a more insidious, creeping trend across the United States that's been under the radar for the most part, although California and Texas have been the canaries in the coal mine.  I touched on it a bit last January, when Duke Energy was crawling on its corporate belly apologizing for massive outages across their service area. [...] There are now all these regional power companies who handle the load shifts for multiple states, and bad decisions driven by the climate cult are beginning to be felt everywhere.\

Biden admin quietly developing settlement with groups seeking to tear down key power source.  The Biden administration is quietly discussing a potentially far-reaching settlement with environmental groups that advocate for tearing down four hydroelectric dams in Washington to protect salmon.  Federal attorneys representing the government said it had "developed a package of actions and commitments" and agreed to pause litigation with environmental activist plaintiffs in the case, according to court documents filed late last month.  In the filings, jointly submitted by the federal government and eco groups, the parties said they could request a multiyear pause on the litigation to allow for the implementation of the package as soon as Dec. 15, 2023.  However, the filing failed to detail exactly what conditions were included in the secretive package developed.  The groups involved in the case have vehemently argued in favor of breaching the four federally managed dams amid declining salmon populations in the lower Snake River, which winds through Idaho and southwestern Washington before feeding into the Columbia River and then into the Pacific Ocean.

The Editor says...
Hydroelectric dams are one of the two available methods to generate electricity without also generating carbon dioxide.  But the far left doesn't seem to care about keeping the lights on as much as they care about wild fish.

Biden Administration Considers Breaching WA's Snake River Dams to Save "Imperiled Salmon Species".  I recently theorized that the EPA is doubling down on the destruction of this country, as Biden's poll numbers are collapsing and woke bureaucrats seek to use what power that they have in the time still remaining to them.  The same is true for the rest of the administration, as evidenced by the fact that a leaked document shows an agreement for the federal government to spend $1 billion replacing four functional hydroelectric dams along Washington's Snake River with green energy alternatives.  ["]The U.S. government is willing to help build enough new clean energy projects in the Pacific Northwest to replace the hydropower generated by four controversial dams on the Snake River, according to a leaked Biden administration document that is giving hope to conservationists who have long sought the removal of the dams as a key to restoring depleted salmon runs.["]

The Editor says...
When your lights go off and stay off, and your phone quits, and the gas station can't pump, you won't care about any stinking salmon.

Putting oil spills into perspective.  I am 70 years old.  My electricity has been provided by a coal-fired power plant my entire life.  I have been privileged to have AC for around 60 years.  My heat has been provided by natural gas almost all my life.  I have lived within one mile of the coal plant, with scrubbers, for 44 years.  I raised three children in this close proximity.  Not once, that I can remember, did I worry about the air quality or worry about opening the doors and windows.  We are all very healthy.  Our current power plant was updated in 2005, at the cost of several hundred million.  It passed all environmental standards yet now, Democrats want to put it out of existence to claim they can change the climate.  It is a shame they care so little about the poor and middle classes that still have to pay off the plant, and now a replacement.

Heating Homes With Natural Gas Is More Than 40% Cheaper Than Electricity:  US EIA.  Heating homes this winter using natural gas is estimated to cut down energy costs by more than 40 percent compared to electricity, according to a recent report by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).  Households using electricity to heat homes are projected to pay $1,063 on average between November and March, according to a Nov. 7 winter fuels outlook report by the EIA.  In comparison, households using natural gas are only expected to shell out $601.  Region-wise, the biggest difference is in the Midwest, where electric heating is expected to cost $1,213 — more than double the gas cost of $581.  In the Northeast, gas heating is projected to be cheaper by $704, in the South by $507, and in the West by $417.  Natural gas heating is also cheaper compared to other alternative energy sources such as propane and heating oil, which are expected to cost $1,343 and $1,851 respectively.

California's EV Conundrums.  The crude oil industry's time in California is limited, and the oil-refining industry is behaving as any industry would in comparable circumstances, by transitioning its operations away from gasoline to activities that will prove to be more profitable in the long run.  And as crude oil supply falls further, much higher gasoline prices will become a way of life for Californians, as the conundrums associated with EV mandates may be growing.  Standard economic logic indicates that high California gas prices should encourage fuels supply to be shipped to California from other states.  But this doesn't happen because no other state formulates California's unique gasoline blend.  In addition, the West Coast fuels market is isolated from other supply/demand centers as California is an energy island.

Carbon Dioxide:  Vital Plant Food.  Carbon dioxide has been called a poison, yet it is actually the sustainer of all life on Earth.  Plants grow from the carbon in carbon dioxide in the air, and animals grow from the carbon in the plants they eat.  So carbon dioxide cannot be a poison.  Turn on the television any day of the week, and there is likely to be some discussion or news about some aspect of energy use.
  •   Everyone needs to buy an electric vehicle.
  •   End the use of fossil fuels by 2035.
  •   Every home with a solar panel (California).
  •   Cancel the Keystone XL Pipeline.
  •   No more coal.
  •   Eliminate the use of natural gas.
  •   No gas stoves.
  •   No gas furnaces.
  •   Battery-powered trucks and buses.
All these programs are based on one important foundation:  the belief that as carbon dioxide levels rise, the earth will get warmer, and will continue to warm until, with positive feedbacks, it burns up with us on it.  Few have ever taken the time to see if the foundation upon which they are operating is actually true.  Few even dare to ask a working scientist for the truth in the matter.  The truth is that carbon dioxide is needed by every plant on the Earth.  Trees, bushes, and plants of all kinds are made mainly of carbon and hydrogen, and the carbon comes from the tiny amount of carbon dioxide that is in the air.

Carbon Dioxide:  Vital Plant Food.  [Scroll down]  It is bad enough that many of these programs have been built on a false foundation.  In truth, many of them have not been really beneficial.  Large solar farms are built in the desert, but in just a few years, the projects have failed.  Wind turbines wear out, catch fire, and break down totally.  They presently cannot be recycled and must be buried.  The only parts that can be recycled are in the generator.  One city bought several electric buses but in just a short time quit using them as impractical.  Electric vehicles may be practical to drive from home to office and back again, but they are not practical on long trips.  It is necessary to stop every few hours and charge the batteries, and sometimes it is difficult to find a proper charging station.  Those who have lived near the coast have seen their cars flooded with sea water, then their cars caught fire as their batteries shorted out.  Not only that, but the driving range is radically reduced when driving in summer (air-conditioning) or winter (heater).

Michael Bloomberg's $1 Billion Assault on The Electric Grid.  Climate-related philanthropy in America has been hijacked by a radical agenda that will hurt the affordability, reliability, and resilience of the U.S. electric grid.  More proof of that hijacking came last month when mega-billionaire Michael Bloomberg announced that Bloomberg Philanthropies would give $500 million to the Beyond Carbon campaign.  The goal of the effort is to shutter the bulk of our most important power plants — the ones that burn coal and natural gas and are therefore dispatchable and weather-resilient — and, in Bloomberg's words, replace them with "renewable energy."  The September 20 announcement quotes Bloomberg as saying the $500 million gift marks a "new chapter in the Beyond Carbon campaign, as we move to finish the job.  By working with our partners across the country, we hope to transform the way we power America by moving beyond fossil fuels and replacing them with renewable energy."  The press release goes on to say the goal is to "shut down every last U.S. coal plant," and "slash gas plant capacity in half, and block all new gas plants."

Powering the Unplugged.  Electricity is the world's most important and fastest-growing form of energy.  It is also the most difficult form of energy to supply reliably.  Many of the world's most pressing challenges are tied directly to electricity, including carbon dioxide emissions, women's rights, and poverty reduction.  The electricity sector matters to climate change efforts because it is the single biggest source of global CO2 emissions.  Electricity matters because it is one of the world's biggest industries.  Global electricity sales exceed $4.5 trillion per year.  That means that the electricity sector generates more revenue per year than global automobile manufacturing, which generated about $3 trillion in 2022.  Furthermore, electricity-related investment is the biggest portion of global energy spending.  This year, the International Energy Agency ("IEA") expects that global spending on the power sector, including investment in renewables, nuclear, hydrocarbons, grids, and batteries, will total $1.2 trillion.  By comparison, spending on hydrocarbons — coal, oil, and natural gas — will total about $950 billion.  Electricity matters because it is the ultimate poverty killer.  No matter where you look, as electricity use has increased, so has economic growth.

Biden administration tries paying off states to plug wells and stop energy production.  The Biden administration is offering federal assistance to certain states for the closure of low-producing oil and gas wells.  Funding comes from the Inflation Reduction Act's $350 million program called the Mitigating Emissions from Marginal Conventional Wells.  The grant opened up in August, as announced by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy.  The program was designed to "help monitor and reduce methane emissions, one of the biggest drivers of climate change, from the oil and gas sector and for environmental restoration of well sites."  Last week, Wyoming opted not to pursue federal funding from the program, with Gov. Mark Gordon (R-WY) stating he believes the offer undermines the state's oil and gas industry and its importance to the economy.

The Editor says...
[#1] Forty percent of "methane emissions" come from natural sources.  [#2] The sun is "one of the biggest drivers of climate change," and methane has a very minor influence, by comparison.  [#3] The climate has been changing for a long time.  Climate change did not begin when natural gas drilling started, and even if it had, the tiny magnitude of global temperature changes in the last century would have been a small price to pay for all the energy that has been produced through the combustion of natural gas.

Is the Left Happy That They Got Their Wish?  The Left has waged a war on fossil fuels for decades.  But once in power it has cancelled critical pipelines, restricted federal oil and gas leases, hectored oil and gas lenders, shut down entire oil fields, and issued arbitrary deadlines when internal combustion engines are to be banned, and clean burning natural gas appliances to be phased out.  And the result of turning the nation "green"?  Gasoline prices spiked to all-time highs, hurting most the poor and minorities, the supposed political base of the Democratic Party.  When elections near, only then does a panicked Left begin draining the strategic petroleum reserve, while begging illiberal regimes abroad to pump more oil that they we will not — in a desperate effort to lower gas and diesel prices, at least temporarily until elections are over.  Bicoastal wealthy elites lecture down to Americans about the existential crisis of "climate change" and the radical revolutions necessary to "transition" (a favorite, multipurpose woke word) to solar, wind, and battery power.

If it Saves One Life and Other Meretricious Lies.  It's not unusual that power-mad politicians justify depriving us of liberty using the appeal to emotion:  "If it saves one life." [...] Just as this nonsensical appeal to emotion was used to justify lockdowns, the green movement thrives on emotional pap which hides the true cost of their policies.  I'm old enough to remember how a major energy project (Tellico) was held up for six years at high cost to energy customers and the local economy because the claimed need to protect the snail darter from extinction.  It was subsequently transplanted and thrives.  The media, using a variation of "if it saves one life" yammered on about the need to preserve every species (actually in that case a subspecies) of a miniscule fish versus the needs of those people in the Tennessee Valley.  It's not the only time some exaggerated claims about a minor species was used to halt needed conventional energy projects, but it was the first of several which set the standard.

California Has Another Planet-Saving Idea.  Making electricity is easy.  Figuring out how to make enough electricity without violating leftist dogma is quite a bit harder.  California's population has grown an astounding 162 percent since 1958.  Yet the state hasn't built a new power plant (other than wind or solar) since the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant came online in 1985.  The state simply does not have the electrical generating capacity to meet its current needs — making it more dependent on imported power than any other state in the Union.  California currently imports between 20 and 30 percent of its power from other states.  The "save the planet" zealots have become dependent addicts, ensuring continued profitability for the evil pushers of environmentally destructive energy.  That dependence on other states is a simple engineering problem to solve.  If you don't have enough electricity, just build more power plants. [...] The problem is California's energy policy.  The state hasn't built a new power plant in almost 40 years because it has committed to reaching 100 percent renewable energy by 2045.

What? Biden Sold America's Oil Reserve to China.  On and after January 20, 2021, [Joe] Biden has issued punitive, increasingly restrictive executive orders, regulations, and expensive legislation — passed by single-party government — intended to shut down big parts of the US fossil fuel industry.  Not satisfied to shut down supply, the federal government has — with and without legislation — methodically perverted the demand side of the curve, too.  After making gas and heating oil prohibitively expensive, they penalized makers of automobiles and countless gas-powered household appliances.  Specifically, they have punished makers of gas powered engines, cars, trucks, boats, lawnmowers, hammered the energy, construction, transportation, and farm sectors, then turned to appliances, aiming to outlaw everything from gas and wood stoves to refrigerators and water heaters.  The Democrat idea, fueled by activists, is to mandate everything by fiat.  The Soviets dealt this way, Chinese still do.  Biden's "make it all electric" mandate sees wind turbines and solar panels covering the Earth, powering the grid, now 80 percent fossil and nuclear.  By magic, wind and sun will run it all.

Sen. Cramer, Colleagues Call on EPA to Withdraw Harmful Proposed Power Plant Regulations.  U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND), member of the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee, joined nearly 40 of his Senate colleagues in a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) asking for the withdrawal of the "Clean Power Plan 2.0," a proposed rule which will force the closure of coal and gas-fire power plants.  The senators said the proposal would require generation shifting from fossil-fuel power to other types of energy, which is in direct conflict with West Virginia v. EPA.  They also argued the rule reflects rushed decision-making that is arbitrary and capricious, subverts public participation, and negatively impacts electric reliability across the country.

Will Someone Please Wake Me From This Nightmare?  Biden has made it clear that he supports going to zero carbon emissions which would eliminate all use of coal, and fossil fuels.  Natural gas is used to make fertilizer, which is very important to agriculture.  And, over 6,000 things that we use on a daily basis are made from oil.  Wind and solar will never take the place of coal-fired, or natural gas-fired energy generation.  Electric cars will soon be a national disaster because they are useless during a time of disaster with no electricity available.  It is not possible to build batteries large enough to carry a city during times when the sun does not shine or the wind blow.

Biden killing whales and raptors for wind, now using a lizard to shut down oil.  This White House must get down on their knees and thank whatever Babylonian gods they worship when a weekend holiday rolls around.  They can slide the shiv in just that quick and hope no one notices in all the hubbub of fireworks or finding a cubby full of blow in the Big House.  Which is precisely what they did this Friday, right before the weekend stretched out to Fourth of July.  A successful conservation effort between land owners and oil and gas industry types that had been working for eleven years was, for all intents an purposes, summarily spiked by Biden's U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).  They've proposed a rule to declare the dunes sagebrush lizard "endangered" under the restrictions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and it's too bad, so sad for the oil industry that the little scamps just happen to live all over the Permian basin.

Biden Brags About Killing Coal Plants As Grid Operators Warn Of Rolling Blackouts.  President Joe Biden boasted that there will be no more new coal-fired power plant developments in the U.S. during a Wednesday speech in Chicago, Illinois, even as the U.S. continues to grapple with energy problems.  Biden bragged that his economic and energy policies have disincentivized any future development of coal-fired power plants while touting the merits of green energy technology his administration's policies favor, according to video of his speech.  His remarks come about one month after a May 2023 grid assessment report from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, which warned that the power grids serving most of New England and a large majority of Americans who live west of the Mississippi River face "elevated risk" of rolling blackouts this summer if weather conditions are hotter than normal.

Greta Thunberg's War on Prosperity.  Swedish Doom Pixie Greta Thunberg is at it again, this time leading a protest during which access to several oil tankers in Malmo Harbor was blocked for five days.  Her message remains as it has been: We must surrender our modern technological lifestyle. [...] She's protesting wind turbines?  Seems she is now.  It seems she's against anything that supports our modern lifestyle, by which I mean anything that has any potential to provide energy, whether cheap or otherwise.  Of course, her own lifestyle would seem to be pretty comfortable.  And that is the great irony that is Greta Thunberg — her war on working-class folks.

Time To Buy Stock In Candle Companies.  The green energy "revolution" is taking us backward, to an era in which there won't be enough electricity to meet the demand.  Members of the House Subcommittee on Energy, Climate, and Grid Security were told last week to expect "potentially catastrophic consequences" due to dispatchable generating sources being retired "far too quickly" in the race to replace those sources — natural gas, coal and nuclear, which are available on demand — with renewables, primarily wind and solar.  Federal Energy Regulatory Commissioner Mark C. Christie told the congressmen that lawmakers' and activists' obsession (our characterization) with green energy threatens "our ability to keep the lights on."  Though obvious to us all, it's important to continually point out that wind can't produce electricity when it doesn't blow and solar can't generate power when it's dark (or the sun is screened out by smoke from forest fires that are caused by man's refusal to properly manage forests, not his emissions of carbon dioxide).

The EPA Threatens to Turn Out the Lights.  Imagine flipping a light switch and not knowing if the lights will come on.  Normally unthinkable.  But the Environmental Protection Agency's proposed power-plant rules would destabilize the energy grid, resulting in less-reliable electric service.  The EPA's aggressive standards require all coal-fired power plants to use a new and still-tricky technology called carbon capture and storage, or CCS, to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions 90% by 2035, or begin co-firing with natural gas.  In addition, natural-gas-fired plants must capture 90% of emissions by 2035 using CCS or switch almost entirely to hydrogen by 2038.  The only other option for both:  shut down.

Biden Wages Terrifying, Suicidal War on Energy Security.  The Biden administration's new 681-page EPA-proposed regulatory rule limiting greenhouse gas emissions for coal-and gas-fired power plants.  This is but the latest attempt to eliminate America's fossil-fueled energy independence, prosperity, and global security.  Although last year the Supreme Court blocked the implementation of the Obama "Clean Power Plan," which would have forced a power shift to renewables from coal, the EPA now wants to include natural gas in their kill list.  According to Section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA can regulate "pollutants" from stationary power sources through the "best system of emission reduction" that is "adequately demonstrated."

There Is No Green "Energy Transition".  The reason for the growth in humanity from 1 to 8 billion in 200 years is simple:  fossil fuels are abundant, cheap, and efficient, so they provide reliable and dense energy at scale that can be manufactured into usable products by humanity.  Renewables, on the other hand, cannot manufacture anything for humanity.  Fossil fuels have helped to generate a quality-of-life revolution for a portion of humanity, and people in poverty who have missed out on this blessing rightfully want what the people in the wealthy and developed countries already have.  Recently, Liberty Energy CEO Chris Wright explained in his viral video, dishonest terminology surrounds the climate debate.  One of these terms is "Energy Transition."  This term gives the impression that there exists a quick, easy, and scalable alternative to eliminate fossil fuels without serious impact on humanity.

The EPA's death warrant for fossil fuel plants.  The Environmental Protection Agency has just released its most aggressive emissions rules to date.  The rules demand that coal and gas plants capture almost all of their emissions.  In essence, fossil fuel plants will have to cut their emissions by 90 percent between 2035 and 2040 or shut down.  Unless, of course, they can afford to run carbon capture systems or swap out natural gas for hydrogen.  But is that even realistic?

EPA v. The Grid.  On May 4, members of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission delivered stark warnings to the members of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.  The agency's acting chairman, Willie Phillips, told the senators, "We face unprecedented challenges to the reliability of our nation's electric system."  FERC Commissioner Mark Christie echoed Phillips' warning, saying the U.S. electric grid is "heading for a very catastrophic situation in terms of reliability."  His colleague, Commissioner James Danly, averred that there is a "looming reliability crisis in our electricity markets."  The commissioners pointed to several factors for the reliability crisis, including numerous coal plants that are being retired prematurely, insufficient pipeline capacity to assure natural gas can be delivered to power plants, insufficient high-voltage transmission capacity, and distortions in the electricity market caused by massive federal subsidies for weather-dependent renewables.

New EPA climate rules drive a stake through the heart of natural gas & coal power plants.  Why do we even have a Constitution?  Has anyone asked a Democrat that lately?  The general mode of operation with them in power has been to have a great, transformative idea no one in the country but them wants, sidestep every legal and constitutional avenue for implementing — or against — said great idea, wave a magic departmental edict wand and voilà!  Make it so.  As if that's all it took and that squawking in the background is just so much peasant babble to be ignored. [...] By executive fiat, they are taking aim at the source of the electricity that lights your house, maybe heats it as well.  The EPA, frustrated as the pace of the adoption of solar, wind, EVs and whatever other unicorn-ish fart schemes are floating out in the ether doesn't match their fever dreams, wants to cut the knees out from under electrical power plants run by natural gas and coal.

Joe Manchin threatens to oppose Biden nominees over upcoming power plant crackdown.  Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., is threatening to oppose all of President Biden's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) nominees over an expected regulation targeting power plant emissions.  Manchin, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, blasted the Biden administration for aiming to shut down fossil fuel-fired power plants regardless of the impacts on the nation's power grid.  The Democratic lawmaker argued that neither the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law or Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), both of which he supported, gave the EPA authority to regulate power plant emissions.  "Neither the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law or the IRA gave new authority to regulate power plant emission standards," Manchin said in a statement to Fox News Digital on Wednesday [5/10/2023].

The war on gas stoves is a war on all natural gas.  Remember when we were assured that there is no war on natural gas stoves?  That was always a lie, of course.  But it is bigger than just stoves.  New York is banning all natural gas connections in new construction.  [Tweet]  Maybe when the Democrats and their MSM allies assured that gas stoves weren't in the crosshairs they actually meant that not only gas stoves were going to be banned.  Natural gas appliances of all types are going the way of the dinosaur.

New York legislators set to ban natural gas hookups in new buildings.  Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) and state lawmakers reached an agreement to phase out natural gas hookups in new buildings beginning in 2025, a first-of-its-kind state law designed to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and transition to cleaner sources of energy.  Hochul said Thursday she reached a handshake deal with lawmakers on the agreement, which was included in New York's fiscal 2024 budget.  Though the budget stops short of an explicit ban on natural gas appliances, it will ban natural gas hookups in most new residential and commercial buildings under seven stories beginning in 2026.  By 2029, that will extend to larger industrial and commercial properties as well.

The Editor says...
If the goal is to "transition to cleaner sources of energy," what's cleaner than natural gas?  Most of the electricity in New York is generated by power plants that use natural gas [Source].

Biden admin preparing major crackdown on power plants that fuel nation's grid.  The Biden administration is reportedly finalizing a proposal that would force fossil fuel-fired power plants to substantially curb emissions or utilize costly carbon capture technology.  The proposal — which will soon be released by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) — is expected to require coal- and natural gas-fired power plants to cut or capture the vast majority of their carbon dioxide emissions by 2040, The New York Times reported on Saturday, citing officials briefed on a draft of the plan.  The regulation, if finalized, would represent the first-ever federal action curbing power plant emissions.  "EPA cannot comment because the proposals are currently under interagency review," EPA spokesperson Maria Michalos told Fox News Digital in a statement.

Kiss your gas goodbye.  All is takes is a bunch of vocal lunatics ruining their own states, and the horde of howling monkeys rattling the cage bars is enough to scare the rest of the sane people away.  That's essentially what's happening in the natural gas world right this very second.  You may own a gas stove or furnace, and you may just adore that appliance, and your state may not even be outlawing the stuff that makes it get hot as all get out and works even when the electricity doesn't.  But guess what?  The utility that sends that wonderous, gaseous fuel through the lines to your house is running scared, and they are already moving to divest themselves of what they see as a YUGE liability — owning natural gas pipelines.

Assault and Battery: Beware Those EVs.  There can be little doubt in any serious person's mind that Green technology is an unmitigated disaster.  It is no longer an issue of Big Oil, which the Leftwaffe is strafing and bombing daily, but of the multi-billion-dollar industry of Big Green, or the Climate-Industrial Complex.  The game has changed.  As The Epoch Times reports, "a powerful lobby of politicians, scientists, and media pushes climate-related falsehoods into the popular perspective," to the advantage of Big Business and the attendant cohort of technopreneurs.  Whether we are considering the fantasy of costly, inefficient, and environmentally harmful wind farms, the array of solar panels under the cloudy skies and grey winters of the northern hemisphere, or even the pending legislation against gas stoves — "now you're cooking with gas" is an expression that may have seen its last days — we must prepare for a penurious and meager future.  Moreover, renewables are not keeping pace with the doing away of conventional and nuclear sources of energy, which means that the national energy supply may be increasingly depleted before the shortfall can be made up — if ever.

When Will This Climate Madness End?  What do gas ranges, Dutch farmers, and moose have in common?  In a normal everyday context, very little.  But in the world of apocalyptic climate change, everything. [...] The enlightened climate cult solution is to ban everything that adds greenhouse gases to the atmosphere and embrace everything that lowers the concentration of greenhouse gases.  For example, gas ranges and ovens are bad because they use fossil fuels like natural gas and propane to cook food.  If gas stoves are banned, electric ranges and ovens can fill the gap.  No worries, right?  The same argument can be made for fossil-fueled vehicles.  Ban them, and switch over to electric vehicles.  Ditto for fossil-fueled power generating stations.  Ban them, switch to renewable sources, and have a happy day.  This sort of logic extends to another greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide.  In the Netherlands, the Dutch Government is trying to force up to 3,000 farms to close to meet European Union pollution limits on nitrogen oxides and ammonia.  This means that almost no form of agriculture is safe from climate change diktats.

Is the Mask of the Green Cult Finally Coming Off?  For decades now, you have heard leftist ear sores bloviate endlessly about "climate change."  The world will end in a decade if we don't take action now! screams AOC.  However, the more skeptical and rational among us tend to question the true motivation of the environmentalist Green cult.  The best example of a real environmentalist was probably conservationist John Muir, the founder of the Sierra Club. [...] Just take a look at the Sierra Club's website today, and see what its goals are for 2030.  Within the next seven years, the Sierra Club hopes to eliminate enough coal and gas in the energy sector to make for 80% carbon "pollution"-free electricity by that time, in addition to decreasing oil used in the transportation sector by 18%, ending the sale of gas appliances, and halting the fossil fuel market by banning oil and gas exports and petrochemical expansion at the same time.

Biden is not only after your gas stove but also your fridge and washer.  An official on President Joe Biden's Consumer Product Safety Commission let it slip to a reporter earlier this year that the sale of gas stoves might soon be banned for health and safety reasons.  The Biden administration, using a bogus study from a group of environmental activists, was signaling its intention to spread a fake health scare over gas stoves.  This was to be a pretext for imposing a ban related to global warming alarmism — something most people care about less than health.  Public outrage over this news forced Biden's minions to rethink their plan.  But they didn't take long to sneak back to it.  The Energy Department announced regulations that will ban the sale of nearly all gas stoves on the market.  It would ban the sale of 96% of gas stoves currently being purchased, to say nothing of the models bought years ago.

Internal Memo Shows Biden Admin Wanted To Ban Gas Stoves Before Public Backlash.  The Biden administration claimed the need to ban gas stoves "reached a boiling point" before the conversation really got heated.  In January, Richard Trumka Jr., a Biden appointee to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), triggered an avalanche of headlines when he told Bloomberg News, "any option is on the table" regarding gas stove regulation.  "Products that can't be safe can be banned," Trumka said.  The comment draws on left-wing myths that gas stoves are a primary source of respiratory problems through indoor emissions.  Such claims, however, have nothing to do with science and everything to do with radical climate activism.  Corporate outlets jumped to downplay the administration's threat after public outcry forced the White House to backtrack such regulations. [...] Other outlets framed conservatives as the aggressors even as nearly 100 cities have already banned the gas appliance.  Another 20 states are considering similar regulations, according to the Washington Examiner.

Gas Ranges Targeted in Class Action Suit Against LG.  A class action suit filed in California alleges LG Electronics USA, Inc. sold gas range stoves in the United States without properly notifying customers of toxic emissions prior to their purchases.  The suit comes as the industry faces attacks and efficiency proposals by the Biden administration that would remove up to half the current gas range ovens on the U.S. market.  A California woman who purchased an LG gas stove from Costco in October 2022 claims in the suit that she was unaware of the "risks" associated with the product before purchasing.

Hess CEO States [the] Obvious on CNBC: Oil and Gas [will be] 'Needed for Decades to Come'.  Corporate America has fomented a culture that's so drunk on environmental, social and governance standards that a CEO stating the obvious on CNBC about the ongoing necessity of oil and gas actually seems profound.  Hess Corporation CEO John Hess wasted no time in pointing out that "oil and gas are going to be needed for decades to come" during the Mar. 7 edition of CNBC's Squawk Box.  Hess even stated that "oil and gas are key" in order to achieve an "affordable, just and secure" energy "transition."  Talk about irony.  Hess noted that "most people don't realize that oil and gas are a strategic industry for the United States."  Hess's comments come just as President Joe Biden is set to allow a program that was engineered to enable oil and gas development on the U.S. outer continental shelf to expire.  According to Forbes magazine, "the expiration of the program is troubling as it signals to oil and gas producers — and ultimately consumers — that the government has an antagonistic attitude towards more domestic energy production."

John Kerry Condemns Fossil Fuels That "Heat Our Homes" and "Propel Our Vehicles".  John Kerry condemned fossil fuels during remarks at the 2023 Our Ocean Conference in Panama.  Biden's so-called Climate Envoy John Kerry traveled all the way to Brazil and Panama this week to lecture on the virtues of making sacrifices to stop climate change.  John Kerry said we are facing a climate change crisis because of "how we live" and the choices we make on a daily basis.  "That crisis is caused by unabated emissions from fossil fuels that burn so that we can propel our vehicles, heat our homes, light our businesses," John Kerry said.

Biden Is Still After Your Gas Stoves.  Shortly after a Biden administration official boasted about how the federal government might ban gas stoves for being "unsafe," the White House reassured the public that no such ban was in the works.  We warned readers at the time not to believe such reassurances because "once this sort of train starts moving there is often no stopping it."  That was in early January.  It took less than a month for the Biden administration to prove us right.  Earlier this month, the Department of Energy released a proposed rule that, if implemented, would essentially regulate gas stoves out of existence.

AOC loses battle to slow GOP push to expand new oil, natural gas leases on federal land.  Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Tuesday failed to slow down the House Republican push for new oil and gas leases on federal land after GOP lawmakers shot down her attempt to require further study of the public health impacts of energy extraction.  The House Natural Resources Committee met Tuesday to adopt its work plan for the new Congress.  Included in that plan is language that says the Biden administration has leased fewer federal acres for oil and gas development than "any presidential administration" since the end of World War II.  "The Committee will examine the lack of oil and natural gas leasing on federal lands in the western United States, including focusing on administrative actions that have created permitting delays and disincentivized production on federal lands," the committee's plan said.

Fossil Future, Part 1.  I am going to try to persuade you of something that might seem impossible:  that one of the best things you can do to make the world a better place is to fight for more fossil fuel use — more use of oil, coal, and natural gas.  My case for expanding humanity's massive fossil fuel use might seem unworthy of even considering given that it totally contradicts what trusted sources tell us is the consensus of virtually all experts, but consider that 1) we know that sometimes what we're told is the "expert" view turns out to be catastrophically wrong, and 2) the "expert" view that we should rapidly eliminate fossil fuel use is a radical and potentially disastrous change in how we use energy. [...] Fossil fuels are a uniquely cost-effective source of energy, providing energy that is 1) low-cost, 2) on-demand, 3) versatile, and 4) on a scale of billions of people in thousands of places — which is why they are growing around the world, above all in places that care most about cost-effective energy, such as China.  Cost-effective energy is essential to human flourishing (our ability to live long, healthy, opportunity-filled lives) because the more cost-effective energy is, the more people can use the miracle of "machine labor" to produce vital material values such as food, clothing, shelter, and medical care.

Democrats, eco groups take aim at other home appliances amid gas stove debate.  Democrats and far-left green groups have set their sights on regulating a wide range of popular household appliances in a bid to push their broader electrification and climate agenda.  The push to regulate everyday appliances — including water heaters, furnaces, clothes washers, dishwashers, ceiling fans, microwave ovens and shower heads — comes as the Biden administration and Democratic lawmakers continue to set lofty net-zero and climate goals for weaning off fossil fuel dependence.  Environmentalists have argued that electrification, banning natural gas hookups and implementing strict energy efficiency standards could help accelerate emissions reductions.  "There's bad news for almost every room in the house," Ben Lieberman, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, told Fox News Digital in an interview. "Climate activists and the Biden administration want homeowners to stop using natural gas and to electrify everything.  That would affect appliances that come in natural gas and electric versions such as stoves, but also heating systems and water heaters."

Brickbat: Bad Gas.  The Colorado Public Utilities Commission has passed rules that could make it more difficult and more expensive to build new natural gas pipelines or extend existing ones in the state.  The rules require regulators to sign off on any pipeline construction plans by natural gas utilities with more than 90,000 customers.  Utilities would have to pay the full costs of pipelines up front.  Democratic Gov. Jared Polis has set a goal for natural gas utilities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 4 percent by 2025 and by 22 percent by 2030.

New Colorado rules could limit natural gas line construction, expansion.  Natural gas for heating, cooking and hot water could be harder — or more expensive — to come by with the advent of new Colorado rules scrutinizing new gas line construction, or extending existing lines.  New rules affecting gas utility companies have the potential to limit system expansion and increase the costs of installing natural gas in new construction, say officials at the Colorado Energy Office.  Xcel Energy officials warned the new rules have the potential to, for all intents and purposes, ban line extensions.

The Coup We Never Knew.  Did someone or something seize control of the United States? [...] When did clean-burning, cheap, and abundant natural gas become the equivalent to dirty coal?  How did prized natural gas that had granted America's wishes of energy self-sufficiency, reduced pollution, and inexpensive electricity become almost overnight a pariah fuel whose extraction was a war against nature?  Which lawmakers, which laws, which votes of the people declared natural gas development and pipelines near criminal?

10 Steps to Save America.  [B]y 2020, the United States enjoyed inexpensive fuel.  It was all but independent in gas and oil.  It had become the world largest combined gas and oil producer.  That status radically curtailed the need for optional military engagements in the Middle East.  It gave America enormous clout against hostile oil exporters like Russia, Iran, and Venezuela.  And such independence helped reduce vast trade deficits.  Again, the Biden Administration simply exploded the idea of fossil-fuel independence as a gradual transition to sustainable energy.  So simply doing the opposite of its policies would correct the pathology almost immediately:  Issue more federal gas and oil leases, approve the Keystone and Constitution pipelines, reopen the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, and build nuclear power plants.  The present course of high-priced and scarce gasoline and oil is eroding the middle class, spiking inflation, widening class divisions, and reducing American autonomy abroad.

Soros-backed group advises Biden admin that Clean Air Act could be used to 'control or prohibit' gasoline.  Governing for Impact, a group funded by George Soros, recently issued a memo to lawmakers advising the Biden administration that the Clean Air Act grants the Environmental Protection Agency the authority to "control or prohibit" the manufacturing and sale of gasoline, Fox News Digital reported.  "The Clean Air Act provides the Environmental Protection Agency with a number of tools to reduce air pollution," the memo read. "One powerful provision is Section 211(c), which authorizes the EPA to 'control or prohibit' the manufacture and sale of any motor vehicle fuel (or fuel additive) if resulting emissions will endanger public health or welfare (or impair emissions control devices)."  The memo, written by GFI and the climate group Evergreen Collaborative, argued that the EPA could force gas stations to establish electric vehicle charging stations on their properties.  "Under this authority, more stringent regulations on vehicle fuels — for example, requiring certain gas stations or national brands to install electric vehicle charging infrastructure — could both reduce deadly air pollution (such as nitrogen oxides and particulate matter) and incentivize the use of zero emissions transportation," the memo added.

The Editor says...
The rash pronouncement that nitrogen oxides and particulates are "deadly air pollution" assumes a lot of things that are not necessarily true.  Nobody is opposed to clean air, but surely the sponsors of the Clean Air Act didn't tell everyone that the law was intended as a weapon against gasoline.

UN considers trying to outlaw all fossil fuels on the planet.  The COP27 globalist gathering that recently took place in Egypt came with open calls for a global phase-out of, and eventual ban on, all fossil fuels.  Were this to actually happen, billions of people would die.  A tiny, failing island in the South Pacific called Tuvalu (ever heard of it?) made the proposition using the following quoted statement:  "We, therefore, unite with 100 Nobel Peace Prize laureates and 1000s of scientists worldwide to urge world leaders to join the fossil fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, to manage a just transition away from fossil fuels."  One wonders:  what does Tuvalu mean by the term "just transition?"  Is ending most human life on earth considered by the globalists to be the "just" thing to do?  Because that it what eliminating all fossil fuel usage would do.

Saskatchewan First Act introduced to literally keep the lights on in this province, and allow farmers to keep using nitrogen fertilizer.  Thou shalt not use coal for power generation post-2030, the federal government hath said.  And it's moving to do the same with natural gas by 2035.  It also wants to limit farmers' fertilizer usage, all in the name of climate change policies.  On Nov. 1, the Province of Saskatchewan said, "To hell with that," but in a more sophisticated, legal manner.  Saskatchewan threw down the gauntlet with the federal government on Nov. 1, introducing Bill No. 88, The Saskatchewan First Act.  If implemented in its current form, the Act basically says Saskatchewan will make its own decisions and rules on environmental standards, particularly those applying to greenhouse gas emissions and power generation.

The Cart Before the Horse.  [Scroll down] Speaking of natural resources, there's a popular notion that we can have comfort without the use of fossil fuels.  Many of us make the mistake of thinking of electricity as an environmentally safe energy source, not realizing that electricity is not a form of energy, but rather a form of energy delivery.  It has to be generated from an actual form of energy — coal, natural gas, oil.  Of course we could use hydroelectric power, but then we disturb the salmon.  What about solar?  Wind?  Those, of course, depend on the weather and there's nothing less dependable than weather.  Also, we have no practical way of storing this energy, which makes it available only when the wind blows or the sun shines.  While we're talking about fuels, let's explore another silly fantasy we're living in.  We're trying to transport goods and people without using fossil fuels.  Have you seen the latest stats on electric trucks?  It isn't pretty.  If we fail to transport goods cheaply, then farmers will have no way to get their products to market.

Austria sues European Union, claiming natural gas and nuclear energy are not 'green'.  Austria is taking the European Union to court over plans to characterize natural gas and nuclear power generation as sustainable energies amid efforts to fight climate change.  The Austrian government on Friday filed a lawsuit with the EU's top court over the classification used to define clean energy resources.  The EU's executive Commission plans to add certain nuclear and gas plants next year to a list that helps investors determine which projects are sustainable.  Austria's environment minister, Leonore Gewessler, warned that the measure could "greenwash" nuclear power and gas despite the environmental damage they cause.

Green agenda now demands elimination of natural gas in homes nationwide.  The green agenda coalition now is demanding the elimination of natural gas furnaces and appliances in homes nationwide, a move that could trigger replacements costs of $12,000 for homeowners.  And the plan is being slammed as representing a federal government "out of control," according to a state lawmaker.  The plan is being pushed by the Sierra Club and dozens of other "environmental" groups, who are demanding the Environmental Protection Agency ban the use of natural gas for home heating[,] everywhere in the country.  The groups' petition claims that the federal agency absolutely has to regulate "deadly pollution" from the energy source.

Insurrection: New York Times Promotes Sabotage, 'Guerrilla Warfare' to End Fossil Fuels.  In January of 2021, The New York Times promoted a book titled How To Blow Up a Pipeline by transparently radical author Andreas Malm.  On Thursday, the Times directly promoted Malm by publishing his guest essay under the headline "History May Absolve the Soup Throwers." [...] While the Times routinely rails against the "insurrection" on January 6 and sees all "domestic terrorism" as a right-wing problem, it promotes a climate insurrection and left-wing domestic terrorism.  Malm explicitly champions sabotage and violence — even guerrilla warfare! — as an efficient path to ending fossil fuels: [...] Malm tyrannically insists "all oil and gas production in rich countries — including the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and Qatar — must be terminated within 12 years.  Not only can there be no new fossil fuel installations; 40 percent of reserves already developed must be left in the ground."

Protests have stymied gas production in the Netherlands that could replace most of Russia's supply to Germany.  This winter may see Europeans freezing to death, unable to heat their homes as natural gas supplies dwindle.  Unemployment and bankruptcies will soar, as companies find themselves unable to cover their costs due to high energy prices.  Germany's vaunted chemical industry, heavily dependent on natural gas feedstock, is likely to wither on the vine.  An economic and social disaster reminiscent of the 1930s is possible.  The word "deindustrialization" is becoming real.

Is California a Luddite Conspiracy?  California politicians continue to pass policies that, by all accounts, appear to be deliberately aimed at substantially reducing its residents' ability to have reliable, on-demand electricity. [...] California has, over the years, been a leader in "decarbonizing" their state.  In their enthusiasm, Californians rapidly shut down coal, oil, and gas power plants over the years, at a rate that the installation of renewable replacements simply could not keep up with.  Nuclear is on the chopping block as well, though the Diablo Canyon nuclear power station has just had its execution deferred for another few years.  Diablo Canyon supplies California with 9 percent of its electricity, and represents 15 percent of its non-fossil fuel energy.  It's worth noting that the only reason Diablo Canyon was slated to close in the first place was because Democrats, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, embarked on a long quest to force Pacific Gas & Electric to close it prematurely.  Electricity prices in California have risen six times faster than the rest of the country since 2011, and are more than double the cost of neighboring states' rates.

"Sue And Settle': Biden Admin Agrees To Cancel Oil And Gas Drilling After Settling With Eco Activists.  The Biden administration will stop oil and gas drilling on more than 58,000 acres of federally-issued land after reaching a legal settlement with environmental activist groups on Sept. 6.  The Interior Department's (DOI) Bureau of Land Management (BLM) agreed to halt drilling permits on 113 oil and gas leases across 58,617 acres of land in Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota, according to the settlement.  The DOI agreed to stop drilling after a coalition of environmental nonprofits led by WildEarth Guardians and the Sierra Club filed a lawsuit against the agency in January 2021.  "This is a sue and settle case," Paul Seby, a lawyer who specializes in environmental issues at Greenberg Traurig, told the Daily Caller News Foundation.  "It's an abuse of the system and is being used to advance the policy goals of the Biden administration at the expense of the law."

Electricity Emergency.  A reliable grid is a foundation of our quality of life.  Our lives depend on ultra-reliable electricity for the refrigerators that preserve our food, the water treatment plants that keep our water drinkable, the air conditioning that keeps us cool, the factories that produce our goods, etc.  Ominously, our grid is in an increasingly fragile state.  Not only have we recently had statewide blackouts in California (2020) and Texas (2021), this summer shortages are occurring all around the US. [...] The root cause of our grid's reliability problems is simple: America is shutting down too many reliable power plants — plants that can be controlled to produce electricity when needed in the exact quantity needed.  And it is attempting to replace them with unreliable solar and wind.  Since at any given time solar and wind can go near zero, using them as replacements for reliable power plants doesn't work.

This is utterly delusional energy policy:
Janet Yellen: U.S. Must Look to 'Wind, Sun' for Energy, Not Oil and Gas.  U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said Thursday the United States must look to "the wind, sun, and other clean sources of energy" instead of relying on oil and gas.  Yellen's remarks came during a trip to Detroit, Michigan, where she boasted about the Democrats' Inflation Reduction Act.  "Our plan — powered by the Inflation Reduction Act — represents the largest investment in fighting climate change in our country's history," Yellen told the crowd.  "It will put us well on our way toward a future where we depend on the wind, sun, and other clean sources of energy."  "We will rid ourselves from our current dependence on fossil fuels and the whims of autocrats like [Russian President Vladimir] Putin," Yellen added.

The Editor says...
The U.S. under Donald Trump was not dependent on Russia, because we were utilizing our own petroleum resources to the maximum possible extent — or at least we were moving quickly in that direction.  Joe Biden has made domestic energy production far more difficult, in every way that he can, for no reason other than the political appeasement of environmental fruitcakes.

Fossil fools: How Germany's fear of nuclear power put Putin in charge of Europe.  On January 1st, 2000, a new leader of Russia ascended to power:  Vladimir Putin.  After his official inauguration that summer, Western leaders greeted him with open arms, hoping to leave Cold War attitudes in the 20th Century.  British Prime Minister Tony Blair would call him a reformer, visit him in the Kremlin, and welcome him into number 10.  President Bill Clinton stated that "no doors can be sealed shut to Russia" and would even float the prospect of welcoming Russia into the EU and NATO.  Gerhard Schröder, then leader of Germany, would embrace Putin too, first politically, then personally and professionally.  Elected in 1998 to lead a coalition with the Green Party, Schröder ran on the promise of phasing out nuclear power, a politically popular idea in Germany with a history of direct action and its own iconic tagline: "Atomkraft?  Nein Danke."  ("Nuclear Power?  No Thank You.")

Plan to demolish Klamath dams in California to save salmon gets boost from federal regulators.  A plan to save migratory salmon by demolishing four hydroelectric dams on California's Klamath River got backing from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Friday [8/26/2022].  FERC released the final version of the environmental impact statement evaluating the dam demolition plan.  FERC commissioners will vote on whether or not to implement the plan later this year.  The dam's operators filed an application to surrender the Lower Klamath Hydroelectric Project on Nov. 17, 2020.

Why We Lost Trust in the Expert Class.  For years, European policymakers had assured the world that the relatively rapid "transition" to "green" energy was the world's preordained future — regardless of the costs.  Accordingly, many European Union governments followed the advice of green experts.  They eagerly shut down coal, natural gas, and nuclear power plants to transition immediately to "renewable energy."  Most citizens were afraid to object that in cloudy, cold Germany solar panels were not viable methods of electrical generation — especially in comparison to the country's vast coal deposits and its large, model nuclear power industry.  As a result, German government officials warn that this winter, in 19th-century fashion, families will have to burn wood — the dirtiest of modern fuels — to endure the cold.  And there is further talk of "warm rooms," where like pre-civilizational tribal people, the elderly will bunch together within a designated heated room to keep alive.

Rigging the War on Fossil Fuels.  [Scroll down]  In September 2020, a Gallup poll likewise found that climate change ranked eleventh in a list of registered voters' top concerns — well behind such items as the economy, terrorism/national security, the COVID-19 pandemic, health care, education, race relations, gun policy, crime, abortion, and immigration.  Notwithstanding the public's consistent and overwhelming lack of concern about climate change as an urgent problem, the main concern of the Biden administration and the entire agenda of the Democrat Party has been, and continues to be, driven by this issue.  In the words of President Joe Biden, "climate change poses an existential threat" — in fact, the chief existential threat to the United States — greater than terrorism, or Chinese expansionism, or the invasion by 2,400,000 unvetted illegal migrants annually across America's broken southern border.  So obsessive is the focus of Democrat leaders on the alleged "existential threat of climate change," that a centerpiece of their policies to oppose it is a war on fossil fuels, beginning with the cancelling of the Keystone pipeline, the shutting down of the ANWR oil field in Alaska, and the refusal for more than 17 months to sell oil-and-gas drilling leases on federal lands.

Americans Want Oil.  The Biden administration tells us that we are in the midst of a rapid transition from fossil fuels to wind and solar energy, and Pete Buttigieg says he can't understand why so many Americans haven't gotten on the bandwagon.  This author reminds us of what the Biden administration seems to have forgotten, but many Americans understand:  ["][W]ithout fossil fuel, nothing separates us from the pre-modern era.  For 99% of the world's population, that era was not a pretty Jane Austen movie.  Life was short, painful, diseased, filthy dirty, hungry, and either too hot or too cold.  Most people didn't live past 40 and half of children died before hitting 5.  There were only four energy sources:  Human labor, animal labor, and primitive wind and water energy.  (Five sources, I guess if you consider the sun drying laundry on the line.)["]  I think we can add that, beginning in the 18th century, there was also steam power fueled by wood.  Steam remains important, of course, but now we boil water using coal, natural gas, or a nuclear reaction, not wood.

Green Energy Chickens Coming Home to Roost.  This year will graphically demonstrate the malign consequences of the misguided efforts to replace cheap, reliable fossil fuel energy with unreliable, inefficient "renewable" energy like wind and solar.  Never in history has a civilization willfully embarked on destroying its material foundations, based solely on a hypothesis rather than scientifically established fact. [...] Here at home, warnings of electricity blackouts across the country this summer have not slowed down many states' increased efforts to shutter electrical plants powered by coal, natural gas, and nuclear fission.  In New York, Governor Kathy Holchul has announced the state's commitment to enforcing a requirement that new power plants must achieve "zero on-site greenhouse gas emissions for new construction no later than 2027."  This policy of wishful thinking follows New York's Climate Act of 2019, which requires that all power generation comes from "green" sources by 2040, including 70% from renewable energy by 2030.

Without Fossil Fuels There Is No Need for Electricity.  America is in a fast pursuit toward achieving President Biden's stated goal that "we are going to get rid of fossil fuels" to achieve the Green New Deal's (GND) pursuit of wind turbines and solar panels to provide electricity to run the world, but WAIT, everything in our materialistic lives and economies cannot exist without crude oil, coal, and natural gas.  Everything that needs electricity, from lights, vehicles, iPhones, defibrillators, computers, telecommunications, etc., are all made with the oil derivatives manufactured from crude oil.  The need for electricity will decrease over time without crude oil. [...] And by the way, crude oil came before electricity.  The electricity that came AFTER the discovery of oil, is comprised of components made with those same oil derivatives from crude oil.  Thus, getting rid of crude oil, also eliminates our ability to make wind turbines, solar panels, as well as those vehicles intended to be powered by an EV battery.

Get ready for more blackouts because of environmentalist policies.  People across the United States and in many other countries are already experiencing sticker shock when they receive their utility bills this year.  The price of energy is continuing to climb along with the price of gasoline.  Unfortunately, according to the leader of one energy industry analysis group, that's not going to be the end of the bad news.  There are already places where the electrical grid is under so much strain that rolling blackouts have been enacted again and we're only going to see more of that going forward.  This issue has little or nothing to do with Russian energy supplies or the war in Ukraine.  The reality is that in many parts of the United States, we're barely producing enough electricity to meet the demand for power, and thanks to environmentalist policies put in place by the government, we're shutting down coal-fired power plants at a rate far faster than we can replace all of that juice through other methods.

Biden's Climate Czar May Have Inadvertently Revealed Deep Dysfunction In The Administration.  Top White House climate adviser Gina McCarthy copied a CBS News reporter on an email chain Wednesday announcing the administration would cancel a series of oil and gas lease sales.  "The Cook inlet sale was canceled.  It is not proceeding," McCarthy wrote to other White House officials in an email, CBS reported.  Another official reportedly responded immediately saying that a decision hadn't been made yet.  Interior Department (DOI) officials then reiterated that sentiment to CBS, also saying the agency hadn't decided if it would move forward on the lease sales Wednesday evening.

The World Does Not Run on Magic.  [Scroll down]  It seems that we assume the world can run in a magical way.  We need only wish a thing, and it will happen, because somebody will take care of it, or rather something, a mysterious agent in a black box.  To save the world from climate change, we should use electricity instead of burning fossil fuels.  But where do we get the electricity?  It must simply happen, like lightning from the sky.  I daresay we have all read hundreds of articles on the need to provide power in a clean, efficient, and sustainable way.  But how many address the fundamental problem posed: that is, that all electricity is generated by the brute physical fact of making a great shaft of magnetic metal turn?

Hundreds of oil wells to close in Long Beach under city efforts to go green.  In 1921, oil was discovered in Long Beach, California, and the city became one of the nation's biggest boomtowns — drilling 1,450 wells.  The port city once produced one-fifth of the nation's oil supply, more than 60 million barrels per year.  That has been scaled back to about 8 million barrels per year, and city officials hope it will dwindle to zero by 2035.  Now, a proposal to spend $1.2 billion to seal up operational oil wells has been discussed by the city's environmental committee.

Ten Steps to Totalitarianism.  Does anybody still think totalitarianism can't happen here?  Ask yourself how many of these steps we've already galloped past. [... #3] Control over Energy:  Whether you believe that anthropogenic climate change is an imminent threat or not, this much is indisputable: energy undergirds all economic activity.  Everything from agricultural production and industrial manufacturing to supply transport, shipping, and consumer shopping depends upon a constant supply of energy.  If everything bought and sold across the planet were viewed as a pyramid with the most luxurious items sitting at the top, hydrocarbon energy in all its forms provides the pyramid's foundation.  As governments seize greater control over hydrocarbon energy, they seize total control over the global economy.

Natural gas [is a] 'large part' of solution to climate goals, industry leader says.  A leading supplier of natural gas in Wyoming told Fox News there are misconceptions about the fossil fuel that powers everything from cell phones to electric cars.  "The single largest misconception about natural gas is that we can't do it clean," Jonah Energy Vice President Paul Ulrich told Fox News.  "We can," he continued.  "We've proven it here in the Jonah Field.  Other operators have proven it, and we absolutely are a large part of the solution to climate goals."  Ulrich said about 40% of electric generation in the U.S. is powered by natural gas.

The Sheer Madness of Today's Left.  Here in California, Governor Gavin Newsom has gone mad.  He reigns over the most expensive gas and diesel prices in the history of the United States, at over $6 and $7 a gallon respectively in most parts of the state.  Californians suffer under the highest gas taxes in the nation and are shutting down nuclear plants.  They seek reductions in clean burning natural gas generators at a time of drought when hydroelectric production is constrained.  So what does Newsom do?  To fuel his state, and keep a shrinking middle class sustainable, does he tap California's huge gas and oil reserves?  They are the seventh largest of the 50 states and might bring down prices in a state that consumes more fossil fuels than any state but Texas.  No, that would be green heresy.  So instead Newsom has proposed spending $11 billion in subsidies to drivers — at $400 per registered vehicle — so that the state's drivers can buy more smelly, dirty gasoline and diesel fuel that they otherwise would not at the prohibitive, but secretly desirable, $6-7 a gallon price.

Hollywood Celebrities Oppose Canadian Natural Gas Pipeline as Energy Prices Soar.  Hollywood celebrities including Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, and Jane Fonda are protesting a Canadian natural gas pipeline that they claim represents a threat to the climate and indigenous rights.  Their demand to defund the pipeline comes as energy prices are soaring around the world, putting a squeeze on working class families and sending a dire ripple effect throughout the global economy.  The pipeline at the center of the fight is the Coastal GasLink, which transports natural gas across the Canadian Rockies in British Columbia to the Pacific coast.

What if we stop producing fossil fuels?  When oil is produced from wells, the fluid that arrives at the surface is usually a mixture of petroleum, gas, water, and sediments.  After initial treatment to remove water and sediments, petroleum is shipped to refineries to make various products such as gasoline, diesel, and aviation fuel.  The gas, which is predominantly methane, also has gas liquids such as ethylene, propylene, and butylene. [...] What does it mean if we do not have these hydrocarbon building blocks?  We return to natural fibers for clothing.  Containers will be made from paper products or glass.  As a kid, I enjoyed searching for tossed soda bottles to get the deposit money from the local supermarket.  Some states who charge an exorbitant fee for plastic bottle disposal might not appreciate the lost revenue.  Maybe we will increase aluminum production for containers.  Aluminum requires a sizeable amount of power per pound of production.  I guess we will return to waxed paper wrapping for children's sandwiches for school lunches.  Forget about all those plastic containers.  How about tires for cars?  Someone had better get those natural rubber tree plantations going again.  What about diesel-engine-driven trains?  What about airplane travel?

The Green Immoralists.  [Scroll down]  Climate-change moralists love humanity so much in the abstract that they must shut down its life-giving gas, coal, and oil in the concrete.  And they value humans so little that they don't worry in the here and now that ensuing fuel shortages and exorbitant costs cause wars, spike inflation, and threaten people's ability to travel or keep warm.  The Biden Administration stopped all gas and oil production in the ANWR region of Alaska.  It ended all new federal leases for drilling.  It is cancelling major new pipelines.  It is leveraging lending agencies not to finance oil and gas drilling.  It helped force the cancellation of the EastMed pipeline that would have brought needed natural gas to southern Europe.  And it has in just a year managed to turn the greatest oil and gas producer in the history of the world into a pathetic global fossil-fuel beggar.

Stop Letting Environmental Groups Funded By Russia Dictate America's Energy Policy.  In aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, one thing has become abundantly clear to the American people:  energy security is national security.  But after decades of indoctrination by environmental groups who have pushed a climate change agenda completely detached from reality, today America is left with neither.  Since the first day of his presidency, Joe Biden has capitulated to America's most powerful, well-funded, dark money environmental groups like the Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, and Climate Action Network, whose agenda is to shut down fossil fuels and restructure our entire economy around a socialist-style Green New Deal.

Manchin Objects to New Greenhouse Gas and Environmental Impact Policies on Natural Gas Pipelines.  The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) February policy statements on interstate natural gas projects drew strong objections from Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and the two FERC commissioners on the five-person panel who voted against the statements.  Those statements, which add consideration of greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts, including on "environmental justice communities," for FERC to approve natural gas infrastructure, were the subject of a March 3 hearing of the Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources (ENR).  While FERC had previously determined project need on the basis of contracts to ship the gas from a prospective pipeline, the first new policy statement adds factors to assess "need."  It also directs FERC to consider environmental impacts, landowner impacts, and impacts on "environmental justice communities," among other factors.

AOC calls Biden's SOTU speech a 'lost opportunity' for failing to promote renewable energy.  U.S. Rep Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said President Joe Biden's State of the Union address 'left a little to be desired' for Democrats because he did not push issues like renewable energy, student loan debt, education or immigration.  The New York Democrat said Biden's speech on Tuesday, where he focused on COVID recovery and the conflict in the Ukraine, failed to capitalize on moving away from Russian oil by committing to green energy.  'I think it was a lost opportunity,' Ocasio-Cortez, 32, told MSNBC.  'There is profound bipartisan support to a long-term shift away from fossil fuels.'  She added that Biden had glossed over issues of 'crisis in education,' student loan debt and immigration, key issues that she said deserved the Democratic party's focus.

The world needs more energy production, not less.
Before You Save the Planet, Save the People Who Live on It.  Not only do climate enthusiasts refuse to acknowledge the issue of ongoing energy poverty for billions of people across the world, but they promote policies that exacerbate lack of access to affordable, reliable electricity.  The socio-economic conditions of energy poverty, which can only be worsened by the forced replacement of fossil fuels with wind and solar, contribute to higher rates of both morbidity and mortality.  Lack of gas for cooking and heating is the major cause of death from indoor air pollution in the world.  The World Health Organization (WHO) states, "Around 2.6 billion people cook using polluting open fires or simple stoves fueled by kerosene, biomass (wood, animal dung and crop waste)."  Around 4 million people among them die annually and many more millions suffer long-lasting illnesses.  Community-level energy poverty affects larger populations.  Some regions that are home to hundreds of millions of people in Africa and Asia have no access to electricity.  Among those who do have electricity, the supply is highly unreliable.  From inadequate supplies of drinking water to intermittent power in health care centers, energy poverty poses an imminent threat to the lives of these people.

You Can Thank Environmentalists for the Invasion of Ukraine.  Thanks to the West's environmentalists, those smug greenies who are more concerned with carbon output than world peace, [Russian President Vladimir Putin] controls much of the energy going to the European Union (E.U.).  Per Statista, here are the countries most dependent on Russia for natural gas.  The percentages tell us just how dependent:
  •   North Macedonia (100 percent)
  •   Finland (94 percent)
  •   Bulgaria (74 percent)
  •   Slovakia (70 percent)
  •   Germany (49 percent)
  •   Italy (46 percent)
  •   Poland (40 percent)
  •   France (24 percent).
It gets worse.  As of 2019, a full 27 percent of the European Union's crude oil, 41 percent of its natural gas, and 47 percent of its solid fuel (mostly coal) come from Russia.  Why?  Well, it's very simple.  Russia is not stupid.  Putin is not stupid.  He drills and digs and fracks while Western countries pat themselves on the back for closing coal mines, refusing oil leases, and shuttering nuclear power plants.

Biden looks to pressure investors away from fossil fuels via climate disclosures.  The pressure is increasing on companies to follow environmental, social, and governance standards from both the private sector and the government.  The Biden administration is prioritizing proposed rulemaking that would require companies to produce climate-related disclosures, most notably through the Securities and Exchange Commission, a form of indirect pressure on fossil fuel companies.  The SEC is debating the extent to which it can compel companies to disclose details about how much energy they buy and how they handle climate risks.  Such self-reported disclosures to investors have already become commonplace in business, and adding government-mandated ESG disclosure rules is a big goal for the administration.

When the Left Hates Green Energy.  Although progressives have advocated for renewables such as solar and wind power, they often oppose any increase in nuclear power, a carbon-neutral and readily accessible energy source.  The far left also disparages natural gas usage, despite the fact that the transition from coal to natural gas has lowered greenhouse gas emissions by 13% since 2005.  One would expect, at least in the short term, environmentalists to embrace nuclear and natural gas as part of a greener energy portfolio, with a corresponding reduction in coal consumption.  Although renewables have exhibited tremendous growth over the past year, a quick look at Germany's energy policy indicates that renewables are not sufficiently mature to power the entire globe.

Lawsuit Alleges Illegal Tactics in House Democrats' Climate Probe of Oil Companies.  House Democrats are using privately funded staff to investigate oil companies for spreading "disinformation" on climate change, a possible violation of federal law and the chamber's own rules, a lawsuit alleges.  A spokesperson for Democrats on the House Oversight and Reform Committee, which is conducting the yearlong investigation, said the committee has followed all relevant laws and rules in consulting with others.  Co-Equal, the private nonprofit group named in the federal public information lawsuit, denies being part of a major hearing in the climate-related investigation of oil companies.  Co-Equal, founded by two of House Democrats' former staffers who led the congressional tobacco hearings in the 1990s, is sponsored by Arabella Advisors, a liberal megadonor.  The group also received $300,000 from an organization backed by another major donor on the left, billionaire financier George Soros.

"ESG" = Extreme Shortages Guaranteed!  The Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors climbing up the agenda in the banking industry would have banks divest in fossil fuels.  This would lead toward a world like that in the 1800's, the last time the world was "decarbonized".  Back in the 1800's, we had no coal or natural gas power plants, and we had not discovered crude oil as something that could be manufactured into usable products.  Life was hard and dirty, and most people never traveled 100-200 miles from where they were born, and life expectancy was short.  Today, there is a lost reality that the primary usage of crude oil is NOT for the generation of electricity, but to manufacture derivatives and fuels which are the ingredients of everything needed by economies and lifestyles to exist and prosper.  Energy realism requires that the legislators, policymakers, and media that demonstrate pervasive ignorance about crude oil usage understand the staggering scale of the decarbonization movement.

Don't They Know We Will Still Need Oil & Gas?  [In England,] Both parties have of course called for a windfall tax on North Sea oil, which would effectively kill the entire sector stone dead anyway.  Meanwhile regulators have killed off the massive new Jackdaw gas field on spurious environmental grounds, and new North Sea projects will only be approved if ministers judge them to be compatible with the drive to net zero.  Yet none of these politicians seem to appreciate that the UK will carry on needing gas and oil, and lots of it too, for decades to come. [...] A rough calculation would suggest we would require 180 TWh of gas to produce 60 TWh of electricity, via CCS or hydrogen.  That is 60% of current consumption.  It is hard to see much of a decline in gas consumption in the other sectors.  Even if new gas boilers are banned in 2035, as mooted, it is unlikely many householders will have already converted to heat pumps beforehand.  Equally industrial users of gas will be loathe to spend billions switching to electricity, and a hydrogen network simply won't exist in any scale by then.  My guess is that natural gas consumption will still be around 700 TWh by 2035, only 14% lower than currently.

The Editor says...
The article above is somewhat informative, but this is the first time I've seen anyone measure natural gas in Tera-watt-hours, assuming that's what TWh stands for.  One of us is misinformed.

Oil and gas industry rallies against environmentalist Biden Fed nominee.  Oil and gas industry groups are coming out strongly against a top Biden Federal Reserve nominee who has called for the financial sector to pull investment away from fossil fuels.  Forty-one trade associations told Senate Banking Committee leadership on Friday that policies favored by Sarah Bloom Raskin, who is up for vice chairwoman for supervision at the Fed, would "wreak havoc" on the U.S. economy if enacted.  "Oil and natural gas provide the feedstock for thousands of products used every day, from anything with a computer chip to the COVID vaccines that have saved millions of lives across the globe," the groups wrote Chairman Sherrod Brown and ranking member Pat Toomey.  The trade groups include the Independent Petroleum Association of America, the Western Energy Alliance, and the Appalachia-based Marcellus Shale Coalition.

It's an Unraveling, Not a Reset.  Modern synthetic fertilizers are typically made using natural gas or from phosphorous-bearing ores.  The former provides the nitrogen that is critical to re-use of fields in commercial agriculture.  They constitute more than half of all synthetic fertilizer production.  So what happens when oil and natural gas extraction are crippled in industrialized nations?  One likely outcome is that the fertilizer manufacturing industry is also crippled, leaving both large commercial growers and smaller farms around the world starved of a key substance they need to grow food for hungry populations.

Federal judge throws out Gulf of Mexico offshore oil lease sale.  A plan to lease millions of acres in the Gulf of Mexico for offshore drilling was denied by a federal judge Thursday [1/27/2022].  U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras for the District of Columbia rejected the lease sale, which was held by the Interior Department in November for 80 million acres to be used for offshore oil drilling, saying it did not do a good job of estimating the effects on greenhouse gas emissions in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act, according to the ruling.

Federal judge throws out oil lease sale in Gulf of Mexico.  A federal court has rejected a plan to lease millions of acres in the Gulf of Mexico for offshore oil drilling, saying the Biden administration did not adequately take into account the lease sale's effect on planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, violating a bedrock environmental law.  The decision by U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras in Washington on Thursday sends the proposed lease sale back to the Interior Department to decide next steps.  The judge said it was up to Interior to decide whether to go forward with the sale after a revised review, scrap it or take other steps.

Stop posing.  Start drilling.  The current energy crisis, with domestic bills set to rise some 50 percent in April, has confronted Net Zero-loving Westminster elites with the stark reality of the choices they've made.  Twenty-five retail energy companies have gone bust, another has been nationalised, along with a fertiliser plant — so that it can produce carbon dioxide for fizzy drinks — all now featuring as extra costs on either bills or taxes.  We are shipping fracked gas from the United States while banning fracking here, and we have undermined investment in the North Sea, while allowing Putin to use Nord Stream 2 as a bargaining chip over the future sovereignty of the Ukraine.  It is literally the case that we are using public money to import gas to manufacture CO2, while claiming to lead the world on tackling climate change.  Unsurprisingly, no one is following.

The campaign to ban gas stoves is heating up.  Over the past three years, dozens of cities across the country have banned natural gas hookups in newly constructed buildings as part of a growing campaign to reduce carbon emissions from homes.  The movement scored a major victory last month, when New York City's outgoing Mayor Bill de Blasio signed into law a ban on gas hookups in new buildings.  Though new laws apply to the entire home, the policy debate often focuses on one room in particular: the kitchen.  Gas stoves account for a relatively small share of the emissions released by a typical household, but they've become a proxy for a larger fight over how far efforts to curb at-home natural gas consumption in the name of fighting climate change should go.  Natural gas consumption accounts for 80 percent of fossil fuel emissions from residential and commercial buildings, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

The Editor says...
[#1] If you mean carbon dioxide emissions, don't say, "fossil fuel emissions."  Nobody is emitting fossil fuels from their houses.  [#2] If my house is heated in the winter by natural gas, and carbon dioxide is generated as a byproduct, here's what I care about most:  My house is heated.  If you have any courtroom-quality proof that the combustion of natural gas in the U.S. is harmful to the entire world, please step forward with it.

Germany 'Dramatically Behind' its Emissions Target After Abandoning 'Dangerous' Nuclear Energy.  Germany is now 'dramatically behind' its CO2 emissions target shortly after it abandoned half of its remaining nuclear plants, calling the tech 'dangerous'.  Germany's Climate Minister, Robert Habeck has said that Germany is "dramatically behind" its emissions targets for 2030, just weeks after the country abandoned half of its remaining nuclear power plants.  Habeck now says that the country has a "gigantic task" ahead should it still wish to achieve its goal of making itself climate neutral.

The Editor says...
One of these days, Mr. Habeck will wake up and realize that he can't have it both ways.  It is not possible to achieve unrealistic "emissions targets" while doing away with nuclear energy.

The Four Horsemen of the Left's Artificial Apocalypse.  [#4] For over two hundred years, the Malthusians have been obsessed with controlling the world's population.  Eugenics, genocide, and abortion are a few of the evils they have wrought.  Replacing the family with government is an easy and effective way for government to decide who may reproduce.  Convincing people that hydrocarbon energy must be swapped for energies popular a thousand years ago is the surest way to hinder innovation, economic wealth, and generational growth.  Brainwashing people into believing that the planet is about to die is the kind of psychological terror that coerces free people into subjugating themselves by handing total power to unscrupulous government thugs.

Leftist Response to Collapse of Build Back Better Legislation Highlights Originating Motive for COVID-19.  The apoplectic response to Joe Manchin's rebuke of Biden's Build Back Better deal in general, and specifically, their reaction to losing the climate change agenda within it, points toward the original intent of COVID-19 in the first place. [...]
[#1]   The "Build Back Better" agenda was never about anything except radical climate change legislation.  Once you accept that, now admitted, baseline, things start to become much clearer.
[#2]   The "Build Back Better" phrase came from the World Economic Forum and was promoted by a multitude of international leaders and left-wing organizations.  That reality then brings up the most important point.  To get to "building back better", you first need to destroy something.  That thing they needed to destroy was how the global economic dependency on carbon-based fuel supplies (oil, gas, coal, etc.).
[#3]   In order to destroy the 'something of that scale', the energy program for the entire world, something massive is needed to fundamentally change the entire world approach toward energy production.  Something is needed to create the crisis that provides the origin for the process to initiate.
[#4]   That triggering mechanism was/is SARS-CoV-2, or what we now call COVID-19 and all variants therein.

Environmentalists oppose every beneficial USE of energy, too.
European Environmentalists Have New Plan For Cargo Ships Based on Paris Climate Agreement Compliance.  To meet the compliance standards of the Paris Climate Accords and the subsequent treaty that all EU nations agreed to, they must reduce carbon emissions in freight and transit systems.  They have spent thousands of hours pouring over possible solutions and will begin the test phase next month. [...] Yes my friends, the extremely well educated scientists, physicists, climatologists, sustainability engineers and cross functional decarbonization problem solvers for the planetary saving climate justice agenda, have invented ... Sailboats!

The Editor says...
That's just brilliant.  If these are the people you're counting on to "save the earth," you're in for a big disappointment.  Anyone who has any experience flying a large kite knows a few things about wind:  [#1] the wind doesn't always blow, [#2] the wind doesn't always blow in the most favorable direction, and [#3] sometimes the wind blows with enough force to rip your kite to shreds, snap the line, or hurt somebody.  If you are foolish enough to use a giant kite to tow a ship across the Atlantic Ocean, at some point in your journey, you will probably have to reel in the kite after it drops into the sea, limp and useless.  Then you and your cargo can either sit there, stranded, or you can light up your good old reliable 50,000-horsepower diesel engines and get back underway.

European environmentalists' insanely stupid plan to decrease shipping pollution.  Environmentalism, as much as anything, represents semi-educated man's yearning to return to a less complicated past, one in which man was dependent upon nature's vagaries, rather than master of them.  Maybe that explains why European environmentalists have decided that the way to reduce carbon emissions from shipping is to use "giant kites" — or, as humans called them for thousands of years, "sails."  This is not a joke.  It's absolutely real and highlights just how ludicrous the modern left has become. [...] We live in an incredibly stupid era.  We are blessed to be removed from the travails of the pre-modern era but those who control our institutions are dragging us back to a time of tremendous human pain and suffering.

The Editor says...
Sometime when you're not busy, use your favorite non-Google search engine to hunt for the "average horsepower of a cargo ship," [1] [2] [3] [4] and you will immediately see the futility of this giant-kite idea.

New York City is banning natural gas hookups for new buildings to fight climate change.  The New York City Council on Wednesday voted to pass legislation banning the use of natural gas in most new construction, a move that will substantially slash climate-changing greenhouse gas emissions from the country's most populous city.  The bill now goes to Mayor Bill de Blasio's desk for signature.  Once signed, the measure will go into effect at the end of 2023 for some buildings under seven stories, and in 2027 for taller buildings.  Hospitals, commercial kitchens and laundromats are exempt from the ban.  Under the law, construction projects submitted for approval after 2027 must use sources like electricity for stoves, space heaters and water boilers instead of gas or oil.  Residents who currently have gas stoves and heaters in their homes will not be impacted unless they relocate to a new building.

Biden's oil and gas leasing "reform" proposal pleases absolutely no one.  When Debra Haaland snuck through confirmation (with 51 votes) to become the Secretary of the Interior, everyone who had been paying attention knew that she was going to be gunning for the oil and gas industry.  That made her a valuable ally for Joe Biden, who began working to shut down pipeline construction and "pause" energy exploration on public lands within hours of being sworn in.  (Unless the pipeline is owned by Russia, of course, in which case he basically finances it.)  Now, with gas prices spiking dramatically and in the midst of what is quickly becoming the Biden energy crisis, Haaland's Interior Department has released a "review" of the country's oil and gas leasing process, in which she finds "significant shortcomings."  The timing of this was no accident, as Joe Biden had been under pressure from progressive ecowarriors to find ways to stop drilling on public lands.

The giant climate energy ruse.  How can you tell when all your freedoms are under assault?  When Biden goes after your energy — all of it.  And what easier way to mask an energy grab than to tuck it under the solemn shroud of climate?  "Climate change," a vacuous term mindlessly embraced by equally mindless leaders, is an easy sell.  Openly throttling the energy essential to the mindful masses is a heavier lift.  So, under the veil of public virtue, petroleum is spirited off the power menu, swapped out for green notions barely amounting to a diet salad.  Energy is so deeply imbedded into society that it is largely taken for granted — that is, until we're all mugged by rising fuel costs as well as inflated prices for everything manufactured or delivered by energy — which amounts to everything. [...] On a human scale, and within our lifetimes, the global spread of energy has levitated a billion people worldwide out of poverty.  They won't be happy with a round trip.

Key Biden Nominee On Oil Companies: 'We Want Them To Go Bankrupt If We Want To Tackle Climate Change'.  Saule Omarova, Democrat President Joe Biden's Marxist-friendly nominee to lead the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, said earlier this year that she wants oil and gas companies to go bankrupt, which comes as Americans face surging gas prices.  "Here what I'm thinking about is primarily coal industry and oil and gas industry.  A lot of the smaller players in that industry are going to probably go bankrupt in short order, at least we want them to go bankrupt if we want to tackle climate change," Omarova says in the clip, unearthed by the American Accountability Foundation (AAF).  Omarova, who made the remarks back in March at the Jain Family Institute's 2021 Social Wealth Seminar (SWS) series, later said that the economic fallout and number of job losses that would ensue would be too much for the U.S., saying, "we cannot afford" it.

Controversial Biden bank nominee said 'we want' oil and gas companies to go bankrupt.  President Joe Biden's pick for a top banking regulatory position said "we want" oil and gas companies to go bankrupt, although she acknowledged the country couldn't afford the loss of jobs.  Saule Omarova, a law professor at Cornell University who graduated college in the USSR, has faced pushback over her nomination to be comptroller of the currency from business groups and Republicans, who have said that she is extreme and opposed to the industry as a whole.  A video of her discussing the idea of a National Investment Authority — a new government bureaucracy that would act directly in financial markets to allocate "both public and private capital" to fight social ills — has resurfaced in which she muses about oil and coal companies failing in order to fight climate change.  "A lot of the smaller players in that industry are going to, probably, go bankrupt in short order — at least, we want them to go bankrupt if we want to tackle climate change," Omarova said as part of the Jain Family Institute's "Social Wealth Seminar" series in March.
[Video clip here].

Biden's 'Marxist' Treasury Nominee Saule Omarova Wants To Bankrupt, 'Starve' Fossil Fuel Industry To Tackle Climate Change.  President Joe Biden's nominee for a key Treasury Department role admitted that oil, natural gas and coal firms need to go bankrupt to prevent climate change, a resurfaced video showed.  "Here what I'm thinking about is primarily the coal and oil and gas industry.  A lot of the smaller players in that industry are going to probably go bankrupt in short order, at least we want them to go bankrupt if we want to tackle climate change," Saule Omarova — who the Senate is considering to lead the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency — remarked in a clip uncovered Tuesday by the American Accountability Foundation (AAF), a conservative research group.  The comments were originally made during a March talk Omarova gave as part of the Jain Family Institute's "Social Wealth Seminar" series.

Al Gore: 'Time to say goodbye to coal, oil and gas worldwide'.  Former Vice President Al Gore called on the world to "say goodbye to coal, oil and gas" to fight climate change in a video released Friday ahead of the upcoming UN COP 26 global warming conference.  Oil, gas and coal are the source of 79% of U.S. energy consumption, according to the latest data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.  Nuclear energy provides 9% of U.S. energy, while renewable energy accounts for 12%.  Gore called on public and private sector leaders to "get real" about immediately reducing greenhouse gas emissions and about moving away from fossil fuels to "clean" energy.

Supreme Court to hear challenge to EPA climate change rules for power plants.  The Supreme Court agreed Friday [10/29/2021] to hear a challenge to federal regulations over power plant carbon emissions, potentially resolving a years-long legal battle that has tied up two previous presidential administrations.  The appeal has its genesis in an Obama administration effort in 2015 to significantly reduce power sector emissions to address climate change.  The Supreme Court blocked those regulations from taking effect and President Donald Trump's administration repealed the rules in 2017, easing the requirements on the plants.  "Nobody contests that these issues have enormous importance," the North American Coal Corporation told the court in a brief earlier this year.  "What must be resolved as soon as possible is who has the authority to decide those issues on an industry-wide scale — Congress or the EPA."

When ideology drives legislation, common sense often ignored when it comes to fossil fuel.  There can be few better examples of ideologically convinced politicians running head-on into reality than a new California law known in the Legislature as AB 1346.  This bill, signed into law in September by Gov. Gavin Newsom, is the personification of today's faddish hostility to everything fossil fuel by the Democrats who dominate California government.  These ideologues want to ban natural gas appliances from new construction.  They want new cars to be all-electric before 2040, even if few have the range to travel from one end of California to another without long stops for recharging.  And they are getting their way.

How Many People Must Be Thrown into the Volcano Before the Left Is Happy?  The whole "global warming" schtick is predicated on the idea that fractional temperature deviations (what climatologists and geologists understood as a natural condition of the planet before their expertise could be used for political and financial gain) are a threat to human life.  Yet temperature fluctuations are poppycock compared to the loss of human life that will be precipitated by choking off the fuels necessary to generate electrical power.  Where electricity is neither stable nor cheap, surviving the winter with scant heat is never guaranteed.  Where refrigeration, water pumps, and lighting are scarce, so too are medicines, food, and personal security.  Killing electricity means killing people, plain and simple.

Anti-carbon Dems won't be happy until Americans suffer like Europeans.  Anti-carbon Democrats don't learn:  They continue to push to close pipelines and power plants while ignoring the dire consequences, now on display across Europe.  On Thursday [10/14/2021], more than 40 New York officials, including likely next mayor Eric Adams, demanded Gov. Kathy Hochul nix permits for a natural-gas plant to replace two in Brooklyn.  The facility would "undermine" New York's "aggressive renewable energy goals," their letter says.  "Aggressive"?  What an understatement:  A 2019 law calls for 70 percent of renewable power by 2030, a goal that could cripple the state.  And it came amid a years-long crusade by ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo to oppose gas pipelines, even as he forced the Indian Point nuclear plant to close.  Meanwhile, Michigan's Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is aiming to shut down a key US-Canadian pipeline, in violation of an international treaty.  That would cut off delivery of more than a half-million barrels of oil and natural gas liquids every day.  Canada has officially invoked the treaty's dispute-resolution clause to block Whitmer.

Los Angeles County votes to phase out oil and gas drilling.  Los Angeles County supervisors voted unanimously Wednesday [9/15/2021] to phase out oil and gas drilling and ban new drill sites in the unincorporated areas of the nation's most populous county.  Over 1,600 active and idle oil and gas wells in the county could be shuttered after the 5-0 vote by the board of supervisors.  A timetable for the phaseout will be decided after the county determines the fastest way to legally shut down the wells.  Among the sites is the Inglewood Oil Field, one of the largest U.S. urban oil fields.  The sprawling, 1,000-acre (405-hectare) site, owned and operated by Sentinel Peak Resources, contains over half the oil and gas wells in the county's unincorporated areas.  The field produced 2.5 million to 3.1 million barrels of oil a year over the past decade, according to the company.

Newspeak Doesn't Change the Fact Natural Gas Is Still Natural.  Academia, gentry class funders and special interests seek unrestrained power to rule the rest of us as if we were but serfs.  Their flagrant use of newspeak, an inartful form of propaganda via the manipulation of words and phrases, must be called out along with the slow but steady squelching of more and more free speech through intimidation, political correctness and subtle exercise of cancel culture sophistry.  Resistance of this on every front is demanded and Mark Mathis delivers.  [Video clip]

Reality Bites Biden's Policies.  The Democrats' idiotic anti-fossil fuel campaign took a hit this week when Biden begged the Saudis to up production after shutting down as much of domestic production as he could.  (Apparently, he believes that oil from the Middle East doesn't affect the climate as much as fossil fuel from Canada and the U.S. Or, if it does affect the climate by warming it, that's now a good thing.) Dane Bjorn Lomborg who, unlike AOC and Greta, knows what he's talking about, explains that more people (166,000 of them) each year die from cold than die from heat.  In like manner to Biden's begging OPEC for more oil, California's loony decarbonization program hit a snag as it is forced to rely on carbon fuels to prevent widespread blackouts.

Now is the Time to Get Serious About Nuclear Energy.  While no other "carbon free" method of producing electricity comes even close to nuclear energy, climate change alarmists refuse to even consider the option.  If you do an objective benefit-cost analysis of nuclear energy compared to the so-called "green energies" of solar and wind you learn that green energies have serious time and space limitations.  For example, you learn that with solar and wind there is a disconnect between when they're produced and when they're consumed.  Nighttime and cloudy days happen, and the wind does not always blow, but the need for electricity goes on.  The only solution to those limitations is reliance on batteries.  Batteries, of course, have their own problems.  It takes at least an hour and usually eight hours to charge an electric vehicle's batteries.  It takes only five minutes to fill your gas tank.

Nunes seeks to stop California from shuttering last nuclear plant amidst energy crisis.  California's push for clean energy has already created hardship for consumers, from a 40% decade-long climb in electricity costs to rolling blackouts that loom as a threat every heat wave.  Now the state is poised to exacerbate that crisis with plans to retire its last remaining, zero-carbon emissions nuclear plant in 2025.  The planned closure of Diablo Canyon, approved by the state in 2018, will take offline another 2200 megawatts of electricity production — nearly 10% of the state's needs — with no ready replacement.  As many as 3 million consumers could be impacted.  Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), one of the senior members of the state's congressional delegation, told Just the News he is moving to stop the closure.

Jane Fonda Encourages Anti-Pipeline Activists in Minnesota to Mess with Critical US Infrastructure.  The 83-year-old Communist and traitor encouraged activists to "raise a ruckus" and create a headache for the Canadian oil company, Enbridge.  "Biden has taken a very clear and very beautiful position on the climate crisis," Hanoi Jane said.  "But we are really facing a potential catastrophe and the science is very clear — it's not enough to do something good here like shutdown Keystone XL, shut down drilling on the Arctic national refuge and then allow Line 3 to go through." "We can't do this in bits and pieces," she added.

Ban on Fossil Fuel Funding Threatens Africa's Future.  Green propaganda, based on unfounded fears of climate doomsday, is beginning to threaten Africa's ambition for developing a reliable and affordable energy sector.  Christians concerned about the world's poor should take notice.  Almost all African countries signed the Paris climate agreement.  Now, in addition to the setbacks incurred due to climate pledges at Paris, the continent is facing a fresh wave of anti-fossil fuel policies and demands from international institutions.  For the people of Africa, this could be lethal.  Abundant, affordable, reliable energy is indispensable to whole societies' rising and staying out of poverty, and fossil fuels are the most affordable, feasible source for that energy.

Democrat Projectionists.  I'm not the first person to note that whatever Democrats accuse their opponents of doing, it is they, in fact, who are doing it.  If you are puzzled why the Biden Administration scotched the Keystone Pipeline but gave a thumbs up on the Russian Nord Stream 2 pipeline to Germany, perhaps this explanation will help.  Under the banner of "green energy" to control emissions.  Germany began shutting down the cleanest emitting power stations:  nuclear.  In 2000, nuclear had a 29.5 percent share of its power generation mix.  In 2020 that share dropped to 11.4 percent and next year every one of its nuclear plants is scheduled to be shut down.  Where will the lost energy generation come from?  Russia.  Do you think that this will place Germany increasingly at the mercy of Russia?  I do, and it's not just Germany.

Oil companies told to stop drilling now to save the planet.  In order to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050, the influential group said in a report Tuesday that investment in new fossil fuel supply projects must stop immediately, and no new coal-fired plants should be approved.  The dramatic recommendations are part of a detailed strategy that the IEA says would result in the world achieving the Paris climate agreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.  Why 1.5 degrees?  Experts have repeatedly warned that exceeding the threshold will contribute to more extreme weather, greater sea level rise, wildfires, floods and food shortages for millions of people.

The Editor says...
"Experts have repeatedly warned" about all kinds of things that never came to pass.  Who are these anonymous experts?  How is CNN so sure they're right?  The proposed solutions would wreck the world-wide economy, and even if the experts are right, you'd never be able to tell if the earth warmed up one or two degrees overnight.  The "experts" are talking about one or two degrees of global warming per century.  That's not an emergency.  That's not a climate crisis.

New IEA Net Zero Roadmap Undermines America's Energy Security.  A new report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) urges investors not to fund new oil, gas or coal projects for the world to reach net-zero emissions by midcentury.  It is the starkest warning yet from the world's leading energy watchdog to curb fossil fuel use.  It is also the most irresponsible.  The Paris-based agency was founded by leading developed countries in response to the energy crises of the 1970s, but its latest report sows the seeds for the next oil shock.

Heirs of oil baron John Rockefeller pledge $30 million of their personal wealth to help protesters BLOCK new oil and gas developments.  Two great-great-grandchildren of Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller Sr. are pouring millions of dollars into an effort aimed at supporting people on the front lines fighting new oil and gas development.  Rebecca Rockefeller Lambert and Peter Gill Case have created the 'Equation Campaign' and pledged a combined $30 million of their personal wealth to the effort.  Among the causes they are supporting are protests against the Keystone pipeline, in the Dakotas, and activists fighting the replacement and expansion of the aging 'Line 3' oil pipeline in northern Minnesota.

Biden's First Hundred Days:  A Failing Report Card.  [Scroll down]  Then there's the XL pipeline's cancellation, a completely irrational act.  Canceling it cost thousands of people jobs.  And what does it accomplish?  The oil from Canada will still come in, but now it will come in by the less safe and more polluting truck and rail.  Jobs lost, and nothing gained.  Indeed, the Biden climate policy, in general, is irrational.  Biden would have the country endure enormous costs for almost no gain in reducing the world's total output of greenhouse gases, particularly since China and India are the major contributors to that output.  Moreover, if Biden were serious about this, he would opt for clean nuclear power and natural gas rather than the unreliable eyesores of wind farms and solar panels.

13 largest U.S. electricity firms push 80% cut in carbon emissions ahead of Biden's climate summit.  Thirteen of the nation's leading electricity companies are pledging to work with President Biden to slash carbon emissions ahead of Thursday's international White House summit on climate change.  On Friday [4/16/2021], the companies sent a letter to Mr. Biden urging the administration to design a wide-reaching energy agenda to curb carbon emission more than 80% below 2005 levels by 2030.  "A federal policy framework can be designed to support the power sector's deployment of strategies that are technically feasible, ensure reliability, and maintain affordability for customers," the companies wrote.

Banks Face Growing Pressure to Phase Out Fossil-Fuel Lending.  Investors managing $11 trillion have called on the world's biggest banks to phase out financing of fossil-fuel companies and throw their weight behind the goals of the Paris climate agreement.  Asset managers, including Federated Hermes Inc.'s EOS division and Pacific Investment Management Co., have asked 27 banks to commit to eliminating emissions across their operations by 2050, including those generated from lending, trading and underwriting, and set interim reduction targets.  The group of 35 investors, which was convened by the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, also said the banks should expand their green finance activities and withdraw from any projects that are at odds with the Paris accord.

Biden 'Environmental Justice' Appointees Equate Energy Production, Fossil Fuels With Racism.  In February, Beverly Wright linked the legacy of slavery and the Jim Crow era with energy development.  In March, President Joe Biden appointed Wright to his White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council.  Wright, the founder of the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice, is joined on the council by Jade Begay of the Indigenous Environmental Network, who co-wrote a 2018 op-ed in EcoWatch contending that climate change is "colonialism" and "cultural genocide."  Biden has named several activists that tie energy development to racial bigotry to the Environmental Justice Advisory Council.

A gas stove
Climate activists want to get rid of gas stoves, whether you like it or not.  Today [2/23/2021] the Washington Post published a story about the battle over the use of natural gas in homes and kitchens.  This is ultimately a battle between consumers, many of whom like their gas stoves, and activists who want to see gas removed from home heating and cooking in favor of electric appliances.  Naturally, this is a fight that began in Berkeley, California.

Biden's next big pipeline decision could deepen clash of greens and unions.  President Biden's pending decision whether to shut down the controversial Dakota Access oil pipeline could deepen early tensions between environmentalists and unions that endorsed him.  Biden's day-one order to revoke a permit for the better-known Keystone XL oil pipeline between Canada and the United States drew backlash from organized labor and some centrist Democrats who say the cancellation will kill thousands of construction jobs.  Now, liberal lawmakers, celebrities, and indigenous leaders have asked the president to shutter Dakota Access, which critics warn would trigger more backlash since the pipeline is already operational, unlike Keystone.  The Dakota Access pipeline has been carrying oil for more than three years from North Dakota to Illinois.

New York City to ban natural gas hookups in new buildings by 2030: mayor.  New York City this week said it will join a growing list of U.S. cities banning natural gas hookups in new buildings.  New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said on Thursday as part of his State of the City address that New York will "ban new fossil fuel connections in new construction by at least 2030."

The Editor asks...
What will be gained from this?

Buyer's Remorse?  Let's Blame the Press.  In his first week in office President Asterisk has done his old boss proud.  In just six days, lunch bucket Joe has signed 36 executive orders and put tens of thousands of jobs at risk.  He's cancelled major construction projects like the Keystone XL pipeline and the border wall — resulting in lost jobs for the very unions who endorsed him.  He is reestablishing a moratorium on energy exploration on federal lands and rejoined the Paris Agreement on climate change.  These orders will cause further job losses in the energy sector and lost revenue in states that supported him. [...] On the campaign trail he promised to end fracking, cancel drilling leases, open the borders, forgive student debt, provide Medicare for all, and rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement.  That this was unknown to his voters is a shocking indictment of the legacy media.

Oil And Gas Producers Pushing Back Hard On Biden Administration.  When Joe Biden signed an order banning any new leases and effectively halting drilling on federal lands for sixty days last week, people in the oil and gas industry were alarmed but not surprised.  Biden had made conflicting promises and claims throughout the primary and the general elections about his plans to satisfy the green lobby and the eco-warriors by "reducing carbon" and tackling Big Oil.  Once he was safely in office, he started delivering on those promises literally on day one.  But that doesn't mean that this is going to be a smooth ride for the "leave it in the ground" crowd that Biden is courting.  There are many companies currently holding contracts that employ tens of thousands of energy industry workers who are now at risk and are exploring their legal options.

Natural Gas Bans Meeting Resistance from Reality.  Some 40 communities in California have implemented bans or restrictions on the use of natural gas, which have ignited a backlash from some of California's prominent Black and Latino leaders, who indicate that the prohibitions on the fuel are a form of regressive tax on low- and middle-income residents.  This battle over the future of residential and commercial use of natural gas in California is an example of regressive taxation.

The Biden-Harris Fracking Plan, Explained.  Democratic vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris twice claimed Wednesday [10/7/2020] that Joe Biden would not ban fracking if he took office, but both Harris and Biden repeatedly said they would support a ban or phase it out during the Democratic primary.  Harris said there was "no question" she favored banning fracking during her failed presidential run.  Biden now says he is only for preventing new fracking leases on federal lands, but he said at a primary debate there would be no room for it in his administration, said at another debate there would be "no new fracking," told a climate activist he would "love to" get rid of it though it would take time, and also said he would "phase out" the practice and get rid of fossil fuels.

The Grifters of the Left.  [Joe] Biden at least got elected by the people of Delaware.  So many of the movers and shakers on the left aren't elected by anybody.  With a lot of them you aren't even allowed to know who they're working for.  Take the environmental movement, as a perfect example.  The enviros make nothing that anybody wants or needs.  In fact, they spend all their time attempting to stop other people from making things people want and need.  There's an entire fake industry that has sprung up out of a governmental impulse, fed by lobbyists and PR consultants and other spin doctors, to take money from taxpayers, rate payers, and other users of energy and feed it into zombie businesses that aren't otherwise competitive in the marketplace.  This industry depends on demonizing fossil fuels and the companies who extract them.  Because if the public were to fully appreciate the good the oil and gas industry has done for America's and the world's economy, it would be very rare that anyone would consent to paying extra for an electric car or wind or solar power.

Joe and Kamala, the Demagogic Duo.  According to media accounts, a "power outage" delayed the debut of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris on Wednesday [8/12/2020] — a foreshadowing of what we can expect from an anti-energy Biden-Harris administration.  Both are committed to an extreme environmentalism that will cripple America's oil and gas industry.  Harris is opposed to all fracking.

Will the Left Kill America's Energy Dominance?  If the "liberal" green movement had the political power during earlier periods of our nation's history that it has now, we would not have built the railroads.  Also, there would be no interstate highway system, and the electric grid system that powers our country would be disconnected and shattered.  What else can one conclude when a significant and vital energy pipeline, the 600-mile Atlantic Coast Pipeline from West Virginia into the southern states, has been canceled because of environmental activist opposition?  Another pipeline, the Dakota Access Pipeline, has been suspended by a federal judge's order in recent days.  Even the urgently needed Keystone XL Pipeline, which will transport natural gas and oil from energy-rich areas in Canada and the Dakotas down to Houston for export and delivery across the country, faces a court-ordered injunction.  These actions are all said to be in the name of wetlands preservation, Endangered Species Act issues and other environmental protections.

Grim Day for Pipelines Shows They're Almost Impossible to Build.  To be an energy superpower, U.S. oil and natural gas requires a suitably gargantuan pipeline network that stretches for millions of miles.  The country's ability to expand that infrastructure is being tested like never before.  In the span of less than 24 hours, a court ordered the Dakota Access crude oil pipeline to shut down and the developers of the Atlantic Coast gas conduit said they were canceling the project.  It was a deluge of bad news for an industry that's increasingly finding that the mega-projects of the past are no longer feasible in the face of unprecedented opposition to fossil fuels and the infrastructure that supports them.  Armed with experienced lawyers and record funding, environmental groups are finding enormous success blocking key pipeline permits in court.

Climate Alarmists Want 'Surgeon General' Warning on Gas Pumps.  From the very onset of the global warming cultural movement, there was some fairly high-level pageantry at work. [...] And despite decades of exponentially escalating propaganda, the climate change crew is still finding new ways to scare the world into their pocket.

Biden Goes Extreme:  Give Oil Industry 'No Ability' To 'Continue To Drill', Take 'Millions' Of Cars Off The Road.  Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden made extreme remarks during CNN's presidential debate on Sunday night [3/15/2020], suggesting that he would end the oil industry's ability to drill, would ban new fracking projects, and would take millions of cars off the road.  "No more subsidies for fossil fuel industry, no more drilling on federal lands, no more drilling including offshore, no ability for the oil industry to continue to drill," Biden said.  "Period.  Ends."

Feds reject removal of 4 Lower Snake River dams in key report.  Years and millions of dollars in the making, a draft federal report on hydroelectric dam operations in the Columbia Basin will not settle the decadeslong fight over saving imperiled salmon in the Columbia and Snake rivers.  Federal agencies found that taking out the dams would "provide a long-term benefit to species that spawn or rear in the mainstem Snake River habitats," but also would have adverse impacts, including increased power costs, a rise in greenhouse gases and reduced reliability of the electric grid.

Oregon governor calls for breaching 4 Snake River dams; Washington's GOP House members outraged.  The governor of Oregon has come out in favor of removing four hydroelectric dams on the Snake River in Washington state, saying that is the best way to increase endangered salmon runs.  Gov. Kate Brown, a Democrat, sent a letter to Washington's Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee this week, offering her support for removing the dams.  Washington, under an initiative spearheaded by Inslee, has been gathering information on what Northwest residents think about breaching the four dams.  That report is expected in early March.

The Editor says...
Hydroelectric power is a rare natural resource.  Hydroelectric generators emit no carbon dioxide.  When the left-wing, tree-hugging, earth-worshiping socialists do away with coal- and natural gas-fired power plants, hydroelectricity will be one of the few remaining options for those of us who enjoy reliable 24/7 electricity.  There is no reason to live in a third-world blackout for the sake of a fish.

Renewable Energy Fairy Tales.  Electricity in the U.S. is generated by using coal, natural gas, nuclear energy and hydroelectricity.  About 7% comes from wind and solar.  Coal is well suited for generating electricity.  We have vast resources and modern plants are nearly pollution free.  But coal is being driven out of business by the Sierra Club that has a long running hysterical campaign against coal.  Although they blame coal for every medical malady imaginable, the real reason the Sierra Club hates coal is that it emits carbon dioxide when burned and they believe that a great global warming disaster from CO2 is looming.  Natural gas is gradually displacing coal because fracking has made it cheap and the plants are cheap to build.  Natural gas can be burned very efficiently and cleanly in combined cycle plants based on gas turbines.  But the Sierra Club does not like natural gas either, even though the natural gas industry gave them millions in the hope of hurting its competitor, coal.  Nuclear electricity does not emit CO2 or noxious substances.  The fuel is extremely cheap, costing much less than already cheap natural gas.  But, in the U.S. the nuclear industry has been driven to the wall by attacks from the environmental movement.  Essentially, they have destroyed the industry with legal and political attacks, making it impossible to build new plants.

Climate Serfdom Is No Future, It's the Road to Destruction.  The political world is saying "no" to policies that make energy less available, more expensive, less reliable, and more intrusive.  Hyperbole of peak demand is going the way of Peak Oil as the hydrocarbon production boom creates its own demand.  Little wonder that compared to 1988 when global warming became a political issue, U.S. fossil-fuel consumption has grown 13 percent despite generous government subsidies to ethanol, wind power, and solar power.  In fact, growth in carbon-based energies in the last 30 years almost matches the total production of these three subsidized renewables, according to statistics compiled by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Florida to buy 20,000 acres in Everglades, largest purchase in 10 years.  A swath of land in the Everglades at the center of a fight between a family determined to drill for oil and a constellation of parties urging them not to might finally have a new future.  The state intends to buy the 20,000 acre tract outright and halt the threat of oil drilling on the protected lands near Broward County's western suburbs, Gov. Ron DeSantis announced Wednesday.

Energy Paradoxes Put Europe in a Precarious Position.  Despite its cool Green parties and ambitious wind and solar agendas, Europe remains by far the world's largest importer of oil and natural gas.  Oil output in the North Sea and off the coast of Norway is declining, and the European Union is quietly looking for fossil fuel energy anywhere it can find it.  Europe itself is naturally rich in fossil fuels.  It likely has more reserves of shale gas than the United States, currently the world's largest producer of both oil and natural gas.  Yet in most European countries, horizontal drilling and fracking to extract gas and oil are either illegal or face so many court challenges and popular protests that they are neither culturally nor economically feasible.  The result is that Europe is almost entirely dependent on Russian, Middle Eastern and African sources of energy.

Triggering A Recession Tops The Dems' Presidential Agendas.  The 2020 Democratic presidential field is in near unanimous agreement that fracking has to be banned or at least regulated to death over time.  It plays well to the party's base, especially its green fringe.  It's also an endorsement of recession.  Joe Biden, currently atop the Democratic primary polls, recently said he would "love to" ban fracking "right now," and would also "love to make sure we can't use any oil or gas, period," reports Common Dreams, a website that caters to leftist and socialist devotees.  But the decelerated Delawarean's plan is to "transition away from" fracking rather than killing it all at once.  So put him in the "slow death" category among Democrat candidates.  Meanwhile, in the summary execution category we find Sens. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and former Indianapolis Mayor Pete Buttigieg.  Warren even said that on the day she is inaugurated, "I will ban fracking — everywhere."

Flood of Oil Is Coming, Complicating Efforts to Fight Global Warming.  A surge of oil production is coming, whether the world needs it or not.  The flood of crude will arrive even as concerns about climate change are growing and worldwide oil demand is slowing.  And it is not coming from the usual producers, but from Brazil, Canada, Norway and Guyana — countries that are either not known for oil or whose production has been lackluster in recent years.

The Editor says...
The article above, apparently from the New York Times and quoted by MSN, reeks with bias.  Oil is not produced and has never been produced "whether the world needs it or not."  Oil production is always a response to steady demand.  The combustion of hydrocarbons (resulting in carbon dioxide as a byproduct) does not cause climate change.  The climate is not changing.  Most of the global warming in the 20th century occurred before 1940, when internal combustion engines were still relatively rare.  An abundant supply of cheap oil is a good thing.  The writers at the New York Times apparently hate America, and can't stand to see capitalism succeed.

Long Island liberals wake up to how green extremism hurts constituents.  "A gas shortage threatens the Long Island region," bleat six Long Island state senators, all Democrats, in a letter pleading for approval of a pipeline proposed to fix the problem — belatedly admitting that the policies they've long favored don't work for their own constituents.  This year, Sens. Todd Kaminsky, John Brooks, James Gaughran, Anna Kaplan, Monica Martinez and Kevin Thomas all voted for Gov. Andrew Cuomo's Green New Deal law, whose very purpose is to further crimp energy supplies, and for a $100 million hike in taxes on energy.  And, as Senate GOP leader John Flanagan (their fellow Long Islander) notes, all were AWOL when the Williams pipeline was up for consideration by the state Department of Environmental Conservation — which recently issued a pseudo-scientific veto of the project.  Or maybe anti-scientific is the right word:  The DEC pretends the Williams pipeline is a threat to water quality.  But it would run under New York Harbor roughly parallel to an existing pipeline (now at capacity).

Green Dream to End Fossil Fuels Also Means Going without Plastics.  The current crop of Democratic Party presidential wannabees have drunk the Green New Deal (GND) Kool-Aid.  Stop fracking!  Stop oil and gas production on federal lands!  Ban offshore oil and gas production!  Most of these "rocket scientists" come from states that import their refined products for transportation fuels and heating oil.  They do not want any of those stinking oil refineries in their backyards but please continue to import the gasoline and diesel from refineries in the Virgin Islands or from Venezuelan-owned refineries.  So where do we get plastics if oil and gas production ceases?

Democrats' Campaign Promise:  We'll Destroy America's Energy Sector, And Economy.  Eight of the remaining Democratic presidential candidates say they want to ban fracking.  Eleven others would limit the process or "regulate it better," says the Washington Post.  Could these politicians possibly be that ignorant of how ruinous their prohibition lust would be in the real world?  First, let's get it straight why the political left hates hydraulic fracturing.  It's not because it's an environmental threat.  They know it's clean process and has been both an ecological and economic boom, in no small part due to the increased production of natural gas, a cleaner alternative to coal for producing electricity.  No, the left loathes fracking because it is so efficient in taking fossil fuel out of the ground.

67 protesters arrested for demonstration at coal power plant.  Scores of climate change protesters were arrested outside a coal power plant in New Hampshire on Saturday [9/28/2019] as they staged a demonstration calling for the facility to be shut down.  About 120 people gathered outside Merrimack Station in Bow, New Hampshire, on Saturday afternoon, with 67 people being arrested, according to the Bow Police Department.

Global energy consumption
One thing to change:  Anecdotes aren't data.  People are terrified of nuclear power (the most scalable form of carbon-free energy) because of images of Three Mile Island (which killed no one), Fukushima (which killed no one; the deaths were caused by the tsunami and a panicked, unnecessary evacuation), and Chernobyl (which killed fewer people than are killed by coal every day).  They imagine that fossil fuels can be replaced by solar energy, without doing the math on how many square miles would have to be tiled with solar panels to satisfy the world's vastly growing thirst for electricity.  And they think that voluntary sacrifices, like unplugging laptop chargers, are a sensible way to deal with climate change.  How do we change this destructive statistical illiteracy and disdain for data?

Kimberley Strassel: 2020 Dems [are] vowing to 'kill every coal job, every oil and gas job' with climate goals.  Wall Street Journal columnist Kimberley Strassel warned on Saturday that 2020 Democratic candidates' climate proposals could cause the loss of millions of jobs.  "When you talk about banning fracking.  When you talk about a carbon-free economy by 2030 or 2050, you are saying 'we are going to kill every coal job in the country, every oil and gas job, all of the shipping jobs that they do — we're talking about millions of positions," Strassel said during the "The Journal Editorial Report."

Seattle Might Ban New Homes and Buildings From Using Natural Gas.  The Seattle Times reports that Seattle's city council is considering legislation which would ban all new homes and buildings within city limits from using natural gas, and mandating that these edifices must use electric heating and cooking.  Councilmember Mike O'Brien will likely introduce the legislation next week.  If passed, it is expected that the regulations will go in effect next summer.  "We know that some people rely on natural gas at home and on the natural-gas industry for jobs, so we want to be thoughtful about how we transition," O'Brien said.  "But in the meantime, let's not continue to make the problem worse."

The Editor says...
This politician says he doesn't want to "make the problem worse."  What problem?  He didn't say, because there is no problem to solve.  Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, if that's what he means.  Mandating electric power instead of natural gas simply means that the gas will be burned at a central power plant instead of individual residences.  Left-wing politicians are really good at offering solutions for which there is no problem.

Joe Biden in New Hampshire:  "I guarantee you we're going to end fossil fuel"; Idiot Leftists Clap Like Monkeys.  It's a cult.  Democrat Joe Biden stumped in New Hampshire:  "I guarantee you we're going to end fossil fuel."  The liberal audience clapped like monkeys.  As Zach Parkinson reported 80 percent of the households in the Granite State are heated by oil, gas, and propane.  The others are burning something else.

Sierra Clubbed.  Why do donors give money to the Sierra Club?  Are they trying to strangle the American economy?  The liberal green group is celebrating its "victory" of putting America's major coal producers out of business — to say nothing of the tens of thousands of miners placed in unemployment lines.  Several thousand more mining jobs were lost last month.  Now the Sierra Club wants to similarly bury the oil and gas industry.  Here is how the Sierra Club spokeswoman, Lena Moffit, explains the strategy:  "We have moved to a very clear and firm and vehement position of opposing gas.  We oppose any new gas-fired power plants.  We also have a policy opposing fracking."

Elizabeth Warren's Energy Plan Is Unplugged From Reality.  Not only does she want to eliminate oil, natural gas, and coal as energy sources, she also wants to get rid of nuclear energy — which, in case you're wondering, emits no CO2.  Warren says, "In my administration, we're not going to build any new nuclear power plants, and we are going to start weaning ourselves off nuclear energy and replacing it with renewable fuels.  We're going to get it all done by 2035, but I hope we're getting it done faster than that.  That's the plan."  To understand how completely detached this idea is from reality, let's look at the data on energy production today, which are helpfully compiled by the Energy Department's Energy Information Administration (EIA).

Democrats [are] struggling to face fact that their plans would all but end fossil fuels.  Most Democratic presidential candidates running for president have rallied around a shared goal:  Cutting greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050.  However, few candidates appear to appreciate the ambition of that target, or explicitly say that it would necessitate almost entirely ending the use of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and gas.  Fossil fuels — petroleum, natural gas, and coal — accounted for 80% of U.S. total energy consumption in 2018, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Without Mining There Is No 'Green Revolution'.  The recent threats by Beijing to cut off American access to critical mineral imports have many Americans wondering why our politicians have allowed the United States to become so overly dependent on China for these valued resources in the first place. [...] The U.S. Geological Survey reports that we still have about 86% of key mineral resources such as copper and zinc remaining in the ground, waiting to be mined.  These resources aren't on environmentally sensitive lands, such as national parks, but on the millions of acres of federal, state and private lands.  The mining isn't happening because of extremely prohibitive environmental rules and a permitting process that can take five to 10 years to open a new mine.  Green groups simply resist almost all new drilling.

The Solar Energy Racket.  [Scroll down]  It is useful to remember that 86% of CO2 emissions come from outside the United States, where they are increasing.  But U.S. emissions have been decreasing due to substitution of natural gas for coal and due to energy conservation.  The other justification for solar is that we will run out of fossil fuels.  The sun won't run out of sunshine for around 10 billion years.  There is no prospect for running out of fossil fuels anytime soon.  Fracking has just unleashed a 100-year supply of natural gas and oil.  The U.S. has coal for 500 years.  The supply of nuclear fuel is, for practical purposes, unlimited.  What we have is an alliance among hysterical environmental groups, profit-making solar developers, and politicians eager to make important friends.  The environmental groups need a stream of impending catastrophes for which they propose impracticable or crackpot solutions.  That's how they excite interest and stay in business.

The trillions of dollars wasted on global warming hysteria, properly deployed, could have improved and saved many lives.  Energy costs are much higher in Britain, due to radical green opposition to the fracking of gassy shales.  The anti-oil-pipeline campaign has cost ~$120 billion dollars in lost oil revenues and destroyed ~200,000 jobs in Alberta and across Canada.  This is an enormous financial and job loss for Canada.  The funds wasted on baseless global warming hysteria, anti-fossil-fuel fanaticism and destructive green energy schemes, properly deployed, could have saved or improved the lives of many millions of people.

"Green" Energy Policies Hurt the Environment, Another Case Study.  Britain has a fracking industry — or could have one, anyway, if it weren't for the Greens' political clout.  It finally became too much for Natascha Engel, Britain's "fracking czar," who quit with a blistering letter of resignation: [...] The United States is the only country to reduce significantly its CO2 emissions; we did it by substituting natural gas for coal in power generation.  But Britain's Greens won't let that country develop its considerable natural gas reserves.

Beto O'Rourke Might Halt New Oil and Gas Drilling on Federal Land.  Former Texas Congressman Beto O'Rourke said Thursday [4/25/2019] he's willing to consider a moratorium on new leases to drill for oil and gas on federal lands as a way to help combat climate change.

The New Nihilism.  Vastly expanded natural gas and oil production has ended the Persian Gulf stranglehold on US foreign policy.  Cheap fuel has empowered the middle classes and helped to expand the economy as well as created trillions of dollars in national treasure.  Yet "The New Green Deal", within a decade after its passing, would call for the end of the internal combustion engine, without ensuring that Americans have reasonable ground, air or sea transportation, affordable methods to heat and cool their homes, or the means to replace the sources of 83 percent of our generated electricity.  Is the point to make power and fuel so expensive that few can use it — on the theory that the planet in 1840 was preferably cooler than it is now?

A nuisance lawsuit turns into a serious problem:
Colorado Supreme Court rules in favor of oil and gas regulators in Martinez environmental case.  The Colorado Supreme Court on Monday [1/14/2019] overturned a lower court's decision that said the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission was required to weigh the impact of oil and gas development on public health and the environment in deciding whether to approve new drilling permits and rules pertaining to the oil and gas industry in Colorado.  Colorado Supreme Court Justice Richard Gabriel wrote the unanimous 7-0 decision that was released Monday [1/14/2019], which found that the COGCC "properly declined to engage in rulemaking to consider a rule" proposed in 2013 by Xiuhtezcatl Martinez and a group of Boulder teenagers.

Ocasio-Cortez: 'There's no debate' that fossil fuel production should stop.  Democratic House candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied an audience of supporters in Washington Thursday evening [10/11/2018] with calls to implement single-payer health care and tuition-free college — along with an appeal to stop fossil fuel production entirely.  Ocasio-Cortez, who is running to represent New York's 14th Congressional District, has made no secret of her opposition to fossil fuels.  She's called for politicians to forsake donations from the industry and is pushing a "Green New Deal" plan which entails a shift to 100 percent renewable energy by 2035.

Is 100 Percent Renewable Energy Possible?  One definition of renewable energy is that it is naturally replenished on a human timescale.  Solar energy and wind energy fit in nicely with that definition.  Most fans of renewable energy explicitly reject renewable hydroelectricity if it involves damming a river.  Most renewable energy-lovers are also dam-haters.  They literally feel that fish are more important than people. [...] Even if hydro were allowed, there are not enough good sites to provide enough energy for the needs of the U.S.

Judge dismisses Chaco-area drilling lawsuit.  Environmental activists are regrouping after a federal judge Monday tossed a lawsuit against the federal government regarding drilling permits in the San Juan Basin, including sites near the Chaco Culture National Historical Park.  Despite an earlier ruling that signaled the claims had merit, United States District Court Judge James Browning issued an opinion and an amended order late Monday [4/23/2018] determining federal land managers did not violate historic preservation laws since they considered the effects of the wells on historical sites.

The Editor says...
In a way, the whole country is a historical site.  I'm not opposed to drilling in "historical sites" that nobody has ever heard of.  Moreover, a private land owner should be able to drill for oil anywhere on his property.  In this case the issue appears to be energy production on federal land, which is so often controversial because the government controls too much land.

Vox's New "Genius" Idea:  Cut Off Fossil Fuel Supplies.  The Vox #fancystats eggheads are at it again with a proposal they're sure will save the environment:  cut off the supplies of fossil fuels.  David Roberts writes the Restricted Supply Side idea is a really good one and believes it could actually help (!?!?!?!?!) the economy.  His particular notation is a study done by London School of Economics and Political Science professor Fergus Green (rather aptly named) and Richard Denniss at Australia Institute.  What's interesting is the fact Green and Denniss don't 100% believe it's feasible, at the moment, and also admit to putting oil, coal, and gas in the same bucket when it comes to "the relative strengths of supply-side policies vary among fossil fuel-types."  It doesn't mean the two aren't planning to try to convince environmentalists to add supply restrictionist policies to their framework.  The key idea on making restricted supplies economically viable has to do with purposefully harming the consumer who uses the item.

Love those 30 year old coal and nuclear plants — nothing gives cheaper electricity.  A US report shows how fantastically cheap and bountiful old coal and nuclear plants are.  The LCOE or the Levelized Cost of Electricity includes the costs of the concrete, turbines, car parks and coal, plus the maintenance and salaries.  It reveals that thirty year old, and even fifty year old coal plants, are the gift from past generations — enormous infrastructure, built and paid for, and ready to churn out bargain electrons.  Or in crazy-land, ready to be blown up.

Subverting US Energy Policies:  A Summary.  Although there has been a lot of press coverage about Russian interference in our political process, they are actually attacking us in a much more effective way, with very little attention being paid to it. [...] There is significant evidence that our country's enemies (esp.  Russia and China) are purposefully subverting our energy sector in a variety of ways.  Of course they are being clandestine about this, in hopes that few citizens will notice.  One of their most effective tactics is for them to support US organizations whose energy agenda is synonymous with theirs.  For example, carefully consider these key energy questions.  Who is it that wants:
  •   US nuclear energy facilities to close down?
  •   US fossil fuel reserves to stay in the ground (onshore and offshore)?
  •   the costs of fossil fuels to go up (e.g. with a carbon tax)?
  •   a high percentage of the US electric grid to be based on unreliable sources?
  •   the US to waste trillions of dollars on unreliable electricity?
  •   our national security weakened by wind energy interference with our military?
If you answered:  "the Sierra Club and their allies," you'd be right.  However the correct answer is also our communist opponents:  Russia and China.

The Real Reason Barack Obama Was Touting The Saudi-Funded Global Warming/Climate Change Hysteria.  The Saudis (as well as Russia and China) spent billions of dollars in media propaganda, university funding, political donations, United Nations funding etc. during Barack Obama's eight years in office to further push the global warming agenda.  None of that effort had anything to do with global warming/climate change though. [...] It should also be noted that that same forces behind all the global warming/climate change propaganda are also the same ones funding the open borders and gun restrictions movement in America as well.  There is no greater collusion of foreign influence upon this country's political process than that.

How Environmentalists Keep Heating Bills High.  How can a nation with massive deposits of very cheap natural gas — such as the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and West Virginia — be importing natural gas?  One reason is that we don't have pipelines to inexpensively transport the natural gas to the Northeast.  Environmentalists who hate oil and gas have spent years blocking this vital infrastructure — not just the Keystone Pipeline but also many other pipelines that should be transporting shale oil and gas efficiently across the country.  It doesn't seem to bother the green groups that the biggest victims of anti-fossil fuel policies are low- and middle-income Americans.

Obama said we can't drill our way to energy independence.  Actually, we did..  In 2012, no less an authority than Barack Obama told us that calling for increased production by increased drilling — "drill, baby, drill," he called it — was not a plan, but rather "a bumper sticker."  Mr. Obama assured us, "You know, we can't just drill our way to lower gas prices," as if all the people who disagreed with him were simply refusing to admit that, deep down, they were wrong and he was right.

The Editor says...
"Drill, baby, drill" was a campaign slogan used by Sarah Palin, not Barack H. Obama.

California Will Block Oil And Coal Shipments, Risks Constitutional Battle.  California officials plan on preventing the federal government from transporting oil and gas using existing pipelines in the state, according to a report Wednesday [2/7/2018] from The San Francisco Chronicle.  Officials on the California Coastal Commission are urging the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) to rescind plans allowing companies to drill for oil off the coast.  They are still hoping for an exemption from the oil drilling plan, that Florida has received.

The Environmentalists' Human Shields.  What was it that took humanity out of a life that was "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short?"  It was cheap power.  It was the ability to heat your home AND cook your food, not having to choose between the two, on a modest income.  Not filling your lungs with smoke from burning wood or animal waste.  Not having to spend back-breaking hours chopping and carrying that wood.  Not losing days from your work and years off your life through those poisonous inhalations and hard labor.  Cheap power is what made modern life possible.  It made everybody's life better, but especially the poor (which is the case for so many other life-changing achievements of capitalism).  It is truly remarkable that "liberals" and "Progressives" champion the most regressive energy policies imaginable.  Higher energy prices generally and electricity prices specifically mean deprivation, hunger, suffering and even death.  And it means these things especially for the poor because the rich are, well, rich.

Green Power is Part Time Power.  24/7 electricity users such as hospitals, trains, factories, refineries, fuel and water pumps, cash registers, infrastructure and mines cannot operate on part-time electricity.  Moreover, every part-time power producer (using sun, wind, batteries, hydro, gas or coal) consumes money full-time for operations, standby, maintenance and replacement.  Each also has to fund its own specialised generators, transmission lines, access roads and workforce.  Electricity becomes both unreliable and expensive, and consumers suffer.  Using taxes, subsidies, dictates and mandates to replace a full-time power producer like coal with up to five part-time power producers only makes sense in the part-time minds that inhabit Greentopia.

8 Really Bad Laws That Went Into Effect Today.  [#5] Fracking ban in Maryland:  After a two year moratorium, Maryland this year passed a complete ban on fracking, which goes into effect today.  The law is not based on sound science but on rank fearmongering.  A 2015 study from Yale found that fracking does not contaminate drinking water, a popular bugaboo for fracking opponents.  The Obama Environmental Protection Agency also found fracking had a negligible effect on drinking water.  Other lies about fracking have also helped to motivate opposition to fracking — fracking does not make it possible to light your drinking water on fire.  Fracking fluid can't seep into groundwater and poison your tap, Fracking doesn't increase air pollution.  It doesn't cause cancer.  And the natural gas freed by fracking is decidedly better than coal.

Now it's a War on Pipelines.  For years, activists claimed the world was rapidly depleting its oil and natural gas supplies.  The fracking revolution (horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing) obliterated that argument, by sending US oil and gas production to new heights.  Indeed, record gas supplies and plummeting gas prices combined with the Obama EPA war on coal to shutter many coal-fired power plants.  So the battle increasingly shifted to the far more emotional claim that continued reliance on fossil fuels (which provide over 80% of the US and global energy that powers modern civilization and living standards) will cause dangerous manmade global warming and climate change.  This gave birth to the climate and renewable energy consortium and the "keep it in the ground" movement.  No evidence to the contrary will budge them from their hysteria-laden talking points on looming climate cataclysms.

North Carolina Governor Opposes Offshore Drilling.  Putting himself at odds with President Donald Trump, North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper announced he does not want the federal government to allow oil and gas exploration or production off the state's coast.  Cooper's position marks a reversal of policy from his predecessor, Gov. Pat McCrory, who favored oil and gas exploration off North Carolina's portion of the Outer Continental Shelf.  "I can sum it up in four words:  not off our coast," Cooper said at a July 20 Atlantic Beach, North Carolina press conference.  "It is simply not worth the risk."

Dakota Access Pipeline Developer Sues Greenpeace Over 'Eco-Terrorist' Campaign.  Energy Transfer Partners, the developer behind the Dakota Access Pipeline, has sued Greenpeace and several other groups for what it calls a 'campaigns of misinformation."  ETP argues in the lawsuit filed Tuesday [8/22/2017] that environmental groups are running a racket designed to raise money by emotionalizing issues.

Lawmakers Cite Evidence Russia 'Colludes' With US Green Groups to Block Fracking.  Forget about allegations of Russian interference in U.S. presidential elections for a moment, or even "collusion" between Russian officials and Trump campaign operatives.  The real action is in the European and U.S. energy markets, according to a letter from two Texas congressmen to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin that details what they call "a covert anti-fracking campaign" with "little or no paper trail."  The Daily Signal obtained a copy of the June 29 letter to Mnuchin from Reps.  Lamar Smith and Randy Weber, both Republicans who chair energy-related House panels.

Why the Greens Hate Nuclear Power.  Let's stretch our imaginations for a moment and assume that the left is right that global warming will bring apocalyptic warming by the end of the century and that the only way to save the planet from extinction is to stop using fossil fuels right now.  That will be a spectacular disruption to world economic prosperity, because cheap fossil fuels account for about two-thirds of all electric power generation and at least 80 percent of transportation fuel.  But if we did stop using fossil fuels, what would make the most sense as a mass-scale substitute to coal, natural gas and oil?  What could reduce carbon emissions while also keeping energy affordable and reliable?  If you answered "wind and solar power," you flunk.

Why I Spend So Much Time and Effort on Climate Skepticism.  It is now clearer than ever that the alarmists have no intention of reaching a symbolic compromise that while unjustified might be livable by the rest of society.  Rather, their apparent intention is to keep pushing the US and other developed countries into a fossil fuel-less society in which all energy used will come from wind and solar or a few other "renewables" but not including either hydro or nuclear.  This is just what the Democratic Party included in its Party platform last year.  And if their candidate had won, this is exactly what the US would now be trying to do.  She even endorsed Al Gore's objectives just before the election, perhaps in hopes of added votes from "environmentalists."  If this had happened, this is a recipe for a financial disaster and probably the end of the US as a global innovator and economic leader.

Apocalyptic Progressivism.  During the 2008 campaign, gas prices at one point averaged over $4 a gallon.  Then-candidate Obama reacted by pushing a green agenda — as if the cash-strapped but skeptical public could be pushed into alternative energy agendas.  Obama mocked then-Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin's prescient advice to "drill, baby, drill" — as if Palin's endorsement of new technologies such as fracking and horizontal drilling could never ensure consumers plentiful fuel.  Instead, in September 2008, Steven Chu, who would go on to become Obama's secretary of energy, told the Wall Street Journal that, "Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe."

Australia's green delusions:  A diesel in the shed.  Today, after Aussies have enjoyed decades of abundant reliable cheap electricity from coal, green energy gambling has taken Australia back to the era that kept a diesel in the shed.  Tasmania is the greenest state in Australia.  It once had a vibrant economy that created mines, sawmills, farms, orchards, oil and metal refineries, dams, hydro-power, and railways.  It is now a green no-go land.  Greens have stopped new hydro developments, opposed mining, crippled the timber industry, prevented new wood chip developments, and will probably celebrate when the last refinery closes.

The Pigpen Left:  Dead body found in DAPL protest debris.  With the snows melting in icy North Dakota, the mounds of frozen garbage left by far-left Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) protesters are finally being cleared.  What should the police find in all those acres of debris?  A dead body, not surprisingly, nestled among all the garbage-barge-like flotsam and jetsam such Occupy-inspired campout protests always leave in their wake.  The body was of a California man who hung out at protests as an "activist" and who had been reported missing by his stepbrother last October.  It was found in the Cannonball River, where it had been left among all the detritus of the protesters, apparently none of them particularly caring, yet all full of self-righteous virtuousness about saving the earth as their demonstration spun into chaos.  That's right:  they left a fellow protester's dead body behind in a river but piously lectured the people of the North Dakota about the horrors of the Dakota Access Pipeline polluting some lake.

Animal rescue finds dogs left behind amid tons of trash at Dakota Access protest camp.  Along with tons of garbage left behind at the Dakota Access protest camp, at least eight dogs have been discovered since protesters departed last week under a federal evacuation order.  The canines — two adults and six puppies — were picked up by volunteers with Furry Friends Rockin' Rescue after the last of the protesters exited the Oceti Sakowin camp, allowing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to join the massive cleanup effort.

Arson is certainly a way to go out with a bang, but aren't these the same people who said they were worried about pollution?
Dakota Access campsite goes up in flames:  Protesters set fire to their tents as deadline to evacuate looms.  Several protesters who camped out on federal land near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation were arrested Wednesday after the Army Corps of Engineers began to shut down the area.  Those at the six-month-old camp had until 2pm local time (3pm EST) to get off the land before authorities went in to either give them a bus home or arrest them.  About 100 protesters voluntarily left before the 2pm state deadline, but a total of 10 were taken into custody. [...] Demonstrators also torched their tents as the deadline to evacuate approached.

Sanitation Crews Search for Dead Bodies Amid Piles of Pipeline Protester Trash.  Authorities in North Dakota are working to prevent an environmental catastrophe caused by the massive amounts of trash left behind by anti-oil pipeline protesters, local media report.  State and tribal sanitation crews are rushing to remove piles of waste and debris left over from the protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline before weather warms and the mountains of trash turn toxic.  According to cleaning crews, they're worried they might even find dead bodies among the piles of refuse that now pollute areas where anti-pipeline protesters camped out for months.

The Environmental Left and Keystone XL.  [Scroll down]  With respect to climate change, Keystone XL would transport 830,000 barrels per day of Canadian crude oil, the total GHG emissions from which would be 147 [to] 159 million metric tons per year on a life-cycle basis.  In the extreme case in which that oil does not displace any other crude oil production elsewhere in the world, the increase in GHG emissions would be about 0.4 percent of the world total.  So:  what would the resulting temperature effect be in the year 2100, using the National Center for Atmospheric Research climate model, under the highest IPCC assumption about the climate sensitivity of increasing greenhouse gas concentrations?  Answer:  about four ten-thousandths of a degree, a number rather inconsistent with apocalypse view of Keystone XL as a "carbon bomb that would cook the planet."

Dakota Access Pipeline protest leader charged with inciting a riot, 74 arrested.  Dakota Access Pipeline protester Chase Iron Eyes was arrested this week and has been charged with inciting a riot, which is a felony.  Iron Eyes allegedly led a group of several dozen protesters who set up a new camp on higher ground, out of the flood plain where the current camp sits.  The only problem:  The property the new camp was set up on is owned by the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Dakota Access Pipeline protesters evicted over pollution concerns.  A few days after his inauguration, President Donald Trump signed executive orders moving the approval process for the Keystone and Dakota Access pipelines forward.  A week later, the then acting secretary of the Army instructed federal officials to issue the easement necessary to build a controversial segment of the Dakota Access pipeline.  Now, the Corps of Engineers has issued an eviction notice to the protesters who have plagued the construction of the pipeline ... because they are polluting the environment.

Dakota Access Pipeline:  Easement Expected to Allow Project to Be Completed.  The controversial Dakota Access pipeline will receive a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to allow construction of the $3.7 billion project to be completed, according to North Dakota Senator Heidi Heitkamp.  The pipeline has been at the center of months of protests that has galvanized Native Americans and environmental activists.  It would carry oil from North Dakota, through South Dakota and Iowa to be shipped out of Illinois.  Members of Congress were notified of the decision earlier on Tuesday [1/31/2017], according to two sources with knowledge of the decision.

N.D. Sen.: Army Corps told to allow construction of pipeline.  The Army Corps of Engineers was ordered to allow construction of the Dakota Access pipeline to proceed under a disputed Missouri River crossing, North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven said on Tuesday [1/31/2017], the latest twist in a months-long legal battle over the $3.8 billion project.  The Standing Rock Sioux, whose opposition to the project attracted thousands of supporters from around the country to North Dakota, immediately vowed to again go to court to stop it.

North Dakota wants hired pipeline protesters to pay state income taxes.  After spending more than $22 million on the Dakota Access pipeline protest, North Dakota wants to make sure any paid activists remember to submit their state income taxes.  Tax Commissioner Ryan Rauschenberger said his office is keeping an eye out for tax forms from environmental groups that may have hired protesters to agitate against the 1,172-mile, four-state pipeline project.  "It's something we're looking at.  I can tell you I've had a number of conversations with legislators regarding this very issue," said Mr. Rauschenberger.  "[We're] looking at the entities that have potential paid contractors here on their behalf doing work."

The Editor says...
What could be more heartwarming than to watch the tax-and-spend liberals go after the anti-capitalist liberals?  The earth-worshiping hippies are about to learn that their liberal utopia comes at a higher price than they had anticipated.

Islamists Join Environmentalists At Standing Rock To Delegitimize America.  In ironic ways, Standing Rock united America.  Positioned as a moral issue that merged land rights with environmental activism, Standing Rock captured the collective imagination of America's varied activist groups.  Since they are far better organized and more comfortable with "direct action" than conservatives are, Islamists seized the opportunity Standing Rock presented to elevate their platform.  Once Standing Rock gained national attention, various chapters and supporters of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations joined the battle.

Green Weenie of the Week:  Standing Rock Blockheads.  This news story from Reuters requires no commentary to explain why the pretentious protesters against the Dakota Access Pipeline near Standing Rock deserve a coveted Power Line Green Weenie Award.

Pipeline protests resume after Trump revives Keystone, Dakota projects.  Holding hands, hundreds of protesters opposed to the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines took to the streets of Washington Tuesday night [1/24/2017] for a fresh round of demonstrations after President Trump signed executive orders clearing the way for the controversial projects to move forward.

Malia Obama gets political at Sundance.  Malia Obama got political at Sundance by attending an event in protest of the Dakota Access Pipeline on Monday [1/23/2017].  "It was amazing to see Malia," activist and actress Shailene Woodley told Democracy Now.  "To witness a human being and a woman coming into her own outside of her family and outside of the attachments that this country has on her ... because she recognizes, regardless of her last name, that if she doesn't participate in democracy, there will be no world for her future children."

The Editor says...
It is apparent that young Ms. Obama believes that the world will come to an end if the Dakota Access Pipeline is completed.  This level of ignorance and superstition is almost unimaginable.

North Dakota tribe formally calls on pipeline protesters to disperse.  A Sioux tribal council on Saturday [1/21/2017] formally asked hundreds of protesters to clear out of three camps near its North Dakota reservation used to stage months of sometimes violent protests against the proposed Dakota Access Pipeline.  The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe on Friday unanimously passed a resolution calling for the camps to be dismantled, it said on its Facebook page on Saturday.  The tribe has been encouraging protesters to go home since the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers agreed to an environmental review of the $3.8 billion project in December.

Dakota pipeline protester will defy grand jury to "keep his dignity".  The Dakota Access Pipeline protests have largely faded into memory of late.  This is largely because they're in North Dakota... and it's January.  But that doesn't mean that all of the legal activity surrounding this mess is over by a long shot.  One rather nasty incident which took place back when the weather was a bit more tolerable was the serious injury suffered by Sophia Wilansky, the 21 year old professional protester from New York.

Native Americans fight Texas pipeline using 'same model as Standing Rock'.  Indigenous activists have set up camps in the Texas desert to fight a pipeline project there, the latest sign that the Standing Rock "water protector" movement is inspiring Native American-led environmental protests across the US.  The Two Rivers camp, located south of Marfa near the border, has attracted dozens of demonstrators in its first week to protest the Trans-Pecos pipeline, a 148-mile project on track to transport fracked natural gas through the Big Bend region to Mexico.

Pipeline protesters arrested at Vikings stadium.  Minneapolis police have arrested two Dakota Access oil pipeline protesters who unfurled a huge banner inside U.S. Bank Stadium during a Minnesota Vikings game.  The man and woman were arrested Sunday afternoon after climbing into a catwalk just after the Vikings' season finale against the Chicago Bears ended around 3 p.m. [1/1/2017]

Report: Obama Will Permanently Block Arctic Drilling Before Trump Takes Office.  The Obama administration will use a legal strategy crafted by environmental activists to remove sections of the Arctic and Atlantic oceans from future offshore drilling lease sales, according to two sources familiar with the plan told Bloomberg.  For months, environmentalists have been urging President Barack Obama to use Section 12(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, a 1953 law governing offshore drilling, in a way it's never been used before — to block offshore drilling leases in the Atlantic Ocean and the Chukchi and Beaufort seas.

Pipeline protest
Sometimes A Picture Speaks More Loudly Than Words.  The Standing Rock Sioux, a tribe of about 10,000, are leading the protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, which they claim could pollute the Missouri River, the tribe's main source of drinking water, and harm cultural lands and tribal burial grounds.  The tribe is working with the environmental group Earthjustice and has filed suit against the Army Corps of Engineers, claiming the government didn't properly consult them before approving the section of pipeline that runs near the reservation.  Energy Transfer Partners, the company building the pipeline, says it has followed state and federal rules, met with Native American tribes, and proposed different versions of the pipeline route.  The pipeline is 92 percent complete, only the small portion near the reservation is being contested.  The pipeline does not enter the Standing Rock reservation.

Trump's Energy Revolution Can't Come Soon Enough.  In July, the Corps said it had approved 200 water crossings and easements for the 1,172-mile pipeline to cross Lake Oahe, Lake Sakakawea and the Missouri River.  When it's finished, the $3.8 billion project will transport 450,000 barrels of oil a day from western North Dakota to Patoka, Ill.  But then protests erupted, fueled by environmentalist and misguided Native Americans, who said the pipeline's crossing of Lake Oahe could pollute water of the Standing Rock Sioux reservation in North Dakota.  In September, President Obama egged the protestors on and said the Corps would look for alternative routes.  On Sunday [12/4/2016], the Army Corps decided to overturn itself, and deny the Lake Oahe easement until it explores these alleged alternative routes.

Van Jones on Pipeline Protest: 'This Feels Like Selma!  It Feels Like Montgomery!'  Van Jones, a CNN commentator and former adviser to President Obama, on Monday compared the pipeline protest in Cannon Ball, North Dakota to the civil rights movement of the 1960s:  "This feels like Selma!  It feels like Montgomery!  It feels like a time when a group that nobody paid attention to, black folks in the South, stood up and the world stood with them, so it's a very powerful, emotional moment, I think, for the tribal communities," Jones told CNN's "New Day."

Trump supports completion of Dakota Access Pipeline.  U.S. President-elect Donald Trump on Thursday [12/1/2016] said for the first time that he supports the completion of a pipeline project near a North Dakota Indian reservation, which has been the subject of months of protests by tribes and environmentalists.  A communications briefing from Trump's transition team said despite media reports that Trump owns a stake in Energy Transfer Partners, the company building the pipeline, Trump's support of the pipeline "has nothing to do with his personal investments and everything to do with promoting policies that benefit all Americans."

Dakota Access pipeline protest erupts into 'ongoing riot'.  Tension flared anew on the Dakota Access pipeline as protesters tried to push past a long-blocked bridge on a state highway, only to be turned back by a line of law enforcement using water cannon and what appeared to be tear gas.

Green Energy Companies Helped Bankroll Tribe Behind Dakota Protests.  Two green energy companies contributed a quarter of a million dollars to the American Indian tribe spearheading a months-long demonstration against an oil pipeline in North Dakota.  Standing Rock Sioux voted unanimously April 5 to accept two $150,000 donations from ConEdison Development and Fagen Inc., both of which have partnered up to build windmills in the North Dakota area, according to internal documents kept by the tribe.  ConEdison Development acquired land near Standing Rock's reservation and began construction on a wind power facility last year.  Fagen was a contractor on the project.

What a Trump Presidency Might Mean for Your Electric Bill.  Solar and wind power, intermittent by nature, are nothing without the backup provided by natural gas — a fact lost on the Sierra Club, whose goal of moving "beyond natural gas" would move us beyond modernity and into a state of perpetual brownouts.  Relatively cheap natural gas remains critical to the long-term success of renewable energy, and Trump has made clear his commitment to the infrastructure and political support necessary to ensure its procurement.

World War II memorial vandalized in apparent pipeline protest.  Someone who was against the Dakota Access Pipeline apparently vandalized the World War II memorial in Washington, the National Park Service said Tuesday [11/8/2016].  Spokesman Mike Litterst said someone spray-painted the North Dakota section of the memorial.  A photo provided by the park service showed the phrase "#NoDAPL" was written in paint.  The Standing Rock Sioux tribe has been fighting along with other tribes and environmental groups to stop the completion of the $3.8 billion pipeline, saying it would threaten the water supply for millions of people.  Supporters say the pipeline is a safer way to move oil than trucks and trains.

Vote Republican to keep the lights on.  The U.S. is now the world's largest producer of oil and natural gas, despite President Obama's costly energy regulations.  Hillary Clinton is campaigning for the presidency not by celebrating the shale extraction that has made us less dependent on energy from parts of the world hostile to America.  Rather, she focuses on renewable energy, claiming that it can supply a third of electricity needs.  Where Obama talked about an "all of the above" energy policy, Clinton focuses on "clean energy" with a $60 billion Clean Energy Challenge aimed at expanding the role of renewables, such as wind and solar power.  She has pledged to cut oil consumption by a third and generate enough from renewable sources to power every home in the country.

Photo by Mike McCleary of The Bismarck Tribune
Some Standing Rock Sioux want pipeline activists to go home as violence escalates.  The thousands of anti-pipeline protesters creating mayhem in rural North Dakota are wearing out their welcome with some members of the Standing Rock Sioux.  Robert Fool Bear Sr., a tribal district chairman, said the outside activists camping out near Cannon Ball are creating headaches for the locals as the Dakota Access pipeline protest approaches three months.  As far as Mr. Fool Bear is concerned, Standing Rock Sioux Chairman David Archambault II should tell them to pack their bags.

The Editor says...
I presume that the pipeline protesters set fire to this pile of trash and old tires as part of their tantrum.  This is remarkable, because their alleged concern about the pipeline is that it might potentially someday leak and pollute the water table.  In reality, these people are probably the worst polluters in the state this week.  Hypocrites!

Company asks pipeline protesters to leave North Dakota land.  The developer of the Dakota Access oil pipeline said Tuesday [10/25/2016] that the dozens of protesters who have camped on company-owned land since the weekend are trespassing and that "lawless behavior will not be tolerated."

Sheriff warns of North Dakota pipeline protesters' criminal pasts as more arrests made.  More demonstrators were arrested Saturday for infiltrating the Dakota Access pipeline construction site as law enforcement warned about a coterie of activists with lengthy criminal records inside the protest camps.  The Morton County [N.D.] Sheriff's Department reported closing down Highway 1806 and arresting 83 people on rioting charges after about 300 protesters marched three miles into private property at a construction site for the pipeline project.  Officers used pepper spray against some activists after they tried to break the police line, during which one protester grabbed a canister and sprayed an officer in the face.

Industry [says] Obama [is] unraveling [the] rule of law with Dakota Access stoppage.  The Obama administration may be unraveling the very fabric of U.S. democracy by holding up the approval of the Dakota Access oil pipeline after a federal court said it could move ahead, a coalition of diverse industry groups said in a letter sent Thursday night [10/20/2016] to Attorney General Loretta Lynch and other federal agency officials. [...] The Dakota Access pipeline has become a symbol for the environmentalist movement in recent weeks, where activists and some Democrats have galvanized opposition against the pipeline as an affront to tribal rights and as a way to combat climate change.  But with the pipeline going through two federal courts for review, and both saying it can go forward, it would appear that politics is taking over where the law has left off, say observers.

Report: 'Keep It In The Ground' Policy Would Cost Billions, 380,000 Jobs.  A recent report by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Institute for 21st Century Energy, estimates if the United States adopts a "Keep It in the Ground" (KG) policy — advocated by major environmental groups wishing to end the development of fossil fuels on federal holdings — the U.S. economy and government revenues would suffer greatly.  The report, titled What If ... Energy Production Was Banned on Federal Lands and Waters?, projects up to 25 percent of U.S. oil, gas, and coal production would be abruptly stopped if KG is implemented.  Among the potential consequences of such a policy are federal and state governments would lose an estimated $11.3 billion per year in royalties and rental fees.  The report also estimates the economy would lose 380,000 jobs, and the authors say as much as $70 billion per year of gross domestic product could be threatened.

Hillary's In League With Groups To Destroy Energy Independence.  This week, Politico reported that Hillary Clinton is aligned with the same groups who are pushing to end the use of coal and shale energy in the United States.  These policies will be destructive to states like Pennsylvania, Ohio and Colorado and severely impact energy rates and jobs across the country.

Green Pixie Dust Energy Policies.  [The Democratic Party Platform] supports impeding or rejecting oil and gas leasing, drilling, fracking and pipelines, as well as gas-fired power plants — while accelerating and incentivizing wind and solar installations and transmission lines.  It says America should "lead the fight against climate change," locally and globally.  Meanwhile, Mrs. Clinton has said she would stringently regulate hydraulic fracturing, banning oil and gas extraction from public lands is a "done deal," and her party is "going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business."  (But it will re-train miners and fund their pensions with taxes and red ink.)  In short, Democrats support a government mandated and regulated energy system that would require constant infusions of taxpayer and consumer subsidies via grants, loans, feed-in tariffs and crony-corporatist arrangements.  It will oppose fossil fuels that provide reliable, affordable energy [...]

Only Canada lets 8377 "losers" and "paid harassers" delay a $36B energy project.  After a three-year delay, Ottawa approves a $36 billion energy project in British Columbia.  Natural gas will be produced through fracking, piped to the coast, liquefied — that's what LNG means, liquefied natural gas — then shipped to Asia.

The Obama Administration Temporarily Blocks the Dakota Access Pipeline.  The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the hundreds of Native protestors who have joined them in rural North Dakota won a huge but provisional victory in their quest to stop the Dakota Access pipeline, as the U.S. government announced late on Friday afternoon [9/9/2016] that it was voluntarily halting work on the project.

Activists, Feds Block Two Proposed LNG Export Terminals in Oregon.  The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) denied on March 11 an application for the construction of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal proposed for Oregon's Jordan Cove.  FERC's decision surprised many.  The agency had approved the LNG terminal's environmental impact statement in December 2015, clearing the way for the project's long-awaited construction.  Just one month prior to the Jordan Cove project's cancellation and after a decade of haggling with local officials and fighting with environmental activists, Oregon LNG, another LNG developer, informed local and state officials it was withdrawing its proposed $6 billion LNG terminal and pipeline, which had been planned to be built on the nearby Skipanon Peninsula.  On April 15, The Daily Astorian reported a "coalition of residents, environmentalists and fishermen" had put significant pressure on government officials to deny the LNG proposals.  According to the Astorian, the coalition "attacked the project as misguided and potentially dangerous."

Book review:
The Global War Against Fossil Fuels.  The global war against fossil fuels is a war against progress, prosperity, and the poor.  No one has ever explained this better than Stephen Moore and Kathleen Hartnett White do in Fueling Freedom.

The few, the loud, the anti-fossil fuel crowd.  If you get your news from the mainstream media, you likely think the views expressed by the environmental activists represent the majority of Americans.  After all, their highly visible protests against the Keystone pipeline — sit-ins in front of the White House, locking themselves to the White House fence and then being arrested for it, and parading down the National Mall carrying a huge inflated tube emblazoned with the words:  "Just say no to Keystone" — were effective.  Despite repeated polling that showed a majority of Americans supported the pipeline, with a small minority opposed, the loud theatrics of the anti-fossil fuel crowd eventually won out.  After years of stall tactics, President Obama finally bowed to their demands and said no to the job-creating infrastructure project.

Feds Sued For Illegally Refusing To Sell Oil Leases.  Western Energy Alliance (WEA), an industry-aligned interest group, sued the Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Thursday [8/11/2016] for failing to hold quarterly oil and natural gas lease sales on public lands.  Though the Mineral Leasing Act requires BLM to hold quarterly oil and natural gas lease sales in each state where lands are available and industry interest exists, the agency has cancelled lease sales and auctions during the Obama administration.  Environmental groups have simultaneously organized to lobby the federal government to postpone the sales so as to discourage or delay drilling on the public range.

Germany waters down climate protection plan.  Germany has abandoned plans to set out a timetable to exit coal-fired power production and scrapped C02 emissions reduction goals for individual sectors, according to the latest draft of an environment ministry document seen by Reuters on Wednesday [6/29/2016].  An earlier version of the draft document that was leaked in May had suggested that Germany should phase out coal-fired power production "well before 2050" as part of a package of measures to help Berlin achieve its climate goals.

Energiewoopsie, Or, What Happens When You Dump Nuclear Power.  The greens have been aflutter for years about Germany's energiewende, or "energy revolution," partly because it involves a lot of their sacred windmills and solar panels and partly because it's a revolution man, so dig it!  Better put the patchouli-infused hemp robes away for the moment, because Germany is backpedalling fast.

Al Gore's daughter arrested in Boston pipeline protest.  Organizers say the daughter of former Vice President Al Gore was among 23 people arrested during a protest of a Boston pipeline under construction.  The arrests happened Wednesday at the site of Spectra Energy's West Roxbury Lateral pipeline.  Forty-two-year-old Karenna Gore was among demonstrators that tried to block construction activity on the site by lying in a trench.

Natural Gas Production Declines on Federal Lands.  Natural gas production has declined on federal lands even while increasing on private property, according to a report from the Congressional Research Service.  Private lands produced 15,601 billion cubic feet of natural gas in 2010.  Production has grown by 55 percent on private lands, rising to 24,143 billion cubic feet in 2015, the latest year for which data is available.  Natural gas production on federal lands has declined by 27 percent since 2010.  Private lands also produce a greater share of the total natural gas produced in the United States.  Privately held property produced 84 percent of the total natural gas produced in the entire United States in 2015, while federal lands produced only 16 percent of the total.

U.S. "built the equivalent of ten Keystone pipelines" while stalling XL extension on "climate change" grounds.  The United States has built the equivalent of ten Keystone XL pipelines while figuring out whether to approve the extension.  They've surpassed Saudi Arabia in oil and gas production with horizontal drilling techniques which have made their once inaccessible resources accessible, putting them into competitor status.  With the third largest oil reserves in the world, Canada has the potential to surpass the U.S. in production and exports but they're not being tapped because we're buying into the climate change and environmental fear mongering whipped up by a country that has surpassed the largest producer in the world.

Taxpayers Finance Anti-Pipeline Activists.  An obscure program nestled deep in the bowels of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) is funneling taxpayer money to environmental activists who oppose natural gas pipelines, according to an investigative report issued by InsideSources.  In 2009, Congress created the Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) program in DOT's Pipelines and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) to provide funding to nonprofits and local governments to act to "improve damage prevention, develop new technologies, or otherwise improve [the] pipeline safety" of natural gas and hazardous liquids pipelines.  During the first five years of the program, over $6.4 million in TAG grants were awarded to 110 recipients.  While much of the money has gone to organizations undertaking projects to improve pipeline safety, InsideSources uncovered several instances where TAG grantees had clear conflicts of interest and engaged in advocacy, in violation of the program's guidelines.

New Rules Expected to Curtail Gulf Oil Production.  The Obama administration finalized new rules it says will improve drilling safety in the Gulf of Mexico, but some experts are saying the regulations will undermine safety.  The Interior Department, which is responsible for licensing and regulating oil and gas production on the U.S. outer-continental shelf, unveiled the sweeping new regulations on April 14, 2016.  The centerpiece of the new regulations is a plan to monitor the safety of offshore wells.  Under the regulations, monitoring of well safety would shift from being located on-site — at the offshore drilling platform — to being stationed at onshore electronic observation centers.

Climate Weenies Held Protests Against Fossil Fuels.  I've perused many, many articles on this, and not one reporter asked any of the protesters two simple questions:
  •   Did you take a fossil fueled vehicle to this protest?
  •   Have you given up your own use of fossil fuels in your own life?  Warmists really do not like questions like that.  They say they are immaterial, because "we all have to make sacrifices in our lives", meaning that Government must be empowered to force these changes.  It also means that they know they are hypocrites, and unwilling to practice what they preach, so, they need to change the conversation.

Don't Let The Nuts Keep America's National Treasure Buried.  Thanks to the technological miracle of "fracking," America now has the proven reserves to be the world's number one producer of oil, number one producer of natural gas, and number one producer of coal.  Imagine what that would be like for America's own economy to include the world leading industries of all three of these crucial sources of energy.  America would then be the Saudi Arabia of oil, the Saudi Arabia of natural gas, and the Saudi Arabia of coal, all within just one economy.  That would mean hundreds of thousands of good paying, blue collar jobs in those three industries alone.

Climate activists protest oil shipments at New York port hub.  Climate activists from around the Northeast gathered Saturday at a key crude oil shipment hub on the Hudson River in upstate New York to denounce fossil fuels and promote an accelerated transition to renewable energy sources.

"Climate Hustle" demolishes climate alarmism.  Without presenting it to the US Senate, as required by the Constitution, President Obama has signed the Paris climate treaty.  He is already using it to further obligate the United States to slash its fossil fuel use, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth[,] control our lives, livelihoods, living standards and liberties[,] and redistribute our wealth.  Poor, minority and working class families will suffer most.  China, India and other developing economies are under no such obligation, unless and until it is in their interest to do so. [...] That's why these countries have built over 1,000 coal-fired power plants and are planning to build 2,300 more — while unaccountable EPA bureaucrats are shutting down US coal-fired generators, and getting ready to block natural gas production and use.

Pipeline-killing Cuomo plainly doesn't care about New York jobs.  Is Gov. Cuomo trying to kill the upstate economy — or is he just so desperate to suck up to enviro-nuts that he doesn't care what happens to that region?  It's a fair question, after his decision to kill the Constitution Pipeline — a vital, 124-mile conduit meant to carry natural gas from Pennsylvania to New York and beyond.  The move "will have a direct and immediate negative impact on our state's economy," says Heather Briccetti, president of the Business Council.

Oregon manages to stop construction of huge LNG export terminal, costing thousands of jobs.  Oregon is always at the forefront of saving the world and every other SJW agenda item these days, or so it seems.  And when it comes to environmental extremists you'll find no lack of them along that stretch of the Pacific coast.  They've scored another huge "victory" this month in the form of halting the proposed construction of a major liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal near the mouth of the Columbia River.  The project had been in the works for years, but took on increased significance after the American energy boom of the past half decade.  The world is hungry for LNG and it represents a major opportunity in terms of evening out our trade imbalance.  But thanks to the dedicated efforts of green energy warriors and Oregon politicians, yet another refusal of a construction permit seems to have been the final straw for The Oregon LNG company and they've pulled the plug on the entire project.

Fighting Junk Science.  The government's Environmental Protection Agency promotes junk science because it gives the bureaucracy mission and funding.  The Sierra Club is little more than a junk science 5th column.  The club has adopted global warming as its primary tool for frightening people into paying dues.  The club's war on coal promotes numerous imaginary scares concerning the alleged toxicity of coal.  The Sierra Club deserves much credit for destroying the nuclear power industry and promoting radiation hysteria to scare [...] everyone in the 1970s and 1980s.  The Sierra Club would rank high in a list of subversive organizations that threaten the national welfare.

Gas pipeline opponents hope to influence NY presidential primary.  Fracktivists, as anti-hydrofracking activists are called, hope to play a role in New York's presidential primary.  They are asking Democrats Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, as well as Republican candidates, to take a stand against the Constitution Pipeline and other natural gas pipelines, that if approved could criss-cross the state.  More than 200 fracktivists held a rally Tuesday [4/5/2016] to oppose natural gas pipelines in New York, and to call on Gov. Andrew Cuomo to ban them.

Obama to Energy Producers: Drop Dead.  You know, I'm starting to think the Obama Administration really doesn't like old-fashioned hydrocarbon energy.  And since when has the Federal government worried about "adverse effects on landowners"??  Well, at least the Obama Administration is going to carry through on allowing new offshore oil drilling.  What's that?  ["]Obama Rejects New Atlantic Ocean Oil Drilling["]

Obama to kill off Arctic oil drilling.  The Obama administration promised to protect Atlantic waters for future generations on Tuesday, raising expectations that waters off the US east coast and Alaska would be protected from oil and gas drilling.  The expected decision reverses Barack Obama's move just last year to open up a vast swath of the Atlantic coast to drilling — and consolidates the president's efforts to protect the Arctic and fight climate change during his final months in the White House.  The five-year drilling plan, which will be formally announced by the Interior Department, was expected to block immediate prospects of hunting for oil in the Arctic and much of the Atlantic, according to those familiar with the proposals.

'Keep it in the ground' at work in the real world.  Going forward, we know what the new year of environmental activism looks like.  They have told us.  They have made it perfectly clear.  They call it:  "Keep it in the ground."  The campaign is about all fossil fuels:  oil, gas, and coal.  Instead of an "all of the above" energy policy, when it comes to fossil fuels, they want "none of the above."  A big part of the effort is focused on preventing the extraction of fossil fuels on public lands — which is supported by presidential candidates Senator Bernie Sanders and Secretary Hillary Clinton.  The recent moratorium of leasing federal lands for coal mining, announced by Secretary of Interior Sally Jewell, is considered a great victory for "keep it in the ground."

America's Energy Outlook Is Bright — and Obama Hates It.  [By 2040, oil and coal] will provide for 80% of the world's energy needs.  Nuclear energy, projected to double by 2040, will provide most of the remaining 20%.  Wind power will deliver a mere 2% of global energy.  Solar even less.  Fortunately, there are ample supplies of oil and gas to power the world economy well beyond 2040.  The International Energy Agency estimates that recoverable oil and condensate resources now stand at 4.5 trillion barrels, replacing earlier "peak oil" estimates of one trillion barrels.  By 2040, it is likely that recoverable oil will have risen again, perhaps by a factor of five and certainly enough to power the global energy through the end of the century.  Recoverable natural gas resources are even greater.  According to IEA, current gas resources are enough to supply the current level of global needs for another 200 years.  And this estimate does not include vast reserves that will result from new exploration and advances in technology.  With the U.S. now self-sufficient and exporting natural gas, the West's energy security is assured to a degree that has not existed in the past.  That's good news for the American people and for the world, even if it is not news that Obama wants to hear.

Republicans furious over Obama move on coal leases.  Congressional Republicans are slamming the Obama administration's decision to halt new coal mining leases on federal land.  Administration officials said Friday [1/15/2016] they would hold off on new lease sales while overhauling the coal leasing program to account for climate change costs.  Republicans, who have badgered Obama for energy and environment policies they say constitute a "war on coal," let loose on the decision Friday.

Obama halts new federal coal mining.  The Obama administration is halting major new leases to mine coal on federal land for about three years as it works to reform the controversial program.  Obama officials want to hold off on the new sales while they figure out how to account for climate change caused when the coal mined on federal land is burned, which could include higher fees and royalties for the private companies that extract the coal.

Obama Brags About Low Energy Prices, Then Proposes To Raise Them.  We did, in fact, "drill our way" to lower gas prices.  Thanks to fracking, oil companies are now able to produce vast amounts of previously unrecoverable oil.  In the past seven years, domestic oil production shot up a stunning 77%, according to the Energy Information Administration, making the U.S. the biggest oil producer in the world.  That's why gas prices are low today.  And why oil imports have dropped so sharply.  And none of it had anything to do with Obama, who tried to hamper oil production whenever he could — blocking Keystone, restrictions on federal lands, EPA attempts to hinder fracking.

Hydroelectric power is handicapped by an outdated licensing process.  "I was talking with someone in the nuclear industry the other day and he said, 'Gee, I didn't realize you people were having the same problems we have.'  When it comes to getting through the permit process, we're not much different from nuclear."  So says Jeff Leahey, deputy executive director of the National Hydropower Association, the Washington lobbying group that supports the hydroelectric industry.  NHA finds this particularly frustrating since it is in the midst of a revival that involves retrofitting existing dams with hydropower.

Paris climate summit: If liberal journos get their wish it may be lights out for billions.  The UN climate change conference (COP 21) is bringing thousands of environmental activists to still-shaken Paris to discuss what liberals consider a bigger threat than terrorism — climate change.  Heads of state are attempting, yet again, to reach a legally binding agreement for carbon dioxide emissions, even though satellite temperature records still show a pause in the warming trend.  That pause began more than 18 years ago in 1997.  The conference has no bigger supporters than the liberal media.  Journalists have worked together with environmentalists to attack nearly every energy source we use.  News outlets have targeted energy that provides more than 90 percent of U.S. power — oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear and even hydroelectric.

The Environmentalist Crusade Against Progress and Technology Aims at Making Man's Life a Hell on Earth.  Energy lights our homes and cities, keeps us cool in summer and warm in winter, moves our cars, ships, trains and airplanes, powers our industries and factories, and creates all the material goods on which our lives depend.  The whole of our civilization depends upon the production and use of energy.  But there is not a single viable energy source that Environmentalism does not attack. [...] It is important to note that environmentalists offer no alternative solutions to our needs of energy.  All of their efforts aim instead at banning, stopping, restricting and reversing all progress.  There is not a single industry or technology that Environmentalism does not attack, directly or indirectly.

Renewable Energy: Not Cheap, Not "Green".  A multi-billion-dollar government crusade to promote renewable energy for electricity generation, now in its third decade, has resulted in major economic costs and unintended environmental consequences.  Even improved new generation renewable capacity is, on average, twice as expensive as new capacity from the most economical fossil-fuel alternative and triple the cost of surplus electricity.  Solar power for bulk generation is substantially more uneconomic than the average; biomass, hydroelectric power, and geothermal projects are less uneconomic.  Wind power is the closest to the double-triple rule.  The uncompetitiveness of renewable generation explains the emphasis pro-renewable energy lobbyists on both the state and federal levels put on quota requirements, as well as continued or expanded subsidies.  Yet every major renewable energy source has drawn criticism from leading environmental groups:  hydro for river habitat destruction, wind for avian mortality, solar for desert overdevelopment, biomass for air emissions, and geothermal for depletion and toxic discharges.

The 7 Keys To Trapping As Many Americans As Possible In Poverty.  You want to make as many Americans poor as possible?  Then start by... [#7] Ratcheting Up Their Expenses: [...] Have the Federal Reserve print money non-stop, which drives up inflation.  Over time, that reduces the purchasing power of the middle class as the cost of everything seems to creep up.  It's also important to go after cheap sources of energy like oil, coal, natural gas and nuclear power.  Not only does that drive up the cost the middle class pays across the board for products, it also hits people directly when they heat and cool their homes.

Environmental Activist Visits North Dakota, Makes Things Up.  Winona LaDuke is a political activist who, among other things, is the head of Honor the Earth.  That's the principle opposition group to the Sandpiper pipeline which would from Tioga, North Dakota, through Minnesota and down to Wisconsin.  LaDuke is also something of a fabulist, writing an op/ed about a recent visit to Williston which might leave some thinking that she's living in an alternate version of reality.

Obama: Nihilist or Just Incompetent?  Obama once bragged of sky-high electricity costs to come — echoed by Steven Chu's dream of European-level gas prices.  Obama mocked "drill, baby, drill" and claimed it was no solution to the energy crisis, as he tabled Keystone and put millions of acres of federal lands de facto off the market for energy exploration.  He tried to "bankrupt" the coal industry.  The EPA became a rogue agency.  Almost all his crony-capitalist Solyndra-like projects failed.  And?  Gasoline and natural gas prices have plunged, thanks to fracking and horizontal drilling.

Famous British Actress Recites Bizarre Poem On TV: Fossil Fuel Workers Are Basically Nazis.  Award-winning actress Emma Thompson recited a bizarre poem for news cameras Wednesday warning [9/2/2015] of an apocalyptic world of "liquefied slaughter" and melting ice caps all thanks to greedy fossil fuel companies.  Attending a protest against Shell's plans to drill for oil in the Arctic, Thompson indulged Sky News reporters with a poem written all by her lonesome, lamenting the immense selfishness of those using oil to fuel their cars and heat their homes.

Gov. Jerry Brown takes aim at oil companies over 'highly destructive' product.  Gov. Jerry Brown, who is in the middle of a political battle over climate-change legislation, took aim at oil companies Monday, saying they sell a "highly destructive" product.  "The oil industry is in deep trouble," the governor told reporters Monday at a news conference on the shores of Lake Tahoe, where he was attending an annual meeting about the area's environment.  Oil companies "have a product that is highly destructive, while highly valuable at the same time.  And we're trying to work out the right policies," he said.

The Editor says...
How do you suppose the governor got to Lake Tahoe?  Not by bicycle, one can surmise.  More likely by way of gas-guzzling limo or gas-guzzling jet.  Maybe both.

Obama Hatches A Vast, Left-Wing, Green Conspiracy.  California Gov. Jerry Brown rips oil companies for their "highly destructive product," while President Obama calls the Koch brothers un-American. [...] Obama apparently sees nothing wrong with burning 25,000 gallons of fuel jetting to Las Vegas to attend Sen. Harry Reid's conference to push uneconomical "green" alternatives to fossil fuels while demonizing those who disagree with him.  Par for the course. Obama has set a goal of slashing CO2 emissions 26% by 2025, proposing that alternative energy sources such as solar and wind will serve as replacements — a key part of his much broader plan to "fundamentally transform" America.  The problem, contrary to Brown's foolish remarks, is that fossil fuels are anything but "destructive."  They are in fact the very source of our industrial economy — and our high standard of living.

Environmental groups raise concerns over Florida's new hunt for oil.  Renewed hunts for oil in sensitive Florida ecosystems have environmental groups raising questions about the state's regulation of the oil and gas industry.

Environmentalist: Clean Power Plan Is 'A Great Start,' But 'I Think We Can Do More'.  First coal, then natural gas?  Apparently so.  A spokesman for the Environmental Defense Fund defended the Obama administration's Clean Power Plan on Wednesday [8/5/2015], saying the benefits of carbon-reduction are "important" and "real" — and hinting that they are just a start:  methane emissions from natural gas may be targeted next.  "I think we can do more," EDF's Jeremy Symons told CSPAN's morning call-in show.  "I think once we get on this path, we will find that we can do more faster.  But it's a great start."  Under the Obama administration's Clean Power Plan, each state must decide how to rearrange their energy mix to achieve EPA-mandated, pollution-reduction targets.  Basically, the plan will force states to abandon coal as an energy source in favor of the wind and solar industries, which are not as cost-effective or desirable in a free market.

Which is worse, Obama's plan to shut down coal plants, or McConnell's 'plan' to fight it?  President Obama is about to release a plan to fight imaginary global warming by shutting down many coal fired power plants.  Coal fired power plants produce a lot of carbon dioxide, which is a key element in the imaginary theory that CO2 causes global warming.  I say imaginary because (1) there hasn't been any global warming in 18 years, (2) man-made CO2 accounts for only about 3% of global CO2, which is mostly natural, and (3) CO2 is a tiny percentage of the upper atmosphere, and is not present in enough volume to be substantially trapping heat.  But Obama's plan to shut power plants is very real.

Obama to Require Steeper Emissions Cuts From Power Plants.  President Barack Obama will impose even steeper cuts on greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. power plants than previously expected, senior administration officials said Sunday [8/2/2015], in what the president called the most significant step the U.S. has ever taken to fight global warming.

Protesters in Portland dangle from bridge in a bid to block Shell icebreaker.  Trying to delay Shell's Arctic icebreaker in Portland, 13 protesters are dangling from the St. Johns Bridge, spanning the Willamette River in North Portland.  The protesters rappelled from the bridge deck at about 2:30 a.m. [7/29/2015] as a group of about 50 kayakers looked on, said Michael Foster, a kayaker from Seattle and veteran of earlier protests against Shell that took place in Washington state.  Foster said the protesters are now suspended in hammocks and bivouacs, the same gear used for rock climbing.  The dangling activists have enough supplies to hang for two days and plan to re-supply, Foster said.

The problem with enviros.  When President Barack Obama recently approved Shell's request to drill in the Arctic, anti-fossil-fuel activists lobbied the Port of Seattle to deny docking rights to the oil giant's Alaska-bound rig.  That effort failed.  Then activists persuaded Washington State's King County to refuse the company a wastewater-discharge permit — an inconvenience that did nothing to stop Shell's progress.  Turning finally to old-fashioned protest, environmentalists in kayaks tried, unsuccessfully, to obstruct the rig en route to Alaska.  The Shell battle highlights a new tactic among environmental activists: Unhappy with policies made in Washington, they're trying to use local regulations to set national policy.

Court rules against Obama administration in EPA case.  The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday [6/29/2015] that the Obama administration failed to consider costs when deciding to regulate mercury pollution from power plants.

The Difficulties Of Powering The Modern World With Renewables.  In 2013 renewables supplied the world with 21.7% of its electricity, according to BP.  Take out hydro and they supplied the world with only 5.3% of its electricity.  Then take out "other" renewables such as biomass and geothermal and the percentage falls to 3.3%.  Why take out hydro and "others"?  Because their growth potential is limited by resource availability — too few good hydro sites, too few high-temperature geothermal fields, not enough wood to make biomass pellets etc. — and for these reasons they may never make a significant contribution to future global energy needs.

WH Science Adviser: 'Cars, Trucks and Planes Are Going to Have to Run on Electricity, Biofuels or Hydrogen'.  John Holdren, President Barack Obama's top science and technology advisor, said at a White House summit on clean energy on Tuesday [6/16/2015] that a "global low-carbon economy" by the year 2050 means that "cars, trucks and planes" will be powered by "electricity, biofuels or hydrogen."  "As we all know, a global low-carbon economy in 2050 is going to have to meet the energy needs of 9 or 10 billion people using technologies that will have to be more advanced than the technologies that are in place today," he said.  "Buildings, agriculture, machines must be dramatically more energy-efficient."

The Editor says...
Utopia comes at a very high cost.  Why not just stick with what works?  The left's idea of utopia also includes complete government control of everything.

Canada: Never mind. We'll just ship our energy to China.  [Scroll down]  Meanwhile, back at home, the feds keep pounding on ExxonMobil for the biggest fines they can manage, yet another Democrat is taking a run at shutting down fracking through a misinterpretation of the Clean Water Act and our restrictions on exports have led to our companies saturating the market to the point where we're now laying off oil field workers.

Environmentalists Fight Huge Solar Plant On Behalf of 100 Sheep.  The Natural Resources Defense Council said it had "significant concerns" about the project.  So what are we talking about here?  A new CO2-spewing coal plant?  Something that runs on "extraordinarily dirty" oil from the Canadian tar sands?  Nope.  These environmentalist groups are celebrating the likely demise of a solar power plant slated to be built in the Mojave Desert.  Bechtel Corp. says its 350 megawatt Soda Mountain Solar Project would generate enough power to light 170,000 homes in California, and the site chosen is ideal because of its "excellent solar resources, its location in an existing utility corridor and due to the low density of sensitive plant and animal species."

Obama admin gives final OK to Md. natural gas facility; environmentalists sue.  The Obama administration on Thursday granted final approval to a $3.8 billion natural gas export facility in Calvert County, Maryland — the first gas export site on the East Coast — but environmentalists sued within hours to stop the project.  After an extensive review that spanned multiple federal agencies, the Energy Department gave the green light to the Cove Point liquefied natural gas terminal.  The move allows the project's operator, Virginia-based energy giant Dominion Resources Inc., to ship fuel to countries with which the U.S. does not have free trade agreements.  The site, expected to come online by late 2017, is now authorized to export up to 0.77 billion cubic feet of liquefied natural gas per day for the next 20 years.

Environmentalism and Envy.  Environmentalists hate dams.  Dams provide lakes, prevent floods, store water for future use, and generate electricity.  Some dams are engineering triumphs that are beautiful and magnificent symbols of human achievement.  What's to hate?  Dams improve upon nature.  But, that's the problem.  Dams, with all their benefits, mock the moral superiority that nature is supposed to have over the works of man.  Somehow the generation of CO2-free electricity by dams is not considered worthy.  The legal definition of renewable electricity in California specifically excludes electricity generated by big hydroelectric projects.  Similarly, the Kyoto treaty to prevent global warming does not give credit to CO2-free nuclear energy.  Logical consistency is not an environmental movement strong point.

Nevada's Caesar.  In the summer of 2007, Nevada Power, the state's utility monopoly, was ramping up plans to build a $5 billion coal plant in the rural community of Ely.  Then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, coming down with the green fever that would animate him for the rest of his career, was not pleased.  The Ely Energy Center, Reid asserted to me during an August television interview, "will never be built."  A month later, Nevada Power CEO Michael Yackira came on the program and pushed back against Reid's anti-coal crusade.

Fossil Fuels Will Save the World (Really).  The environmental movement has advanced three arguments in recent years for giving up fossil fuels:  (1) that we will soon run out of them anyway; (2) that alternative sources of energy will price them out of the marketplace; and (3) that we cannot afford the climate consequences of burning them.  These days, not one of the three arguments is looking very healthy.  In fact, a more realistic assessment of our energy and environmental situation suggests that, for decades to come, we will continue to rely overwhelmingly on the fossil fuels that have contributed so dramatically to the world's prosperity and progress.

King Barry.  Obama is a lawless leader, choosing to rule by memorandum, regulation and executive order — he is not a president; he is a king. [...] The EPA is now putting the finishing touches on the plan to save the world from global warming by tripling Americans' electric bills and throttling business by raising the cost of energy.  Barry does not like coal and the EPA, ever obsequious to Barry's wants, wants to shut down all coal-powered electrical generation in America.  Coal-fired plants produce almost 40% of the nation's electricity, and Barry... er, I meant the EPA, wants to shut them down.  Not to worry, the plan is to replace all that electricity with... well, nothing.  (Fracking?  The same crowd has plans for that too.)

Obama's Keystone Veto Is a Victory for the Lunatic Left.  President Obama's veto of the Keystone XL pipeline is difficult to understand unless you are aware of the wider context, which is the Left's war on the energy infrastructure of the United States.  It isn't just Keystone.  The Left is working to block every piece of energy infrastructure of any consequence everywhere in the country, in the hopes that doing so will hobble the oil and gas industries and usher in a new age in which the American economy runs on solar panels and happy thoughts.

Udall Votes Against Special Interest Bill for Keystone Pipeline.  Today [1/29/2015], U.S. Senator Tom Udall voted against a bill mandating approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline, saying it was an unprecedented act for Congress to require the administration to approve a pipeline for a private, foreign corporation.  The vote came shortly after Udall offered an amendment to create a national Renewable Electricity Standard, which would require utilities to generate 25 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by 2025.  His amendment received bipartisan support from almost half the Senate, demonstrating significant support for a forward-looking energy policy.

The Editor says...
In an ostensibly free country, the government should not have the power to tell a company how to run its business.  In this case, an elected representative is proposing a law that would require electric utilities to generate a substantial portion of their product from "renewable sources."  If the government can do this, they could just as easily tell bakeries what to put in their bread, or require automobile manufacturers to build some fraction of their cars out of titanium.

Greens clueless on energy.  In short, if campaigners get their wish and fossil fuels are phased out by 2040, the world will face an energy gap of at least 9.2 billion tonnes of oil equivalent.  That is the equivalent of 147 countries with no energy.

Climate scientists beg governments to leave buried fossil fuel reserves in the ground.  Vast underground reserves of oil, gas and coal should be classified as off limits if the world stands any chance of averting dangerous climate change, a major study of global fossil-fuel deposits has found.  Scientists calculated that a third of global oil reserves, half of gas reserves and more than 80 percent of coal reserves should remain in the ground as "unburnable" to avoid exceeding the 2[°]C "safe" threshold for global warming.

The Editor says...
Apparently these propagandists have decided that any temperature increase greater than two degrees would make life unbearable, but a world without petroleum and coal would be wonderful.

The Pipeline and the Damage Done.  [Scroll down]  The point is the oil won't remain underground.  It will be extracted, turned into gasoline, and keep cars running all over the world.  That means blocking the pipeline, should the president decide to do that, will have no effect on greenhouse gases.  That appears to make little difference to the environmental movement.  It opposes fossil fuels and anything that facilitates their use, period.  There's another reason the green lobby has exerted enormous pressure to kill Keystone.  It's a power play.  If it works, the political clout of the movement will grow.

Schumer: Dems have enough votes to thwart Keystone oil pipeline.  Republicans fell just shy of the 60 votes needed to move the pipeline in the Democratic-controlled Senate last month.  Now, flush with a new majority in the Senate, they plan to try again to force approval of a 1,200 mile pipeline from Canadian oil sands to the Gulf coast.  Democrats, readjusting to their status in the minority, plan to try to slow it down or make it more palatable with amendments.  Schumer said Democrats were planning to try to add amendments to add "clean energy" jobs, require the oil be sold here instead of exported, and require use of US-made steel.

Schumer: Obama Should Veto Keystone Jobs Even if Dems Get Every Amendment We Want.  Speaking Sunday [1/4/2015] on Face the Nation, Schumer outlined many of the amendments that Democrats would be seeking but then added, "in conclusion, we will have enough votes to sustain a presidential veto."  Bob Schieffer, rightly puzzled, then asked, "So even if these amendments pass, you will still urge the president to veto this legislation?"  "Well yes," Schumer conceded.

The Editor says...
This is remarkable.  Senator Schumer wants to load the Keystone pipeline bill with pork-barrel amendments, probably paying back political favors in every direction, but even if all that is loaded onto the bill, he still hopes it doesn't become law.  Senator Schumer must really hate petroleum — or capitalism itself.

American economy stronger than Obama incompetence.  The recovery might be robust if Mr. Obama's policies had not hamstrung recovery every step of the way, especially in the energy sector, where the president has been particularly hostile to affordable energy.  With his monomaniacal effort to put coal mines out of business, his curbing exploration for oil and natural gas on federal lands, opposition to fracking, construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, and expensive carbon-emissions regulations, Mr. Obama has been the obstructionist-in-chief to affordable energy.  He employed remarkable audacity — the unkind might say mendacity — to take credit for the plunge in the price of gasoline over the past year.

Cuomo Killed Lots Of Jobs By Pointlessly Banning Fracking.  New York state found that fracking would mean more than 50,000 jobs for eight economically depressed counties bordering Pennsylvania.  In banning it, Gov. Andrew Cuomo chose green over black gold. [...] Environmentalists and government have been fishing in vain for evidence of health hazards from fracking for many years, but to Cuomo no evidence equals "uncertainties," hence the ban.

Renewable Energy Will Never Work, But Can Nuclear?  I am not sure how low the true cost of electricity produced through nuclear energy could go, but I will say this:  if climate alarmists really believed the claims they make about global warming — I don't think they do — they would be agitating tirelessly for lightly-regulated nuclear energy.

Purity politics, Democrat-style.  On a rainy Monday morning, 50 sodden liberal activists stood on the muddy front lawn of the Capitol Hill home of Sen. Mary Landrieu, advocating for the Louisiana Democrat's defeat.  "This house is high and dry, but the coastlines of Louisiana are sinking, very much like Senator Landrieu's career!" Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth, shouted into a microphone.  The activists behind him, who had inflated a model of an oil pipeline on the senator's lawn using a generator and a window fan, erupted in cheers of "Woo-hoo!" and "Yeah!"

DA drops charges in case of blocked coal shipment.  Two environmental activists, who had planned to use the necessity defense against charges of blocking a shipment of coal to a Massachusetts power plant, walked out of court this morning after prosecutors abruptly dropped all charges against them.  Ken Ward and Jay O'Hara planned to use the unusual defense — arguing that they were acting to prevent harm from global warming to the planet — in a trial slated to start today that would have featured high-profile witnesses, including NASA climate scientist Jim Hansen and environmental activist and author Bill McKibben.

Greens are the enemies of energy.  Here in America and elsewhere around the world, Greens continue to war against any energy other than the "renewable" kind, wind and solar, that is more costly and next to useless.  Only coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear keeps the modern and developing world functioning and growing.

Colorado Dems Frack Backtrack is all about November.  In April 2013, the Mora County Commission voted, 2 to 1, and passed the first-in-the-nation county-wide ban on all oil-and-gas drilling.  It was spearheaded by Commission Chairman John Olivas — an environmental activist.  Since then, two lawsuits have been filed against the little county because of the anti-drilling ordinance.  Olivas didn't just lose in the Democrat primary election, he was, according to the Albuquerque Journal, "soundly beaten" by George Trujillo — 59.8% to 34.2%.  Trujillo campaigned on a repeal of the ordinance and has said he is open to a limited amount of drilling in the eastern edge of the county.  Mora County's ban on all drilling for hydro-carbons, not just fracking, was incited by an out-of-state group:  the Pennsylvania-based Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF), which has also been active in Colorado.
[Emphasis added.]

Lawsuits seek to stop work at coal mines in 3 Western states until more reviews done.  Coal industry representatives say lawsuits against mines in three Western states could have consequences across the U.S. as environmentalists seek changes in how mining is approved on federally owned reserves.

Bill Cosby and wife support opponents of proposed Massachusetts pipeline.  Comedian Bill Cosby and his wife Camille are supporting protesters marching across Massachusetts in opposition to Kinder Morgan's proposed natural gas pipeline.  The couple, who own hundreds of acres of protected land in Shelburne Falls, about 100 miles west of Boston, have been opposed to the pipeline since the company notified them last winter of plans to survey their land.

Bill Cosby: Natural gas pipeline disrespects 'flora and fauna'.  Comedian Bill Cosby and his wife Camille are supporting protesters marching across Massachusetts in opposition to Kinder Morgan's proposed natural gas pipeline.

White House Vows to Veto 'Unreasonable' Bill to Expedite Cross-Border Pipelines.  The White House has threatened to veto a bill expected to pass the House this week that would remove any Keystone-like delays from pipeline projects that enter the U.S. from Canada or Mexico.  The North American Energy Infrastructure Act, authored by Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Rep. Gene Green (D-Texas), requires the secretary of Commerce, with respect to oil pipelines, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), with respect to natural gas pipelines, or the Secretary of Energy (DOE), with respect to electric transmission facilities, to approve a request for approval of construction, connection, operation, or maintenance unless it is not in U.S. national security interests.

Admit it, greens — renewables can't power U.S. economy.  Big Green activists have taken their crusade against hydraulic fracturing to a number of state capitols for the same reason they oppose the Keystone XL pipeline.  They want the fossil fuels that power the U.S. economy to remain in the ground, untapped.  The fact that the ongoing natural gas boom is doing far more through market forces to reduce the use of coal than any government regulation is apparently irrelevant to them.  But the question they must answer is precisely how they propose to keep the American economy functioning until green power can actually replace fossil fuels.  It is an important question, because renewable fuel cannot do the job — not even under the Obama administration's most optimistic projections.

Keystone Pipeline Is D.C.'s Dumbest Debate.  From the start, the fight about Keystone XL has been symbolic.  As captured by Ryan Lizza in his terrific September 2013 New Yorker article on the topic, Kate Gordon, a leader of the anti-Keystone movement explains, "The goal is as much about organizing young people around a thing.  But you have to have a thing."  The environmental community, reeling from the failure of cap and trade, needed a fight around which to coalesce.  Blocking approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, the "tipping point in the fight against climate change," became the rallying cry.

Barbarians at the Power Plant Gate.  Although it hasn't attracted much attention outside the business pages, Energy Future Holdings, the largest utility in Texas, is going through the biggest bankruptcy proceeding since the collapse of Chrysler five years ago.  The story does not bode well for the future of American utilities.  Instead it sheds light President Obama's bizarre notion that the nation can shut down coal plants and replace them with "energy from sun, wind and soil" without suffering the kind of brutal economic consequences now being experienced in Japan and German.

Carter-Obama Energy Policy: From Gasoline Lines to Pipeline Obstructionism.  In the 1970s, President Jimmy Carter's petroleum price and allocation regulations, premised on the belief that we were running out of supply, put America in the gasoline lines.  Thirty-five years later, depletion fears refuted, Carter champions a letter to President Obama urging rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline segment (the last of four legs) on easily refutable arguments, discussed [in this article].  And Obama obliged.

Horses, teepees arrive on Mall for Keystone protest.  The "Reject and Protect" protest is a weeklong event hosted by the Cowboy and Indian Alliance, a group of ranchers, farmers and leaders of seven Native American tribes.  Protesters said activists also plan to project anti-pipeline messages onto the Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday night, hold an interfaith ceremony outside the Georgetown home of Secretary of State John Kerry and stage an unspecified "bold and creative" bit of civil disobedience.

Dems May Regret Steyer's Keystone Payoff.  After a lengthy study of the plans for the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, the U.S. State Department issued an 11-volume report back in January confirming what most experts had already concluded long before then:  the vital project would not damage the environment or increase the rate of carbon pollution.  But liberal activists weren't happy and have used the 90-day automatic review process that followed that report to furiously lobby the administration to stop the construction of the 1,700-mile pipeline from Alberta to the Gulf Coast refineries.  The key player in that effort was Tom Steyer, the billionaire environmental extremist who has pledged to give $100 million to Democratic candidates who do his bidding.

Greens Are Reds.  The greens are, in short, against almost all forms of electric power, except those that are prohibitively expensive.  They are against oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, and hydro, which together account about 90 percent of our electric power production.  They want wind and solar energy, which produce about 3 percent of our electricity and aren't even green.  We'd have to pave over entire states and vast stretches of desert with solar panels to produce enough electricity to power our $18 trillion economy.

Former US president joins opposition to Keystone XL.  Former President Jimmy Carter joined fellow Nobel laureates Wednesday [4/16/2014] in opposing Keystone XL, insisting that approving the pipeline would trigger "more climate upheaval" around the globe.  In an open letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, Carter and the nine other Nobel Peace Prize winners bluntly warned the leaders:  "Your decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will define your climate legacy."  The missive, published as an advertisement in Politico, represents the first time Carter has taken a position on the $5.4 billion project and makes him the first former president to come out against the pipeline.

The Democratic Civil War Over Energy.  A split is growing in the Democratic Party, one that ought to rival the divisions on the right that the headlines trumpet.  Greens are increasingly bitter about President Obama — annoyed that he's dropped climate legislation, scaled back green subsidies, ignored fracking.  They've channeled their frustration into the fight against Keystone, warning that they'll turn their significant money and resources against Mr. Obama's party if the president approves more "dirty oil."  Since this president cares about nothing so much as winning elections, he's sat on the pipeline for five years.

Activists to Kerry: Keystone a 'bigger mistake' than Vietnam.  Academy Award-winning actor Jared Leto and 13 other young activists, including the grandson of Robert F. Kennedy, are calling on Secretary of State John Kerry to reject the Keystone XL oil pipeline.  After speaking with top State Department officials on Thursday, the activists sent a letter to Kerry, digging deep into the secretary's past when he testified in Congress against the Vietnam War.

Pipeline protesters arrested at White House.  They chanted 'climate justice now' and carried signs with slogans such as 'don't tarnish the earth' in an effort to persuade President Barack Obama to reject the pipeline.

The Editor says...
What is "climate justice," and where is the evidence that someone has "tarnish[ed] the earth?"

The Sierra Club Hates Energy.  The Sierra Club doesn't want to see the U.S. benefit from coal, oil and natural gas.  It wants to see the landmass filled with solar farms and thousands of wind turbines that would not produce enough electricity to meet the needs of nation, let alone a major city.  Because they are unpredictable, all require the backup of traditional plants.  Nor does the Sierra Club make any mention of the Obama administration's war on coal that has forced 153 plants to shut down.  It's Environmental Protection Agency has proposed regulations that would require new plants to employ carbon capture and sequestration technology that is not commercially available!

Obama's basketball strategy on Keystone XL.  Affordable power dissolves liberal fantasies.  White House wise men insist on spending the public's money to promote retro power plants such as windmills, which went out of fashion with the Industrial Revolution.  Eliminating the Keystone XL Pipeline, which would take cheap crude from the oil sands of Canada down to the Gulf Coast of Texas, is nevertheless a liberal priority.

Report: Keystone Pipeline Will Not Worsen Climate Change.  The threat of environmental damage was a major hurdle to the pipeline's approval. [...] Anti-pipeline foes are now effectively out of excuses.  The pipeline has shown to be quite popular among Americans of both parties, and the environmental effects have been shown to be a non-issue.  The pipeline is expected to create upwards of 2,000 jobs.

Chris Hayes Takes on Obama's 'Addiction' to Oil: Just 'Say No'.  Following the release yesterday [1/31/2014] of the State Department report on the environmental impact of the Keystone XL Pipeline, MSNBC's Chris Hayes delivered a blistering rebuke of America's dependence on fossil fuels, likening President Barack Obama's apparent willingness to embrace the project to a drug addicts trapped in a "self-destructive cycle."

NYC Mayor Supports Moratorium on Fracking in NY — 'Too Much Danger'.  New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio weighed in on the hydraulic fracturing debate in his state during a press conference Thursday [1/23/2014] in Washington, D.C.  "The one thing I'm firm about is I don't see any place for fracking," de Blasio told reporters at the U.S. Conference of Mayors when CNSNews.com asked what his policy would be "as far as developing oil, natural gas and other traditional energy sources in the state."  "The science simply isn't reliable enough; the technology isn't reliable enough, and there's too much danger to our water supply, to our environment in general," de Blasio said.

Environmentalists Defend Pedophilia Advocate.  Environmentalists are rallying to the defense of an anti-fracking activist who has advocated pedophilia and incest after a Pennsylvania court barred her from entering any land owned or leased by a local oil company.  Cabot Oil and Gas won a temporary injunction this week prohibiting Vera Scroggins, director of the anti-fracking group Citizens for Clean Water, from setting foot on any portion of the 200,000 acres of land for which Cabot holds leases.

Fracking protestors glue themselves to wrong gas station.  The group thought they were attaching themselves to pumps at a gas station owned by a company called Total.  They were upset after the company announced they would invest millions in shale oil and fracking.  But there was a pretty big oops involved.  Station manager Reezwan Patel told The Bolton News in Ruston Lane UK, "Total don't own the station any more.  It is owned by Certas Energy, but the signs haven't changed yet."  "We had to close for six hours," Patel grumbled.

Emails Show Extensive Collaboration Between EPA, Environmentalist Orgs.  Internal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emails show extensive collaboration between top agency officials and leading environmentalist groups, including overt efforts to coordinate messaging and pressure the fossil fuel industry.  The emails, obtained by the Energy and Environment Legal Institute (EELI) through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, could fuel an ongoing controversy over EPA policies that critics say are biased against traditional sources of energy.  Emails show EPA used official events to help environmentalist groups gather signatures for petitions on agency rulemaking, incorporated advance copies of letters drafted by those groups into official statements, and worked with environmentalists to publicly pressure executives of at least one energy company.

More Pipelines in the Pipeline.  Environmentalists continue to resist pipelines such as the Keystone XL, even though pipelines result in fewer spillage incidents and personal injuries, and in a substantial cost advantage, when compared to road and rail.

Court declines to block big oil pipeline.  A big pipeline carrying oil from tar sands crosses many states and is opposed by environmental groups that warn of potential dangers.  Sound familiar?  No, not Keystone XL.  It's the Flanagan South Pipeline, proposed to carry oil between Illinois and Oklahoma.  And in a new decision, a federal judge has declined the environmental groups' request to stop the project with a preliminary injunction.

Enemies of the people.  The process of developing coalbed methane in the area has been ongoing for many years now.  In 2004 a local entrepreneur with a background in coal started drilling for gas, and latterly another company had taken on the task.  Neither could make the process economic.  In 2011, however, the licence passed into the hands of Dart Energy, a coalbed methane specialist, who have found a way to extract the gas profitably. [...] But this plan reckoned without the intentions of the greens.  Despite an incident-free operations history, despite electricity having been generated without incident, despite Dart being a local business, putting money into the hands of local people, a major campaign was launched to try to prevent any further development of the site.

Unfortunately, akdart.com has no connection whatever to Dart Energy.

Gore: The Keystone XL pipeline is "ridiculous," an "atrocity," a "threat."  Self-titled "environmentalists'" recalcitrance on acknowledging the reality that Canada's oil sands are coming out of the ground — regardless of whether or not the Keystone pipeline's northern extension is built — truly knows no bounds.  It's only too bad they don't seem to realize that terrestrial pipelines are the relatively cleaner, safer, and more environmentally friendly method of transport for oil, natural gas, and petroleum products, and that by blocking the pipeline, they're probably doing more environmental harm than good in the long run.

Canadians Riot Against Fracking.  Dozens of anti-fracking protestors were arrested in Canada after throwing Molotov cocktails and torches into at least five police cruisers on Thursday [10/17/2013].  The demonstrators were rallying against a shale exploration project in New Brunswick, Canada, home to the Elsipogtog First Nation tribe, the National Post reported.  Many of the protestors were tribe members and New Brunswick locals.

EPA Foils Clean Fuel.  By slowing the conversion of vehicles to CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) fuel The Environmental Protection Agency is causing needless nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, particulate, and mercury air pollution.  It might just as well be renamed the Environmental Destruction Agency.  The EPA has set up a system that adds thousands of dollars to the cost of converting a vehicle from gasoline or diesel oil to CNG, thus sapping a large proportion of the possible fuel cost savings (CNG costs about half as much at the pump) from those who are thinking of switching.

Target: Natural Gas.  The oil and gas fracking boom increased household disposable income by $1,200 last year as lower energy costs flowed to consumers, according to a new study from IHS Global Insight.  So Americans may want to know that President Obama's nominee to chair the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) thinks natural gas is a "dead end."  That nominee is Ron Binz, and in March 2013 he spoke at an Edison Foundation panel on utilities and green technologies.  To fight global warming, he argued, government must adopt a "new regulatory model, because that's where it's going to start."

Environmentalism: The Road To A Primitive Existence.  The environmental movement is remarkably backward.  It prefers to push back man's achievements in return for some vague environmental gain.  Today's environmentalists are arguably anti-energy.  As others have said, they see energy as a problem, not a solution.  Sure, they like taxpayer-funded energy.  But it is too expensive for the market, too undeveloped, too unreliable for practical use, and is harder to produce than the energy we easily get from fossil fuels.  We can't run a modern and growing economy on costly experimental energy.

Demoralize the anti-oil fringe.  It has become a familiar scene at major oil company annual meetings.  Protestors, some of whom have purchased token amounts of stock to appear, confound the proceedings by asking oil companies to exit their business in the name of the environment.  According to this fringe, oil companies have a responsibility to protect the planet from the scourge of fossil fuels.  Oil companies are portrayed as pushing their product while the planet overheats.  This black-and-white view of energy policy puts the global warming issue into a moral context.  It assumes everyone who believes in catastrophic climate-change theory is good, and those who don't are bad.  It also asserts that replacing fossil fuels will make the world better and "sustainable."

Why Environmental Professionals Hate All of the Above.  For many environmental leaders, "clean energy" is a moving target.  What was acceptable last year is no longer so, and the question is why.  In terms of carbon emissions, natural gas is twice as clean as coal.  That was once good enough to earn it lukewarm praise from many green supporters.  Now, with the U. S. Energy Department projecting that gas will be the fastest-growing global fuel source through 2040, environmental leaders have turned against it.  They now claim that hydraulic fracturing causes catastrophic damage to the earth, air, and water, and that natural gas was never that clean to begin with.  What's behind this change of heart?  Maybe it's the need to continue the struggle.

Barack Obama expresses reservations about Keystone XL pipeline project.  Barack Obama has given the strongest indication to date that he holds reservations about the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, saying the project would not create many jobs and could raise gasoline prices.  In an interview with the New York Times, the president disputed a main justification for the pipeline — its economic benefits — and reaffirmed he would reject the project if it expanded carbon pollution.

Oh, my: Green group suing the State Department over Keystone XL.  After President Obama's big climate-change environmentalist pander-fest in June, during which he contended that his administration will not be approving the Keystone XL pipeline unless they find that doing so "does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution," his ambiguity understandably sent radical environmentalists into a slow-burning tailspin of panic and desperation.

Trains full of fracked N. Dakota oil are heading our way.  Each week, more and more mile-and-a-half long tanker trains filled with oil travel into the Pacific Northwest.  The sweet crude — sucked from deep under North Dakota — brings opportunity for business and jobs in the Lower Columbia region and stirs fears the river will become a fossil fuel highway.

Bias alert!
It stirs fears?  I guess the earth-worshiping hippies of the Pacific northwest are afraid of massive shipments of oil coming their way, if this article is to be believed, and that's a big if.  If the people of Washington state are so afraid of oil, let them pay $5 a gallon for gas, and send the oil south instead!

Think of the Keystone XL pipeline as an IQ test for greens.
Can Environmentalists Think?  The reason oil is moved on trains from places like North Dakota and Alberta is because there aren't enough pipelines to carry it.  The provincial governments of Alberta and New Brunswick are talking about building a pipeline to cover the 3,000-odd mile distance.  But last month President Obama put the future of the Keystone XL pipeline again in doubt, [...]

Al Gore says Obama must veto 'atrocity' of Keystone XL tar sands pipeline.  Al Gore has called on Barack Obama to veto the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, describing it as "an atrocity".  The former vice-president said in an interview on Friday that he hoped Obama would follow the example of British Columbia, which last week rejected a similar pipeline project, and shut down the Keystone XL.  "I certainly hope that he will veto that now that the Canadians have publicly concluded that it is not safe to take a pipeline across British Columbia to ports on the Pacific," he told the Guardian.

Green groups to Obama: Designate lands to stop drilling.  Environmental lobbyists are pressing President Obama to turn more western lands into national monuments to prevent oil-and-gas companies from drilling there.  The Sierra Club is leading the charge and is sweetening its message with political sugar, saying Obama could thereby help Democrats win House and Senate seats in midterm elections year.

Democrat Congressman: The Keystone Pipeline is Bad Because...  Democrat Raul Grijalva of Arizona thinks you'll be persuaded to reject the Keystone XL Pipeline because rocks [...] sink in water.  That's the sum and total of his argument. [...] We all fret around here about the low-information voter.  How about the low-information politician?

Idiot Dems in California trying to kill fracking despite massive potential for jobs and energy.  Estimates are that there's billions of barrels of oil in the Monterey Shale formation and accessing that could provide millions of jobs.  But Democrats are proposing everything from banning fracking to burdening it with heavy regulations.

California Dems push anti-fracking bills, aim to curb potential oil bonanza.  California is on the verge of a new gold rush.  Expanded hydraulic fracturing — or "fracking" — at the Monterey Shale formation is sparking estimates that 15 billion barrels of oil could be accessed, along with millions of jobs and huge contributions to the domestic energy supply.  Even the state's green-friendly Democratic governor, Jerry Brown, says "the potential is extraordinary."  But standing in the way is a flurry of anti-fracking bills.

Misguided Energy Policy: Alone, Enough to Cause American Failure.  Nowhere is the threat to America's future more clear, and more easily avoided, than in the energy sector.  Therein, fairytale fears about climate change have grown to the point that the U.S. is now on the verge of committing suicide by turning off many of its most important energy sources to appease loud, misinformed climate activists.

The President's Ruinous Energy Policy: Once More with Feeling.  [Scroll down]  The reality is that in the decades to come, America will need all the carbon-based fuel it can produce.  If the U.S. fails to develop adequate carbon fuels, its economy will decline, and it will be outpaced as a global superpower.  Those who endorse the fantasy of a carbon-free future are, in effect, promoting the destruction of America as well.  Unfortunately, our current president is one of these.

Keystone XL Opponents Hypocritically Talk Property Rights.  Opponents of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline are increasingly trumpeting private property rights as a reason people should oppose the pipeline.  Drawing upon small-government conservatives' wariness of the federal government abusing its eminent domain power, environmental activist groups are suddenly presenting themselves as champions of limited government and private property.

Activists threaten massive protests over Keystone XL.  Environmentalists opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline are pledging to turn up the heat on President Barack Obama by risking arrest through acts of civil disobedience at fundraisers, political meetings and federal agency offices.  The planned protests are designed to build political pressure as Obama nears a final decision on the project.  They illustrate the political challenge facing Obama, who risks alienating at least one key Democratic base — environmentalists or labor unions — no matter what he decides.

Relentless Liars: The Great Green Edifice is Crumbling.  The Greens regard anything that would provide energy for any reason to anyone as the enemy.  That is why "a panel of experts will discuss fossil fuel projects in our state, their impacts, and ways to reduce that pollution."  Fuel is not pollution.  Fuel is what we use to heat or cool our homes, drive our vehicles, provide electricity, and conduct the business of the nation.  The air and water in New Jersey is so clean we actually invite people to live here, start businesses here, and to visit as tourists to enjoy it.

Environmentalists Plan 50,000-Strong Rally Against Keystone XL.  Environmentalists, terrified that Barack Obama may abandon them and approve the proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would transport heavy crude oil from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico, are threatening a massive act of civil disobedience with 50,000 people willing to be arrested.

The Dream of a World Without Oil.  [Mark Z.] Jacobsen's article provides a thorough assessment of the future of WWS [wind, water and solar].  Unfortunately, rather than buttress his argument, his figures undermine the conclusion that we don't need fossil fuels.

Why Environmentalists Are Wrong on Keystone XL.  It may seem arbitrary, given the large number of oil and gas pipelines that already criss-cross the US, that this particular one has generated such a high profile debate around energy security and the environment.  But this debate isn't really about a pipeline.  This pipeline isn't going to make or break the development of Canada's oil sands, nor — as I will show here — is it going to make a measurable difference with respect to climate change.  The truth is that the Keystone XL pipeline is symbolic.

Environmentalists 'outraged' by federal Keystone XL report.  Environmentalists are angry that the Obama administration's report on the Keystone XL pipeline did not find significant negative effects on the environment. [...] The State Department's draft assessment of the pipeline found that the pipeline won't have a huge impact on climate change, because it won't substantially impact the development of tar sands oil or the amount of oil refined in the Gulf Coast region.

Celebrities seeking to block NY gas drilling may be violating state lobbying law.  Celebrities of music, stage and screen who are gaining attention for the effort to block New York from approving a method of gas drilling may soon be getting more attention than they bargained for — from state regulators.

A futile and stupid plan to "save the planet".  The Obama administration continues to drag its feet on approving the Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport crude oil from Canada through the American Great Plains to refineries on the Gulf of Mexico.  Environmentalists oppose the pipeline because they hate oil, which they claim causes "climate change."

Obama Possibly Trading Keystone for More Taxes?  Pretty much everyone, including all of the major labor unions, is geeked about the Keystone Pipeline, which would create jobs and improve the United State's energy independence.  But a bunch of hippies hate it, and the hippies vote, probably illegally in seven states, so Barack Obama is totally against it for right now, you guys.  The Earth, it matters so much more than rebuilding the American economy by providing needed jobs to skilled and unskilled laborers in states across middle America, and ending the vice grip that backwards Middle Eastern nations have on our energy consumption.

Domestic Oil Production At Record Level Despite Obama.  Earlier this month oil output hit its highest level in the U.S. since the summer of 1992.  That's good, but it could be better.  The Obama administration won't get out of the way.

Just the Fracks, Ma'am.  Natural gas is a cheap, abundant American resource, and cleaner than all of its viable alternatives to boot.  It would be hard for a reasonable person not to favor natural gas as a component of our national energy mix, but then anti-frackers like Josh Fox, Yoko Ono and their ilk put little value on being reasonable people.  They are the neo-Luddites resisting a modern energy revolution, standing between the people and the prosperity promised by affordable domestic energy.

Protesters march on National Mall, demand Obama stop Keystone XL pipeline.  Around 40,000 people gathered on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on Sunday [2/17/2013] to give President Obama a clear message:  the Keystone XL pipeline isn't welcome here.  The four-hour event began at the Washington Monument, where politicians and leaders of various eco-groups gave motivational speeches to the crowd.

Global Warming Believers March in D.C..  [Scroll down]  The global warming movement has staked a lot on the Obama administration blocking the Keystone XL pipeline that will bring oil from the rich Canadian oil sands south to the petrochemical complexes of Texas.  The problem for Obama is that if the pipeline is blocked, the Canadians will surely build a pipeline to either their East or West coast in order to sell the oil into the world market.  So, oil that would have been sold directly into U.S. markets at a good (for us) price will, instead, be cycled through world markets and we will end up paying more for oil that is no longer exclusively ours.

Bipartisan senators to Obama: Come on with the Keystone pipeline already.  Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman signed off on TransCanada's revised route through his state earlier this week, effectively clearing what the Obama administration has cited as a major hurdle to green-lighting the entire Keystone XL pipeline.  Having already been through years of multiple State Department reviews, and with the southern portion of the project already under construction, it appears that bipartisan members Congress in fact can agree on at least one thing:  The administration's level of well-orchestrated stalling on this thing is starting to get downright ridiculous.

With decision looming, green groups press Obama to kill Keystone XL pipeline.  More than 70 green groups urged President Obama in a Monday [1/7/2013] letter to kill the Keystone XL pipeline to make good on promises to address climate change. [...] In their letter, the groups said Obama should speak out more often on climate change, impose emissions limits on existing coal-fired power plants and focus on creating clean-energy jobs.  They added the president also should shut down the proposed pipeline that would bring Canadian oil sands to Gulf Coast refineries.

Hollywood's Fractured Logic.  One of the most hilarious — if not tragic — events that we as Americans witness is when Hollywood attempts to "inform" the public about energy issues, which often takes the form of fanatical opposition to oil and natural gas development.  During a staged protest against the Keystone XL pipeline this past summer, for example, Daryl Hannah and Margot Kidder were arrested while voicing their disapproval of U.S. infrastructure development.

Keystone XL critics now calling for more indepth climate change study.  With President Obama poised to decide whether to allow construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline — based on a second, more environmentally-sensitive path — critics now appear focused on derailing the project over a climate change study.

Protestors call on Obama to reject Keystone XL pipeline.  Less than two weeks after Barack Obama won his re-election campaign, protesters gathered Sunday to call on the president and his administration to reject the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, and to act on climate change.

U.S. donors pump hundreds of millions into Canadian groups opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline.  Pipeline opponents include environmental pressure groups who oppose oil sands because they see its extraction and processing as especially destructive to the environment, and because they oppose carbon-based fuels in general. [...] Unfortunately, U.S. donors' funding of anti-oil sands groups displays a troubling lack of transparency.  Approximately $83.7 million — 42 percent — of that funding has been funneled in such a way that the link between foundation grants and the Canadian recipients are unknown to the public.

Frack film's flim-flam.  'Promised Land," a new movie from Matt Damon and John Krasinski, attacks fracking — a new way of getting oil and gas out of the ground, which has become the latest villain of the environmental movement.  Last week, I revealed the film's co-writers, Damon and Krasinski, have gone to enormous lengths to twist the narrative to make American energy corporations the villain.  At the time, their efforts could be just passed off as just another Hollywood leftist fantasy to explain why the world is not how they think it should be.  But now a more sinister possibility has emerged.

Actress Daryl Hannah Arrested in Keystone Pipeline Protest.  Actress Daryl Hannah was arrested in Texas on Thursday [10/4/2012] after she stood in front of an earth-moving machine clearing ground for the construction of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, her representative said.

Global protests planned over gas drilling process.  More than 100 protests against the natural gas drilling process known as fracking are scheduled to take place around the world on Saturday [9/22/2012], building on public concerns but also using an overly simplified message to spur outrage.

"Frackdown?" Environmental activists protest gas drilling.  On Saturday [9/22/2012], activists at roughly 100 events around the globe were scheduled to protest a controversial oil and gas extraction practice called hydraulic fracturing or fracking.  Organizers dubbed their activities in North America, Europe and Australia a "Global Frackdown."  More than 50 Code Pink members gathered near the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco.

The Editor says...
You remember Code Pink, don't you?  They're the people who protest Middle East wars, but only while a Republican is in the White House.

Greens Against Green Energy: Big Solar gets the Big Oil treatment.  [Scroll down]  So solar energy, like corn ethanol, really doesn't reduce greenhouse gas emissions?  Now they tell us.  And there's more, says the letter:  The environmental impact from these solar panels "are long term (decades to centuries)" and they threaten the habitat of "endangered species, including the desert tortoise, Mojave fringe-toed lizard, flat-tailed horned lizard, golden eagle and desert bighorn."

Greenpeace occupies Russia rig to halt Arctic drill.  Greenpeace activists said they climbed OAO Gazprom's Prirazlomnaya platform in the Arctic to protest drilling plans on Russia's first major oil project in the ocean.  Six ecologists, including the environmental organization's executive director Kumi Naidoo, occupied the rig and interrupted its operation around 4 a.m. local time, Greenpeace said today [8/24/2012] in an e-mailed statement.  "The activists are out of reach and have enough supplies to last them for several days," the group said.

Green group urges Interior to delay Shell's Arctic drilling plans.  In a report released Monday, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is urging the government to hold off on approving Royal Dutch Shell's plans for Arctic drilling until more information can be gathered about the project's environmental effects on the region.

Greenpeace urges 3 EU nations to shut 12 nuclear reactors immediately.  International environmentalist group Greenpeace has urged three nations in the European Union to shut down 12 nuclear reactors immediately on the grounds that EU tests to assess the safety of reactors have overlooked their flaws.

There is no California.  [Scroll down]  As gasoline prices soar, California chooses not to develop millions of barrels of untapped oil and even more natural gas off its shores and beneath its interior.  Home to bankrupt green companies like Solyndra, California has mandated that a third of all the energy provided by state utilities soon must come from renewable energy sources — largely wind and solar, which presently provide about 11 percent of its electricity and almost none of its transportation fuel.

Hydro bill energizes debate over the nation's dams.  Hydropower dams would get a boost, while their skeptics would get punished, under a controversial new bill backed by Western conservatives in Congress.  In a bit of tit for tat, the legislation introduced this month would strip federal funding from environmental groups that have challenged hydropower facilities in court over the past decade.  The bill further would block federal money from being used to study or undertake dam removals, save for the rare occasion when Congress has authorized the action. [...] American Rivers, the National Wildlife Federation and Trout Unlimited are among the organizations that could be cut off from federal grant funding under the bill; each has been party to a suit potentially challenging hydropower generation, and each has received federal money.

Do Greens Have A None-Of-The-Above Energy Policy?  Two environmental groups in April filed suit to block an energy project they said would seriously harm the local ecosystem.  It wasn't a coal plant, or an oil refinery, or a nuclear reactor.  It was a wind farm — the very sort of "clean" energy environmentalists champion as an alternative to dirty traditional supplies.  But the Portland Audubon Society and Oregon Natural Desert Association say a wind farm on Oregon's Steens Mountain, along with needed access roads and transmission lines, would threaten eagles, sage grouse and bighorn sheep and call it the "antithesis" of "responsible renewable energy development."

Sayonara, Sierra.  A federal judge denied the Sierra Club's request for a temporary injunction to halt construction of the lower half of the Keystone XL Pipeline Sunday [8/5/2012].  The environmental advocacy group recently filed a lawsuit to halt construction of the lower leg of the TransCanada corporation's contested Keystone XL oil pipeline, the whole of which would run from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico, traversing eight states along the way.

Radical environmentalists push to destroy dams to reopen salmon spawning habitat.  Environmentalists, local Native American tribes and several government agencies want to tear down the four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River — one of which created Copco Lake — that stretches 255 miles from Oregon to the Pacific Ocean.  Primarily the dams create clean energy to supply more than 70,000 homes and businesses in northern California and southern Oregon with electricity, but opponents say the dams must be destroyed to restore depleted fisheries and reinvigorate their upstream habitat.

Capitol Protesters Think Fossil Fuels are a Big Fracking Deal.  What do you get when you bring hundreds of fervent environmentalists and NIMBYs together on the west lawn of the Capitol to denounce fracking, every single fuel that originates from the ground, and, for old time's sake, Dick Cheney?  You get enviro banjo tunes, the "Ecological Our Father" at the interfaith prayer service ("Our Father, who art in the forest..."), and more punny protest signs built off the F-bomb than even Joe Biden could dream up.  Do it on a standard hot, humid July day in D.C., and add in the global warming condemnations and simultaneous praises of the solar intensity as an endless wellspring of clean energy.

Sierra Club Sues to Stop Offshore Drilling, and Guess Who Is Funding the Defense.  [Scroll down]  A little known US law called the Equal Access to Justice Act, signed by President Jimmy Carter in 1980, allows the groups to use lawsuits against government as revenue sources.  When they sue, the government has to incur the costs of defending itself against the lawsuits, and also picks up the expenses for the groups suing the government.  No one even keeps track of how much money the government has ended up spending on such lawsuits.

I do not like this, Uncle Sam, I do not like the GO GREEN Scam. [Scroll down]  Harvard Research Fellow Leonardo Maugeri said that U.S. huge oil and gas shale reserves are "the most important revolution in the oil sector in decades."  The Sierra Club, a left-wing environmentalist group, after touting natural gas as a cleaner alternative to coal and oil for years, has "undertaken a massive campaign against the extraction of natural gas from shale."  The EPA targets companies that use hydraulic fracturing (fracking), accusing them of environmental contamination of soil and water.  Scant evidence is provided of such contamination.

When the Moore Family Lost Power.  Electrical power is the central nervous system of our modern economy and our 21st-century lifestyles, and living without it for a few days reminds us how vulnerable we are to being sent back to a pre-Industrial Age.  Yet every initiative by green groups is focused on reducing our access to electrical power — although they never admit that explicitly.  This power outage was caused by a severe thunderstorm from Mother Nature, but I'm convinced that rolling brown outs are coming, thanks to the radical environmental movement that has taken hold of our body politic.

Environmentalists Oppose Wind Power Line in Idaho, Wyoming.  Idaho and Wyoming residents and environmental groups are expressing opposition to a proposed 1,100-mile long high-voltage power line designed to transmit 3,000 megawatts of mostly wind-generated electricity to fast-growing areas in the West. [...] Among the many issues that have been raised by residents and environmental groups are concerns about the power line's effect on the habitat of the imperiled sage grouse.

The Editor says...
The sage grouse is a game bird in Wyoming and Montana.  There is no shortage of them, and they are not "imperiled".

Environmentalists Sue to Block Oregon Wind Project.  In the suit, the Audubon Society of Portland and the Oregon Natural Desert Association say "energy speculators willing to game the system and take advantage of the state's strong renewable energy mandates" threaten to "radically transform significant portions of terrestrial landscape."

The Editor says...
On another page, I argue — or I let others argue — that windmill power is not a practical source of energy.  So if a group of environmental activists goes to court to stop the construction of windmills, that doesn't bother me much.  The items immediately above and below are posted on this page because the environmentalists think windmills represent a reliable energy source.

Environmentalists Sue over Proposed California Wind Farm.  Three influential environmental activist groups are suing the federal government over plans to build a 100-turbine wind farm on federal land in Kern County, California.  The suit, filed by the Defenders of Wildlife, the Sierra Club, and the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), alleges the proposed North Sky River project poses a threat to the endangered condor, the protected golden eagle, and other birds.  Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, the suit says the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) failed to account for the wind farm's negative impact on the birds.

Five years of environmental red tape, followed by 18 months of construction.
117-Mile, 500,000-Volt Transmission Line Will Support Electric System Reliability.  The completion of the nearly $1.9 billion project culminates a rigorous, 5-year-long environmental review and permitting process and 18 months of construction that encompassed both overhead and underground technology as well as different climates and rough, remote terrain.

Where Will You Be When the Lights Go Out?  America's energy policy is being dominated by environmentalists' priorities — regardless of the impact to the American economy, individual communities, or economically-challenged citizens.  The plans to shut down or limit America's abundant, available, and affordable energy are organized, coordinated, and effective.  The results will be "lights out in America" — a dim future.

The Sierra Club, ECO Terrorists.  The media are finally catching up to America's shale natural gas boom, with even Fortune magazine waddling in with a cover story.  But the bigger recent news is that Res Ipsa Loquiturone of the most powerful environmental lobbies, the Sierra Club, is mounting a major campaign to kill the industry.

Shale study's lead author faces 'green' backlash.  Faced with mounting criticism, the State University of New York at Buffalo is distancing itself from a Marcellus Shale gas-drilling study released earlier this month by the school's own Shale Resources and Society Institute.  But the report's lead author is defending the work by the fledgling institute, saying Monday [5/28/2012] that it's being mischaracterized by environmental activists who oppose any additional domestic fossil-fuel production.

Fights brewing over massive coal-export plans for the Northwest.  Physicians fret about an explosion of locomotive exhaust, while mayors grumble about the potential for long traffic-snarling trains.  Washington state fears 1,200 new barge trips on the Columbia River could spark more accidents and marine-vessel groundings.  Tribes worry that spilled coal could poison aquatic food webs.

Angry at coal? Then turn off your lights.  Why is Montana so backwards when it comes to exploiting its natural resources for the benefit they can provide in terms of tax revenue, jobs and powering our civilization?  The answer is, of course, the environmental movement, which has placed one issue ahead of all other considerations — and has used schools, mass media and politicians to press their agenda.

Leaked Emails Show 'Grossly Overestimated' Environmental Report to Back Up Mining Ban.  Republicans on the House Natural Resources Committee are demanding answers from Interior Secretary Ken Salazar about leaked emails showing that the administration lacked scientific justification for blocking uranium mining on one million acres of previously designated federal lands in Arizona.

Vermont becomes 1st state to ban fracking.  Vermont's governor has signed into law the first state ban on a hotly debated natural gas drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing.  There's no drilling currently happening in Vermont, which is believed to have little to no reserves of oil or natural gas.

The Week That Was.  A strident opponent of coal-generated electricity, the Sierra Club campaigned that natural gas was the clean alternative.  The Club has bragged that it prevented the construction of some 150 coal fired power plants.  Now that the EPA has proposed rules to prevent the construction new coal-fired power plants, the Sierra Club has begun a campaign calling natural gas a dirty fuel.  Of course, the objective is to cripple the economy by shutting down all forms of energy use and electric power generation.

Environmentalists Oppose Wind Power Line in Idaho, Wyoming.  Idaho and Wyoming residents and environmental groups are expressing opposition to a proposed 1,100-mile long high-voltage power line designed to transmit 3,000 megawatts of mostly wind-generated electricity to fast-growing areas in the West. [...] Among the many issues that have been raised by residents and environmental groups are concerns about the power line's effect on the habitat of the imperiled sage grouse.

The Sierra Club Opposes 'Clean Energy'.  In March, Senator Jeff Bingaman (D, N.M.) introduced the Clean Energy Standard Act of 2012, which identifies natural gas and nuclear — along with renewable energy sources — as being "clean."  If that definition holds, then groups such as the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, and lots of others will be in the rather uncomfortable position of having to oppose Bingaman's measure even though those very same groups regularly tout the need for more clean energy.

Sky-high Electric Bills Courtesy of Obama EPA's War on Coal.  The Obama administration seems to be packed with activists who are pathologically obsessed with obstructing our ability to utilize this "miracle rock."  At the same time, the EPA radicals are also throwing roadblocks in the way of our access to, and use of, oil, natural gas, uranium, and every other viable form of energy.

Coal, gas exports meet tough environmental resistance.  Last week, the Sierra Club announced that it would use a unique 1970s environmental agreement to halt the construction of a natural gas liquefaction and export plant at Cove Point in Maryland.  Energy giant Dominion, which hopes to build the first such plant on the East Coast, plans to move forward and could end up fighting environmentalists in court.  The coal industry also has proposed massive export facilities in the Pacific Northwest, where millions of tons of American coal would be prepped for shipment to burgeoning markets in Asia.  But those projects have generated an intense backlash from environmentalists and their political allies...

Environmentalists challenge natural gas export plans.  Environmentalists are challenging Freeport LNG's bid to export natural gas from a facility in Texas — the latest attempt to undercut a push by more than a half dozen companies to send the fossil fuel overseas.  The move by the Sierra Club came in the form of a formal protest lodged with the Energy Department, which is considering a request by Freeport LNG and other firms for licenses to export liquefied natural gas.

Obama's Real Oil Agenda.  During a speech in Miami, President Obama planted himself firmly in the use less oil camp.  Amidst laughter, he said efficiency was one of the "easiest ways to reduce our dependence on oil."  Missing from the phrase was the word "foreign."  Was it simply just a slip of the tongue, or something more revealing?  Well, just a month earlier when President Obama rejected the Keystone XL Pipeline, he claimed the rejection was part of his commitment to policies that reduce our "dependence on oil."  President Obama does not just want to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, as he frequently states, but all oil.

Minnesota Non-Profits Receive $440,000 to Oppose Keystone Pipeline.  Three Minnesota environmental non-profit advocacy groups have received nearly half a million dollars in out-of-state foundation funding to oppose the Keystone oil pipeline project, according to a Freedom Foundation of Minnesota analysis.  The California funding to state groups comes as a surprise, since Keystone's proposed route does not include Minnesota.

Enviros Whack 100 Coal-Fired Plants.  While we are all looking at gas prices, there is another dramatic energy price increase going on that is totally optional; one that is within the President's power to completely reverse.  Coal-fueled electricity generation is the lowest cost. Yet, due to cost-increasing regulations, coal-fueled power plants are being shut down at an alarming rate — killing jobs, raising rates, and putting the reliability of the electrical grid at risk.

Obama Vilifies Fossil Fuels.  At the very same time that the shale revolution is saving the economy hundreds of millions of dollars per day, directly creating tens of thousands of jobs, decreasing the need for foreign oil, and spurring growth in manufacturing that will lead to billions of dollars of new investment and still more jobs, the president is bashing the oil-and-gas sector.  Not only that, but in Obama's new budget, he continues to insist that "clean energy" will drive America's future competitiveness.

Solar power firms in Mojave desert feel glare of tribes and environmentalists.  Presence of horned toads and desert tortoises are holding up production at multimillion-dollar sites in California.

Open letter from the Honourable Joe Oliver, Minister of Natural Resources.  We [Canadians] must expand our trade with the fast growing Asian economies.  We know that increasing trade will help ensure the financial security of Canadians and their families.  Unfortunately, there are environmental and other radical groups that would seek to block this opportunity to diversify our trade.  Their goal is to stop any major project no matter what the cost to Canadian families in lost jobs and economic growth.  No forestry.  No mining.  No oil.  No gas.  No more hydro-electric dams.

Little Green Morons.  As this is being written vast new reserves of natural gas are being found all over the nation, but as far as the Sierra Club is concerned, drilling for it poses risks "to our air, water, climate, and people in their communities."  Short of putting your head in the oven and turning on the gas, there are no significant risks and haven't been any in the sixty years or so that "fracking" has been used to access natural gas.

Obama loves oil! Not!  If the President thinks he won any Greenie Points by kicking the Keystone XL pipeline down the road, he certainly lost them all — and probably then some — with his support for fracking and offshore drilling [in his State of the Union speech].  Radical environmentalists don't want to hear about energy security, objective risks, or practical safety measures:  they want to close down hydrocarbons as the work of the climate devil.

Northwest Indiana power plant to shut on March 31.  After electrifying Northwest Indiana for more than 80 years, one of Indiana's oldest coal-burning power plants will be switched off by March 31, and 109 workers will lose their jobs.  The State Line Energy Station in Hammond, a hulking red landmark between Chicago and Indiana, is closing due to economics, lawsuits and new federal clean-air regulations.

The Editor says...
Free advice for the owners of that plant:  Put it in moth balls.  Surround the building with fences and guards, and keep the place ready to restart when common sense prevails in this country once again.

Destroying America by Denying Access to Energy.  It is the crime of the century that America, home to some of the world's greatest reserves of coal, natural gas and oil, is being deliberately destroyed by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Interior as they do everything in their power to restrict access and drive energy producers out of business.  It is common sense that a nation that cannot produce sufficient electricity to turn on its lights and power its manufacturing sector will be destroyed if current Obama administration regulations and actions continue.

Trust deficit made visible by State of the Union.  Big Green's minions insist there's no safe way to develop fossil fuels and they comprise a lobbying and regulatory roadblock sufficient to heap mountains of delayed and rejected drilling permits on sites properly leased by oil and gas companies.  They have Obama's ear — and apparently the keyboards of his speechwriters.

Al Gore: Obama right to reject Keystone.  Al Gore says President Obama made the right call when he denied a permit for the Keystone XL oil sands pipeline. ... The State Department, which headed the federal review of Keystone XL, has invited TransCanada to reapply, and the company intends to do so.  Gore, in his post, says opponents need to be ready.

The Human Story of Hydrofracing.  Today, the people, who think of themselves as progressives, are actually against progress.

I Finally Understand Democrats.  In order to believe that Democrats have the answer today, you would have to believe:
  •   That ice ages and the warming periods in between were not caused by man's influence on the earth but a half degree rise in average temperatures over 30 years is.
  •   That using the equivalent of two gallons of fossil fuel to produce one gallon of ethanol makes sense because it is "renewable."
  •   That in spite of the fact that one third of the world is hungry it makes more sense to use food for fuel than drilling for a fuel source that nobody can eat.

Environmentalism and the Leisure Class:  This week President Obama handed down what may prove to be one of the most fateful decisions of his entire administration when he rejected the plan to build the Keystone XL Pipeline carrying oil from the tar sands of Canada to the refineries of Houston. ... In turning down Keystone, however, the President has uncovered an ugly little secret that has always lurked beneath the surface of environmentalism.  Its basic appeal is to the affluent.  Despite all the professions of being "liberal" and "against big business," environmentalism's main appeal is that it promises to slow the progress of industrial progress.

Hydraulic Fractured Fairy Tales.  Fracking is destroying the entire plan of the Gang Green, those environmental zealots; it makes the move to alternative fuels and energy poverty unnecessary, since we are swimming in oil just waiting to be fracked.  Gang Green had to find a way to demonize fracking, and have been kicking this earthquake idea around for some time.  Now that there was an earthquake or two in Ohio, they have what they need to blame fracking and scare people.

The environmentalists are now going after the production of frac sand in Wisconsin.
Sand mining boom in Midwest emerges in fracking debate.  Largely overlooked in the national debate over fracking is the emerging fight in the U.S. heartland over mining "frac sand," which has grains of ideal size, shape, strength and purity.

Progressives Crave Energy Scarcities.  Imagine what a horror 2011 was for progressives as Americans began to comprehend their stunning abundance of fossil fuels — beyond their two centuries' supply of coal.  Progressives responded with attempts to impede development of the vast, proven reserves of natural gas and oil here and in Canada.  They bent the willowy Obama to delay approval of the Keystone XL pipeline to carry oil from Canadian tar sands; they raised environmental objections to new techniques for extracting gas and "tight" oil from shale formations.

State of Denial: How New York May Squander Its Energy Boom.  [Scroll down]  New York State — famous for its hordes of "progressive liberals" who claim to worry so much about the working class — could also be economically humming by creating those high-paying blue-collar jobs so desperately needed in this "he-cession." ... But no — of course, New York's environmentalists are up in arms about fracking (and every other method of energy production that actually works — i.e., reliably produces low-cost energy).  This has led to quite a battle, indeed.

When the power fails on a really hot day or cold night, nobody will support this move:
EPA unveils rules limiting mercury, other power plant toxics.  The long-delayed final standards have been the subject of a ferocious lobbying and public-relations battle.  And it's a fight that could spill onto the presidential campaign trail at a time when GOP candidates routinely accuse Obama of pursuing an overzealous green agenda.

Green groups outraged at accelerated pipeline plan.  "Red alert - call the White House and tell them not to back down to big oil on Keystone," environmental activist Bill McKibben said in a tweet.  McKibben mobilized some 10,000 demonstrators outside the White House earlier this year to protest the pipeline.

The Editor says...
The same people, or perhaps their parents, used to protest the construction of the Alaska Pipeline, for the same baseless reasons.  The Alaska Pipeline has been quite beneficial to Alaska as well as the other states.

The Volt Administration.  The XL pipeline would have delivered an estimated 500,000 to 700,000 barrels of Canadian oil to the U.S. daily.  But bowing to pressure from environmentalists, the president delayed the permit at least until 2013.  The administration has proposed $60 billion in tax increases on the energy sector and knee-capped the nuclear industry by blocking uranium mining and pulling all funding for the Yucca Mountain waste disposal site.  The Environmental Protection Agency has imposed regulations on coal plants that the agency acknowledges will raise electricity prices.

EPA Fracking Report and Energy Politics.  Yesterday's EPA report raising water pollution worries about fracking in Wyoming amounts to psy-ops in the Obama re-election campaign. ... The electorate is coming to realize that there are a lot of new hydrocarbon resources out there in the American interior and offshore.  Even the New York Times has noted the oil boom in North Dakota, poster child for the New American Prosperity that lies ahead if we vigorously pursue the energy opportunities that lie ahead.  Energy independence is in prospect, and that alone would change the strategic dynamics of world politics, and weaken many of our overseas antagonists.  Oil prices could actually drop substantially if the worldwide potential of oil sands, shale, and fracking of natural gas is developed.  The biggest game changer of all is the bounty of clean-burning natural gas unlocked by fracking, with which America is particularly well-endowed.  The only way Obama can defend his energy policies is to raise fears of pollution.

If the Lights Go Out.  Say what you will about Obama Administration regulators, their problem has rarely been a failure to regulate.  Which makes the abdication of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission especially notable — and dangerous for the U.S. power supply.  Last week FERC convened a conference on the wave of new Environmental Protection Agency rules that are designed to force dozens of coal-fired power plants to shut down.  The meeting barely fulfilled the commission's legal obligations, but despite warnings from expert after expert, including some of its own, the FERC Commissioners refuse to do anything about this looming threat to electric reliability.

Environmentalists mount fresh challenge against Shell's Arctic drilling plans.  Environmentalists have opened a new front in their campaign to block Shell's planned drilling in Arctic waters near Alaska, by challenging the government's decision to issue the company essential air pollution permits for some of the work.  At issue are Clean Air Act permits the Environmental Protection Agency issued last month for Shell Oil Co.'s Kulluk drillship and support vessels, which the firm plans to use while working on exploratory wells in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas starting next summer.

Energy in America: No Bridge to Oil.  North of the Arctic Circle, the tiny village of Nuiqsut, Alaska, has become the latest flash point in the struggle between oil drilling and environmentalism.  The town, with a population of 400, nearly all Eskimos, sits on the edge of the Colville River and the National Petroleum Reserve, or NPR.  How isolated is it?  It takes four flights and eight hours to get there from Seattle.  Conoco Phillips wants to build a road bridge and pipeline over the river to connect to the nearby Alpine development, which sits just outside the NPR.  But the Army Corps of Engineers rejected the plan telling, the oil company it had to go under the river.

Piping Up Oil Jobs.  Let's say your neighbor invites you over to her holiday party and you respond:  "No way, you're an animal killer.  Last year, you served meatballs at your party and I'm against animal cruelty."  Don't expect your neighbor to ever talk to you again.  Likewise, Canada has offered America an invitation to create jobs and slash her dependence on Middle Eastern oil.  The U.S. State Department released in-depth economic and environmental reports stating that it would be in America's "national interest" to accept Canada's offer.  Yet, the Obama administration ignored the State Department and snubbed our northern neighbor by delaying the project on the basis of alleged environmental concerns.

Hey Obama: Gas Up and Go.  [This is] the most anti-oil, anti-energy administration this country has seen since the failed presidency of Jimmy Carter. ... But that's what happens when your president goes on a jihad against American energy.  Obama has opposed coal, he wants to be punitive against the oil industry, won't allow drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and, in a politically cowardly move, stalled plans for the Keystone XL pipeline.  The only energy Obama seems to support is the mass anger of Occupy Wall Street.

'Lazy' Isn't America's problem.  President Obama was wrong to say at the Asia-Pacific economic summit that America has gotten "lazy" in the last few decades at attracting foreign investment.  What he should have said, in light of his administration's handling of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, is that America has become quite adept at blocking it.

Powering Down: Federal regulation is killing energy development.  American energy policy is increasingly defined in terms of what is prohibited, not what is promoted.  Coal, nuclear, and natural "shale" gas all have been hampered by the current administration.

Obama's New Job Plan: Kill 400,000 Jobs Immediately.  The decision by the Obama administration to delay any action on the XL Keystone pipeline until after the election is a fitting development for an administration that has pursued a bankrupt energy policy, a bankrupt jobs policy and is quite literally bankrupting the country with politics thinly veiled as policy.

U.S. to Delay Decision on Pipeline Until After Election.  The Obama administration, under sharp pressure from officials in Nebraska and restive environmental activists, announced Thursday [11/10/2011] that it would review the route of the disputed Keystone XL oil pipeline, effectively delaying any decision about its fate until after the 2012 election.

Obama delays oil pipeline plan, discards 20,000 jobs.  Roughly 20,000 oil industry construction jobs are being thrown under Obama's 2012 campaign bus, largely because the president needs to pump up his sagging support among the environmentalists.

U.S. to seek new Keystone route, delaying approval.  The Obama administration plans to announce on Thursday [11/10/2011] it will explore a new route for a Canada-to-Texas oil pipeline, delaying a final approval beyond the 2012 U.S. election, sources briefed on the matter said.

Green Energy Skepticism.  Although our energy needs have been increasing rapidly, the U.S. didn't build a new refinery between 1998 and 2008, even then over the strong objections of liberal progressives.

How the EPA Is Like DDT.  Asthma is a perplexing disease for which, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), there is no known cause.  According CDC statistics, the percentage of the general population with asthma increased by 265% from 1980 to 2009.  According to EPA statistics, from 1980 to 2009, the emissions of sulfur dioxide when down by about 76% and, from 1995 to 2009, emissions of nitrogen dioxide went down by about 48%.  There is no statistical relationship or known causal relationship between asthma and emissions of these compounds.  Yet, when announcing the new cross-state emissions rules in 2011 to further restrict emissions of these compounds, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson claimed, without evidence, the new regulations will prevent 400,000 new cases of asthma each year.

Keystone Pipeline Delay Puts Energy Future On Hold.  The administration's industrial policy of picking winners and losers, particularly in the energy sector, has given us such white, or should we say green, elephants as the bankrupt solar panel manufacturer Solyndra.  It has an opportunity to pick a real winner — the Keystone XL pipeline to bring oil from Canada's rich tar sands to the American market.  So far the administration has given lip service to the project, with final approval seemingly in the hands of the State Department, since the pipeline crosses an international border.

Dissecting pipeline protests from the White House to the Cornhusker State.  The Keystone project is opposed by environmental groups who view the pipeline as an endorsement of Canada's decision to extract and sell oil sand resources.  China, undeterred by any "green" opposition and always seeking new sources of supply, has already invested over $15 billion in the Canadian operations.  China's government hopes the U.S. will turn down the pipeline project so that the resources can be put on tankers to supply the energy-hungry nation.

Obama faces choice on Keystone pipeline: Big Labor or Big Green.  [The Keystone XL pipeline] would transport crude oil produced in Canada's Alberta tar sands region to refineries in Texas.  Not only would U.S. dependence on OPEC nations for oil be significantly reduced, building the pipeline would also, according to the Canadian Energy Research Institute, create as many as 435,000 jobs in the U.S. by 2035.  But incessant delays since 2008 caused by the cumbersome permitting process and environmental impact assessments have put the project in jeopardy.  Even if federal officials, including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson, Secretary of the Interior Kenneth Salazar, and, finally, President Obama, ever get around to approving the project, TransCanada will then face additional years of costly litigation by extraordinarily well-funded Big Green environmental groups.

Obama to Be Involved in Keystone XL Pipeline Decision.  President Obama says he will be closely involved in the decision on whether to approve the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline that has pitted two of his key constituencies, labor unions and environmental groups, against each other.

Obama's Regulatory Excess and Abuse.  Shortly after Obama took office, his Interior Secretary Ken Salazar "canceled land leases for energy development on 77 parcels of land in Utah.  Then he canceled a pending oil-shale lease sale based on his expert judgment that it 'didn't meet the smell test.'"  Kerpen adds, "Overall there has been a steep drop-off in leasing on federal lands....  2010 saw a 79 percent drop in leasing in Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming from 2005.  Total onshore royalties dropped 33 percent in just two years."  Even more virulent is the Obama Administration's attack on coal, which the President seems to have targeted for quick phaseout, even though we have the world's most expansive coal reserves, offering 200 years of inexpensive energy.

Greens Flummoxed By Cheap, Clean U.S. Gas.  Green groups have a major new concern:  fracking, the process of extracting natural gas from shale deposits far underground.  What they don't have is much hard evidence that fracking is a danger.  Fracking already is producing a bonanza in the U.S.  Theoretically it could provide enough to replace all coal-powered electricity with cleaner-burning natural gas.

Windmills stopped at night after bat death.  Thirty-five windmills at a western Pennsylvania wind farm have been silenced at night since a bat that belongs to an endangered species was found dead under one of the turbines.

Windmills to shut at night following demise of rare bat.  Night operation of the windmills in the North Allegheny Windpower Project has been halted following discovery of a dead Indiana bat under one of the turbines, an official with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said Monday [10/17/2011].  The finding marks only the second location where an Indiana bat has been found dead under a wind turbine.  Two Indiana bats were found under turbines in the Mid-west, said Clint Riley, supervisor for Fish and Wildlife's Pennsylvania field office.

Eco loons go bat crazy.  The warped mentality that puts the (imaginary) needs of bats perfectly capable of looking after themselves before those of humans differs little from the warped mentality which demands that stretches of countryside be carpeted with environmentally unfriendly, economically ruinous wind farms...  This mentality in turn causes real people — not fluttery, squeaky, nocturnal insectivores, but actual humans with families, friends, histories, consciousness, emotions etc — genuine suffering and distress.  As this newspaper reports today, at least 2,700 people are dying every year because they can't afford to heat their homes in winter.  And one of the main reasons they can't do so is because of the misguided policies of eco-zealots...

Fracking gets a clean bill of health.  [Scroll down]  This accident was among the most serious that can happen during the completion of an onshore shale-gas well.  Yet nobody was injured, the public was never in danger, and there was no lasting impact on the environment, as the analysis shows. ... But don't expect the anti-fossil-fuel crowd to let scientific evidence get in its way.

Is There Any Real Shortage of Oil?  Several arguments have been used in preventing the development and use of our hydrocarbon resources.  One is that smoke and harmful pollutants from the exhausts of automobiles and coal-fired plants generating electricity harm the environment and the people.  Certainly there was once some truth in that, but major strides have been made in cleaning up our air.  Exhausts of automobiles have been greatly improved, along with efficiency of engines.  The output of pollutants of generating plants has been greatly reduced.  But things like this will never satisfy the environmental radicals.  They want to completely eliminate the use of our hydrocarbon resources, and I believe that the real reason is that they want to destroy our American way of life, in all of its aspects.

Environmentalists Sue to Block TransCanada Pipeline — Before It's Approved.  U.S. officials illegally allowed a Canadian company to begin preparing the route for its proposed 1,700-mile-long oil pipeline from western Canada to Texas even though the project hasn't gained final government approval, three conservationist groups contend in a lawsuit.

Green groups sue Interior to thwart Shell's Arctic drilling.  Environmental and Alaska native groups are suing the Interior Department over its approval of Royal Dutch Shell's plan to begin drilling in Arctic waters off Alaska's northern coast as soon as next year.  The groups allege that Shell lacks adequate oil-spill cleanup plans.

Greens want terror oil in your gas tank.  Canada, not the Middle East, is the No. 1 supplier of oil to the United States, a symbiotic relationship that has existed for decades.  What's more, the Canadian province of Alberta is home to the world's third-largest petroleum reserves.  Viewing America as the most logical market for its expanding production, the government of Alberta and the TransCanada Corp. are proposing a pipeline called Keystone XL to bring crude oil from Alberta to refineries along the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast.

Green Twilight.  Rational opposition to the greens has consistently misinterpreted the movement's core beliefs.  Critics have concentrated on arguments that wind, solar, and squirrel-on-a-treadmill power cannot replace brute force methods such as nuclear, coal, and oil.  That electric go-carts are no substitute for technologically mature internal-combustion cars, that bullet trains cannot possibly compete with jetliners.  All this is true — and all this is irrelevant.  It's all irrelevant because green initiatives are not meant to replace anything.  They are intended to form the basis of a new, deindustrialized society with minimal power generation, limited air travel (or travel of any sort, for that matter), and local, nonindustrial economies.  In a green society, there will be no massive power plants, no private automobiles, no jetliners.

Conservation:  Everyone is for it — in the abstract.  In practice, not so much.  The most efficient way to conserve energy is not to use an electronic device at all.  Yet Americans are using more and more.  The typical U.S. household had one TV set in 1978.  Today it has 2.5. ... Eighty-seven percent of homes now have central AC.  Anyone want to give up theirs?  Combine such trends with population growth, and Dominion expects demand to soar 30 percent in the next decade and a half.  Where will the juice come from?

Watermelons v the Shale Gas Miracle.  [Scroll down]  I hear reports that the shale gas deposits in the North East of England may be larger still; and that those under the North Sea may dwarf even these.  We are talking, in other words, of cheap energy sufficiently abundant to supply our needs for at least the next century, possibly much longer.  This means in turn that our industry will become more competitive, the cost of heating and lighting our homes will fall dramatically, and that our economy suddenly now has an opportunity to grow even as those in much of the Western world are collapsing.  So why aren't we out on the streets, celebrating, drinking and rutting like it was VE Day all over again?  In a word:  Watermelons.

Solar, We Have a Problem.  It's called the SunShot Initiative, mirrored after President Kennedy's man-on-the-moon mission. ... The DOE is calling for man-on-the-moon-type missions, but we already have men on the moon.  Their names are coal, natural gas, nuclear and hydroelectric power. ... In reality, the biggest threat to our electricity security is our federal government preventing access to our abundant domestic resources, most notably coal and natural gas.

President Obama and the EPA's War on Jobs.  For some time now, I and others have been documenting the relentless assault on economic growth by the EPA under President Barack Obama.  I feel like a broken record at times trying to beat this drum and get people to realize that while Obama doesn't keep all of his campaign promises, destroying the coal industry is one that he has done everything he can to stay true to.  For anyone that paid attention during the 2008 presidential cycle, Obama made it clear that it was his intention to bankrupt the coal industry through regulation and legislation.

Want More Jobs? The Low-Hanging Fruit Is Energy.  Everyone knows that Obama's jobs program is a joke; but let's assume that you actually do want to help create a million or more jobs, while simultaneously increasing government revenues by many billions of dollars.  How would you do it?  It's actually easy:  just stop the irrational antagonism to energy development that is America's most glaring public policy failure.

Actresses and Professors Protest the Pipeline.  It seems odd that anyone would oppose construction of a pipeline that would help secure America's energy future by ensuring supplies from a reliable ally like Canada.

Governor asks Obama to bypass the Congress...
Nebraska governor asks Obama to nix Keystone pipeline.  Nebraska's governor urged U.S. President Barack Obama on Wednesday [8/31/2011] to block TransCanada's planned Keystone oil pipeline from Alberta to the Gulf Coast, saying it could hurt a regional water source.

The Editor says...
Or it could do any number of other things, but the one thing it is sure to do is to deliver cheap oil to U.S. refineries.

Gore urges Obama to block pipeline for 'dirtiest source of fuel on the planet'.  Former Vice President Gore called on President Obama late Wednesday [8/31/2011] to reject a pending permit application for a controversial pipeline project, calling the oil that it would carry "the dirtiest fuel on the planet."

The Editor says...
I thought coal was supposed to be the dirtiest fuel.  In any event, the dirtiness of a coal mine(r) doesn't matter to most people, as long as the coal goes straight to a power plant and is converted into electricity.  I would burn coal in a potbellied stove or even in my fireplace if that was the only way to keep warm in the winter.

Arrests continue at White House oil pipeline protest.  U.S. Park Police arrested another 45 environmentalists near the White House Sunday [8/21/2011], the second day of a two-week demonstration urging President Obama to block a proposed pipeline that would greatly expand imports from Canada's oil sands projects.  Police say 110 people over two days have been peacefully arrested after engaging in civil disobedience in front of the fence north of the White House.

Ruby Red Tape.  The abstraction known as "regulation" is often invoked as a reason businesses aren't growing or hiring fast enough, and with good reason.  Anyone wondering what that means in practice should consult the epic saga of the Ruby pipeline.

Legal challenge to licensing of U.S. nuclear plants.  A group of 25 anti-nuclear organizations will file legal challenges today [8/10/2011] that aim to slam the brakes on licensing actions at the nation's commercial nuclear plants, based on preliminary reviews of the disaster at Japan's Fukushima plant this year.

Inhibiting an Oil and Gas Boom.  The fossil fuel shale extraction industry, where technological advancements and discoveries of huge reserves of oil and natural gas hold great promise for the nation's future energy needs, is under attack.  In June the New York Times ran a dubiously sourced series of stories that sought to show the bullishness on natural gas is overblown.

New EPA rules to devastate coal industry.  The coal industry is crying foul over new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations which they say will be among the most be costly rules ever imposed by the agency on coal-fueled power plants.  The result, industry insiders say:  substantially higher electricity rates and massive job loss.

How Environmentalists Cause War and Repression:  No other group has done as much to keep America dependent on foreign oil as the environmentalists have.  After leading successful campaigns against nuclear power and domestic drilling, the green movement may lecture on "oil wars," but it is responsible for most of them.

Choking off the supply of uranium:
20-year mining ban planned for Grand Canyon area.  The Obama administration said it intended to place a 20-year ban on new mining claims on 1 million acres of land bordering the Grand Canyon, moving to protect an area that is a crucial water supply to the Southwest and where uranium mining claims have jumped 2,000% over the last seven years. ... Environmentalists said the decision would keep the Grand Canyon panorama from being gradually industrialized.

Environmentalists push to keep U.S., others from oil drilling in Arctic.  Environmentalists are toiling to stop a modern-day gold rush at the top of the world, as the U.S. and four other countries scramble to stake claims to potentially vast oil riches under the frozen waters of the Arctic Sea.  Environmental activists such as Greenpeace are opposed to any resource extraction in the region.

More Enviro-Anomalies.  The believers in eco-faith who form the core of the environmentalist movement have been pushing "renewable energy" sources (paradigmatically wind and solar power) while waging a jihad against all forms of fossil fuel.  Nowhere has this cult of the renewable been as strong as it has been in California, where Governor Jerry Brown, long a high priest of the environmentalist faith, is back in power.

More Enviro-Anomalies.  [The obscure dunes sagebrush] lizard, supposedly dying out, has a habitat that stretches across southeastern New Mexico and west central Texas, smack-dab in the middle of the longest-exploited and most productive oil field in America, the Permian Basin field.

Sierra Club already using EPA Clean Air regs to shut down manufacturing jobs.  Since 2005, anytime a new coal-fired power plant was proposed anywhere in the United States, a lawyer from the Sierra Club or an allied environmental group was assigned to stop it, by any bureaucratic or legal means necessary.  And they succeeded.  According to The Los Angeles Times, by 2008, the coalition claimed to have stopped construction of 65 power plants nationwide.

Solar energy plans pit green vs. green.  Janine Blaeloch, executive director of the Western Lands Project, a non-profit group that examines the impacts of government land privatization, supports developing America's renewable energy sources but says fields of mirrors along miles of open desert isn't the way to do it.  "These plants will introduce a huge amount of damage to our public land and habitat," she said.

EPA bullies its way to first CO2 emissions limit.  The EPA is finally getting around to setting limits on greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources, like power plants — coal industry watch out. ... if the Lake Side limit becomes a precedent or standard for power plant emissions, coal-fired electricity production could be significantly constrained.

Alternative Energy and the King Canute Strategy.  For two centuries the American economy has been driven by ever cheaper energy, from the steam engine to modern coal and nuclear electric power, and of course petroleum-based transportation.  As costs of production and transport declined, incomes rose.  Now environmentalists seek to reverse the process.  They propose to raise the cost of our cheapest and most important energy source, coal.  Subsidies for production of wind and solar energy already in place induce investment in much higher cost solar and wind power energy.  Since the most efficient locations for solar and wind energy do not coincide with concentrations of population and energy demand, transmission costs must be added to costs of production.  It is the Industrial Devolution of the 21st century.

Environmentalists sue Texas over coal plant permit.  Environmental groups have challenged in court a decision by a Texas state agency to grant an air permit to a proposed coal-fired power plant in South Texas.

Meet the sand dune lizard.  He's also known as the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard; this endearing little critter is native to the American Southwest.  Specifically, eastern New Mexico and West Texas. ... You see, the favored habitat of the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard also happens to be a favored habitat of the Domestic Production Crude Oil Rig:  the US Fish and Wildlife Service plans to declare the former to be an endangered species, and you know just how this story ends, right?

Greens vs. Energy.  This April 22, if you find yourself frustrated at rising gasoline prices, or rising electricity prices, or rising natural gas and heating oil prices, make sure you place plenty of blame on the environmentalists behind Earth Day; for decades they have found a reason to oppose every practical form of energy in the name of "saving the planet." ... Environmentalists have long thwarted drilling and mining projects on the ground that fossil fuels "destroy the environment."  What they neglect to mention is that over the last 200 years, fossil fuels, in fueling industrialization, have improved our environment in life-changing ways — industrialization has brought far cleaner air and water, with far less susceptibility to poisons or diseases, and with far less vulnerability to climate.

Just sit in the dark.  This is progressives' idea of "progress."  They've railed against every economically viable form of energy — coal, oil, natural gas.  Now, post-Japan, they'll be crossing atomic power off the list, too.

Let's wean ourselves off of  our oil "addiction"  civilization.  Don't know if it was Bush who originally came up with that stupid term — probably not — but I sure did cringe every time he used it.  Weaning ourselves off of civilization itself really is more apt, since that's basically what it would amount to.  Here's a small sampling of what we'll be doing without if the green-weenie neo-Luddites have their way.

Against All Energy Anywhere.  Were it not for Green propaganda, the U.S. would not be wasting billions of taxpayer dollars on idiotic wind and solar farms that are utterly dependent on government subsidies and mandates that require utilities to use the pitifully small amounts of electricity they produce.  The same can be said of the equally idiotic regulatory mandates for ethanol that drive up the cost of every gallon of gas pumped while, at the same time, reducing the mileage and damaging to your car's engine.  Even Al Gore thinks ethanol is a bad idea.  Ironically, more people have died from wind turbines than nuclear plants.  In 2008, there were 41 recorded deaths.  The carnage on birds and bats is rarely mentioned by the media.

Are environmentalists an obstacle to clean energy production?  [Scroll down]  Recent examples include environmentalist lawsuits seeking to block construction of a solar power plant in California's Mojave Desert due to threats to the endangered desert tortoise and environmentalists suing to block the construction of a 75-wind turbine project in Nevada due to threats to local wildlife.  Rob Mrowka, an ecologist for Tucson, Ariz.-based Center for Biological Diversity, told The Ely Times of Ely, Nev., that a green energy project's location sometimes outweighs considerations such as climate change.  "We've got environmentalists out there who are fighting with environmentalists over whether or not they want renewable wind power or they want to save the chicken," Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe told The Daily Caller regarding Oklahoma environmentalists and their effort to block construction of wind farms because of how it could negatively affect prairie chickens.

Fearing EPA's Carbon Tax.  The EPA is moving to impose tough limits on carbon emissions from the big power plants across the country — and then plans to screw the new carbon limits down tighter and tighter.  Farmers' fuel and electricity costs would go through the roof, along with everybody else's.  The goal, after all, is to make the coal, oil, and natural gas that power most of our power plants too expensive to use.  They need to make all our electricity at least slightly more expensive than the ultra-costly solar panels and wind turbines that have failed to produce "Green power" in Europe and, thus far, fail to provide much energy here at home.

Obama is AWOL in Oil Crisis.  We have a major oil crisis unfolding now and where's Obama? ... We now, this week, have oil prices busting through $100 a barrel.  This will create major havoc to our already anemic economy.  How did we get here?  Our president has a moratorium on nearly all domestic oil production:  we can't drill off our coasts, nor Alaska and certainly not the gulf.  We can't build nuclear power plants, dam rivers, explore for natural gas or mine coal.  We're stuck with windmills and failing solar power companies — companies that can't even stay in business after billions in taxpayer subsidies.  This is an energy policy written by hippies.

The Green Double-Cross Begins.  I have a very basic axiom about environmentalists and energy; call it "Hayward's First Law of Green Thermodynamics," and it goes as follows:  There is no source of energy, no matter how clean, that left-environmentalists won't oppose if it becomes practical to scale up.
This is an original compilation, Copyright © 2024 by Andrew K. Dart

George Soros Handicapping American Energy.  I have written numerous columns regarding the actions George Soros has taken over the years to hurt American oil and gas companies.  He has a vested interest (to the tune of at least a billion dollars) in trying to rig the system to make his "clean energy" investments pay off.  Since these investments need oil and gas to be high-priced, anything he can do to harm the companies that bring this bounty to the surface help those green schemes.  One of his favorites among the Soros-funded 527 Astroturf groups is MoveOn.Org, which recently protested against the development of shale gas, America's greatest hope to wean ourselves off of dependency on foreign sources of energy.

Five Dollars a Gallon?  Conservative thinkers have been saying for years (decades?) that we need to build up our own oil resources here at home so we're not at the mercy of the oil Imams of the Middle East.  We should have allowed more off-shore drilling.  We should have allowed Alaska drilling.  And shale.  There are ways to do these things safely and cleanly.  But it wasn't done.  The environmentalists wouldn't let it happen.

The Wind-farm Eruption.  [Scroll down]  The uber radicals at the top of the various "green" movements — and high in the Obama administration — are for wind energy precisely because it doesn't work.  (Think about it.  None of the projects/techniques/schemes of providing energy supported by the government has any chance to produce industrial-grade power in significant quantities.  All of those that have a chance — such as coal-to-liquid fuel conversion and community-sized, inherently safe reactors — are stifled by the environmental bureaucracy for various reasons, primarily global warming and nuclear waste.  Both rationales are almost exclusively based on counterfactual claims, poor hypotheses, and hysteria rather than real danger.  A reasonable person would have to say that it is too coincidental that radicals always land on the side of the argument for reducing the energy assets of the United States.  I think it is important that we all realize this and assess all government programs in light of it.)

There is nothing 'smart' about rationing electricity.  [Scroll down]  As we have seen before, there are elements in the Green movement who actively want to revive wartime-style rationing and who welcome shortages and inconvenience, because they believe this is the price we must pay for "Saving The Planet."  What is a matter of the direst concern is when such a fringe mentality becomes part of the political and economic mainstream.  Rationing our energy supplies it is not progress.  It is a step back — quite literally — towards the Dark Ages.

California's environmental regulations cause economic blackout.  The origin of the modern environmental movement and the creation of Earth Day are often said to have their origins in the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill.  "Californians have largely treated environmentalism as a 'religious sacrament' rather than as one component among many in maximizing people's quality of life," note the editors of Trends magazine, commenting on California's decline.  Nowhere is this more evident than the state's hostility to energy production.

President Stupid.  You have to be stupid to openly declare that you want to drive the coal industry out of business when it provides half of all the electricity the nation uses every day, but that is precisely what President Stupid's administration is doing.  You have to be stupid to declare a moratorium on drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico after courts have twice told you to remove it.

No Coal, No Power, No Gas.  During the early February cold spell in the southern plains, when wind chills in Dallas dipped to minus twenty degrees, Texans were going without power to heat their homes and businesses even as the state was sitting on massive surpluses of natural gas.  Even hospitals were having to switch to emergency generating systems.  And this in the state with the largest energy production capacity in the continental US.  How was it that Texas suffered an extended period of rolling blackouts at a time when there's a glut of coal and natural gas waiting to be used?

White House Lies On Blackouts Exposed.  [Scroll down]  Maxed-out energy grids are a direct consequence of a shortage of new power plants to meet demand.  Indeed, contrary to another of [When Obama Communications Director Dan] Pfeiffer's falsehoods when he claimed that Texas was not subject to EPA restrictions, one of the delayed power plants that could have alleviated the energy shortage, the Las Brisas Energy Center, has been the subject of an EPA battle with Texas state authorities for the past three years.  A federal court ruling last month gave the EPA permission to proceed with greenhouse gas regulation in Texas, temporarily superseding Texas' non-compliance with the new regulations which came into force on January 2.  The White House's claim that EPA regulations are not currently affecting Texas is a complete fabrication.

Reaction to the State of the Union speech:
On Energy, Obama's Full of Hot Air.  [Scroll down]  The EIA [Energy Information Administration] affirms that "most renewable generation technologies are not economically competitive with fossil fuels over the projection period" of 2007-2035.  Plus, one of the only two renewable energy sources deemed viable up until then is hydropower.  But the president didn't even present it as an option, and many environmental hard-liners want us to dismantle hydropower dams, not build more of them.

Mojave Desert solar power farm:
U.S. Losing Resource Wars to ... Turtles.  [Scroll down]  A big win for America's fledgling green-energy industry?  Not in the eyes of the Western Watershed Project, a conservationist NGO which has just filed a federal suit to stop the project.  Watershed's complaint:  the sun farm threatens the habitat of the Desert Tortoise, a reptile registered on the Endangered Species List.  Or, to be precise, the project — a 6-mile square footprint in Mojave's 50,000 square mile expanse — threatens 25 Desert Tortoises documented by wildlife biologists in their site survey.

Conservation group sues to stop California solar plant.  A U.S. conversation group has sued the federal government over its approval of a major solar power plant in the California desert, the latest in a string of challenges to the nation's renewable energy goals from the environmental community.

Sierra Club Sues California's Green Gov to STOP Solar Power Plant.  Like everything else, the eco-mentalists love the idea of renewable energy, as long as it's situated next to poor people, not in their pristine back yard.

Clean Energy: The Nuclear Solution.  [Scroll down]  The environmentalist lobby doesn't like nuclear any more than it does coal-fired generation, mainly because it works!  The alternatives they give are non-solutions.

The EPA Versus the USA.  It seems almost beyond reason that a single U.S. agency could so hate America that it was prepared to ignore the Constitution, distort a Supreme Court decision, and impose its will on the nation in the name of totally discredited science.  That, however, is what the Environmental Protection Agency is seeking to do...  The use of fossil fuels — coal, oil, and natural gas — accounts for 85% of America's energy sources.  The EPA proposes to limit or end their use.  As such it is an enemy of the people and Congress must act to stop this insane agency before it destroys the nation.

Fight Back Against Obama's Lawless EPA.  On November 15, Obama's Environmental Protection Agency issued a 100-page, highly technical "guidance" document proposing that as of January 2, 2011, large sources of greenhouse gas emissions — such as power plants, steel operations, and petroleum refineries — be required to obtain preconstruction and operating permits limiting their greenhouse gas emissions and to install the "best available" technology to do so. ... Previously, no such permits were needed, and no greenhouse gas limits existed.  It is widely agreed such new rules will drive up the costs of electricity, iron and steel, gasoline, and anything else produced by large operations, with these costs passed along to consumers already staggered by a jobless "recovery" from the recession.

The top 5 overlooked energy stories.  [#2]  Clashes over power lines:  The Obama administration has made it clear that it wants to expand the country's reliance on renewable energy sources like wind and solar.  But that requires huge investments in massive power lines necessary to bring renewable electricity from one side of the country to the other.  Electric utilities have been fighting for months about who should be required to pay for those new power lines.

Green v. Green.  I love it when holier-than-thou greenies attack one another. ... But yesterday, driving the streets of Berkeley, I came across a new variant in the Green v Green struggle.

The Left and Energy Policy.  There are several factors that contribute to a nation's future prosperity.  One of the most important is an efficient and dependable supply of energy.  A modern economy cannot function without adequate energy sources to power its electrical grid, supply its industries, heat its offices and homes, and fuel its transportation needs.  These facts are self-apparent, even to the left, so why is the left attempting to hamstring every promising new source of energy available to America?  I can think of only one reason: because the left, as its main objective, wishes to bring America to its knees.

Greenpeace seeks to halt North Sea drilling.  Environmental activist group Greenpeace on Friday [11/12/2010] filed a legal claim to force the government to stop deepwater drilling in the North Sea, which it says threatens the environment and could even cause oil spills similar to the Gulf of Mexico disaster.

The Hollywood left blocks new oil field drilling.  The primary importance of a vigorous, healthy American oil industry is essential to achieving energy independence and maintaining American freedom.  I would wager there are very few Tea Partiers driving electric cars home to solar-paneled houses.  I believe it's time, therefore, that Americans get behind the oil industry and petition our elected representatives to do something about the absurd level of red-tape and smoke thrown up by leftists every time an oil company wants to drill for more of the one natural resource Americans need most:  Texas Tea.

Environmentalists Blocking Wind Farms?  And Solar?  And Geothermal?  Kansas is ranked second in the nation behind Montana for wind energy potential, a fact which should have environmentalists jumping for joy.  Instead, they're trying to block the construction of transmission lines to wind farms in south central Kansas and north central Oklahoma.  Why?  Well it all has to do with the lesser prairie chicken.  According to a story by the Hutchinson News in February of this year, ranchers and wildlife officials in the area are teaming up with groups like the Sierra Club to block the construction of the lines, which would apparently run through prime breeding territory for the bird.

Environmental groups sue to block wind farm.  Some conservationists have filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block the startup of Maryland's first industrial wind farm because it allegedly threatens federally protected Indiana bats.

Green group sues Interior to reinstate offshore drilling ban.  The Center for Biological Diversity filed litigation against the Interior Department Friday [10/22/2010] that seeks re-instatement of the federal deepwater drilling ban, alleging Interior lifted the moratorium this month without enough ecological study.

More about offshore oil drilling.

Facts oiled up.  James Hansen, the head of one of President Barack Obama's NASA labs, came to Canada last week to tell us not to allow a French company called Total to proceed with its Canadian oilsands project.  Even for Obama, that's quite a foreign policy accomplishment:  Interfering with two allies at once.

GE's Really Big, Bad Ideas.  China is building a new coal-fired plant almost weekly in order to ramp up its ability to compete internationally.  It is no accident that the nations that use the most energy are also the most successful.  It has been U.S. energy policy to slow the building of coal-fired plants even though the U.S. is estimated to have several hundred years of coal with which to supply their needs and ours.

Cops save, arrest Greenpeace activists.  Four Greenpeace activists who had clung to an oil rig off western Greenland with rock-climbing gear were arrested on Thursday [9/1/2010] after an Arctic storm forced them to abandon their environmental protest.

Dems Propose Back Door Energy Taxes.  While Harry Reid may have allowed the energy tax hikes to die on the floor of the Senate, liberals nationwide have continued their attacks on the energy industry.  The Gulf oil spill is barely a fond memory of a moratorium and Democrats are already seizing on the incident to push a host of job-killing, industry-kneecapping taxes and regulations designed to do what they failed to do legislatively:  take down the American energy industry.

The green jobs con job.  The green agenda is straightforward: to replace conventional energy sources with unconventional ones — wind, solar, ethanol, etc. — that have failed the test imposed by market competition.  That these unconventional energy sources must be subsidized heavily (or the conventional forms hindered) in order for them to survive is highly revealing; but the central point here is that green policies inexorably have the effect of making energy more expensive.

No Science, Fake Science, and the Destruction of the Nation.  Any scientist who has not sold his soul to the environmental movement will tell you that the reason that greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide (CO2), do not cause any warming is due to the fact that they have to conform to the laws of thermodynamics.  The first law states that "energy can be neither created nor destroyed.  It can only change form."  Energy produced by coal, natural gas, oil, or nuclear is energy that has changed from one form of matter to another.  The attack on these sources of energy is a direct attack on the economic success of America and it is one that is at a dangerous peak of activity generated by the Obama administration, primarily through the Environmental Protection Agency.  There is simply no such thing as "dirty energy."

IER:  Administration's Assault on Energy Continues.  In response to the U.S. Interior Department's announcement that it will add even more red tape to the already lengthy permitting process for deepwater oil and gas production, Daniel Kish, Institute for Energy Research senior vice president for policy, released the following statement:  "The Administration continues its assault on US energy production, this time trying to convince us that a shortage of paperwork led to the Gulf spill.  No amount of Government Green Tape would have stopped the spill, and in fact, Americans saw that it actually made cleanup harder."

More about the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Clean Energy:  The Nuclear Solution.  [Scroll down]  The environmentalist lobby doesn't like nuclear any more than it does coal-fired generation, mainly because it works!  The alternatives they give are non-solutions.

There is no global warming and no need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.  The vast bulk of CO2 is natural.  The Earth produces 97% of the CO2 in the atmosphere.  The atmosphere is essentially and overwhelmingly water vapor.  CO2 plays no role in climate change.  Cap-and-Trade is a tax on energy use and Americans are constantly told that energy use in any form — coal, oil, natural gas, or nuclear — is bad.  That's not just a lie, it is insane.

More about carbon dioxide.

Protests spew over Montana-Gulf pipeline plan.  Environmental groups and landowners, upset by last month's oil spill in Michigan, are urging the Obama administration to deny a proposal for an oil pipeline that would go from the Montana-Canada border to refineries along the Texas Gulf Coast.

Obama is Strangling Big Oil.  There was no "official" announcement.  Not in so many words.  Connect the dots of what has occurred in just the past two weeks to deep-water oil drilling, shallow-water drilling, and oil refining.  The effect is the same.  Barack Obama is shutting down Big Oil.

The Smart Grid Trojan Horse.  For decades, utilities satisfied unbridled energy demand growth by constructing new generating plants.  The concept was pleasantly simple:  Predict the pace by which energy consumption would increase and build generating plants to keep ahead of it.  Then came environmentalism and its evil twin, mindless anti-capitalism, both rooted in the counterculture of the 1960s.  Thereafter, utilities began to evolve at the point of a gun.  Every aspect of generating electricity came into question under a variety of federal energy acts and environmental regulations.

Myths Associated with the 'Smart' Electrical Grid.  [Scroll down]  Let me be clear about one thing:  generation capacity is dangerously low in some locations, and in a few specific locations, transmission capacity is stretched dangerously thin.  Those are local issues, and not a national problem.  And one of the largest reasons why generating capacity is dangerously low in some locations is that building has been difficult due to political and legal resistance.

Environmentalists Oppose All Man-Made Power.  What are we to think about a movement that makes war on industrial-scale power generation?  In seeking to cut off the motive power of industry, environmentalism is attempting to destroy the Industrial Revolution by starving it to death.  Such a reversal would begin a new Dark Age for mankind — a Dark Age in which Americans would be compelled to accept a standard of living well below that of the Third World — a Dark Age that would begin with the deaths of billions of human beings who would have become the "surplus" population that could no longer be supported in a world without industrial production.

Obama's Affordable Energy Policy:  Safe, Legal and Rare.  Undermining access to abundant conventional energy sources has proved to be a key component of Barack Obama's promised "fundamental transformation" of America.  To be fair, he was uniquely candid when vowing that "under my plan of a cap-and-trade system electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket."  This interview received limited coverage despite also revealing plans to "bankrupt" politically disfavored industry while also raising "billions of dollars."

Environmentalists Prevent Cleaner Power Plant Construction.  In 2007, Sunflower Electric Power Corporation proposed a state-of-the-art coal-fired power plant in Holcomb, Kansas.  This plant represented a $3.5 billion investment in one of the most rural areas of the country, $78 million in annual payroll during the construction phase, and more than 300 permanent jobs and $15 million in payroll once it was completed.  The plant, with two 700-megawatt generators, would have used technology to limit emissions.  It would have been a huge economic boon to an area which largely relies on the meatpacking industry, tourism, and agriculture for jobs.  Then a bureaucrat on the other end of the state killed it.

Citizens Alliance for Responsible Energy.  In the years ahead we'll need to greatly increase our electricity supply.  While it is important to continue to develop renewable energy sources, they are not likely to be nearly enough to meet the growing demand.  Coal is still a great resource and clean coal technology is rapidly becoming a reality.  After a dormancy of nearly 30 years, it's time to bring back nuclear power, which is safe and clean.  Anti-development and anti-energy activist groups are attempting to deceive the public into believing that we can wean ourselves off of oil in the near future.  Perhaps in the decades ahead that worthy goal will be realized, but in the meantime there is no viable substitute for petroleum — the most powerful and versatile fuel known to man.

Environmentalists Also To Blame For Exxon Valdez And Gulf Spills.  Environmentalism did not cause the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster, but it did help make it possible, just as 1989's Exxon Valdez disaster, which the Gulf Oil spill has now eclipsed, was also ironically made possible by a desire to protect the environment.  The original plan when oil was discovered at Prudhoe Bay on Alaska's North Slope was to build a pipeline directly to the northern border of the 48 contiguous states.  Groups like the Sierra Club waged a major battle against both the Prudhoe Bay development and the pipeline.

Renewable Energy:  There Ain't No Free Lunch.  Catch words these days for the favored form of energy include "green," "clean," "renewable," and "sustainable" — among others.  Yet nobody can quite quantify what exactly "green" means.  Examples pointed to by proponents include wind and solar, with a few pointing to hydroelectric power, biomass, and fuel cells.  But those examples, and the logic behind them, fail the very definition of renewable (or clean, green, or sustainable for that matter).

Obama's EPA stifles new energy gains.  [Scroll down]  This week, it's Lisa Jackson, Obama's Environmental Protection Agency head, putting another pillow over the face of the energy industry:  A "comprehensive research study to investigate the potential adverse impact that hydraulic fracturing may have on water quality and public health." ... Jackson forgot to mention "concerns" about hydraulic fracturing come only from environmental groups seeking to stop all uses of fossil fuels like oil, coal, and natural gas.

Enviros play dirty on coal, natural gas.  [Scroll down slowly]  Environmentalists talk about how they plan to replace coal with an array of "green" alternative energy sources, including biomass, solar, wind and ethanol.  What they don't want to talk about is the fact that there's no way those sources are going to replace coal-fired power production by 2030.  And they don't want to talk about the fact that there's another extraordinarily plentiful and much cleaner energy source — natural gas — that can readily replace coal and lower energy costs more effectively than any alternative source.  In fact, the same environmentalists who are shutting down coal plants are also opposing increased natural gas production.

State Panel Calls Fort Worth's Gas Production Safe.  Natural gas drilling in the Fort Worth, Texas metropolitan area is releasing few or no hazardous emissions, and producers are complying with state health standards at all locations, reports the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.  The commission released its findings after conducting a comprehensive study of natural gas sites in response to environmental activists' assertions the sites were endangering public health and should be shut down.

It's Always "Earth Hour" in North Korea.  [Electricity] is the difference between the Dark Age and the present age... but not for everyone.  Much of Africa is in darkness. too.  People who hate civilization and the humans who created it are welcome to live out in the wilderness or in some primitive backward country where they burn dung to cook their meals.  If America doesn't start building more coal-fired plants, nuclear plants, and other generators of electricity, we too shall live in darkness when the sun goes down.  Be warned, the present administration is doing everything possible to make that future happen.

The Greens Hate Energy, America, and You.  "There's nothing like a fresh start. On his first day in office, President Obama could make four decisions that would start 2009 with a 'clean slate' of energy policies," said Friends of the Earth[.  A]t the same time, the Sierra Club announced its own "Clean Slate Energy Agenda" that — surprise — was the same.  The focus of both is on energy use and accessibility.  Both want a lot LESS energy use.  Along with all other environmental organizations both use the bogeyman of "global warming" to demand huge reductions in "emissions." ... This is the objective of one of President Obama's earliest executive orders.  Driving up the cost of owning and operating a car directly strikes at the ability of Americans to be mobile and independent.  Justifying it as necessary to reduce global warming is just a big fat lie.

The President's Tax Hike on Drilling.  One well-publicized element of President Obama's proposed budget is the elimination of "subsidies" for fossil fuels.  But, in large part, these are not subsidies at all. ... Obama, in proposing to eliminate expensing of these drilling costs, is not abolishing a tax subsidy, but is imposing a tax penalty.  And, given his often-articulated disdain for fossil fuels, he is probably quite aware of this fact.

How to spell Obama energy policy: 'D-e-l-a-y'.  The need to develop America's bountiful fossil fuel resources will only intensify as our economy grows and those of emerging world economic powers like China and India similarly expand.  But President Obama is moving national energy policy in exactly the opposite direction.  Instead of aiding exploration and development of available fossil fuel resources, the administration appears to be doing everything possible to slow or even stop it.

Obama's Tonya Harding energy policy:  Politicians would have us believe there's a Brave New World of renewable energy out there.  But like the book, the reality of our current energy policy is more of a dystopia.  Case in point:  With great fanfare last October, President Obama took a trip to Florida to celebrate raising the electricity bills of Sunshine State residents.  Well, not really.  But that is in effect what happened.

Power plants criticize proposal to block use of seawater for cooling machinery.  [California] water board regulators are mulling a plan to force the power companies to spend billions to stop vacuuming the ocean for water to cool their machinery.  Mostly, the companies don't want to.

Energy Suicide:  Unplugging America.  The U.S. is home to huge reserves of coal.  It is often called the Saudi Arabia of coal.  The same applies to oil.  For all the talk of "energy independence", the U.S. through its energy policies has been embarked since around the 1970s on something I call energy suicide.  If there is one thing the Greens truly hate it is the fuels we use to maintain our economy and our lifestyle.  High on the list is coal, but it is essential to understand that the Greens are at war with oil and nuclear power as well.

In California, quest for cleaner power hits tortoise-sized speed bumps.  On a strip of California's Mojave Desert, two dozen rare tortoises could stand in the way of a sprawling solar-energy complex in a case that highlights mounting tensions in the United States between wilderness conservation and the quest for cleaner power.

Our National No-Energy Policy:  Thomas Pyle, the president of the Institute for Energy Research, recently offered a chilling description of our national energy focus.  "When it comes to paving the way for the responsible development of homegrown, job-creating energy resources, no administration in history has done more to ensure producers do less."

You Have to Watch Both of Obama's Hands.  [Scroll down slowly]  Utilities have to hold back on investments in coal-fired plants until the situation is clarified.  Which might just suit Vice President Joe Biden, who announced during the campaign that no coal plants would be built during an Obama administration. [...] The president seeks relief from the [OPEC] cartel by talking of "energy independence," while Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar decides to "improve protection for land, water and wildlife" by imposing new regulations that make it more difficult to develop oil and gas resources on 260 million acres of federal land.

Obama turns off homegrown energy.  The Interior Department has collected only one-tenth as much revenue from oil and gas lease sales in 2009 as it did in 2008.  Revenue from such lease sales produced a return for the taxpayer of $942 per acre in the last year of the Bush administration, compared with only $254 per acre in the first year of the Obama administration.  Presently, not quite 3 percent of the 2.46 million available [acres of public land] are leased and that percentage is headed down.  Under Obama's Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, fewer acres on- and off-shore were leased in 2009 than in any previous year.

Cheap Natural Gas and Its Enemies.  A vast reservoir of clean-burning natural gas could be available at reasonable cost in the coming years, freeing us from some of our dependence on imported energy.  Yet there are those who consider such a development a threat.

Top Ten Green Auto Headlines of 2009.  Higher fuel-economy standards forced increased production of nickel-hydride batteries for hybrids, which in turn jump-started the nickel-mining industry.  Green jobs?  Nope.  "Environmental groups find the rush to bring in mining projects alarming," reported the Detroit News as the National Wildlife Federation filed suit against mining permits in job-starved Michigan.

Save the Planet by Banning Ice Cream.  If you believe the global warming crowd, then you must believe that we have to minimize our energy consumption.  Are you willing to wear the same clothes for years to forgo the energy needed to produce new ones?  Are you willing to live without cars, air conditioning, television, heat, holiday dinners, computers, and ovens?  If this seems extreme, consider their premise:  Our use of energy, in any amount, takes us that much closer to destruction, therefore any reduction must be good.

Big Oil Bites Back.  Wednesday [5/27/2009], Chevron was descended upon by a zoo-full of San Francisco leftists pushing rain forest sentimentalism, Burma, and other pet causes dear to the no-soap crowd.  They journeyed all the way to San Ramon, Calif. to shout "Shame on you!" and "No blood for oil" and worse yet to make demands on the company. ... The real aim of all these attacks is to end these companies' world leadership in oil extraction.  The green groups want to put an end to what the oil companies do best, from finding oil in the world's most hostile climates like the Arctic Sea, to extracting oil from abandoned wells, to drilling oil 12 miles through salt walls under the sea.  The ultimate goal is less oil to power American industry and to maintain the quality of private life.

L.A. may drop plans for controversial transmission line.  Los Angeles officials said the city may abandon plans to build a highly controversial "green" power transmission line through unspoiled desert and wildlife preserves on a route east of the San Bernardino Mountains, focusing instead on alternative pathways mostly along an interstate highway where high-voltage lines already exist.

The Editor says...
Does anyone remember the California energy crisis of 2000?  They're setting themselves up for another one.  The lunatics of California would rather have "unspoiled desert" in their state than electricity in their homes.  And if you live anywhere near a desert, wouldn't you want to have air conditioning?

Greenpeace protesters occupy Alberta oilsands site.  A group of Greenpeace activists have scaled three smokestacks at a Shell oilsands upgrader plant in northern Alberta in a call for action on climate change.  Three of the protesters were arrested as they tried to gain access to the site.

Judge blocks drilling on refuge.  A federal judge has indefinitely blocked gas and oil drilling on a wildlife refuge that sits next to the Great Sand Dunes National Park in south-central Colorado.  U.S. District Court Judge Walker Miller on Thursday [9/3/2009] granted a preliminary injunction, ruling environmental groups presented adequate evidence that drilling would cause irreparable injury to Colorado's Baca National Wildlife Refuge.

Renewable Energy, Meet the New Nimbys.  Environmentally friendly energy projects are running into the same cries of "not in my backyard" that stymied a previous generation of alternative-power efforts.  Even as Americans tell pollsters they are eager for alternatives to fossil fuel, some are fighting proposals for solar and wind projects and for the thousands of miles of transmission lines that would be needed to carry the cleaner energy to market.  The protests echo grass-roots opposition that has blocked nuclear plants and energy producing trash incinerators for decades.

EPA to Kansas:  Start over on coal plant proposal.  A federal official has told Kansas to start over its review process for a proposed coal-fired electric plant in southwest Kansas that Gov. Mark Parkinson had endorsed.  Sunflower Electric Power Corp., based in Hays, plans to build the electric plant in Finney County.  Sunflower had wanted to build two plants, but Rod Bremby, the state's secretary of health and environment, rejected an air-quality permit for them in October 2007, citing their potential carbon dioxide emissions.

US nuclear recycling faces the axe.  Earlier this week, the administration of President Barack Obama quietly cancelled plans for a large-scale facility to recycle nuclear fuel.  The move may prove a fatal blow to the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) set up by previous president George W. Bush.

Six charged after Niagara Falls observation tower stunt.  State Parks Police arrested six activists who unfurled a 70-foot banner this morning off the observation deck in Niagara Falls State Park in protest of the use of tar sands oil.

The sun and the oceans do not lie.  The moves now being made by the world's political establishment to lock us into December's Copenhagen treaty to halt global warming are as alarming as anything that has happened in our lifetimes.  Last week in Italy, the various branches of our emerging world government, G8 and G20, agreed in principle that the world must by 2050 cut its CO2 emissions in half.  Britain and the US are already committed to cutting their use of fossil fuels by more than 80 percent.  Short of an unimaginable technological revolution, this could only be achieved by closing down virtually all our economic activity:  no electricity, no transport, no industry.

Boom in hydropower pits fish against climate.  The Rocky Reach Dam has straddled the wide, slow Columbia River since the 1950s.  It generates enough electricity to supply homes and industries across Washington and Oregon.  But the dam in recent years hasn't produced as much power as it might:  Its massive turbines act as deadly blender blades to young salmon, and engineers often have had to let the river flow over the spillway to halt the slaughter, wasting the water's energy potential.

The Editor says...
Properly designed hydroelectric facilities include screens and fences to keep fish and debris and swimmers out of the turbines.

Closing the Door on Building New Coal Power Plants.  Community [i.e., environmentalist] opposition, legal challenges, and financial uncertainty over future carbon costs are prompting companies to rethink their plans for coal.  Since the beginning of 2007, 95 proposed coal-fired power plants have been cancelled or postponed in the United States — 59 in 2007, 24 in 2008, and at least 12 in the first three months of 2009.  This covers nearly half of the 200 or so U.S. coal-fired power plants that have been proposed for construction since 2000.

Obamamotive.  [Scroll down]  Don't get the idea that this is about clean energy.  If it were, the Obama administration would be pushing for nuclear power as the rest of the world is doing.  A May 20th AP article reports that President Obama has agreed to "transfer sensitive nuclear items" to the United Arab Emirates to help that nation build its nuclear power industry to supply the UAE's "growing demand for electricity."  It seems the United Arab Emirates can produce electricity from clean, inexpensive nuclear power and the Obama administration will help them, but the United States will have to make do with windmills and solar panels.  To add insult to injury, the article points out that as part of this agreement the UAE will buy the nuclear fuel from the US.

"No Coal" Goal.  The road to Copenhagen in December 2009, where the United Nations will attempt to come up with a successor to the Kyoto (global warming) Protocol, is already before us.  The signs along the road indicate the global-warming alarmists are already blitzing the general public and the media about the supposed need to severely limit fossil-fuel usage, particularly coal.

Los Angeles will end use of coal-fired power.  Los Angeles will eliminate the use of electricity made from coal by 2020, replacing it with power from cleaner renewable energy sources, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said.  Consumers of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, the largest city-owned utility in the United States with 1.45 million electricity customers, will see higher power bills in the fight against climate change, he added in his inaugural speech for his second four-year term as mayor on Wednesday [7/1/2009].

The Editor says...
Guess what, L.A. — the climate will inevitably change, and you'll be stuck with higher electric rates for no reason!

No Energy from this Executive.  "As I've often said, in the short term, as we transition to renewable energy," President Obama stated in April, "we can and should increase our domestic production of oil and natural gas. ... We still need more oil, we still need more gas.  If we've got some here in the United States that we can use, we should find it and do so in an environmentally sustainable way."  Does anyone believe Obama was serious about this? Given his practice of misdirection — saying one thing, doing another — no one should have.  Now, nearly five months into the Obama presidency, it's clear he didn't mean a word of it.  His administration is impeding, not promoting, increased production of oil and gas, as it is of coal and nuclear power.

America's Nuclear Power Lag:  While President Barack Obama welcomed the "peaceful development" of nuclear power plants in Iran and other countries which do not see themselves as friends of the United States, he and his liberal Democratic colleagues seem intent on killing off the remnants of the nuclear power industry in the United States.  Although candidate Obama said he would consider nuclear power use if a reasonable solution can be found to storing nuclear waste, President Obama has taken absolutely no action in developing civilian nuclear power.  The comprehensive energy program of the Democratic Congress, the Waxman-Markey bill does not even mention nuclear power.

FutureGen 'Clean Coal' Project Scaled Back by Obama.  The scope of the stalled FutureGen "clean coal" project in central Illinois is being scaled back by the Obama administration in an effort to revive the plans for a coal-fired power plant that spews fewer gases into the air.  The U.S. Energy Department said today [6/12/2009] it will support a modified version of the proposal, seeking to build a plant in Mattoon, Illinois, that can capture and bury 60 percent of its carbon emissions.  The Bush administration had crafted the original idea for a plant that could trap almost 100 percent of emissions, and then canceled it after costs exceeded estimates.

Our Self-Created Energy Problem.  Canada, rarely thought of as an oil-rich nation, is in fact awash in crude.  Indeed, it is America's primary source of imported oil.  The province of Alberta alone holds 173 billion barrels of crude.  Some government analysts say that's enough to supply U.S. petroleum needs for 24 years.  This Canadian crude doesn't gush from the ground.  The tarlike oil is mixed with sand and has to be extracted using heat.  The process emits more carbon dioxide that conventional drilling.  Environmentalists, who've yet to see any oil they like, consider it dirty oil.

Get The Frackin' Gas.  An oil company wants to invest its profits in clean-burning American natural gas.  A Hungarian billionaire and a "green" politician want to stop it.  This is the real Climate-gate scandal.

America "awash in natural gas" but will enviros stop its production?  Fossil fuels account for 84 percent of all the energy America uses now and they will account for 78 percent in 2035, according to U.S. government projections that include the most likely levels of growth in renewable energy source like wind and solar.  That in turn means we are going to need all the oil and gas we can find and produce for the foreseeable future.

The Danger of Environmentalism.  A grave danger faces mankind.  The danger is not from acid rain, global warming, smog, or the logging of rain forests, as environmentalists would have us believe.  The danger to mankind is from environmentalism.  The fundamental goal of environmentalism is not clean air and clean water; rather, it is the demolition of technological/industrial civilization.  Environmentalism's goal is not the advancement of human health, human happiness, and human life; rather, it is a subhuman world where "nature" is worshipped like the totem of some primitive religion.

Environmentalism vs Creativity:  For decades environmentalists have cried that man should adopt an "alternative" form of energy.  But in this freest country on earth, exactly how have they exercised their liberty to try and make their dream come true?  Well, they support like-minded politicians — who've invented nothing but obstacles to innovation.  They march in protests — that have created nothing but vandalism.  And they rage against capitalism — the only system by which worthy creations can effectively be financed, marketed and widely distributed.

Environmentalist Economic Strangulation.  Solar energy requires vast territories for solar cells — as many as 46,000 square miles would have to be covered by solar panels.  One logical place for a "solar energy farm" would be the wide-open, sunshine-rich, sparsely populated Mojave Desert.  However, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) already has nixed that possibility in the name of wilderness protection.  As a frustrated Gov. Schwarzenegger lamented, if you can't put solar panels in the Mojave Desert, then where can you put them?

Dianne Feinstein:  I Brake for Turtles.  Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican, thinks he has a partial solution to America's dependence on foreign oil.  But he says liberals and environmentalists are rejecting his plan to make it easier to build solar and wind power stations.  California's Mohave [sic] Desert is an inhospitable place, he notes, but 19 companies think it's perfect for siting solar or wind facilities on 500,000 acres owned by the federal government there.  But Senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat who used to be San Francisco's mayor, is having none of it.  She is pushing legislation to turn the land into a national monument, which would prevent such development.

Feinstein:  Don't Spoil Our Desert With Solar Panels.  California's Mojave Desert may seem ideally suited for solar energy production, but concern over what several proposed projects might do to the aesthetics of the region and its tortoise population is setting up a potential clash between conservationists and companies seeking to develop renewable energy.

The Editor says...
Democrats like Ms. Feinstein are constantly crowing about "energy independence," yet they seem to find insurmountable problems with everything from oil wells to windmills and solar panels.  I wonder... what energy source would she suggest we all use?  And how much time does she spend in the currently-unspoiled desert?

Feinstein to introduce legislation to establish 2 national monuments in Mojave Desert.  Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) says she plans to introduce legislation today to establish two national monuments on roughly 1 million acres of Mojave Desert outback that is home to bighorn sheep and desert tortoises, extinct volcanoes, sand dunes and ancient petroglyphs.  Its centerpiece, Mojave Trails National Monument, would prohibit development on 941,000 acres of federal land and former railroad company property along a 105-mile stretch of old Route 66, between Ludlow and Needles.

The Editor says...
Why is Senator Feinstein so eager to "prohibit development?"

Desert Vistas vs. Solar Power.  Senator Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation in Congress on Monday [12/21/2009] to protect a million acres of the Mojave Desert in California by scuttling some 13 big solar plants and wind farms planned for the region. ... Her intervention in the Mojave means it will be more difficult for California utilities to achieve a goal, set by the state, of obtaining a third of their electricity from renewable sources by 2020; projects in the monument area could have supplied a substantial portion of that power.

NIMBY Feinstein nixes solar, wind farms.  Senator Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who chairs the Senate subcommittee that oversees the Interior Department, has scuttled plans to build 13 multi-million dollar solar plants and wind farms on a million acres in California's Mojave Desert proposed as a national monument.  Feinstein's move will severely complicate her state's quixotic effort to obtain a third of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020.

Obama nukes nuclear storage.  For more than two decades, the Congress, the president and the sprawling federal bureaucracy have worked to find a safe place to store the waste of nuclear reactors.  Yucca Mountain, a remote formation in the deserts of Nevada, was the chosen site.  Now President Obama, bowing to the demands of a fraction of anti-nuclear activists, has thrown 22 years of hard work up in the air.

Yucca Mountain, Though on Hold, Would Be Very Safe.  President Barack Obama has proposed a budget that would eliminate funding for the nearly completed Yucca Mountain storage facility for spent nuclear fuel.  Proponents vow not to abandon the plan, and they have strong scientific reasons to support it.  Yucca Mountain was selected as the nation's first repository for high-level nuclear waste because of its many natural barriers preventing the escape of radioactive particles.  These include the mountain's surface soils, its overall physical shape, the thick rock layers above and below the levels used for storage, and the very impermeable materials located below the area's deep water table.

Obama Budget Abandons Yucca Mountain.  In a significant energy policy redirection, the Obama administration appears poised to pull the plug on funds for permanent nuclear waste storage at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.  President Barack Obama's recently unveiled budget eliminates funding for the Yucca Mountain geologic repository, in spite of years of planning and almost $8 billion invested in the project.

Harry Reid's Land Grab:  The 1200-page, pork-laden, $10 billion proposal locks up millions of acres of energy-rich property by designating it as environmentalist-friendly "federal wilderness" area where not even as much as a bicycle would be permitted to travel across the land.  Many of these areas recently became available when the ban on domestic drilling in Western states expired last fall and the liberal left couldn't muster the courage to keep it in place due to rising energy prices.  Now Democratic leaders are using different legislative strategies to put a new kind of ban in place.

Lost In An Energy Wilderness.  Earlier this year, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar canceled 77 Utah oil and gas leases that had gone through seven years of studies, negotiations and land-use planning.  They were rejected because temporary drilling operations might be "visible" from several national parks more than a mile away.  We are not making this up.  Some of these parcels are in or near the Green River Formation, an oil-rich region in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming that's been called the "Persia of the West."

The Long Awaited Re-Emergence of the Silent Majority.  Radical environmental legislation, in the form of endangered species acts, clean water acts, salmon recovery acts, inhibiting or outright prohibiting energy source extraction, power generation by any energy means, or the construction of oil refineries, and the fraud that is man-caused global warming in the form of CO2 emission limits and the insane cap and trade policies, has cutoff American creativity, ingenuity, industriousness and its envied economy, bringing the economy to its knees and rendering the United States a third-world country.

Cap and Trade Primer:
Eight reasons why cap and trade harms the economy and reduces jobs.  The most popular way to regulate carbon dioxide emissions is through a cap and trade program.  President Obama and many policymakers support some form of this regulatory policy. ... These proposals are very, very costly and economically damaging.  If enacted, last year's flagship cap and trade proposal, the Lieberman-Warner bill, would increase the cost of gasoline by anywhere from 60 percent to 144 percent and increase the cost of electricity by 77 to 129 percent.

A Country at the Mercy of Environmentalists.  For several decades, environmentalists have managed to get Congress to keep most of our oil resources off-limits to exploration and drilling.  They've managed to have the Congress enact onerous regulations that have made refinery construction impossible.  Similarly, they've used the courts and Congress to completely stymie the construction of nuclear power plants.  As a result, energy prices are at historical highs and threaten our economy and national security.

Pickens plan is hot air that may burn America.  Radical environmentalists with the ear of Washington's new one-party political leadership oppose new domestic oil, natural gas and coal exploration and constructing new nuclear power plants.  Nothing but "alternative" energy seems acceptable.  One of the most prominent alternatives is the "Pickens Plan," trumpeted by Texas billionaire T. Boone Pickens.

Did someone mention T. Boone Pickens?

Let's sit in the dark and freeze to death.  We keep hearing about alternative energy.  President Obama is calling for a Manhattan Project on alternative energy.  We already had a Manhattan Project on alternative energy 65 years ago.  We called it the Manhattan Project.  Its research eventually led to the development of nuclear power plants.  France gets 87 percent of its electricity from nuclear power.  We stopped building nuclear power plants in the United States 30 years ago after a movie starring Jane Fonda and Jack Lemmon scared everyone, and there was a non-fatal accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant.

When green has shades of gray.  Green-energy advocates and land preservationists in California are on opposite sides of a proposal to place solar-mirror fields in the Mojave Desert.  The dispute is reminiscent of the battle over wind power in Nantucket Sound — a clash of competing "goods" where all the players wear green hats.  But as with Cape Wind, the threat of global warming is too great to keep all undeveloped land off the table.

Capitol Hill's Coal-Fueled Power Plant Dims Clean Energy Hopes.  As Congress tries to clean up the nation's energy sources and cut gases blamed for global warming, it is struggling to do so in its own backyard.  The Capitol Power Plant, a 99-year-old facility that heats and cools the hallowed halls of Congress, still burns coal and accounts for one-third of the legislative branch's greenhouse gas emissions.  For a decade, lawmakers have attempted to clean it up.

Controversy Over Yucca Mountain May Be Ending.  More than two decades after Yucca Mountain in Nevada was selected to be the national nuclear waste repository, the controversial proposal may finally be put to rest by the Obama administration.  In keeping with a pledge President Obama made during the campaign, the budget released last week cuts off almost all funding for creating a permanent burial site for a large portion of the nation's radioactive nuclear waste at the site in the Nevada desert.

Has Obama killed nuclear power?  It looks like Obama's budget intends to give up on implementing the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository.  (Congratulations, Senate Majority Leader Reid (D-NV).  So, nuclear waste would continue to sit around nuclear power plants.  Which means nobody is going to build anymore nuclear power plants in the U.S. ever.

Yucca Mountain Site is Ideal for Spent Nuclear Fuel.  Spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste have been accumulating in the United States for nearly 60 years, when nuclear materials were first used to produce electricity and to develop nuclear weapons.  Waste that was planned for disposal at the Yucca Mountain storage facility in Nevada resides instead in temporary storage at 121 sites in 39 states.  After decades of scientific study, it is clear no legitimate safety issues preclude opening Yucca Mountain for the storage of spent nuclear fuel.

Utility Suspends Nuclear Plant Effort.  A utility in Missouri said Thursday that it was suspending its efforts to build a new nuclear reactor, making its proposed plant, Callaway 2, the first of the so-called nuclear renaissance reactors to fall by the wayside.  The industry has been looking forward to its first construction start in 30 years.  According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 17 companies have filed applications to build 26 reactors.

Discovered: 200 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.  Good news for America undermines the green energy agenda.  The Wall Street Journal reports a huge new discovery of natural gas — a fossil fuel so clean even liberals can stand it. ... Good news, right? It's good for consumers, it's good for the country and the economy, and it's good for the world's resources. ... But it's bad for the Fear Industry ... it's bad for our media airheads, who have to think of whole new scare headlines ... it's bad for the Green Doom Brigade.

Obama sounds death knell for nuclear power.  Under the guise of cutting wasteful spending, President Obama is terminating support for the Yucca Mountain spent nuclear fuel repository in Nevada.  While not unexpected, this development means that there will be no place to store nuclear waste, probably for decades, other than at temporary storage locations at each of the nation's nuclear power plants.

Democrats are opposed to coal-fired power plants — unless they own them.
Green lobby guides Democrats on climate bill.  Democratic lawmakers who spent much of the Bush administration blasting officials for letting energy lobbyists write national policy have turned to a coalition of business and environmental groups to help draft their own sweeping climate bill.  And one little-noticed provision of the draft bill would give one of the coalition's co-founders a lucrative exemption on a coal-fired project it is building.

Let's Get Real About Renewable Energy.  Let's start by deciphering exactly what Mr. Obama includes in his definition of "renewable" energy.  If he's including hydropower, which now provides about 2.4% of America's total primary energy needs, then the president clearly has no concept of what he is promising.  Hydro now provides more than 16 times as much energy as wind and solar power combined.  Yet more dams are being dismantled than built.  Since 1999, more than 200 dams in the U.S. have been removed.

Blowhards.  For the last seven years and counting, the green entrepreneur Jim Gordon has been trying to build a fleet of wind turbines in federal waters near the upscale seascapes of Cape Cod, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket.  The site seemed ideal, given the stiff ocean breezes and the eco-friendly politics in Massachusetts.  The company says its 130 towers could meet 75% of the region's electricity needs and reduce carbon emissions by some 734,000 tons every year.  The sort of people who can afford to use "summer" as a verb are in favor of all that.  Completely in favor, really.  But they did want to raise one quibble.  Unfortunately, the wind farm would create "visual pollution" in Nantucket Sound, particularly the parts within sight of their beachfront vacation homes.

Saving lives with coal.  Since 1970, unhealthy power plant pollutants have been reduced by almost 95% per unit of energy produced.  Particulate emissions (soot) decreased 90% below 1970 levels, even as coal use tripled, and new technologies and regulations will nearly eliminate most coal-related pollution by 2020, notes air quality expert Joel Schwartz.  Moreover, the vast bulk of modern power plant particulates are ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate.  "Neither substance is harmful, even at levels tens of times greater than are ever found in the air Americans breathe,"Schwartz says.

Global Warming and the Price of a Gallon of Gas:  You may want to give credit where credit is due to Al Gore and his global warming campaign the next time you fill your car with gasoline, because there is a direct connection between Global Warming and four dollar a gallon gas.  It is shocking, but true, to learn that the entire Global Warming frenzy is based on the environmentalists' attack on fossil fuels, particularly gasoline.

Lawmakers ask coal-fired plant near Capitol to switch to gas.  Four days before a planned civil disobedience action at a coal-fired power plant near the U.S. Capitol, the leaders of the House of Representatives and the Senate asked Thursday for the plant to replace all its coal with natural gas. ... The power plant, three blocks south of the Capitol, has been running every day since it went into service in 1910.  It provides heating and cooling for the Capitol, the Library of Congress and about 20 other federal buildings on Capitol Hill, using both coal and natural gas.

Radical Environmentalism Is An Unmitigated Farce.  My other issues with environmentalists have to do with their getting in the way of a free society to provide the resources necessary to keep that society going economically.  Environmentalists have stopped oil refineries and nuclear power plants from being built for over 25 years.  That's why a gallon of gas is now well over $2.00 [in September 2005] and will not likely come down and that's why our power capacity is at or near maximum. ... Environmentalists have stopped the drilling for oil in areas of known oil reserves, thus making us more dependent on foreign sources and driving up the cost of oil and oil-associated products, accordingly.

Energy in the Balance.  Take the example of renewable energy projects, the very sort about which environmentalists often wax lyrical.  But "the greens are blocking the very transmission network needed for renewable electricity to move through the economy," according to The Wall Street Journal.  The utilities willing to spend $1 billion to build the needed 240 miles of transmission line are projecting a completion date of 2014 at the earliest because of the length of permitting hearings and subsequent appeals.

Minnesota Green Group Fights Wind Power Transmission Line.  A Minnesota environmental activist group is fighting against the construction of power lines to deliver wind power to the state, shortly after environmental activist groups successfully pressured the state government into enacting renewable power mandates.  Less than two years after the state legislature passed an aggressive renewable power mandate, the Citizens Energy Task Force has registered as a "legally intervening party" and is drafting legal arguments asserting the proposed wind power transmission lines unlawfully threaten regional wildlife.

The Editor says...
Environmentalists apparently thrive on problems rather than solutions.  They want to replace reliable oil and gas with intermittent wind and solar power.  They want us to use the power of the wind, but they oppose the construction of electric transmission lines.  There is no way to satisfy environmentalists, other than to stop using energy altogether.

Clean-Coal Debate Pits Al Gore's Group Against Obama, Peabody.  Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and his Alliance for Climate Protection say clean-coal technology is a fantasy.  Peabody Energy Corp., the biggest U.S. coal producer, says another prominent Democrat has pledged to make the technology a reality:  President Barack Obama.

New Utah Power Plants Restricted by Referendum.  Sevier County, Utah voters have approved a referendum requiring public approval for new coal-fired power plants, placing severe restrictions on the ability of power companies to meet growing electricity demand in the region.  The vote may be challenged in court.  Sevier Power Co. is seeking to build a 270 megawatt coal-fired power plant on 300 acres of privately owned land in central Utah near the town of Sigurd.  With passage of the referendum, Sevier Power's proposal will be subject to a special election.

Court halts Utah oil and gas leases.  A judge late Saturday [1/17/2009] halted the Bush administration's efforts to open 110,000 acres of federal land in Utah to oil and gas exploration, ruling that the danger of damaging the pristine land required further study before leases were awarded.  The leases to the parcels had been auctioned off Dec. 19 in a move that environmental groups said was a last-minute gift to the energy industry before President Bush left office.

Bias alert!
A "gift to the energy industry" is a gift to the energy consumer.  Personally, I'd rather enjoy cheap gas in my neighborhood than "pristine land" way out west.

Environmentalists file 11th-hour lawsuit to block proposed lease sales in Utah.  Environmental groups filed a lawsuit Wednesday as a last-ditch effort to block the sale of leases for 110,000 acres of federal land in Utah that the Bush administration plans to auction off on Friday.  Critics say the proposed lease sales are an 11th-hour attempt by the administration to leave its mark on the striking, energy-rich red-rock landscape of southern and eastern Utah.

The Editor says...
Read between the lines:  The landscape is "energy-rich" and the environmentalists don't want that energy to be tapped.

Environmentalists look to Obama to limit drilling.  Environmentalists on Monday [11/10/2008] applauded an announcement that U.S. President-Elect Barack Obama would consider curtailing oil and gas drilling in some areas, and expressed hope future energy policy decisions would contain more environmental protections.  The co-chair of Obama's transition team, John Podesta, said on Sunday that Obama probably would reverse an executive order by President George W. Bush allowing drilling in fragile lands in Utah.

The Editor asks...
What is fragile land?

Democrats Still Aren't Serious About Drilling.  After a five-week paid vacation, Democrats are back in Washington and claiming that they want to do something about oil prices.  But the problem is that their plan, which passed the House yesterday [9/16/2008] and will likely come up for a vote in the Senate later this week, will not produce a single drop of oil.  Why?  Because it does nothing about environmental groups that are suing to stop drilling.

Second thoughts on warming:  President-elect Barack Obama wants to phase out coal-based electricity generation, switch to renewable energy and follow Europe's lead on climate change.  That could prove difficult.  Coal generates half of all U.S. electricity.  Wind provides less than 2 percent of all electricity and cannot be relied on when it's needed.  Europe's lead can't even be defined, much less followed.

Biden:  'No coal plants here in America'.  Some great rope line video from Joe Biden's recent Ohio swing, where he was asked by an anti-pollution campaigner about clean coal — a controversial approach in Democratic circles for which Obama has voiced support, particularly during the Kentucky primary.  Biden's apparent answer:  He supports clean coal for China, but not for the United States.  "No coal plants here in America," he said.  "Build them, if they're going to build them, over there.  Make them clean."

Gore urges civil disobedience to stop coal plants.  Nobel Peace Prize winner and environmental crusader Al Gore urged young people on Wednesday [9/24/2008] to engage in civil disobedience to stop the construction of coal plants without the ability to store carbon.  The former U.S. vice president, whose climate change documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" won an Academy Award, told a philanthropic meeting in New York City that "the world has lost ground to the climate crisis."

Gore's Rebellion.  Speaking last Wednesday [9/24/2008] on a celebrity panel in New York, the Nobel Prize Laureate proclaimed:  "If you're a young person looking at the future of this planet and looking at what is being done right now, and not done, I believe we have reached the stage where it is time for civil disobedience to prevent the construction of new coal plants that do not have carbon capture and sequestration."  He added, "clean coal does not exist."  Mr. Gore didn't explain how far he thinks his young acolytes should go in their rage against the coal-burning machines that provide about 50% of U.S. electricity.  Sit-ins?  Marches against power plants?  How about trashing power lines:  What could he mean by "civil disobedience"?

Gore the Vandal:  Did you see the news item about Al Gore's speech this week in which he urged "civil disobedience" to stop the construction of coal-fired plants to meet our nation's growing need for more electrical power?  Gore epitomizes what I suspect future generations will call "The Great Global Warming Hoax", but in the meantime, he is able to generate the bogus science and anti-energy propaganda that is at the core of environmental ideology.

Up in smoke.  The Environmental Protection Agency's rejection of a permit for a Utah coal plant this week spells trouble for three coal-fired power plants proposed in Nevada.  Environmentalists are hailing the decision, released Thursday [11/13/2008] by the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board, as the final straw for new traditional coal plants.  Utah's permit was denied because it did not limit greenhouse gas emissions ... .

Outdoor wood boilers under fire.  Who doesn't love the smell of a wood fire?  The scent of a burning oak or maple log can brighten even the dreariest winter day. ... The problem is a home furnace called an outdoor wood boiler.  The furnaces are designed to burn wood, wood pellets or corn in an outdoor shed, heating water that is piped into the house.  Unlike a wood stove or a campfire, however, wood boilers give off copious amounts of smoke.

Hidden Audio: Obama Tells SF Chronicle He Will Bankrupt Coal Industry.  Imagine if John McCain had whispered somewhere that he was willing to bankrupt a major industry?  Would this declaration not immediately be front page news?  Well, Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview.  The result?  Nothing.

Palin Attacks Obama on Coal Production.  Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin unleashed a new volley against Barack Obama on a four-city tour of Ohio on Sunday [11/2/2008] by touting newly released audio comments made by the Democratic presidential candidate promising to restrict the construction of new coal-fired power plants in the U.S.  The issue is particularly sensitive in coal-rich Ohio, West Virginia, and Colorado.  Obama made the comments to the San Francisco Chronicle in January, which were posted on YouTube over the weekend.

Ohio Coal Association Says Obama Ticket Not Supportive of Coal.  Mike Carey, president of the Ohio Coal Association (OCA), today [11/3/2008] issued the following statement in response to just-released remarks from Senator Barack Obama about the nation's coal industry.  "Regardless of the timing or method of the release of these remarks, the message from the Democratic candidate for President could not be clearer:  the Obama-Biden ticket spells disaster for America's coal industry and the tens of thousands of Americans who work in it.

Palin, Obama Camp Spar Over 'Bankrupting' Big Coal.  Is there more daylight between Republican and Democratic energy proposals than commonly thought?  In the election's final weekend, coal once again became the battlefield, with a broadside attack from Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin on Sen. Barack Obama's plans to "bankrupt" the coal industry.  She referred to a January interview Sen. Obama gave to the San Francisco Chronicle in which he said that new environmental regulations — including caps on greenhouse-gas emissions — would make traditional coal-fired plants terribly expensive.

We Cannot Worship Nature and Remain Free.  When I heard Barack Obama promise to bankrupt the coal industry I did not hear a man at war with coal — I heard a man at war with man. His harsh words for the coal industry sprang from his near deification of nature and his subsequent willingness to sacrifice not only our livelihoods in the name of "environmental responsibility" but our freedom as well.

The Great Global Warming Swindle.  A very large section of the world's population still does not enjoy the benefits of electricity. ... These people burn wood or dried dung in their homes to cook their food.  They have no artificial light or heat in their homes (huts).  Their wretched fires give off horrific amounts of smoke and eat up fuel (trees).  When it gets dark they must sleep.  When it gets cold they shiver (it gets cold in Africa too you know).  And of course no electricity also means there are no fancy things like water purification plants. ... Getting electricity is a matter of life and death for about a third of the world's population.  Africa has coal and oil, but the greens say these must be left untouched.  This is barbaric.

The fruits of environmentalism:
UK faces blackouts within 10 years after closure of coal power plants.  Britain faces blackouts within ten years as power stations go out of service.  Energy experts claim government dithering has failed to guarantee the construction of new plants.  Nine oil and coal-fired power plants are to close by 2015 because of an EU directive that aims to limit pollution.  At the same time, four ageing nuclear power plants will also be shut.

Utah coal plant permit blocked by EPA panel.  The Environmental Protection Agency was blocked Thursday [11/13/2008] from issuing a permit for a proposed coal-burning power plant in Utah without addressing global warming.  The ruling by an agency appeals panel means the Obama administration probably will determine the fate of other similar plants.  The panel said the EPA's Denver office failed to adequately support its decision to issue a permit for the Bonanza plant without requiring controls on carbon dioxide, the leading greenhouse gas.

The Editor says...
Note to Associated Press writers:  Please note that "the leading greenhouse gas" is water vapor, not carbon dioxide.

Harry Reid Sneaks in Oil Shale Ban.  Leave it to Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid to crash the Energy Freedom party.  Not only is he crashing the party, he's doing so through the side door where he thinks no one can see him.  Just when it appeared that we could celebrate Congress lifting the ban on oil shale, Senator Reid "has decided to sneak an extension of the oil shale ban through as Congress fights over the financial bailout."

Cheap Natural Gas and Its Democrat Enemies.  We have the power to tap vast shale gas reserves that lie under our feet through large swaths of America, but special interest groups aligned with the Democratic Party are trying to frustrate plans to bring this cheap, plentiful, and clean energy to the surface.  Who are the irresponsible parties?

Environmentalists balk at drilling off NJ coast.  With oil and gas drilling heating up as an issue in the presidential race, environmentalists and the governor reiterated their opposition to tapping reserves off the state's coast, saying it would endanger the environment and the tourism industry on which New Jersey is so dependent.  "It is a dark, dark day for the natural coast.  Some might say it's as black as oil," said Cindy Zipf, executive director of Clean Ocean Action, who joined environmental and fishing groups at a news conference Wednesday on the Avon boardwalk.

Congressional corruption:  The energy crisis comes to rest at the feet of the Democrats.  For more than 30 years, the Democrats have used whatever rules and procedures necessary to block or prevent the energy industry from keeping up with the growing demand.  Democrats have prevented the construction of a single nuclear plant, or a single oil refinery, and the development of our domestic energy resources.  It is the Democrats that are now preventing even a reasoned debate.

Pedaling no-gas options.  Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives sent a message last week to hard-working commuters forced to pay historically high prices for gasoline:  Ride a bike.  The message was buried on page 255 of a 290-page bill the Democratic leadership introduced at 9:45 p.m. last Monday night, forced through the Rules Committee at 10:00 p.m., and put up for a "debate" and final vote — with no amendments allowed — on Tuesday evening [9/16/2008].

Who Are You Calling Stupid?  [Scroll down]  There's a reason why we don't have more coal-fired and nuclear plants generating the electricity we need.  There's a reason our electric power grid is not being upgraded to meet our future needs.  There's a reason oil companies won't spend billions to build new refineries.  There's a reason food costs more when corn is converted into fuel instead of food.  The reason is thirty-one years of government regulations and general interference with the power and energy industries that must answer to their investors while coping with "environmental" laws that slow or render impossible the provision of our energy needs.

We Can Thank Shortsighted Politicians for High Energy Prices.  For decades left-leaning politicians have advocated higher prices and less energy.  They were going to save the environment by punishing Americans into driving less and driving smaller cars.  Now their policies have succeeded with a vengeance.  The very left wing politicians who favored a policy of no oil and gas exploration, no use of coal, no development of nuclear power, and no aggressive development of new technologies are now panic-stricken that their policies of higher prices have led to higher prices.

Environmentalism's Big Lie:  Renewable Energy.  Claims that renewable energy can replace fossil fuels and nuclear power are a fraud.  In California, moreover, environmentalists have revealed that their real attitude toward renewable energy is no less hostile than their attitude toward all other forms of man-made power.  After the installation of hundreds of "alternative" energy plants in the state — in the nation's most ambitious program to build environmentally correct power plants — the greens have begun to reject one renewable power technology after another.

A Step Back From Enviro Lunacy.  Lobbyists and litigators for environmental restriction groups have produced energy policies that I suspect future generations will regard as lunatic.  We haven't built a new nuclear plant for some 30 years, since a Jane Fonda movie exaggerated their dangers.  We have allowed states to ban oil drilling on the outer continental shelf, prompted by the failure of 40- or 50-year-old technology in Santa Barbara, Calif., in 1969, though current technology is much better, as shown by the lack of oil spills in the waters off Louisiana and Mississippi during Hurricane Katrina.

Color Energy Woes Green.  The global economy depends on available, affordable energy.  Many place their hopes for abundant energy supplies in yet-to-be-imagined technologies.  But while researchers tinker with far-off possibilities, there's something we should do right now to keep our primary energy sources flowing — break the radical environmentalists' chokehold on national energy policy.

Seeing The Light:  Most of France's electricity has been generated by nuclear power for years, and now Great Britain is again looking to atomic energy.  Why can't we increase nuclear output in this country?  The answer is, of course, irrational opposition by environmentalists.  They screech about greenhouse gas emissions from gas- and coal-fired electric plants but, with a few exceptions, they fanatically resist the most reasonable alternative:  nuclear power.

Greens Will Leave us Cold and Hungry.  Earthworks is about to initiate its own "No Dirty Energy" campaign "to alert the public to the climate, ecosystem and community risks associated with mining and burning the world's dirtiest fuel sources?"  Labeling coal and oil "dirty" is pure PR and ignores the fact that coal, a cheap and abundant energy sources, provides just over fifty percent of America's electricity, an energy without which the entire nation would cease to function.  It ignores the way the Green's campaign against oil has for four decades thwarted the right of American's to access and use its national oil and natural gas reserves yet to be found and extracted from 85% of our coastlines or the well-known fact that billions of barrels of oil remain untapped in ANWR.

Blame the greens when the lights go off.  In successive weeks, Greenpeace has denounced proposals for new coal-fired power stations and a new generation of nuclear power plants.  It may be true that clean-coal technology is a long way off, but whatever other complaints can be made about it, nuclear power is an alternative to fossil fuels and honest greens are hard-headed enough to admit it.  James Lovelock, the greatest environmentalist of our time, describes it as 'the one safe, available, energy source' and despairs at the green movement's 'irrational' objections.

The Nancy Pelosi of Kansas.  Gov. Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas … has spearheaded Kansas efforts to ban new coal plants, becoming the first state to reject new energy generation on health (read global warming) grounds. [...] But as Planet Gore's own Sterling Burnett has reported, 13 potential Kansas wind-farm projects are endangered as a direct result of the state's rejection of the coal plants!

Britain Plans World's Biggest Tidal Power Station.  Great Britain is mulling plans to build the world's largest tidal power station.  Though the climate-friendly energy source is expected to provide 5 percent of the country's power, environmentalists oppose the project, which they say will destroy vital wildlife habitat.

Uranium mining potential:  What does uranium have in common with Arctic oil, offshore natural gas, coastal wind and cellulosic ethanol?  They're all sources of energy that government bureaucrats have declared off-limits — needlessly.  Just last month, Rep. Raul Grijalva, Arizona Democrat, declared an emergency situation to withdraw public lands adjacent to the Grand Canyon from uranium mining.

Virginia Is Sitting on the Energy Mother Lode.  Virginia is one of just four states that ban uranium mining.  The ban was put in place in 1984, to calm fears that had been sparked by the partial meltdown of a nuclear reactor on Three Mile Island outside of Harrisburg, Pa. in 1979. ... [Henry Bowen and Walter Coles] are asking the state to determine whether mining uranium really is a hazard and, if not, to lift the ban.  But they've run into a brick wall of environmental activists who raise the specter of nuclear contamination and who are determined to prevent scientific studies of the issue.

Interior to halt uranium mining at Grand Canyon.  Interior Secretary Ken Salazar will announce Monday that his department is temporarily barring the filing of new uranium mining claims on about 1 million acres near the Grand Canyon, an Obama administration official said.  The land is being "segregated" for two years so that the department can study whether it should be permanently withdrawn from mining activity, said the official, who requested anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

Democrats' Drilling Bill Angers Environmental Purists.  All summer long, House Republicans staged weekly news conferences outside the Capitol calling for more offshore oil drilling.  And they were usually met by an assortment of environmental protesters chanting in unison, trying to drown out the GOP's pro-drilling voices.  Some even wore polar bear costumes to protest Arctic drilling proposals.

Did someone mention polar bears?

No Energy, Please.  Andrew Mencinsky, executive director of Surfer' Environmental Alliance, called the natural gas project "an ecological disaster waiting to happen — one that could be triggered by an accident or a terrorist attack."  Yeah, right.  Terrible things could happen, might happen, or may happen.  In fact, accidents happen.  That's why they're called accidents.  People and businesses go about their lives acting with reasonable caution.  We don't live our lives based on what the Greens call "the precautionary principle", the belief that any possibility of a problem is sufficient reason to not precede with any project.  Were that the case none of us would never get behind the wheel of our car because auto accidents kill about 40,000 Americans every year.

So much for "checks and balances."
Uranium mining halted by House.  House Democrats on a single committee used an emergency power Wednesday to halt new uranium mining claims near the Grand Canyon, in a move Republicans say violates the Constitution.  Voting 20-2, the Natural Resources Committee passed a resolution declaring an emergency and directing the Interior Department secretary to block new claims.  Under a 1976 act of Congress the new resolution has the force of law, without needing the full House or Senate.

Legislating from the bench:
Georgia Judge Blocks Coal Power Plant.  In yet another skirmish involving arguments over human-induced global warming, a Georgia judge has halted construction of a coal-fired power plant.  Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thelma Wyatt Cummings Moore invalidated a state-issued permit for the $2 billion, 1,200-megawatt Longleaf Energy Plant.  Moore's decision, handed down July 1, stated Dynergy must first obtain a permit from state regulators limiting the amount of carbon dioxide the plant would be allowed to emit.

Enviros sue to stop drilling.  A coalition of 10 environmental and wildlife organizations filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Denver on Friday [7/11/2008] in an effort to stop hotly contested drilling on the Roan Plateau. … The Roan Plateau, northwest of Rifle, has become a battleground between energy interests and environmentalists who hope to keep drill rigs off the top to protect deer and elk habitat and creeks full of native cutthroat trout.

The Editor says...
If my car ran on cutthroat trout, I'd root for their side.

Let's Drill.  Eighty-five percent of the untapped domestic sources of oil have been put off-limits.  There's a federally mandated moratorium on drilling offshore, and huge roadblocks to exploiting the oil on the vast federal lands have been erected.  "What keeps these areas closed are exaggerated environmental fears, strong prejudice against oil companies and sheer stupidity," wrote Robert Samuelson recently.  Lifting the moratorium requires action by Congress and the White House.  So don't hold your breath.  The Democratic Congress is a wholly owned subsidiary of the environmental lobby, which regards oil exploration, much less drilling, as a sin against nature.

Shut Up and Produce Some Oil.  Liberals are flailing about looking for some political cover on energy and gas prices.  For decades now, they have supported the policies of extremists who have systematically sought to shut down every major energy source for our economy.  We can't drill for oil offshore, we can't drill in the frozen tundra of north Alaska, we can't even develop oil shale on the mainland.  Liberals are even opposing the development of new oil discoveries in the Plains states.

Report:  Most oil, gas beneath public lands off-limits.  A new report from the Bush administration says most of the oil and more than 40% of the natural gas beneath public lands in the United States are off-limits to drilling.  Rolling back environmental safeguards and employing new drilling technologies would give energy companies access to 19 billion barrels of oil and trillions of cubic feet of natural gas, administration officials said Wednesday [5/21/2008].

Coal Power Opposition Raises Blackout Possibilities.  The lights may soon go out in the Washington, DC metro area and other parts of the country due to environmental activist opposition to coal-fired power plants, energy analysts are warning.  "Electric power has already become painfully expensive in Washington and its suburbs.  Now, local utilities, say, it could become something even worse:  scarce," the Washington Post reported on February 3.

Protest halts coal train for six hours.  Thirty-seven demonstrators were arrested after about 1000 people halted trains in Newcastle yesterday [7/12/2008] in a protest against the coal industry's role in climate change. … Three coal trains bound for Carrington Coal Terminal — one of the ports which make Newcastle the world's biggest export point — were halted for about six hours after about a dozen protesters chained themselves to carriages.  Hundreds of others lined the fence as mounted police held them back from the rail line from 11:00 am until about 2:30 pm.

"So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted."
Barack Obama,    
January 17, 2008.

Environmentalists Oppose New CO2 Scrubber Idea.  Scientists at Columbia University are developing a carbon dioxide (CO2) scrubber device that removes one ton of CO2 from the air every day.  While some see the scrubber as an efficient and economical way to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide, many environmentalists are opposing the technology because it allows people to use fossil fuels and emit carbon in the first place.

The Editor says...
One could easily conclude that the environmentalists don't care about reducing CO2 in the atmosphere as much as they care about suppressing and inhibiting industrial activity.  But here's the futility of carbon dioxide sequestration:  CO2 is plant food.  All plant life on earth depends on it.  There's no need to build machines to remove CO2 from the air — every plant in the world is doing that already.

Alaska's 'Frustrated' Governor Palin On Our 'Nonsensical' Energy Policy.  We believe that listing polar bears as such is a significant threat to development, because most live on the North Slope.  (But) the biggest problem with the ruling is that we are the only state that is impacted.  Most polar bears (are found) in Canada.  We've got other places in the world once again telling us Alaskans how to live, and whether we can develop.  We've coexisted with bears for decades to no detrimental effect.  Our bear population is thriving.  This listing is nothing but interference from outsiders who insist on keeping Alaska from developing our resources responsibly.

CEI Fights Sierra Club Demands for CO2.  The purpose of the Clean Air Act is to protect public health and welfare from hazards created by airborne pollutants.  The act's fundamental logic requires that EPA first determine the dangerousness of an air pollutant before taking steps to regulate it.  In the case of CO2, EPA has not yet issued a finding that CO2 emissions endanger public health or welfare.

Fossil Fool.  As pressure builds to develop America's domestic energy resources, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid now says it's a health issue.  Coal and oil, he says, make us sick.  So why does he oppose nuclear power?

How the Greens Captured Energy Policy:  Through its influence in the media and government (both bureaucracy and congress), the Greens effectively abolished nuclear power, curtailed domestic oil production, and left the American energy industry in the comatose state in which it abides to this day.  Nor this was an error or overreaction — it was a deliberate effort to fulfill the Green agenda.

Judges deliver major setback to Big Stone II project.  A proposed new coal plant near the Minnesota-South Dakota border was dealt a major setback Friday [5/9/2008] when two Minnesota administrative law judges recommended against construction of its power lines in western Minnesota.  The transmission lines are necessary if the $1.6 billion Big Stone II plant is to be built near Milbank, S.D., just a few miles from Minnesota's border.

Lights out, America?  The lights may soon go out in Washington, DC — and it could happen where you live, too.  "Electric power has already become painfully expensive in Washington and its suburbs.  Now, local utilities, say, it could become something even worse:  scarce," reported the Washington Post this week.  Maryland, for example, may face rolling blackouts as early as 2011 or 2012 on summer days.  The core of the problem is that the region's ability to meet its ever-increasing demand for electricity is being short-circuited by environmental activists who are doing every thing they can to make it as difficult as possible to generate and transmit power. … The euphemism the environmentalists use for this strategy is "conservation."  But "rationing" is perhaps the most honest descriptor.

Green groups bolster lobby against offshore drilling.  Environmental groups are scrambling to shore up opposition in the Democrat-led Congress to more offshore oil drilling, countering the push for added domestic production by President Bush and voters pinched by rising gasoline prices.  "There are plenty of us on the other side creating pressure, too," said Nick Berning, spokesman for Friends of the Earth, which is unleashing a campaign targeting select congressional districts to fend off calls for Congress to let the offshore drilling ban expire Sept. 30.

Refusal to drill impacts gas prices.  You no doubt have noticed all of the headlines concerning the recent escalation in the price of oil. … While these headlines caught your eye, there was another one that probably didn't:  "SF County Approves Drilling Moratorium."  With a unanimous vote the Santa Fe County Commission, with the governor's full support, laid down a moratorium of at least one year on the granting of any drilling permits in the Galisteo Basin.  The 100 people in attendance stood and cheered the Commission's decision.

Al's Ignoble Nobel:  Al Gore has made an enormous business of his opposition to the oil companies.  He has made literally tens of millions from his crusade (far, far more than any oil company executive presently working).

Nuclear energy:  Power play.  Utilities face a serious problem.  Electricity demand is projected to increase 40 percent by 2030, according to government estimates.  Meanwhile, overzealous regulators make it difficult to expand energy capacity.  So power companies are left with few options. ... Unfortunately, instead of loosening regulations to induce capacity expansion, state and federal governments are moving toward rationing electricity.

We're (Still) No. 1.  We were once limited by only our dreams.  Now we are limited by politicians who can't see beyond the next election.  They punish entrepreneurship and innovation through regulation and taxation.  They punish success and reward failure.  Profit is a dirty word.  They want to redistribute income rather than create wealth.  Maybe America could compete better if we didn't have the highest regulatory and corporate tax burden in the world.  We import oil from terrorist supporters while leaving ours in the ground.  China is building nuclear and coal plants.  Why aren't we?

Energy transmission companies are the new Public Enemy.  Across America, radical environmental activists are doing everything possible to stop the construction of power lines, dams and roads.  The way they see it, cutting down on using energy is the best way to make sure more energy is available.  Want to meet the rising demand for more residential electricity?  Don't build more power lines.  Instead, change your light bulbs and make them energy-efficient.

May the sun set on global warming frenzy.  In the belief that anthropogenic CO2 is the primary cause of global warming, triumphant activists praise the blockage of new coal-fired electric power plants, with the justification that someday "cleaner options" will be available … With an abundance of coal readily available, technological improvements in coal-fired power plants are rejected in favor of wishful thinking about forthcoming renewable energy sources, while here and now power needs are increasingly ignored.  The power industry is then chastised for brownouts caused by insufficient supply.

The Virtues of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide:  If Al Gore were truly alarmed about hydrocarbon use, he would be clamoring for nuclear power plants.  The construction of just 50 nuclear installations similar to that partially completed at Palo Verde near Phoenix would erase most of the U.S. carbon dioxide output — and would also erase most of the U.S. trade deficit at the same time.  Yet, while The Wall Street Journal recently counted 381 nuclear power plants in various stages of planning or construction around the world — but none being constructed in the United States, Al Gore and his retainers actually oppose nuclear power.

Mandating Renewable Energy:  It's Not Easy Being Green.  Environmentalists abhor all fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and petroleum) and nuclear energy.  They collectively refer to this type of energy as "brown" power. … While we all know that brown power has its share of problems, a close look at green power reveals a surprising number of serious environmental and consumer-related problems that advocates would rather not talk about.  As it turns out, environmentalists are far more united in their opposition to brown power than they are in their support of green power.

Greenpeace is wrong — we must consider nuclear power.  Until the past couple of years, the activists, with their zero-tolerance policy on nuclear energy, have succeeded in squelching any mention by the IPCC of using nuclear power to replace fossil fuels for electricity production.  Burning fossil fuels for electricity accounts for 9.5 billion tonnes of global carbon dioxide emissions while nuclear power emits next to nothing.  It has been apparent to many scientists and policymakers for years that this would be a logical path to follow.

The Greenies Hold Up Solar.  The Bureau of Land Management announced that it's placing a two-year freeze on proposals for new solar-energy farms on federal lands, pending the results of … an environmental impact study.  Turns out that with solar technology advancing briskly, energy firms have been rushing to get their hands on the flat, sun-drenched land the federal government holds in abundance in many western states. … The bureau estimates that the planned solar projects could power more than 20 million homes.

No Sun Intended.  The Bureau of Land Management quietly decided in May that the development of solar plants in 119 million sun-soaked, federally owned acres in the western states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah would have to wait at least two years while bureaucrats sorted out their environmental impact.  For decades environmental groups have been pushing the government and private sector to develop more alternative sources of energy.  But that campaign is beginning to look like a sham to cover the groups' BANANA — Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything — activism.

Preservationists say gas drilling imperils ancient carvings.  Along Utah's Nine Mile Canyon lies what some call the longest art gallery in the world — thousands of prehistoric rock carvings and paintings of bighorn sheep and other wildlife, hunters wielding spears, and warriors engaged in hand-to-hand combat.

The Editor says...
Here's the easy solution:  Outlaw the use of natural gas in states that prohibit drilling.  But seriously, is there really great value in every drawing that was ever scratched on a rock?  Is there enough value to halt any further use of that land?

An idolatry called environmentalism.  The so-called Dead-Red Canal, inspired by Theodor Herzl's original idea of a Dead-Med canal, envisions a 166 km. waterway that would generate power thanks to the dramatic 400 m. elevation gap between the Dead Sea and the Red Sea, and fuel a series of desalination plants as well as a Riviera that would shoulder three times as many rooms as Israel's entire hotel industry currently has. … Needless to say, the canal would also refill the Dead Sea.  Also needless to say, all this is anathema to assorted environmentalist crusaders.

Turbine plan brings whirlwind of questions.  For years, environmental groups have viewed electricity-producing wind farms with a touch of reverence:  energy from the natural rhythms of the air, without the need for fossil fuels or polluting greenhouse gases.  But questions about the risk, cost and environmental impact of offshore wind threaten to slow what some call a headlong state rush to approve a $1.6 billion, 150-turbine wind farm off Rehoboth Beach, along with one of two on-land, backup natural gas-powered generating plants.

Citizens Protest Wind Farm Plan for Maryland.  Seven hundred Maryland residents showed up at hearings at the state capitol and in western Maryland to protest an industrial wind farm proposal they say would despoil the region's mountaintops.  The proposed wind farm, which would be operated by an out-of-state company, would sit on 400 acres of currently undeveloped wilderness.

Conservationists lose wind farm ruling.  A divided Public Utility Commission shut the door Wednesday [10/17/2007] on conservationists' efforts to air concerns about the effect of planned Gulf Coast wind farms on migratory birds.  The groups sought to intervene in an application for a 21-mile transmission line that would run through the sparsely populated Kenedy Ranch.

Group trying to stop BP refinery expansion.  The Natural Resources Defense Council filed a federal court appeal Wednesday [7/9/2008], alleging that BP Whiting's air permit will allow an expanded refinery to emit substantially more pollution than the Clean Air Act allows.  The environmental group hopes the lawsuit will send BP and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management back to the drawing board to draft a new, more stringent permit.

Environmental Group Sues to Block Oil Refinery Expansion.  An environmental group on Wednesday filed a lawsuit intended to stop the expansion of a BP oil refinery in Whiting, Indiana.  A shortage of oil refining capacity is often mentioned as one reason for soaring gasoline prices.

Republican Bill Would Encourage New Refinery Building.  House Republicans [are trying to] drum up support for a bill that would "expedite" the construction of new oil refineries in the United States. … But environmental groups and others oppose the bill….

Environmentalists Square Off in Squirrel Squabble:  When a Pacific Northwest utility company announced in January [2001] it would build the world's largest wind power plant, it came at a moment when the West was feeling the pinch of energy-starved California.  But there's a problem:  The Washington ground squirrels, which are protected under the Oregon Endangered Species Act.

Polar Bears' Plight Raised In Drill Bids For Oil, Gas.  The Interior Department yesterday announced $2.6 billion in winning bids from companies seeking to drill for oil and gas in Alaska's Chukchi Sea despite protests from environmental groups and members of Congress that oil and gas exploration would endanger polar bears.

There's no need to 'save' the polar bear.  Environmental groups are pushing to list the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act, and the Bush administration is considering their demands.  It might make sense — if the polar bear were endangered.  But the worldwide population of these bears has more than doubled since 1965, to an estimated 20,000-25,000 today.  Far from being threatened, by all accounts the bears are thriving.  So what's behind the push to "save" the bears?  A desire to ban energy exploration in much of Alaska, and a threatened species tag is just the ticket to make it happen.

Polar Bears and Stalking Horses:  If the polar bear is declared "threatened," this could trigger a number of restrictions on activities that produce carbon emissions in the "lower forty-eight" states — a persistent objective of the more extreme environmentalists.  To get to that point, several groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, filed suit to put the bears into the "threatened" category.  The environmentalists' concern for polar bears is touching, but the furry creatures are only a stalking horse for their real objective:  stopping the construction of a natural gas pipeline from Alaska to the Lower Forty-Eight in order to tap the 35 trillion cubic feet of proven natural gas reserves in the North Slope.

Alaska disputes polar bear threat.  The polar bear can be found in just one place in America — Alaska — and is perhaps as much a symbol of the state as, say, alligators are of Florida.  So you might think Alaska's politicians would be pounding on doors in Washington to protect it.  You'd be wrong.  As the federal government decides whether to list polar bears as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, Gov. Sarah Palin and the state's Republican congressional delegation are solidly opposed to the idea.

Did someone mention Polar Bears?

Dozens of Coal Plant Proposals Scrapped Due to Global Warming Concerns.  At least 16 coal-fired power plant proposals nationwide have been scrapped in recent months and more than three dozen have been delayed as utilities face increasing pressure due to concerns over global warming and rising construction costs.  The slow pace of new plant construction reflects a dramatic change in fortune for a fuel source that just a few years ago was poised for a major resurgence.  Combined, the canceled and delayed projects represent enough electricity to power approximately 20 million homes.

Coal plant permit denied.  Delivering a stunning victory to those concerned about global climate change, Kansas' top regulator rejected a proposal to build a coal plant in western Kansas.  The decision puts Kansas squarely in the center of the growing debate over global warming and energy policy, and adds the state to the small but growing list of states where plants have been rejected based on their carbon emissions.

The Editor says...
It's very unusual to read about "a stunning victory" in the news.  Usually defeats are stunning.

Coal plant denial awaits review.  Angry legislators aren't sure what to do about the denial of a permit for two proposed coal-fired power plants in southwest Kansas, but a committee plans to resume its investigation next month into the permitting process.  The committee is likely to press Rod Bremby, secretary of health and environment, to explain his rejection of an air-quality permit last week for Sunflower Electric Power Corp., because of potential carbon dioxide emissions.

Kansas Rules Against Electricity.  The Kansas Department of Health and Environment has rejected a proposal to build new coal-fired plants due to carbon-dioxide emissions.  I wonder if the folks at the Kansas Department of Health and Environment think that electricity is made by fairies who live in the garden or that an army of elves produce it?

Confronting Liberalism's Elusive Causes and Effects:  To the people of Kansas, the power grid is fine, since no shortages have yet occurred.  Furthermore, with the decision to put environmental consciousness ahead of the mercenary interests of those nasty power companies, Kansans can applaud themselves for being so environmentally aware and friendly.  Surely they have done their part to save the planet.  The harsh reality however, is that those who consider the Kansas Department of Health and Environment decision to be a worthy one, and who have determined to ignore the looming fallout from such a decision, are merely playing the same game that the American left has played with America's well-being on numerous fronts, and from which America has, time and again, reaped horrendous consequences.

Negotiations loom after final House action on coal plants bill.  Senators and House members are preparing to bargain over the final version of a bill to allow two coal-fired power plants in southwest Kansas, hoping whatever they draft can survive a potential veto by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius.

'Sour grapes' accusation on clean coal technology.  A rift in the environment movement has widened, with the head of WWF accusing other groups of "sour grapes" over its support for clean coal and Greenpeace rushing forward the release of findings opposing the technology.  "There are other groups obviously who are intractably opposed to coal, almost from an ideological point of view," WWF chief executive Greg Bourne told The Age.

The National Academy of Dubious Science.  "Highly sophisticated computer models" means a really complicated guess.  The computer models are programmed with simplified assumptions about how the climate works, then asked to project results 100 years into the future.  These models are notorious for leaving out important factors — like clouds — and failing to predict today's actual weather.  The target of the global warming theory, "greenhouse gas emissions," means coal, oil, natural gas, and just about everything else that we use to generate power.

Reid opposes new coal-fired power plants worldwide.  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says the threat of global warming should preclude the construction of new coal-fired power plants anywhere in the world.  The Nevada Democrat last month came out against three proposed major coal-fired plants in his home state, but has now extended that opposition to any such new plants worldwide.

Something Fishy about Eco-Extremists' Power Play.  If the Hoover Dam isn't one of the wonders of the modern world, it's not for lack of trying.  Tens of thousands of people spent years building this amazing mountain of concrete.  But some on the crazy eco-left want to tear it down — along with as many other dams as they can get their hands on.

America's dams are in danger.  Not just from terrorists or the ravages of time, but from the extreme fringe of the environmental movement.  Operating under a well-organized national campaign, groups like Environmental Defense, the Sierra Club and others are systematically trying to tear down dams, destroy hydroelectric facilities and prevent new dams from being built.  In many cases, it's simply to save fish, especially salmon.

Utility blasts its Oregon dam to make way for fish.  The largest dam removal in the Pacific Northwest in 40 years began on Tuesday with blasts of 4,000 pounds of explosives, the dam's owner, Portland General Electric, said.

A Cartel Worse Than OPEC:  What has become the obvious intent of this cartel is the destruction of America's access to its own resources.  Examples are:  "protection" of a spotted owl despite near destruction of the timber industry in Oregon and Washington; desperately needed petroleum reserves set aside in Alaska to protect the sex habits of the caribou; the set-aside of vitally needed sulfur-free coal reserves in Utah; and denial of offshore drilling for a number of reasons, including the spoiling of the view of a few people by rigs 15 miles away.  This list could continue for a full column.

Abundant energy supplies off-limits.  Good news:  The more we look for oil and natural gas in the United States, the more we find.  That might even be great news — if so much of the energy wasn't out of reach.  According to a new Interior Department report, there are substantial onshore energy deposits on federal lands.  A companion study of offshore energy reserves released earlier this year reached the same conclusion.  But both reports found much of this energy is either explicitly off-limits or hampered by regulatory constraints that effectively make it so.

The Green Fever Subsides.  Despite their rhetoric, the environmentalists who keep the movement going with countless organizations, by lobbying the government, and with a constant propaganda program, care little about a healthy, growing, successful economy.  They say they do, but so much of what passes for environmentalism is actually a constant attack on the most basic elements of the nation's economy.

Greens are the Real Energy Problem.  It goes without saying that the global economy depends on the availability of affordable energy. … Regardless of form — whether oil, gas, coal or nuclear — the Green movement is blocking efforts to harness our accustomed energy sources while leading us down the primrose path of so-called "renewable energy."

It's a Wonderful Life, So Far.  The single-family home with the white picket fence, two cars in the garage, and a couple kids in the backyard has everything wrong with it, according to some environmentalists.  The home is made completely or in part of wood … but logging is a bad thing.  That little yard in a small suburban or rural community contributes to "urban sprawl."  When those two cars leave the garage for work or the grocery store or to take the kids to school, they burn unacceptable quantities of fossil fuels traveling paved roads which, in all too many cases, prevent animals from migrating (apparently only chickens are able to cross the road).  Oh, those two kids?  They are a problem, too.  Overpopulation, you know.  Enjoy America while you can.

If Environmentalism Succeeds, It Will Make Human Life Impossible.  Earth Day approaches, and with it a grave danger faces mankind.  The danger is not from acid rain, global warming, smog, or the logging of rain forests, as environmentalists would have us believe.  The danger to mankind is from environmentalism.

Democrats target truckers, utilities with global warming bills.  Targeting truckers, contractors and others, [California] Senate Democrats on Thursday [2/22/2007] introduced legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions beyond the landmark global warming law that took effect this year.  The package of bills would ban methane releases from garbage dumps, reduce exhaust emissions from trucks, construction equipment and school buses, and force utilities to increase energy from renewable sources.

Democrats oppose new dams in California, favor conservation.  Democrats in the state Senate on Thursday said California does not need to build new reservoirs as it tries to cope with the expected consequences of global warming.  Instead, the state should rely on conservation, underground storage and boosting the height of existing dams.  Their plan, outlined in a series bills, runs counter to Republicans' desire for new reservoirs to help California address the changes anticipated from global climate change.

Senator Kerry's Propellers:  While left-over hippies with gray beards chain themselves to the gates of future nuclear power plants hoping to stop progress, and while bird- and caribou-watchers shed tears over the imagined trauma that Alaska oil drilling might cause, the rest of us get on with the business of business — finding real ways to make and save energy.

The False Panacea of Renewable Energy:  The true environmental costs of supposed environmentally friendly energies are exposed:  wind machines kill birds and massive amounts of toxic waste result from the production of solar panels.

Greens Attack America:  The one abiding goal of both the Greens and "animal rights" lunatics is to attack America's economic base in every way possible.  This is why, for the past few decades, they have sought to undermine every kind of industry in the nation, from timber to energy, from agriculture to fast foods, from mining to ranching.

The Pseudo-Scientific Road to Destruction:  Through their corrupt scientific methodology to their exaggerated and false claims that are backed by government guns, environmentalists manipulate and coerce men into accepting their ultimate goal:  returning man to his meager, pre-industrial existence.

If Environmentalists Succeed, They Will Make Human Life Impossible.  The fundamental goal of environmentalists is not clean air and clean water; rather it is the demolition of technological/industrial civilization.  Their goal is not the advancement of human health, human happiness, and human life; rather it is a subhuman world where "nature" is worshipped like the totem of some primitive religion.

The Green Taliban Of America:  The hubris of the Greens has allowed them to dictate to everyone just how we should conduct our lives for decades.  That is why you can't build a home, an office building, a factory, a hospital or a school, without an "environmental" study.  That is why Americans have been steadily deprived of pesticides, many used safely for decades, to protect us against the diseases spread by insect and rodent pests.  That's why millions of acres of our national forests burned this year because Greens won't let them be managed through selective logging or to allow roads to be built into those forests.  The list goes on and on because the Greens have been responsible for one third of every law and regulation in the Federal Register today.

The Editor says...
Let me refresh your memory about The California Energy Crunch of 2000.

There Is No Electricity Tooth Fairy.  The North American Electric Reliability Council projects that the nation needs about 10,000 megawatts of new generating capacity each year through 2008 to keep up with an annual rise in demand of 1.8 percent.

The Cause of the California Power Blackouts:  The childish quest for a free lunch is what has led to blackouts all over the state of California.  People trapped in elevators that stopped between floors when the electricity was cut off should understand that this is part of the price paid for years of moral posturing by the environmentalists and the "consumer advocates."

California's Dim Bulbs: Californians didn't want dams across their rivers, derricks on their ocean, power lines across their borders, or fossil fuel smoke in their sky.  These might interfere with all the smart things Californians do, such as hang-glide.  California was going to rely on "negawatts" — dramatic power conservation.  And California was going to rely on alternative power generation.

Greens Say "Turn Off Your Lights".  The Greens, who brought about that State's energy crisis, wants to worsen it by reducing the dam's hydroelectric generation in order to protect salmon while millions of Californians wait for the next rolling blackout.  If this isn't insanity, I don't know what is.

Why Natural Gas Is the Only Game in Town.  Roadblocks to building new coal and nuclear plants in the U.S. are fueling expectations for a natural gas boom.  Dozens of proposals for new coal and nuclear plants have been shelved, cancelled, or delayed because of rocketing construction costs, financing risk, regulatory uncertainty, and public concern over global warming and toxic pollution.  Opposition is also rising to new coalfired power plants built without the capacity to capture greenhouse gas emissions.

Energy solutions mean ignoring eco-nuts.  In doing some research for an environmental article recently, I noticed that virtually every one of the leftist environmental groups is opposed to coal-fired power plants. ... When ecological groups present their arguments as calm, well-reasoned factual reports, they do a good job of making their cases to the American people and our leaders.  When such groups, however, base their arguments on few facts but lots of emotionalism, that's when they cease to be good public health advocates and instead start to sound like envirowacko loonies — unreasonable ones, at that.

Environmentalists Square Off in Squirrel Squabble:  When a Pacific Northwest utility company announced in January [2001] it would build the world's largest wind power plant, it came at a moment when the West was feeling the pinch of energy-starved California.  But there's a problem:  The Washington ground squirrels, which are protected under the Oregon Endangered Species Act.

Jump to the page about the Endangered Species Act
Back to the Environmental Issues page
Back to the Home page

Document location http://akdart.com/enviro12.html
Updated June 25, 2024.

©2024 by Andrew K. Dart