The Democrat Party, led by Barack Obama, is obstructing the flow of oil
Political pressure is one of the major influences on the price of oil. Democrats
in Congress need to have an endless series of crises to solve. The United States has
plenty of oil, but much of it has been placed off-limits by the Democrats in Congress and
(years ago) in the White House. To allow more drilling here at home would have the effect of
lowering gas prices at the pump. That would make the (Republican) President look like a
problem solver, and the Democrats can't afford to have that happen.
Democrats and environmentalists are
co-dependent. Democrats pretend that only they care about environmental issues,
and environmentalists help to maintain public pressure by creating an endless series of
environmental crises for the government to solve. Unfortunately, the federal government
almost never solves any problem. Problems keep bureaucrats employed, so real solutions are
out of the question. For example, the Environmental Protection Agency was established by President
Nixon at a time when air and water quality in this country was really poor in the big cities. Now
that those problems have been all but eliminated (airborne lead has been reduced by over 99 percent),
the EPA is still around, looking for more and more minute problems to solve. Other agencies
are the same way, and now there are hundreds of
security, the unstable Middle East, and the wisdom of electing Donald Trump. Back in the 1970s, the economy of
the wWestern world was held up for ransom by a few relatively unstable Middle Eastern nations. This, because they, by
an act of nature, owned much of the energy upon which the modern world depends. Since that time, we have seen several
different approaches to preventing that 'ransom' situation from happening again — approaches that included
President Jimmy Carter's wishful thinking that a non-petroleum-based synthetic energy source could be economically developed
and manufactured, to President Barack Obama's equally 'wishful' thinking that the hateful and unstable Middle Eastern
countries could be bought off and won over by simple kowtowing to them while sending them billions of dollars of American
cash. None of that worked.
Brags About Low Energy Prices, Then Proposes To Raise Them. We did, in fact, "drill our way" to lower gas prices. Thanks to
fracking, oil companies are now able to produce vast amounts of previously unrecoverable oil. In the past seven years, domestic oil production
shot up a stunning 77%, according to the Energy Information Administration, making the U.S. the biggest oil producer in the world. That's
why gas prices are low today. And why oil imports have dropped so sharply. And none of it had anything to do with Obama, who tried to
hamper oil production whenever he could — blocking Keystone, restrictions on federal lands, EPA attempts to hinder fracking.
oil exports plunge 50.2 percent in November. Mexico's oil exports fell 50.2 percent from a year earlier in
November, a month in which the country's trade deficit totaled $1.57 billion, the National Institute of Statistics and
Geography, or INEGI, said. Total exports amounted to $31.02 billion last month, down 4.1 percent from
November 2014, the INEGI said in a statement Thursday [12/31/2015]. Oil exports plunged 50.2 percent to
$1.57 billion, while non-petroleum exports rose 0.9 percent to $29.46 billion.
Renames a Mountain while Russia Plays for Keeps in the Arctic. Earlier in August, Russia resubmitted a claim to
a huge undersea expanse of the Arctic to the U.N. Russia fields 41 icebreakers, compared to two fielded by the United States,
and is building 10 search-and-rescue stations with accompanying communications infrastructure along its northern coast.
There is a lot of oil and gas under that ice, and Russia is playing for keeps.
Time to Lift the Oil Export
Ban. Today, there is only one major product the U.S. bans from export. Surprisingly, it is a product in which
the U.S. is nearly self-sufficient. Forty years ago, it may have made sense to ban the export of oil, but the U.S. is now
producing an excess of certain grades of oil. That oil would find eager buyers overseas, spurring growth in our economy.
Death To Canadian Oil!.
International sanctions have, since 2011, cut Iran's oil exports in half and severely damaged its economy.
Iran, it is estimated, currently has more than 50 million barrels of oil in storage on 28 tankers
at sea — part of a months[-]long build up. It is widely reported that, due to
aging infrastructure and saturated storage, it will take Iran months to bring its production back up to
pre-sanction levels. The millions of barrels of oil parked offshore are indicative of their eagerness
to increase exports.
Top 10 reasons to vote Democrat.
[#9] Vote Democrat because you believe oil company's profits of 4 percent on a gallon of gas are obscene, but
the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15 percent isn't.
tumble after Greece vote, China stock market turmoil. Oil prices suffered their biggest selloff
in five months on Monday, falling as much as 8 percent as Greece's rejection of debt bailout terms and
China's stock market woes set off a deepening spiral of losses. Adding to the pressure on oil, Iran and
global powers were trying to meet a July 7 deadline on a nuclear deal, which could bring more supply to
the market if sanctions on Tehran are eased. The self-imposed deadline could be extended again, officials
at the negotiations said.
Chevron CEO Talks Oil Prices And Energy Independence. It's clear that when oil and gas
fell (to $40 a barrel earlier this year), that wasn't a sustainable world price based on global
supplies. Only a few producers can make money at that price, so when the price fell to that level,
marginal producers dropped out, supplies fell, and the price has risen back up to a more sustainable
level. With lower prices, some oil drilling is not economic. The world market produces
93 million barrels a day. All producers are taking action, and with natural declines investment
slows (and) supply and demand come into better balance.
Leaps on Slower U.S. Inventory Build, Iran. Oil prices jumped over 5 percent on Monday [4/6/2015]
as traders reassessed how quickly Iran might increase exports after a preliminary nuclear deal and anticipated
that a months-long rise in U.S. crude inventories may be slowing.
End crude oil export ban or say goodbye to U.S. shale revolution. The explosive growth
in the production of U.S. shale oil in recent years has been credited for giving the economy a
much-needed boost. But a just-released study from Bentek Energy asserts that unless the nation's
crude oil export ban is lifted, the shale energy revolution will come to an abrupt end. "We have
seen so much growth in the economy due to the oil revolution that we've had in the U.S. and that
growth won't be able to continue if another demand force isn't made available," said Jenna Delaney,
analyst for Bentek Energy, an energy marketing and analysis company based in Denver.
price of oil — where is OPEC now? The world price of crude oil, which has
been around 100 dollars a barrel for the past 6 years, has suddenly collapsed and is now tending
below 50 dollars. Many are trying to understand this rapid decrease and have proposed various
explanations. Of course, the ready explanation is simply in terms of supply and demand; but this
just begs the question. The supply of oil has increased sharply in recent months —
mainly because of the prolific production of shale oil in the United States, thanks to the technologies of
fracking and horizontal drilling. In fact, the US is now the world's largest producer of crude oil
and US imports of oil have dropped to the lowest level in 10 years. At the same time, the
demand for oil has not increased greatly — because of depressed economic conditions and more
efficient use in cars and trucks throughout the world.
Jumps as Saudi King's Death Spurs Speculation Over Policy. Oil rose after the death of
King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, the biggest producer in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.
Futures rallied as much as 3.1 percent in New York and 2.6 percent in London after the Saudi royal
court announced the death in a statement. Crown Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz will succeed Abdullah on the
throne. The kingdom, the world's largest crude exporter, led OPEC's decision to maintain its oil-production
quota at a meeting in November, exacerbating a global glut that's driven prices lower.
Endless Gifts From Uncle
Obama. [Scroll down] No one knows why oil dropped so far so fast. The supply
situation — lots of new shale oil coming on stream, for months if not years. The demand
situation has not changed at all. Saudi Arabia and OPEC declined to cut production to support a
price near $100 a barrel. But they never said they would support the price of oil. And in any
event, world oil consumption is so immense that even if the Saudis cut production by a million barrels a
day, the cut would mean roughly 1 percent of demand. So, then why did oil — facing
small increases in supply and at most a slowing in demand — suddenly fall by about 55 percent?
of Oil. Obama once ridiculed cheap energy, which is now saving him from himself.
the Saudis and the US Really Collude to Smash Oil Prices? The oil price drop that has
dominated the headlines in recent weeks has been framed almost exclusively in terms of oil market
economics, with most media outlets blaming Saudi Arabia, through its OPEC Trojan horse, for driving
down the price, thus causing serious damage to the world's major oil exporters — most
notably Russia. While the market explanation is partially true, it is simplistic, and fails to
address key geopolitical pressure points in the Middle East.
Stock of the Oily Plunge. Every major paper has carried a sober to slightly disbelievingly
gleeful depiction, kitted out with solemn graphs and charts, of the precipitous plummet of oil prices since
June of 2014. The Wall Street Journal spoke of the concern of OPEC if the price should settle further
below $60/barrel. The NYT speaks to the agita experienced in Venezuela, until recently the
benefactor of Cuba and other non-friends. Nigeria and especially Russia are hurting, as in the past
decades, these have been one-commodity countries.
Personal And Economic Benefits Of Cheaper Oil. A barrel of oil has tumbled to $83, or
22% below its June high — unambiguously good news writ large for consumers, motorists and
the U.S. economy overall, and a teachable moment if there ever was one. The U.S. imports about
3.5 billion barrels of oil a year. So a $20 reduction in price is equal to a $70 billion tax cut.
Is Facing International Pressure To End Its Ban On Crude Oil Exports. Washington is facing growing
international pressure to ease its long standing ban on crude oil exports, with South Korea and Mexico joining the
European Union in pressing the case for U.S. oil shipments overseas. South Korean President Park Geun-hye told
a visiting U.S. delegation of lawmakers on the House of Representatives energy committee on Aug. 11 that
tapping into the gusher of ultra-light, sweet crude emerging from places like Texas and North Dakota was a priority,
the lawmakers said.
New Oil-by-Rail Rules. The U.S. Department of Transportation proposed new regulations
this month aiming to reduce the risks of shipping oil by rail. The new rules would require the
upgrading of existing rail cars (called DOT-111 cars) used to transport oil; impose speed limits on
"high-hazard flammable trains" and oil-bearing trains; establish new braking practices; and mandate
route-based risk-assessments. Tank cars used to transport oil would also have to be manufactured
to much tougher standards than the existing DOT-111 fleet. No one is against safety, of course,
but the new regulations pose several challenges. First, they are going to be costly.
Things Barack Obama Has Done Wrong: [#8] After BP had a huge oil spill in the Gulf, Obama not only
bungled the clean-up process, he slowed oil production from other companies that had done nothing wrong which led to higher
oil prices. [#9] Obama has helped drive up the cost of gas by blocking the Keystone Pipeline.
U.S for global oil price slump. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on Thursday [10/16/2014] blamed
Washington for the slump in global oil prices. Washington is "flooding" the market with cheaper shale oil to
bring down prices and ultimately impact Russia and other oil-producing nations, Maduro said at a televised Cabinet meeting.
Foes Cringe as Unions Back Drilling Boom. After early complaints that out-of-state firms got the
most jobs, some local construction trade workers and union members in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia say
they're now benefiting in a big way from the Marcellus and Utica Shale oil and gas boom.
Ended the Green Movement in Europe? Wind farms do not have the capacity of keeping the central heating
thermostat at a sensible level, leaving Putin's new Cold War seeming literal as well as metaphorical. The
EU in 2013 prepared an "Association Agreement" with the Ukraine with a view to granting them membership to the EU.
Putin's response to this cozying up was the de facto annexation of the Crimea. The first energy casualty is
the South Stream project, a gas pipe line under construction connecting Russian gas to the EU.
give initial approval for Oregon facility to export natural gas. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle
for weeks have been pressing the Obama administration to expedite permits for natural gas exports, claiming it would
send a powerful message to European allies, and Russia, which last week annexed the Crimean Peninsula. Even if
immediate changes might not do much to help Ukraine and other Eastern European nations in the short term, advocates
argue they would send a message that Russia's energy grip on the region will eventually weaken.
groups tell Obama natural gas exports undermine climate goals. Environmental groups fired a shot Tuesday [3/18/2014]
in the growing discussion about natural gas exports as they urged President Obama to block new export terminals on climate change
grounds. The flashpoint is a $3.8 billion Dominion Resources-proposed export facility in Cove Point, Md., on the Chesapeake
Bay, which the groups are rallying to prevent as a burgeoning effort to prohibit exports of fossil fuels. [...] Republicans, with
some Democrats, are pushing the Obama administration to expedite export approvals as a means to reduce Russia's grip on energy
supplies in Central and Eastern Europe, a position it uses to wield political influence.
How the Greens Help Putin in Crimea Incursion.
The Russian economy is highly dependent on oil and gas exports, and reducing Russian oil and gas exports would be the most direct
way to cause pain to the Russian leadership. However, Europe is heavily dependent on Russian gas and oil, particularly gas.
Six European Union countries — Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Bulgaria — are 100 percent
dependent on Russian gas. Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Slovenia and Greece depend on the Russians for more
than 50 percent of their gas. The countries in the EU did not need to be in this position, because the EU has plenty of
gas reserves that could be economically tapped using hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. Because of the environmental lobby,
though, the EU has allowed itself to become dependent on foreign energy sources — particularly Russian.
Unleash American Energy. House Republicans
have a worthy suggestion to protect Ukraine and increase the West's leverage there: Deregulate American energy production and encourage oil and
gas exports. The Department of Energy has been reluctant and slow to approve permits for shipping natural gas overseas, for instance, which the
market demands from the U.S. for the first time. Crude-oil exports remain illegal. Energy production on federally owned lands has been
Paul: U.S. Anti-Energy Policies Empower Russian Aggression. The Obama administration's anti-energy policies empower Russia
aggression and take away America's ability to respond, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) explained in a Time magazine editorial. Paul said America
has all the means to deter and punish Russian military aggression without the use of American military force but the Obama administration
has taken important economic weapons off the table with its anti-energy policies.
Job Destroyer. Does the president have a clue
about what creates jobs and what kills jobs? Based on the evidence from his five years as president, the answer is no, he
doesn't. [...] His environmental policies are relentless job killers. The crackdown on the coal industry has come at the cost of
tens of thousands of jobs. Approval of the Keystone pipeline would lead to thousands of new jobs, but Obama has balked.
So too would the opening of federal lands to natural gas production, just as it has on private lands.
The Editor says...
The writer of the article immediately above seems to presume that Mr. Obama's destruction of the economy is merely the result
of his hapless incompetence — ignoring the very real possibility that Obama's actions and their results are intentional and
malicious. Mr. Obama probably knows very well "what creates jobs and what kills jobs," and is doing the opposite, because his
goal is to increase and perpetuate dependence on Big Brother.
Moving Crude by Railcar Stalls on the Track.
Companies that thought they had found a relatively easy way to move crude from the booming oil fields of North Dakota to the West Coast are encountering
obstacles. Half a dozen companies are trying to build rail terminals on the coast of Washington state to receive trainloads of crude from the Bakken
field in North Dakota.
Podesta: Climate game
changer. Environmental groups believe John Podesta will be a force for change on climate issues at the White House. [...] Three key areas
Podesta and the climate team will work on are Environmental Protection Agency rules on existing power plants, developing a comprehensive methane strategy
and developing new fuel economy standards for heavy-duty vehicles. While Podesta's full portfolio won't be known until he arrives next year, an
administration official said he'll probably spend time working with the Department of the Interior on its regulatory policies. That's likely to
include administration decisions about how to lease out federal lands and which energy development and mining projects to permit.
Fracking boom frees the US
from old oil alliances. [Scroll down] Saudi Arabia has increased production to match, keeping prices stable, but new fields being
developed in neighbouring Iraq and the rise in importance of gas have also made its role less vital. And now all that Iranian oil may sooner
rather than later end up back on the market. Some suggest Saudi Arabia might cut its production, hiking world prices, as a retaliatory action.
But even were it to do so — and it has given no indication of it — it might itself be the worst victim. Saudi has some slack to reduce
its own income from oil and keep its budget in the black, but not so much.
The Coming Oil Wars. Accidental wars only happen in the movies.
What's happening now in the East China Sea is a calculated Chinese provocation that could lead to war. [...] War for oil isn't new. When Japan
attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941, its principal grievance was the American decision to cut off most of its oil supply.
chief Sally Jewell says Obama will go around Congress on national monuments. Department of Interior Secretary Sally Jewell vowed that
President Obama would use executive authority to create more national monuments to protect lands if Congress doesn't pass legislation to do so.
"If Congress doesn't step up to act," Jewell said during a speech at the National Press Club in Washington, "then the president will take action." [...]
Congress hasn't approved a new national monument or park since 2010, with Republicans charging that the White House is keeping too much federal
land off limits to oil and gas development.
The Editor says...
Mr. Obama couldn't care less about wide open spaces, camping and hiking in the wilderness, or expanding national parks. His goal is to
choke off the supply of domestic oil and cripple the U.S. economy.
Obama orders government to prepare for impact
of global warming. President Obama issued an executive order Friday [11/1/2013] directing a government-wide effort to boost preparation in
states and local communities for the impact of global warming. The action orders federal agencies to work with states to build "resilience" against
major storms and other weather extremes. For example, the president's order directs that infrastructure projects like bridges and flood control take
into consideration climate conditions of the future, which might require building structures larger or stronger — and likely at a higher price
The Editor says...
By now it should be obvious: Obama's goal is to make everything more expensive. Electricity, gasoline, medical insurance, and, as we see here,
everything else. In order to justify preparations for the "impact of global warming," Mr. Obama would have to prove that there is (or will be) any
global warming, and prove that one or two degrees of warming would be hazardous. Neither he nor anyone else will never accomplish such a goal.
As usual, Mr. Obama is meddling in everybody's business for no reason except to impede capitalism.
Using 'Sue and Settle' to Thwart Oil and Gas
Drillers. Last week the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and an environmental advocacy group agreed to a legal settlement that will
place nine species — including the Panama City crayfish, moccasinshell mussel and boreal toad — on the fast track for placement
on the endangered species list. It is only the latest of many such listings. The Center for Biological Diversity has petitioned Fish and
Wildlife to designate some 250 species as endangered since 2008. Many of CBD's petitions — and lawsuits — are still
in the pipeline. About 97% of the species that are designated as endangered never move off the list.
Rich, Arrogant, and Stupid. [Scroll down] We have put
off-limits huge supplies of oil and natural gas — a trillion barrels by some estimates — everywhere from Alaska to the Gulf of Mexico.
The only development going on is on private lands in states that, unlike California, do not put up punitive regulatory barriers to exploration and exploitation.
Obama has intensified this bizarre behavior. He has blocked the Keystone pipeline, and his federal Bureau of Land Management has just reduced by two-thirds
the 1.3 million acres George Bush set aside for development in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.
American energy booming despite Obama's
policies. Oil, natural gas and coal production in this country are at record levels. But this is despite Obama's policies, not, as he implied,
because of them. Oil, natural gas and coal production are zooming upwards on private land, but plummeting on government lands.
Calling it Treason. We could have walked away from the Middle East
already and left them to their own savagery, but the president insists that we remain inextricably tied to their historical need to kill each other so that we
can overpay for oil, both monetarily and with American lives. Thus, as technology enables us to break free of dependence upon Middle East oil, our president
bends over backwards to ensure that never happens.
Obama administration cuts back oil shale
development. Controversy is heating up over an administration plan to drastically reduce the amount of federal lands available for oil shale
development in the American West. The Bush administration had set aside 1.3 million acres for oil shale and tar sands development in Colorado, Utah
and Wyoming. The new Bureau of Land Management plan cuts that amount by two-thirds, down to 700,000 acres, a decision that has prompted industry outrage.
groups to Obama: Designate lands to stop drilling. Environmental lobbyists are pressing President Obama to turn more
western lands into national monuments to prevent oil-and-gas companies from drilling there. The Sierra Club is leading the charge
and is sweetening its message with political sugar, saying Obama could thereby help Democrats win House and Senate seats in midterm
Obama steals credit for energy success he opposed. President Obama may be the first chief executive to take credit for the
results of things he has opposed throughout his time in the Oval Office. The latest example came last week, when the Department of
the Interior announced it had approved 21 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico for energy resource exploration and development.
Production Obstruction. Delays in federal permitting for oil and
gas exploration on public land is likely reducing national energy production and depriving the federal government of revenue, according to
a federal report released Friday [3/22/2013]. The report is the latest addition to a mounting body of evidence undercutting the
administration's claims that it has fostered increased oil and gas production, critics say. Production on lands the federal
government controls has plummeted during Barack Obama's presidency.
China Deal Benefits Obama Donors. The
government watchdog group Judicial Watch is suing the Treasury Department for records pertaining to the department's decision
to grant a Chinese government-backed company access to oil deposits in the Gulf of Mexico, a move that will benefit Obama donors.
The Chinese National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) reached a "definitive agreement" with Nexen, Inc., a Canadian energy company,
announced on July 23, 2012, to buy all of the company's outstanding public shares.
US clears big Chinese oil deal.
United States officials have signed off on Chinese oil giant CNOOC's $15.1 billion purchase of the Canadian oil company Nexen, a
deal that triggered U.S. review because Nexen has oil-and-gas assets in the Gulf of Mexico. Nexen announced Tuesday [2/12/2013] that
the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has approved the transaction, and that the deal "now has all of the
requisite approvals to proceed to close." CFIUS is a Treasury Department-led interagency panel that reviews foreign purchases
of U.S. assets if the transactions could affect national security.
Obama's path toward energy poverty.
[I]nstead of promoting the most reliable and least expensive energy technologies, such as coal-fired electricity generation, Mr. Obama
encourages the least reliable and most expensive sources. It was certainly an understatement to say, as he did in the address, "The
path toward sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult." He should have added, "and virtually useless," because
the sustainable energy sources he has most in mind are wind and solar power. The president presents the transition to these
technologies as an economic benefit. He asserted, "We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs
and new industries — we must claim its promise. That is how we will maintain our economic vitality." No, that
is how you ruin a country's economy.
Energy cash influx leads to a
state surplus in Texas. An inbound crush of revenue, private sector productivity, job creation, economic growth — this
is everything we are giving up while the Obama administration has tried to forcefully mold the energy economy of their greenest political fancies
by delaying on drilling leases for federal lands and waters, flexing their regulatory muscles and waging a war on coal, "investing" our money in
their pet projects, and bandying around with potential new regulations to crack down further on hydraulic fracturing.
The North American Gusher.
Since becoming president, Mr. Obama has treated hydrocarbon production like an infectious disease to be eradicated. His administration
had to commission a study to learn, as announced last week, that allowing American companies to export liquefied natural gas would be
beneficial to the U.S. economy. Still, the Department of Energy says it can't make "final determinations" on export applications
until it hears from those who object.
regulations seen in Obama's second term. Energy producers braced for tighter regulation in President Barack Obama's second
term, with coal companies expecting more emissions restrictions and drillers anticipating less access to federal land even as his platform
promotes energy independence.
To 'Become Largest Global Oil Producer' By 2020, 'Net Oil Exporter' By 2030 — If We Let It. In a striking blow
for the environmental left, the International Energy Agency has released a report detailing how the United States is on track to outpace
Saudi Arabia in oil production. This surely puts the Obama administration in a bind concerning its green energy monomania that has
dominated their energy policy for the past four years. This finding shows that the United States can be energy independent, and we
have the resources to do so. However, the boot of government is trying to centralize and control those resources to expand
their dependency agenda.
Our Incoherent Energy Policies.
The price of gasoline hit $4.80/gallon in California just a few weeks ago. And yet near four years into this Administration, we are still without a coherent
policy to access our vast reservoirs of oil and gas offshore, on federal lands and Alaska.
With Election Over, the News Flows Freely.
We heard throughout the campaign of President Obama's "all of the above" energy policy. That was then. This is now. About 48 hours
after he was assured of reelection, the president's Interior Department issued a plan to close to oil shale development 1.6 million acres of
federal land in the West to oil. These acres were targeted for oil shale exploration and development by the prior administration. Instead,
only some 677,000 acres would be open for oil shale exploration, and an additional 130,000 for tar sands production. The reason for excluding
so much acreage from development includes a desire to protect sage grouse habitats and land with "wilderness characteristics."
The Editor says...
Personally, I couldn't care less about the sage grouse, and something tells me that when gasoline is $5.00 a gallon and constantly climbing,
nobody else will care, either.
Democrats Better Start Soul Searching.
We can't know quite what a second Obama term will bring, but if his first term is an indication, there's little reason to expect his party will be
crowing. [...] On Friday [11/9/2012], citing ecological concerns, the administration closed off 1.6 million acres of federal land in western
states from planned oil shale extraction. An American energy boom lies in wait underground and Obama is determined to keep it there.
The U.S. will be the world's leading energy producer, if we
allow it. As readers of these pages know, the key to this U.S. energy boom has been technological innovation and risk-taking funded by private
capital. Specifically, the private oil and gas industry pioneered the use of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) to tap
unconventional deposits such as shale that once were technologically out of reach. It also wouldn't have happened if the industry wasn't able to drill
on private land, free from federal regulation. This is a real energy revolution, even if it's far from the renewable energy dreamland of so many
government subsidies and mandates.
Barack H. Obama is doing everything he can to prevent this: U.S. Oil Output to Overtake
Saudi Arabia's by 2020. U.S. oil output is poised to surpass Saudi Arabia's in the next decade, making the world's biggest fuel
consumer almost self-reliant and putting it on track to become a net exporter, the International Energy Agency said. Growing supplies of
crude extracted through new technology including hydraulic fracturing of underground rock formations will transform the U.S. into the largest
producer for about five years starting about 2020, the Paris-based adviser to 28 nations said today [11/12/2012] in its annual World
Obama Shuts Down 1.6M Acres to Oil Shale
Development. Just two days after President Obama's re-election, the Obama Interior Department announced a plan to shut down 1.6 million
acres of federal land to oil shale development. The land had originally been slated for drilling under President George W. Bush.
The Editor says...
This puts us one step closer to $5.00 gasoline. Thanks a lot, Obama voters!
Obama Is Right. Every other month, Secretary of the Interior
Ken Salazar withdraws more land from potential energy development. Most recently, he put nearly half of the 23-million-acre National Petroleum
Reserve on Alaska's North Slope off-limits, restricting development to 12 million acres with potentially 549 million barrels of oil.
In 2002, the Reserve, designated almost a century ago by Congress for energy development, was thought to hold 9 billion barrels of oil.
Mysteriously, in 2010, this estimate was reduced to 900 million barrels. People notice when you pull billions of barrels of oil from
potential production. Change the story by redefining the estimate, and the news item goes from page 1 to page 19 when the
administration puts America's resources off-limits.
Prices Doubled, Obama Locks Up National Reserve. As the administration fast-tracks solar projects on public lands, it has
locked up more than half of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, preferring to continue outsourcing energy jobs and dollars.
Obama's Alaska Oil Debacle Is a 'None
of the Above' Energy Policy. The Obama administration's decision to block oil drilling in the National Petroleum
Reserve in Alaska (NPR-A) is the latest symbol of an energy policy that could be described as "none of the above." It
is an even worse decision when you consider the recent history of the Reserve, which was partially opened to oil and gas
drilling and exploration by the Clinton administration in the late 1990s.
DOE delays decision on
natural-gas export license. The Obama administration punted a decision on whether to prevent a liquefied natural gas (LNG)
export license, saying it needs more time to review a complaint that an environmental assessment for the plan did not go far enough.
The Department of Energy (DOE) said it needs to review a complaint regarding a conditional permit granted to Cheniere Energy.
That permit would let the firm export LNG to countries without free-trade agreements from its Sabine Pass terminal in Louisiana.
The Editor says...
What does the Department of Energy do to facilitate the production of energy? The DOE doesn't produce energy — it reluctantly
issues permits to energy producing companies. In other words, the United State would have far more energy available if the DOE were
Obama's slippery foreign oil promise. It was one of President Barack
Obama's boldest 2008 campaign promises: Getting the United States off oil from anti-U.S. hot spots within a decade. That didn't happen.
Persian Gulf oil imports are down only 5 percent, while the U.S. remains Venezuela's biggest oil-trading partner since Obama said changing that
relationship was crucial "for the sake of our economy, our security and the future of our planet."
Obama's Great Alaska Shutout. President Obama is
campaigning as a champion of the oil and gas boom he's had nothing to do with, and even as his regulators try to stifle it. The latest example is the
Interior Department's little-noticed August decision to close off from drilling nearly half of the 23.5 million acre National Petroleum Reserve in
Alaska. The area is called the National Petroleum Reserve because in 1976 Congress designated it as a strategic oil and natural gas stockpile to
meet the "energy needs of the nation." Alaska favors exploration in nearly the entire reserve.
Where's Our Energy? When President Barack Obama took
office, the average price for a gallon of regular gas was $1.84. That means gas prices have more than doubled on Obama's watch. But why?
The primary reason is that the system is rigged. [...] Another reason Americans are getting hosed at the pump is that President Obama loathes the fossil
fuel industry and does everything he can to inhibit production.
Are Democrats More Likely to
Release Strategic Oil Reserves? In contrast to last year's release, the International Energy Agency disagreed with the need this time,
stating "There is no reason for a release" and "The market is sufficiently supplied." I think the Obama Administration is signaling that they may
release some oil for two reasons. One is to spook the markets and cause a sell-off of oil, with the hope of lowering gasoline prices. The
other is to test the reaction from the American public and from U.S. allies so they can better judge the political risks of such a blatant attempt to
manipulate prices heading into the election.
Obama's New America. Mr. Obama made much of the truth that the USA is
producing a lot more energy from oil and gas domestically now compared with some years ago. But he gives no credit at all to the oil companies and the
gas companies that made that possible.
Manufacturer: EPA against all fossil
fuels, not just coal. "I firmly believe that this administration, including the EPA, has a very, very robust, anti-fossil fuels
agenda," [Charlie] Drevna said in a telephone interview. "You guys in West Virginia should know this as well as anybody else. What
is this administration trying to do with coal? Well, they're trying to do the same with oil and other fossil fuels. It's just an
anti-fossil fuels agenda. One can argue whether it's noble or not. I don't think it is. Is it detrimental to the
consumers? Is it detrimental to the economy and national security? Absolutely." Consumers stand to lose dramatically,
whether they are driving a pickup truck or a passenger car, mowing the lawn or steering a motorboat, he said.
Plan Would Make America An Energy Superpower. Mitt Romney has unveiled a market-based plan to achieve U.S. energy independence
by 2020 and make America an energy superpower. It calls to mind just how stagnant our energy policy has been up until now.
Romney energy plan would put
states in control of drilling. An energy plan Mitt Romney unveiled Thursday [8/23/2012] adopts familiar GOP ideas for weaning
the United States off foreign oil by boosting offshore drilling and relaxing environmental regulations. Although both President Barack
Obama and his Republican challenger view energy development as a way to rev up the economy and create jobs, Romney focuses on the oil and
Eating America's Seed Corn.
As gas prices climb back toward $4 a gallon, the Obama administration — facing a tough reelection campaign and rising Middle East
tensions — is once again considering tapping the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. For years, administrations have bought and stored
oil for emergencies, in fear of a cutoff of imported oil, as happened during the Arab embargo of 1973-74. But since 2009, the U.S. government
has declared most federal lands off-limits to new oil and gas exploration — despite vast recent finds of energy and radically new means
to tap it.
Once again, the strategic political oil reserves come into play. Report: Obama may release oil
reserves. President Obama will consider releasing oil from the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve if increased sanctions on Iran cause costs to
rise, according to a report on Friday [8/17/2012]. Officials have a plan ready if gasoline prices do not fall after Sept. 3, according to Reuters.
Historically, gas prices drop after the Labor Day holiday.
7 Things to Expect If Obama Is
Elected to a Second Term. [#3] Gas and energy prices will be dramatically higher: Obama once said, "Under my plan of a cap and
trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." His Energy Secretary Steven Chu added, "Somehow we have to figure out how to boost
the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe." Is it any wonder that Obama won't drill ANWR, has blocked the Keystone Pipeline, and has slow-walked
The Mother of All Hoaxes. The U.S. is
floating on an ocean of oil, but for now it can only be extracted from lands owned privately because the Obama administration has done
everything in its power to restrict access to it on federally owned lands and, of course, the billions of barrels locked up off-shore.
In exactly the same way that the Obama administration has presided over the loss of billions in subsidies and loan guarantees for the
solar panel companies or the ridiculous costs of wind power industry compared to a single coal-burning plant, at the heart of it all has
been the claim the global warming is caused by "greenhouse gas" emissions, carbon dioxide, that imperil the Earth.
Department opening up more federal land... for solar panels. Forget about the leasing for oil, gas, and mineral drilling
that would allow the energy market to produce the jobs and economic growth it is absolutely chomping at the bit to create — let's
prioritize our administrative resources and land use for an industry that has demonstrated itself barely capable of competing on the global
market despite heavy assistance from taxpayers. Yeah, that's a great plan.
Caught in a green crossfire. President Obama has waged war on fossil
fuels for three and a half years — and American consumers and families are caught in the green energy crossfire. They are getting hit
with higher energy prices, dismal employment prospects and a floundering economy, as billions go to unfriendly overseas countries for oil we could
produce in the USA, and billions of tax dollars are wasted on subsidy schemes designed to make "green" energy more competitive — by
raising the cost of electricity and fossil fuels that really power our economy. Even worse, his policies are actively killing jobs and preventing
job creation: in the oil patch, coal country, and hundreds of industries whose survival depends on reliable, affordable energy.
EPA Proposes Stricter New
Standards for Soot Pollution. Adding to the Obama administration's mounting heap of regulations, the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) proposed Friday [6/15/2012] new air quality standards to curb the purportedly fatal repercussions of soot emissions. In reducing the emission of such
particles, which environmentalists say are one of the most hazardous air pollutants, oil refiners and large manufacturers will be forced to invest in
costly pollution-reduction upgrades.
Obama's war on guns and oil. The Obama
administration is using more than just the Environmental Protection Agency to "crucify" businesses it doesn't like. Congress won't enact
any gun-control measures, and the American people aren't interested in paying more at the pump. So President Obama has to get a lot more
creative in pushing his anti-gun, anti-affordable-energy agenda. His latest technique is dispatching the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) to wage small-scale battles against guns and oil. [...] It's obvious what the White House is up to, and the American
people shouldn't stand for it.
Big Enviro Push Coming to End All Coal, Oil, Gas Subsidies.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) will announce legislation today to end every last subsidy for oil, coal and natural gas production.
"The measure would do away with tax breaks, financial assistance, royalty relief, direct federal research and development and many loopholes that benefit the fossil
fuel industry," Sanders' office said.
Real Hope for Ending Federal Debt. [Scroll
down] Of course, tapping the United States' natural resources is the opposite of what Obama is doing. Oil and gas production on federal
lands has dropped by 40% under the dreary marriage of environmentalism, puerile elitism, and Marxism which is Obamanomics. What is true of oil
is also true of coal.
Obama Wants Power, Not Jobs. Natural gas is a feedstock for the production of
fertilizer, plastics, and many chemical products. Fortunately, America possesses vast reserves of recoverable natural gas. The low price of this gas is
one factor spurring companies like Dow Chemical to expand production in the United States rather than send jobs overseas. [...] It all sounds like an economic
miracle, and it is. So why is Obama trying to kill it?
Hires Exxon Mobil to Get Oil Obama Doesn't Want. Alaska contains a wealth of oil both on land, in ANWR, and off
shore in its outer continental shelf. But President Obama and the Democrat party are staunchly opposed to allowing us to
avail ourselves of it. And via the Keystone Pipeline, Canada could supply nearly 1,000,000 barrels of oil a day that we're
not getting from Alaska, but Obama and the Democrats have stopped that too.
Administration's Energy Policy A Boon To Petrotyrants. Wittingly or not, President Obama has contributed to high oil prices by
stymieing U.S. production. But if that's the idea, it makes sense to secure energy abroad. He hasn't. In fact, Obama's stated
policy, in his March 30, 2011, energy speech has been a crude central planner's diktat of reducing oil imports by a third over the next
10 years and replacing them with increased production of biofuels and other unproven "green" energies yet to be developed.
Vote — Scarcity or Abundance. With our Presidential candidates clear, there's no better issue
to contrast our choice than energy policy. [...] Natural gas in America has decreased in cost because of the dramatic
expansion in supply. The same could be done with oil.
Crackdown On Speculators Won't Cut Prices. President Obama's promised "crackdown" on speculators
is another example of his using government to strangle markets and increase control over the private economy.
Worse, it won't cut gas prices one bit.
Our president goes on a wild goose chase against "speculators." Obama's Snipe Hunt.
Watching President Obama stumble through his energy crisis, it seems only a question of whether he will
end up channeling Jimmy Carter or President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner of Argentina. The latter,
in case you missed it, just announced that her government will be seizing a 51 percent interest in
YPF, the Argentine subsidiary of Repsol, the Spanish conglomerate that is the 15th largest refiner in the
world. In most places, that would be called theft, but in the banana republic of Argentina it's just
business as usual.
Ways that Barack Obama has Decimated the American Economy. Our economy runs on coal, natural gas, nuclear power and most
importantly, oil. By refusing to drill ANWR, blocking the Keystone Pipeline, fighting offshore drilling, slow walking drilling on
federal land, trashing fracking, and attacking oil companies on a regular basis, the Obama Administration has driven up the cost of oil.
Not only does this take money out of the pocket of consumers, it increases the cost of just about everything in the economy via higher
Democrats' dumbest new energy idea.
For scurrilous attacks on the oil and gas industry, few liberals in Congress can hold a candle to Rep. Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts.
Several weeks ago, Mr. Markey, who is the ranking Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, filed a bill that would require bidders for
oil and gas leases on federal lands to certify that all production from such leases would be offered for sale only in the United States. [...] The
congressman obviously doesn't understand how energy markets work.
The case of President Obama's missing oil tax.
Candidate Barack Obama pushed it hard in 2008: a tax on Big Oil company profits that would flow back to families in
$1,000 rebate checks. President Barack Obama acts as if the idea never existed.
BrightSource and the Fracking Task Force.
Bad stuff always happens on Friday the 13th. So it was on Friday [4/13/2012] that BrightSource Energy, the large solar energy company that has
already received $868 million of a $1.6-billion loan guarantee, canceled its IPO application. And that same day, President Obama appointed
Heather Zichal to head a new high-level task force to coordinate regulation of hydraulic fracking. The two events, both highly inauspicious, were not
unrelated. The connection is simple and obvious: in order to prop up failing solar companies, Obama needs to force natural gas prices higher.
What Happened To Our Cheap
Oil? It didn't disappear. It's still here. [...] There hasn't been an oil refinery built in the U.S.
since 1976, ironically the same year that Jimmy Carter was elected. He was responsible for the creation of the
Department of Energy and the enabling legislation was passed and signed into law on August 4, 1977. Hundreds
of billion dollars later with a budget of $24.2 billion a year, 16,000 federal employees and approximately 10,000
contract employees, we are no closer to being independent of foreign oil.
Sticker shock at the pump.
The president wants to raise taxes on oil companies by about $40 billion over 10 years. Senate Democrats were
more modest, limiting the tax hike to just the biggest companies for about $26 billion over 10 years. Even if
Democrats were interested in using the new revenue to reduce the deficit, this tax would barely cover five hours of government
spending a year. Instead, their bill used the majority of the money to increase the subsidies to their political allies
in the intermittent energy business, making this a mere redistribution of corporate wealth.
Critics hit Obama's energy move.
Over the weekend during a brief refueling stop in Alaska on the way to the nuclear summit in Seoul, Mr. Obama issued a release inviting
industry input on an oil and gas lease sale in Alaska's Cook Inlet. ... But the Cook Inlet, off the coast of South-Central Alaska is the
oldest oil field in the state, dating back to the early 1960s, and industry organizations are ridiculing the move as an attempt to try to
dress up an old leasing area the industry has had little to no interest in drilling in for years.
Old Democrat Party: FDR Expanded US Domestic Oil Production. In spite of the Obama Administration, a
rag tag assortment of small "wildcat" oil and gas entrepreneurs have proven that America has over 100 years' supply
of natural gas and over 50 years' supply of oil. With Obama's green initiatives in tatters, his new strategy
seems to be taking credit for drill, baby, drill achievements, but remains fearful of the political consequences to
build the pipelines to pump, baby, pump all that oil and gas to markets.
Policy. Americans remember that [President Obama's] team boasted about wanting higher energy costs in 2008,
when Obama was still basking in hope-and-change adulation. Energy Secretary-designate Steven Chu, who doesn't own a car,
pontificated about wanting higher American gasoline prices, hoping they would somehow reach European levels. Candidate
Obama breezily warned of skyrocketing energy prices — the necessary cost of his planned cap-and-trade,
anti-global-warming legislation. Senator Ken Salazar of Colorado, who was soon to become interior secretary,
bragged that even if gas reached $10 a gallon, he would not vote to open up new federal offshore oil leases.
to 2009: Administration Policies Sought to Discourage 'Overproduction' of Oil. In May 2009, four
months into the Obama presidency, retail gasoline prices averaged $2.32 per gallon. Rep. Charles Boustany (R-LA)
wrote Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to express concern about the impact that the Administration's budgeted changes
in tax policy would have on the oil and gas industry. ... In just three years' time, retail gasoline prices are up
68%. $4.00+ gasoline prices loom as a key reelection vulnerability for the President; in response, the
Administration's rhetoric has shifted to "energy friendly", but its original energy-hostile policies have not
changed a whit.
go on offensive over rumors about tapping oil reserves. Republicans launched a preemptive strike last week
against rumored plans by the White House to tap the country's emergency oil reserves. Releasing oil from the
Strategic Petroleum Reserve, a 696-million-barrel stockpile stored on the Gulf Coast, is a ploy to score political
points amid gas prices that are nearing a national average of $4 per gallon, Republicans argued.
Tapping Petroleum Reserve has
gotten trickier. Moving to tap the four giant Gulf Coast salt caverns that hold 700 million
barrels of government-owned crude would still almost certainly knock global oil futures lower, delivering some
relief at the pump for motorists and helping Obama in the November election if he can prevent gasoline from
rising above $4 a gallon nationwide. On Thursday [3/15/2012], prices fell by as much as $3 a barrel after
Reuters reported that Britain was set to agree to release stockpiles together with the United States later this year.
Oil Speculation Task Force Should Look Into Obama. Pres. Obama says he wants Attorney General Eric
Holder to "pay attention to potential speculation in the oil markets," so he's calling the DOJ's speculation task
force to action. ... But, Obama's stubborn refusal to approve the Keystone oil pipeline project or oil drilling
permits is one of the things they're speculating about when they drive up the cost of oil.
drilling for oil in Arctic refuge. The U.S. Senate on Tuesday [3/13/2012] resoundingly rejected
a sweeping measure to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other protected areas to drilling as well
as approve construction of the Keystone pipeline project. The vote was the first time in four years the
Senate has voted on a measure including ANWR drilling, and it failed miserably.
Lies. President Obama is spewing lies and distortions on America's energy capabilities, and attempting to
paint political opponents as medieval. The president's agenda is anti-American and anti-progress. It's
driven by a statist ideology. Frankly, the country's not likely to expand domestic supply and reduce foreign
dependence while the Democrats are in power.
Oil and Gasoline Prices.
Actual oil prices are unknown to most Americans. ... A few of us know that the price of U.S. crude oil is always
cheaper than the price of foreign OPEC crude oil. Some of us know that because we have followed "World Crude
Oil Prices" on the website of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the U.S. Department of Energy for
years. On November 11, 2011, the EIA shut down the World Crude Oil Prices website. EIA did
not even leave up the valuable historic data on the website. The Obama administration has hidden actual
oil prices from the public. That should be a scandal.
best way for government to reduce oil dependence? Do nothing. [Scroll down] After the oil shocks of the 1970s, the United
States succeeded in reducing its use of oil. As late as 1995, the United States was using no more oil than it had used in 1978.
Not its use per person, or use per vehicle, but its use, period. This progress was not accomplished by reinventing the internal
combustion engine. It was accomplished by (1) shifting homes from oil to gas heat; (2) ending the burning of heavy oil by
electrical utilities; and (3) shifting freight traffic from trucks to trains. No government official planned these changes.
They just happened, in response to market forces. Result: Even as Americans put more cars on the road —
and drove further in them — they successfully decreased their oil reliance.
Sen. Reid raises possible FTC
probe of gasoline. Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid on Tuesday [2/28/2012] said he hoped the
Federal Trade Commission would look into rising domestic gasoline prices, noting "rampant speculation" in oil
The Editor says...
The market exists to allow investors to speculate. The Senator might as well launch an investigation into
rampant shopping at the supermarket.
America the whole truth about gas prices, Mr. President. [Scroll down] The president is just
flat wrong about those silver bullets. His predecessor pulled the trigger on one on July 15, 2008,
by lifting an executive branch moratorium on oil and gas exploration and development in the Outer Continental
Shelf regions off America's coasts. Literally within minutes, the price-per-barrel of oil on the world
market plunged from just below its historic high of $149 to $136, a 6.3 percent decrease. Bush also
challenged the then-Democratic Congress to lift a parallel legislative moratorium on the same areas.
Saving this for an "October surprise"? Obama
administration coy on possibility of tapping oil reserve as gas prices rise. The Obama administration
is staying mum about the possibility of opening up the Strategic Petroleum Reserve as a way to curb the rise in
gas prices — declining to rule it in or out while insisting all along that officials are not interested in
"short-term fixes." Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner stirred speculation on Friday [2/24/2012] when, in an
interview on CNBC, he said "there's a case for the use of the reserve in some circumstances."
Gassy Rhetoric: DNC chair blamed Republicans for high gas prices in
2005. Obama told students in Miami on Thursday that there is "no silver bullet" when it comes to lowering
gas prices. The White House press secretary told reporters this week there are no "magic solutions." But
Democrats haven't always been so consistent in their message. In fact, one prominent Democrat argued in 2005 that
President Bush and Republicans were directly to blame for high gas prices.
'Stupid' and Oil
Prices. 'The American people aren't stupid," thundered President Obama yesterday in Miami,
ridiculing Republicans who are blaming him for rising gasoline prices. Let's hope he's right, because not
even Forrest Gump could believe the logic of what Mr. Obama is trying to sell. To wit, that a) gasoline
prices are beyond his control, but b) to the extent oil and gas production is rising in America, his energy
policies deserve all the credit, and c) higher prices are one more reason to raise taxes on oil and gas
drillers while handing even more subsidies to his friends in green energy.
accuses Obama of lying about energy. The White House is lying to the American public when it says
its policies are responsible for increased oil production, the American Petroleum Institute said.
Execs Say Obama Led Us To 'Energy Abyss'. Energy executives and other industry players gathered
for the North American Prospect Expo (NAPE) in Houston shredded administration assertions that it is opening
up areas for oil and gas exploration and that its policies are responsible for increased oil and gas production
on President Obama's watch. "These have been the most difficult three years from a policy standpoint
that I've ever seen in my career," Bruce Vincent, president of Houston oil and natural gas producer Swift
Energy, told the Houston Chronicle.
The Obama Fable about Energy. As I always
say it is better to read Obama's speeches then to just listen. Obama never talked about the high price of gasoline at
the pump in his last SOTU. It is way too high, and it is causing folks to have to sacrifice. But, after all,
Obama said we would need to sacrifice for hope and change. The big question should have been answered by the community
organizer as to why the price of oil is getting out of sight again?
Obama's "green energy" policies won't work.
Two powerful forces are pushing crude oil prices up. First, the Obama Administration is restricting American
production of oil through its "no drill America" energy policy, in which it obstructs efforts to increase domestic
oil and gas production. This is bad for consumers not only because it restricts total world supply, but
especially because it restricts supply from sources unaffected by foreign political instability. Secondly,
oil from the Middle East remains vulnerable as illustrated by Iran's continuing threat to mine the Straits of
Hormuz and so block 35 percent of all world oil carried by ship.
ANWR — Is President Obama Serious
About Domestic Oil Production? President Obama admitted in the State of the Union that energy
production creates jobs, so why isn't he opening up new areas like the North Slope of the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge (ANWR) for oil and gas production? As we have noted numerous times, the federal government leases a
mere 3 percent of federal lands for energy production. The United States is already the world's third
largest oil producer, but we could produce a lot more oil if the federal government would let the American people
explore for oil on more federal lands.
[Italics in original.]
Obama claims credit for cheap
natural gas. President Barack Obama has been taking the credit for the worldwide boon of cheap natural-gas,
and declining to give credit to the entrepreneurial energy industry.
Drawing a pipeline in the
sand. On Wednesday, Rep. Fred Upton's House Energy and Commerce Committee is expected to question Kerri-Ann
Jones, assistant secretary of state for oceans and international environment and scientific affairs, about the administration's
choice. "We want to know why this project was derailed at the 11th hour after an extensive review process and with
time to spare before the president's deadline," the Michigan Republican said in a statement Thursday [1/19/2012]. The
House had given Mr. Obama until Feb. 21 to act on the project.
by Denying Access to Energy. It is the crime of the century that America, home to some of the world's
greatest reserves of coal, natural gas and oil, is being deliberately destroyed by the Environmental Protection
Agency and the Department of the Interior as they do everything in their power to restrict access and drive energy
producers out of business. It is common sense that a nation that cannot produce sufficient electricity to
turn on its lights and power its manufacturing sector will be destroyed if current Obama administration
regulations and actions continue.
Obama loves oil! Not!
Without his nose growing visibly, the President claimed the government was behind the technological advances that
led to the current shale gas boom, and even suggested that he might take credit for the rise in domestic oil
production. In fact, Mr. Obama's administration has hampered and castigated oil companies at every turn.
In the light of the hysterical grandstanding over the BP Gulf spill (whose impact proved to be greatly exaggerated),
it was ironic indeed to hear the President now declare a great opening up of offshore exploration.
What can the President do to make America Prosper? The President's
policies are raising energy prices, which makes consumers poorer and destroys jobs in energy-intensive industries.
If President Obama is sincere when he says that 'we can't wait' to create jobs and economic growth, then he should
reverse his anti-energy policies and tell the EPA to stop its regulatory onslaught against coal-fired electricity.
He could start tonight by taking back his decision to block the Keystone pipeline.
Department energy propaganda misleading, disingenuous. The interior department announced Tuesday [1/10/2012]
that oil and gas lease sales on public lands increased 20 percent in 2011, generating more than $250 million
in profits for taxpayers. The fact, however, is that oil production on federal lands, lease sales, and revenue
have drastically declined during the Obama administration. "The American people need only to check their
electric bills or the price they are paying at the pump to see just how well the Obama administration's energy
policies are working. ... The president promised to make energy prices 'skyrocket,' and so he has." ... said
IER Senior Vice President Dan Kish.
Top 10 Most Needed Government Reforms.
[#6] Energy production: It is far past the time for the federal government to get out of the way and
let America's vast energy resources be developed. With large coastal oil reserves and shale oil potential in
the heartland, it is a crime that America can be held hostage for its energy needs by Middle Eastern madmen.
The EPA Choke Oil Shale Production? The latest salvo in the administration's war on energy may be new
rules and permits to regulate a process to get oil and gas from porous rock, sacrificing jobs and economic growth
while under review.
Energy in America: No Bridge to
Oil. North of the Arctic Circle, the tiny village of Nuiqsut, Alaska, has become the latest flash point
in the struggle between oil drilling and environmentalism. The town, with a population of 400, nearly all
Eskimos, sits on the edge of the Colville River and the National Petroleum Reserve, or NPR. How isolated
is it? It takes four flights and eight hours to get there from Seattle. Conoco Phillips wants to
build a road bridge and pipeline over the river to connect to the nearby Alpine development, which sits just outside
the NPR. But the Army Corps of Engineers rejected the plan telling, the oil company it had to go under the river.
Obama's Disastrous Energy
Record: The energy policies of the Obama administration have made America less safe and have significantly
contributed to our nation's high unemployment rate and lackluster economic growth. At the same time, President
Obama's failure to expand our oil resources has led to higher prices at the gas pump for all Americans. In
short, the Obama administration has been an utter failure in managing the energy sources of the United States.
Hey Obama: Gas Up and Go.
[This is] the most anti-oil, anti-energy administration this country has seen since the failed presidency of
Jimmy Carter. ... But that's what happens when your president goes on a jihad against American energy.
Obama has opposed coal, he wants to be punitive against the oil industry, won't allow drilling in the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge and, in a politically cowardly move, stalled plans for the Keystone XL pipeline.
The only energy Obama seems to support is the mass anger of Occupy Wall Street.
Isn't America's problem. President Obama was wrong to say at the Asia-Pacific economic summit that
America has gotten "lazy" in the last few decades at attracting foreign investment. What he should have said,
in light of his administration's handling of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, is that America has become quite
adept at blocking it.
Liberals, And Destructive Energy "Policies". President Barack Obama seems to have determined that
our problem isn't so much "foreign oil," but oil itself. His Administration has sought to force the nation
away from consuming all types of oil — both foreign and domestic — and to move us in the
direction of his environmentally preferred "green" energy sources. Unfortunately, the President has
approached energy policy just as he approaches most everything else — with the naïve assumption
that as long as lots of government programs and mandates are established, the agenda will be accomplished and
all will go well.
Excess and Abuse. Shortly after Obama took office, his Interior Secretary Ken Salazar "canceled
land leases for energy development on 77 parcels of land in Utah. Then he canceled a pending oil-shale
lease sale based on his expert judgment that it 'didn't meet the smell test.'" Kerpen adds, "Overall there
has been a steep drop-off in leasing on federal lands.... 2010 saw a 79 percent drop in leasing in
Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming from 2005. Total onshore royalties dropped
33 percent in just two years." Even more virulent is the Obama Administration's attack on coal,
which the President seems to have targeted for quick phaseout, even though we have the world's most expansive
coal reserves, offering 200 years of inexpensive energy.
We must remove energy production
obstacles to create jobs. Two of the biggest challenges facing the United States are getting people
back to work and becoming less dependent on foreign oil from hostile countries. Unfortunately, the President's
rigid belief that stimulus spending could create private-sector jobs has failed and left us with higher unemployment
and skyrocketing debt. His energy policies undermine America's security by making it more difficult for
entrepreneurs and private employers to produce domestic energy resources.
A Disastrous Presidency.
The gulf lost 40,000 jobs when the president decided it was best to shut down all oil production after the BP oil
spill. The approval for Keystone XL Pipeline sits on his desk, awaiting his signature. It would
connect Canadian oil from the tar sands of Alberta with refineries in Cushing, Oklahoma and Nederland, Texas,
while providing 20,000 direct jobs and 100,000 indirect jobs. With recent discoveries and improvements in
drilling techniques, some have called America the Saudi Arabia of natural gas. America also has the
largest oil reserves in the world; the Bakken Formation alone is said to contain more than 11 billion
Sen. Inhofe: Obama's EPA Waging War on Fossil
Fuels. "The President of the United States wants to destroy American energy," said Oklahoma GOP
Sen. James Inhofe, the ranking member of the Senate Energy and Public Works Committee. "His intention is
to kill fossil fuels, which we rely on for 99% of the energy in America. "All of this killing of our
energy supply is not by accident. It's on purpose."
EPA Czar Pushes 'Urgency' Drilling Regulations. Fearing President Barack Obama might not get
re-elected to the White House in 2012, Texas EPA Czar, Al Armendariz, a professor at Southern Methodist
University in Dallas, called for greater "urgency" in getting oil and gas fields in the Lone Star to be
declared as "health hazards."
Energy Policy. Of all the absolutely mindless things coming out of Washington these days, it's
hard for me to imagine anything more mindless than the Obama administration's thinking on energy policy.
His energy secretary has said he thinks we'd all be better off if gas cost $7 per gallon. They've used
the BP oil spill, whose lasting environmental impact seems to be minimal, as an excuse to end all deepwater
drilling and virtually all other drilling. This has crippled the economies of oil-dependent states,
particularly those along the Gulf Coast.
industry study: Wider drilling would add 1 million jobs. A study commissioned by a
major oil-industry lobbying group found that federal policies to expand oil-and-gas development
could add 1.1 million U.S. jobs over the next decade and bring in $36 billion in federal
revenues by 2015. "We can be a major driver in the economic recovery and we stand ready to
do so," said American Petroleum Institute (API) President Jack Gerard in an interview about
the study, unveiled Wednesday [9/7/2011].
Obama energy crisis as you've never before seen it. It's been eclipsed somewhat
in recent months by the continued stagnation of the economy and the increasingly loud Republican
presidential nomination battle, but the energy crisis caused by President Obama's Permatorium on
drilling in the Gulf of Mexico is just as serious as it ever was. And it's going to get worse
if something isn't done soon to lift the bureaucratic strangulation being applied to the oil and
natural gas industries by Obama's Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar.
Congressman warns Alaska pipeline could be dismantled within 10 years.
The Obama administration is setting the stage for the dismantling of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline and poses the
greatest threat to its existence today, according to House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings.
The 800-mile pipeline cost $8 billion to construct in the 1970s, and has moved more than 18 billion
barrels of crude oil. Three oil companies constructed it, in the face of significant opposition from
environmentalists, in response to the 1973 Arab oil embargo.
Ruby Red Tape.
The abstraction known as "regulation" is often invoked as a reason businesses aren't growing or hiring fast
enough, and with good reason. Anyone wondering what that means in practice should consult the epic saga
of the Ruby pipeline.
Our Debt Crisis Through Energy Freedom. Things would not look so bleak if the federal
government allowed more freedom in the development of American energy resources. Energy freedom
would boost economic growth and lower oil prices. The fiscal crisis would be eased as more revenues
flowed into the Treasury, and fewer people [would need] unemployment benefits and food stamps.
The Tea Party,
Right About Everything. [Scroll down] According to a new study by IHS Global Insight,
merely picking up the pace in granting oil drilling permits would go a long way in producing jobs throughout
the US, adding to GDP and reducing dependency on foreign oil sources. In 2012 alone it could mean
230,000 new jobs, $44B more in GDP, 150 million more barrels of oil, and $15B less in
The Economy. With the job market in the dumps, and the president moving that to the top of his
priority list, wouldn't getting out of the way of 740,000 jobs that could be created in the oil industry be a
no-brainer? Well, no.
leader decries 'extreme' regulations. Despite President Obama's pledge to cut red tape for job-creating
industries, regulations and other delays are holding up billions of dollars in investments and thousands of
jobs for oil and gas producers, the head of the American Petroleum Institute tells The Washington Times.
on the rule of law. [Scroll down] In 2008, the Senate voted against the "cap-and-trade"
bill that would have created a carbon-tax system and vast federal power to interfere in the energy market.
So the Environmental Protection Agency declared carbon dioxide a pollutant and has embarked on a massive scheme
to impose cap-and-trade through bureaucratic power. Meanwhile, Mr. Obama's green fascists have virtually
shut down new oil exploration and drilling.
continues his war on cheap American energy. Barack Obama's EPA has been on a crusade to kill
off efforts to boost America's domestic energy supplies. We are now among the least attractive nations
for energy companies seeking to explore and develop energy supplies. The American people are waking up
to the man-made disaster that Barack Obama has created. Three quarters of Americans now think our oil
and gas resources are under-exploited. Yet, Barack Obama and his Democratic allies are doing all they
can do kill carbon and jam down our throats ruinously expensive and uneconomic green schemes that benefit
The use of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for political gain:
Obama's Oily Desperation.
The excuse being used by the Obama Administration and the International Energy Agency for the oil release is
that reduced oil exports from Libya are raising energy prices and thus hurting world economies. However,
the Saudis have already said they would increase production to offset losses from Libya — and they
have done so. ... The idea that the federal government needed to knock oil prices down further or faster for
economic purposes while oil was already in what would be considered a dramatic sell-off is simply not credible.
Too Little, Way Too Late.
The Democrats have been blocking oil companies from developing America's fossil fuel resources — the
largest in the world — for decades. Whenever their anti-drilling policies are challenged, they
assure us that increasing domestic production would do little or nothing to bring down the cost of energy.
Yet, whenever the price of gasoline becomes politically embarrassing, what do they do? They take "emergency"
action to increase the supply of petroleum by opening up the Strategic Petroleum Reserve — some
700 million barrels of oil that are stored along the Gulf coast.
Strategic Petroleum Reserve Is an Obama '12 Reelection Asset. The American economy, the one
that even Democrats admit Obama now owns, is hurtling towards a near depression so fast that the administration
will exploit any asset, and embrace any ploy, however desperate, in the hopes the economy will resurrect
itself and reflate Obama's plummeting poll numbers at the same time.
Cash for Pumpers. On
Thursday [6/23/2011] the President announced that he would release 30 million barrels of oil from the
nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The immediate effect on world markets was to knock the oil price
down by over $4 a barrel. But many experts question the wisdom — and the timing —
of the move. Clearly, the timing of the withdrawal was politically motivated.
Obama's Oil Dump A Political Ploy? The White House announced Thursday that for only the third time
in history, the U.S. would release 30 million barrels of oil from the national stockpile. ... The spigots
have been opened just twice — in 2005 by President Bush, who released 11 million barrels after
disruptions from Hurricane Katrina, and in 1992 by President Bush Sr., who tapped 20 million barrels in
the wake of the Gulf War. President Obama's release — which is far bigger than either of
those two emergencies — is supposedly in response to disruptions from Libya, which isn't even
a U.S. supplier. It isn't our crisis.
Obama's Oily Desperation.
In a move that has everyone from oil analysts to traders to petroleum producers scratching their heads, the
Obama Administration announced on Thursday morning that the U.S. along with over two dozen other nations will
release 60 million barrels of oil from emergency oil stock piles. Half of the total release, or
30 million barrels, will come from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
Strategic Petroleum Reserve Isn't a Political ATM. The Obama administration announced
Thursday the answer to a question it hass been mulling for months: It will tap the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve to release 30 million barrels of oil over the next 30 days. The
administration is hoping the move will lower the price of oil. While the move led to immediate declines
in the short term, this move will do little to impact prices and energy security over the long term and only
proves that the administration's energy policy is a disaster.
New Low. Less than a year ago, the
Obama Administration was insisting that its moratorium on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico would do no harm to our
nation's economy because we could just buy more oil from OPEC. Now, instead of allowing more production in
the Gulf of Mexico and offshore Alaska, the President is tapping our strategic reserve in the salt domes of Texas
and Louisiana, which will only have to be refilled later at potentially higher prices. Tapping the SPR will
do nothing to bring down oil prices in the long term, but rather distort markets even further without bringing any
significant new energy supplies to market. If allowed to drill in Alaska, we could produce an extra
one million barrels a day for decades, rather than one month, as the president's plan calls for.
Our Hokey President.
[Obama's] release of oil from the strategic reserve is a classic: the Democrats tell us that increasing
our domestic production won't affect gas prices, until they face a political crisis. Then the clouds
part, momentarily, and they remember Economics 1: increasing supply will lower prices.
nation's true oil reserve in the Gulf of Mexico. The Obama administration has come under
criticism for its decision to drain 30 million barrels from the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve,
purportedly in an effort to address Libya's unrest and ease prices at the pump. The critics are
right. This move was not necessary. Gas prices are trending downward already, and our nation
doesn't face an emergency that warrants tapping into the strategic reserve.
of oil from reserves seems to have had no effect. The move was widely ridiculed as a blatantly
political effort to get past the Fourth of July holiday weekend; some liberals, however, hailed it as a success.
The verdict is now in, as the effect of the release has run its course. This morning, an expert in the field emailed:
* The SPR's release of 30 million barrels of oil was sold to oil refiners and traders at
more than $10/bbl BELOW market. Can the US taxpayer afford the $300mm subsidy?
* Does the public know that prices are the same now, less than two weeks since the SPR
announcement? Was this money well spent?
Obama's gas stunt
comes up empty. The results are in from President Obama's controversial decision last month to
tap into the nation's oil reserves to drive down gas prices: none. Like his futile efforts to revive
the moribund U.S. economy by spending $1 trillion in borrowed money, the president's release of 30 million
barrels from the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve produced nothing more than a brief pause in the steady
rise in prices at the pump.
Whether he needs to or not... Obama may tap Strategic Petroleum Reserve. [Scroll
down] The whole situation if rife with political implications, especially for President Obama, who faces reelection in November.
Obama can't appear to be seen as weak on Iran. That would open him up to charges that he's soft on national defense. But crimping
Iran's oil output too much could raise gas prices, angering voters just before they head to the ballot box.
government attack on oil companies. The main feature of the Democrats' bill, which was defeated
in the Senate but which we probably have not heard the last of, was to deny five major oil companies the
domestic production tax credit that is available to all manufacturers and mining companies, including oil
companies. The justification? Well, big oil companies get lousy ratings in polls. So
stick 'em with a higher tax bill. Sounds a lot like gangster government to me.
U.S. Energy Crisis a Liberal Power Grab.
It is no coincidence that U.S. oil production peaked in 1970, the year after President Richard Nixon signed
the National Environmental Policy Act and the Environmental Protection Agency was established, just the beginning
of a decade of laws that have made the United States the hardest place in the world to produce energy.
When the federal government started taking over roles traditionally held by the states and expanding its
reach into every corner of every economic activity in the country, those who love more government had the
perfect proxy for justifying more power over the economy and over the way Americans live their lives.
Obama's schizo energy
policy. Rising energy costs already have changed many families' summer vacation plans, threatened
to short-circuit the weak recovery from the Great Recession and, combined with recent increases in food prices,
contributed to incipient inflationary pressures that foreshadow a lower standard of living and a return to the
stagflation of Jimmy Carter's presidency.
Issa report goes after Obama administration's energy agenda. Rep. Darrell Issa of California,
chairman of the House Oversight Committee, has found another target in the Obama administration's policy
agenda: energy. Late Monday [5/23/2011], Issa released a scathing report accusing the White House of being
complicit in driving up oil prices to push a move to alternative energy sources.
Energy Costs: An Intentional Result Of Government Action. President Obama, Energy Secretary Chu
and others have stated that American consumers should pay more for energy, including electricity and gasoline.
From a political perspective, increasing the price of energy (by whatever means) helps them make the case for
"green" energy. Even beyond the effort to raise energy prices through "cap and trade" legislation that
Congress rejected, a pattern of increased enforcement, regulatory delay and new hurdles can be seen across
numerous agencies and approval processes. The result of this government action is less production,
higher costs for producers, and more expensive energy.
Natural gas pains.
America's energy woes show what's wrong when politicians intervene in the market. ... As gasoline prices
skyrocket, natural-gas backers sense an opportunity to grab a larger share of the fuel market and want
lawmakers to climb aboard the "green" fuel express.
Maybe, Drill. When President Obama said during his Saturday [5/14/2011] radio address that
"we should increase safe and responsible oil production here at home," the operative words were "safe and
responsible." We will drill if it's safe for polar bears, caribou and West Texas lizards, and if it
doesn't contribute to the "climate change" myth. Similar words were used to justify the seven-year
moratorium on offshore drilling off both coasts, in the eastern Gulf of Mexico and in the seas off Alaska
following last year's Deepwater Horizon explosion in the Gulf, even though no other wells were found to be
latest fake plan for more drilling. First he promised to open up the Atlantic to exploration.
Then he reneged. Then he said he'd lift his oil moratorium in the Gulf. Production has only decreased
since. Yesterday [5/14/2011] Obama again played Lucy to the American energy consumer's Charlie Brown. This
time he is promising to direct "the Department of Interior to conduct annual lease sales in Alaska's National
Petroleum Reserve, while respecting sensitive areas, and to speed up the evaluation of oil and
gas resources in the mid and south Atlantic."
"The president doesn't know squat about energy production". Oklahoma is one of the nation's
top energy states, so it's no surprise that its senators and representatives are opposed to President Obama's
energy and environmental policies. What is surprising, however, is the intensity of their reactions to
Obama's proposal to do away with $4 billion worth of energy industry tax breaks.
Energy Security. Americans keep hearing only short-term solutions and narrowly focused rules
and regulations. The U.S. still imports more than half its oil, gasoline prices are at historic highs,
and consumers are paying the price. One bipartisan policy tradition is to deny Americans the use of
our own resources.
Supplies Put Alaskan Pipeline at Risk. When the famed Trans Alaska Pipeline carried two
million barrels of oil a day, the naturally warm crude surged 800 miles to the Port of Valdez in three
days and arrived at a temperature of about 100 degrees. Now, dwindling oil production along
Alaska's northern edge means the pipeline carries less than one-third the volume it once did —
and the crude takes five times as long to get to its destination.
war on oil production threatens Alaska pipeline. The House is voting on the Reversing President
Obama's Offshore Moratorium Act today which, among other things, would require the administration to allow
drilling in at least 50 percent of the Outer Continental Shelf, including the Arctic. Also today,
The Wall Street Journal's Russell Gold has a great article on how President Obama's efforts to stop new oil
fields in Alaska is threatening to shut down the entire Alaska pipeline.
Public Misplaces Blame for
High Oil Prices. [Scroll down] Obama and other Democrats have pooh-poohed the idea of
more drilling. First, new leases would take years to result in new oil, they say. Second, they argue
that oil companies are sitting on existing leases, with some hinting that companies are deliberately sitting on
proven reserves. Oil companies point out that it takes a long time to get to the point of drilling.
They have to find the oil — if it exists — and then figure out if it's economical to pull
it out of the ground.
'Safety' Fears Cripple U.S. Oil. The Energy Department wants to find ways to make hydraulic
fracturing, a fast-growing method of extracting natural gas, safer and cleaner. Say, isn't that how
the administration justified its offshore drilling ban?
Clue About Drilling And $4 Gas. With last month marking the one year anniversary of the Gulf
spill, the public should take a moment to review America's energy landscape. They won't like what
they see. The White House has declared open season on our domestic oil firms.
would mean smaller deficit. With the price of oil at more than $100 per barrel, higher gasoline
prices are eating into Americans' budgets. Consumers, however, are not the only ones losing out. The
various taxes, lease revenues and royalty payments to federal, state and local governments for oil and gas
production on public lands is a significant source of revenue — among the largest sources outside
of the personal income tax. Yet, the Obama administration stubbornly clings to a "no new production in
our backyard policy" — while blaming oil companies for high prices.
Pelosi blames high gas prices on "oil men in the White House". Back in 2008 Speaker of the
House Nancy Pelosi said, "The price of oil is at the doorstep. Four dollars plus per gallon for oil is
attributed to two oil men in the White House." Oddly enough, Pelosi is now conspicuously silent about
gas prices. No public comments. No press conferences. No interviews.
Sky-High Gas Prices Good? Examine a few revealing past remarks from President Obama and the
Cabinet officials who are now in charge of the nation's energy use and oil leases on federal lands.
Then decide whether the current soaring gas prices are supposed to be good or bad. In 2008,
then-Colorado Sen. Ken Salazar — now the secretary of the Department of the Interior in charge of
the leasing of federal oil lands — refused to vote for any new offshore drilling. In a
Senate exchange with Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Salazar objected to allowing any drilling
on America's outer continental shelf — even if gas prices reached $10 a gallon.
Oil and Obama don't mix.
Americans are paying more than $4 a gallon for gas, ExxonMobil announced a 69 percent boost in
earnings, and President Barack Obama is struggling with the fact that he can't do much about any
via executive power grab. The Environmental Protection Agency has ruled that Shell Oil Co. may
not drill for oil this summer in the Arctic Circle off Alaska, where an estimated 27 billion barrels of
domestic oil are waiting to be extracted. Never mind that Shell's already spent nearly $4 billion
on the project, including $2.2 billion to Uncle Sam for the leases. No, the EPA's appeals board
said the oil giant had failed to include possible greenhouse-gas emissions from an icebreaking vessel in its
calculations and that the project might somehow threaten the health of the 245 people in an Eskimo village
70 miles away.
Listing of lizard may shut down Texas oil.
You can't make this up. First, a Spotted Owl destroyed the timber industry of the Pacific Northwest,
then a minnow turned the most productive agricultural land in the world into a dustbowl, and now, as energy
prices spike and the economy sputters, they're going after Texas with a scurrilous reptile. Specifically,
the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard.
A Lizard Stop West Texas Oil? After the harm done by the spotted owl and delta smelt, the listing
of a tiny reptile as endangered may be the latest salvo in the war on domestic energy.
Despite $4 gas, Obama boots Shell from Arctic drill site. EPA Rules Force Shell
to Abandon Oil Drilling Plans. Shell Oil Company has announced it must scrap efforts to drill
for oil this summer in the Arctic Ocean off the northern coast of Alaska. The decision comes following
a ruling by the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board to withhold critical air permits. ... The closest village
to where Shell proposed to drill is Kaktovik, Alaska. It is one of the most remote places in the United
States. According to the latest census, the population is 245 and nearly all of the residents are Alaska
natives. The village, which is one square mile, sits right along the shores of the Beaufort Sea,
70 miles away from the proposed off-shore drill site.
rebukes Obama over committing to support Brazilian oil. Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) is criticizing
President Obama for expressing support for Brazilian oil production while limiting American energy output.
"Under his administration, there is a de facto moratorium on oil exploration in the Gulf of Mexico,"
Pence wrote in an op-ed Monday [4/25/2011] in The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne, Ind. "The United States
has a drilling ban off both coasts, on Alaska's continental shelf and in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge."
everyone but himself for high gas prices. The president's energy non-policy of funding solar,
wind, and god-knows-what-other kind of power while doing everything to prevent opening new oil fields to
exploration and development is not to blame for high gas prices, says the president.
Fake Energy Policy. In 1999, Americans paid $90 billion for all their oil, less than 5 percent
of what they paid in federal taxes. At current prices of $108 per barrel, Americans this year will pay
over $800 billion for oil, an amount equal to 33 percent of all federal tax revenues, with two
thirds of the take going to fill the coffers of foreign regimes. If current trends continue, there is
every prospect that oil prices will more than triple by Obama's 2025 target date, leaving us paying more for
oil than we pay to the federal government.
U.S. Gov't Agency
Plans $2.84 Billion Loan for Oil Refinery — In Colombia. The U.S. Export-Import
Bank, an independent agency of the federal government, is now planning a $2.84 billion loan for a massive
project to expand and upgrade an oil refinery — in Cartagena, Colombia. The money would go
to Reficar, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ecopetrol, the Colombian national oil company.
will end up paying $6 a gallon for gas: Someday, you will be pumping gas, staring at the digital
numbers racing by, and you'll wonder: "How could I possibly be paying $6 a gallon for gasoline?"
You also will be wondering why so many of your friends and relatives are still looking for work. Or why
America is more dependent on foreign oil than ever before. If you look back to today, you'll remember
why: President Obama's de facto moratorium on deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
Desperation Breeds Familiar Energy
Gimmicks. When lawmakers were home for spring recess this month, they faced an earful of
outrage as gas prices near $4 per gallon, well ahead of summer driving season. Some members of Congress
told their constituents that they are pounding on the administration to jumpstart offshore drilling in order
to relieve the pressure at the pump. ... Opponents of American energy development on Capitol Hill are
becoming increasingly desperate to deflect criticism against anti-drilling policies which the
majority of Americans realize have contributed to this price surge.
promised higher energy costs. He wasn't kidding. President Obama held a town hall meeting
Wednesday at a wind turbine manufacturing plant in Fairless Hills, Pa., to promote his Big Green energy
agenda. Not everyone in the audience was receptive to his message. ... "There is no magic formula to
driving gas prices down," the president also said Wednesday. Maybe so, but Obama has figured out a
pretty good formula for driving gas prices up.
hoax: The emphasis was on a vast expansion of "clean energy." The familiar pipe dreams
were unfurled again: Biofuels. Further increases in fuel economy requirements. Electric
cars. Flexible-fuel vehicles. High-speed rail. Public transit. Sure all nifty ideas,
their regulatory quirks notwithstanding. And all are costly, many to the point of wiping out any possible
benefits. If the president sought increased oil production to hold down prices, he'd do a lot more good.
President's New Energy Plan: If you want to lower the price of something, the best solution
is to produce more of it. This is basic Econ 101 stuff. But nowhere in the administration's
new energy proposals, presented by the president this Wedesday in a speech at Georgetown University, is the
idea of pumping more oil in the United States addressed, except to say it is impossible.
Obama's overseas oil:
It's no surprise that gas prices are on the rise as President Obama returns from his truncated excursion to Rio.
The commander in chief has shown more interest in helping Brazilians develop their energy resources than he has in
helping ease the pain of Americans stung by spiraling prices at the pump. Three months into the new
administration, Brazil's state-owned oil company, Petrobras, received approval for at least $2 billion in
U.S. government-backed loans.
Soros Wins Under Obama's
Energy Policies. Abby Wisse Schacter, in the New York Post, notes that the Obama administration
is clamping down on oil and gas development in America (both onshore and offshore) but is hell-bent on helping
other nation's tap their resources and points out that such help is being showered specifically in New Guinea,
of all places.
administration's energy stagnation. It is starting to look obvious that the administration doesn't
want oil exploration and extraction at home while it is promoting the same exploration and extraction
elsewhere — specifically Brazil and New Guinea. ... [But] this isn't about a single piece of
equipement, [sic] it is about wanting to retard offshore drilling in America, period.
George Soros: Demagoat. Another
interesting note: Soros has a lot invested in Brazilian oil production. His puppet, Obama announced
that the U.S. would be investing and trading in Brazil's oil development. Of course, Obama doesn't want to
drill here in the U.S. The connection is very clear. Since Soros is out to destroy the USA like he
has other countries, all of the organizations he funds are nothing but puppets for him, just like Obama.
Obama went to Brazil to protect the Soros investment there in Petrobras.
Wrecking a Nation.
In 1985, the U.S. imported 25 percent of its oil usage. Today, it's 61 percent. And
still we are placing restrictions on increases in domestic production, both for oil and other sources of
energy. A few days back, President Obama, rather than sticking around a couple hours to explain to
the American people or to the U.S. Congress why we were going to war in Libya, flew off to Brazil to hand
out a permit to allow deep sea oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico to Brazil's state-run oil company,
Petrobras. Capitalist companies in America need not apply.
Man-Made Energy Crisis. Gas is well over $4 a gallon in most places in California —
and soaring elsewhere as well. But are such high energy prices good or bad? That should be a
stupid question. Yet it is not, when the Obama administration has stopped new domestic offshore oil
exploration in many American waters, curbed oil leases in the West, and keeps oil-rich areas of Alaska
exempt from drilling.
Obama Needs to go Back to Energy School.
The Administration's "logic" regarding oil leases is liable to drive one insane. The claim is that oil
companies pay billions of dollars to the federal government to obtain the right to drill, and then purposely
don't drill in order to drive up the price of oil. But wouldn't it be cheaper to not bid on the
lands in the first place? And why is the oil industry in favor of expanded access to drill offshore and in
ANWR, if their nefarious plot is to keep oil off the market and push up prices? Obviously the whole thing
makes no sense. The reason the oil industry doesn't extract oil from certain leased land is that oil
isn't distributed evenly across the globe.
Stall, Baby, Stall.
Many Americans fear that President Obama's new energy proposal is once again "all talk and no real action," this
time in an effort to shore up fading support for the Democrats' job-killing cap-and-trade (a.k.a. cap-and-tax)
proposals. Behind the rhetoric lie new drilling bans and leasing delays; soon to follow are burdensome
new environmental regulations.
Drill, Drill, Drill. In the fact sheet that accompanied the speech, there's a lot of talk
about "responsible development" for natural gas fracking chemicals, state regulators, tapping experts, the
environmental community, and protecting public health and the environment. In other words, the standards
for new drilling could be so high that there won't be that much new drilling. The president doesn't
discuss the role of the EPA, which is going after coal, natural gas, and oil. And while he says he'll
speed up new leases and permits, he then blames oil companies for not using their old leases. That's
an old saw of an argument that neglects to mention dry holes.
Oil Lease LIES! How do you know which parts of Obama's energy speech were either lies or
misrepresentations? The parts where his mouth was moving. This morning President Obama outline
his energy policy which is comprised of trying to pull the energy policy wool over America's eyes.
Executives Slam Obama for Boosting Brazil's Offshore Drilling. Republican lawmakers and
oil industry executives are slamming President Obama for offering to help Brazil expand offshore drilling
while U.S. production struggles to get back on its feet in the wake of the BP spill. The president,
on the first leg of his trip to Latin America, said in Brazil over the weekend that his administration wants
to assist the Brazilian government "with technology and support" in developing its oil reserves — a
black gold mine he said could hold twice as much oil as U.S. deposits.
Obama's Crony Capitalism. The president's announcement that his administration would lend billions
of dollars to develop Brazil's offshore oil reserves left many Americans flabbergasted. After all, he had
issued two drilling moratoriums in U.S. waters and then was declared in contempt of court for defying a federal
judge who ordered the moratoriums reversed. Some wondered if the president wasn't intentionally acting
against U.S. interests. Others wanted to know if pleasing political campaign contributors was the idea.
Obama Boldly Continues his Energy
Deception. President Obama finally held a press conference on the subject of rising
gas prices last week that required anyone who has been watching his administration's war on domestic
energy to suspend disbelief. Instead of announcing a reversal of his anti-domestic energy
policies, he explained that on his watch, oil production is actually up and imports are down.
What the President failed to explain was that his energy policies have nothing to do with this,
and that the U.S. would actually be producing more oil today if his administration had not been
doing everything in its power to stop domestic energy production since they walked into office
in January of 2009 when gasoline was $1.80 a gallon.
Solving US Energy Problems:
The big problem is the Democratic agenda to destroy US oil. Currently, this agenda is well
illustrated in the Gulf of Mexico. BP's Macondo Prospect well, which blew out in the Gulf of
Mexico last year, was reported by the federal government to be producing 62,000 barrels of oil per
day. At the present oil price, that is $2.2 Billion a year. This well may have been
the largest oil well in the history of the world. Yet, it was plugged and abandoned, and the federal
government would not allow the development of the large oil reservoir it was in, which may have created
thousands of new jobs. No other nation on earth would do that to an oil well which may have been
the largest oil well in world history.
Exploiting the Japanese.
[Scroll down] Then the President proceeded to take credit for record levels of domestic oil
and gas production in 2009, the year in which he was inaugurated. The last I heard, oil and
gas drilling has a lead time of at least five years, with exploration, leasing, licensing, and
actual production taking as long as twenty years. Yet Obama suggests he had something to
do with 2009 production levels? What he has done, with his Gulf drilling ban and
restrictions on East Coast and Alaska drilling, is to set future U.S. oil and gas production back
to Lower Oil Prices, Energy Information Chief Says. Richard Newell, administrator of the U.S.
Energy Information Administration (EIA), said that while oil prices are likely to stay above average for the
remainder of 2011, it is unlikely that an increase in domestic oil production would dramatically affect oil
prices in either the short-term or the long-term. Newell, a political appointee, was tapped to head
the EIA by President Barack Obama in mid-2009.
The Editor says...
This man clearly does not understand supply and demand, and obviously knows nothing about
the oil industry.
An Energy Policy
Designed to Fail. Gasoline prices are on the rise again, mostly due to a combination of
turmoil in the Middle East and increased worldwide demand that has driven crude prices up over $100
per barrel. When refiners switch to EPA-required summer blends starting on May 1, gasoline
prices will increase even more. The left understands that the harder consumers are hit at the
pump, the more sympathetic they are to calls for more domestic oil exploration. In an attempt
to head off the issue, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other
leftists have fallen back on a tired, discredited canard: the "use it or lose it" approach.
benefits when Obama puts federal lands off-limits? It sounds like a logical argument until it
runs into the reality provided by the answer to two basic questions — How much federal land is
actually off-limits and who benefits from those lands being kept off limits? Based on government data,
the answer to the first question is this: Ninety four percent of federal onshore lands are off-limits
to oil and gas exploration, while 97 percent of offshore federal lands are off-limits. So
virtually all of the public lands now owned by the American people but controlled by the federal government
isn't even eligible to be placed on the auction block for bidding by U.S. companies for energy exploration
Not Serious. No-drill Democrats are looking wan under the bright light of rising gasoline
prices. So what do they do? They retreat to their worst ideas and claim they've brought a
fresh set of solutions to the table.
Green Goons. It's getting so people
are afraid to drive more than 150 miles for fear that they won't be able to afford the gas to get home
again. Still, President Obama refuses to allow oil development either on government-owned land or just
off our coasts. We have enough petroleum in the ground right here in the United States to last us
centuries but Obama, the Democrats and their green goons won't let us get at it for fear there might be a
spill and a sea gull might get oil on its wings. It's all right though to send $1,000,000,000 a day to
Muslim countries who use much of it to finance jihad against us in their radical quest to destroy western
civilization. Our liberal Democrat rulers want fossil-fuel energy prices to go up in hopes that
Americans will turn to solar panels, windmills and Chevy Volts.
Why We Need to Drill
Here and Drill Now. Upon taking office, President Obama's Department of Interior, led by
Ken Salazar, began taking deliberate steps to reduce domestic drilling. From canceling oil and gas
leases throughout the American West to banning offshore production to refusing to issue deep water drilling
permits, the Obama administration has imposed virtually the same regulatory agenda that Americas soundly
rejected in 2008. The result of these policies is also the same as last time. Oil prices above
$100 per barrel for the first time since 2008.
Our Man-Made Energy
Crisis. [Scroll down] What's missing is a coherent U.S. energy policy. At best, the
Obama administration's approach to U.S. domestic oil and gas production can be characterized as a strategy of
ambivalence, an uneasy equilibrium between desire to lessen the role of fossil fuels and the reality of their
necessity in a functioning U.S. economy. Last year's Deepwater Horizon tragedy in the Gulf tilted the current
administration's policies to an even more punitive posture vis-a-vis domestic energy production. ... The time to
rethink and redesign our entire energy strategy is now.
On The Poor. Those on the left who say they care most for the least fortunate see the soaring
price of gasoline as positive — despite the fact that those with the lowest incomes are hurt
the worst. Since January 2009, when President Obama was sworn in, the average price of a gallon of
regular-grade gas has rocketed from less than $2 to $3.53. During this period, Obama's administration
has placed an illegal ban on oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, refused to permit deeper exploration into
our rich fossil fuel reserves and pushed $2.3 billion in a useless green energy initiative.
calls for new energy policy, more domestic drilling. Amid rising energy prices, Sen. Lisa
Murkowski (R-Alaska) is urging the formulation of a national energy policy that expands U.S. oil drilling
and creates alternatives to reduce consumption, both of which would provide greater control over energy
prices. In the weekly Republican radio address, the ranking member on the Senate Energy and Natural
Resources Committee said her party is prepared to "end the de facto moratorium on new development in the
Gulf of Mexico and parts of the Rocky Mountain West."
uses rising gas prices to call for opening Alaska's oil fields. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska),
citing rising gas prices, called on the administration Thursday [3/10/2011] to open up Alaska's oil reserves
for further exploration. "We are the only country that has identified a huge resource base and then
absolutely refused to use it," said Murkowski, referring to her state's massive oil reserves that remain
untapped because of their designation as a wildlife refuge. "We need to develop a coherent national
As the White House goes to court to defend its self-imposed drilling moratorium, it floats the idea of tapping
our strategic petroleum reserve to lower rising prices. How about the oil offshore and in Alaska?
No new drilling permits, but we'll tap into Strategic Petroleum Reserve! Oil prices have been
on the rise recently, with supply worries from the unrest in the Middle East pushing prices past $106 a barrel
this morning, the highest in two years. Americans are feeling the sting of an average $3.50 a gallon
price at the pump, with prices as high as $5 a gallon in some areas such as L.A. The Obama administration
has issued contradictory statements on the high oil prices.
As Gas Prices
Rise, Is It Time to 'Drill, Baby, Drill'?. With unrest and turmoil in oil-producing Middle
East and North African countries upon which America heavily relies for our domestic oil consumption and
with gas prices inching toward $4.00 a gallon, now is the time to drastically increase America's own oil
production. Even before the Middle East and North African government meltdowns, many experts were
predicting $4 a gallon gas in 2011 and $5 a gallon gas in 2012.
The End of the Drilling
Permitorium? Guess Again. After 314 days of the United States government holding the nation's oil
industry hostage in a fashion which hearkened back to the Carter administration, the first deep water drilling permit
in the Gulf of Mexico has been issued. Or has it? As The Hayride points out, this wasn't actually a new
Gas Price Increases Are Intentional. Gas
prices continue to go up. When George W. Bush was President of the United States, Democrats constantly
demanded he open the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to help lower prices. Some even wanted a temporary suspension of
the gas tax. With Obama? Crickets. ... The left could use gas prices as a political wedge issue against
George W. Bush because they knew he did not actually want higher gas prices. Barack Obama, on the other
hand, wants higher gas prices. His Energy Secretary, Steven Chu, wants the same.
Here, Drilling Now: It's Just Common Sense. One of the problems we face right now is the uncertainty
in Libya, an OPEC nation that has cut its normal daily output of 1.6 million barrels of oil per day (bpd) to
just over 700,000, amid the political tensions surrounding Muammar Gaddafi. What this means for humanity as
a whole is that there is now less oil on the world's market to meet the demand around the globe. What this means
for you and I as Americans is that our refusal to "drill here, drill now" is catching up to us with a vengeance.
Making Us More Dependent on Foreign Oil. Expectations of political instability in the North
Africa and the Middle East are factors which cause the price of crude oil to rise, but the reality is the
Obama Administration is doing serious damage to our essential domestic oil industry. The Administration
is making our nation more and more dependent on imported foreign crude oil through increased regulations,
taxes, and litigation.
Barack Obama repeating Jimmy Carter's mistakes.
You need to watch only a few minutes of cable news analysis to realize just how ludicrous our national energy
policies have become. As escalating tensions and chaos unfold in Egypt, Libya and other Middle Eastern
nations, one energy analyst suggested that if Libyan oil supplies were to fail, the United States would rely
on Saudi Arabia for its oil needs. If that statement alone doesn't put U.S. leaders on red alert, the
looming national energy crisis may soon become reality.
Obama: Lost in Translation.
On February 2, 2011, his administration was found to be in contempt of court, for knowingly and intentionally defying the
court's injunction of its enforcement of a ban on oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. And just weeks before the
issuance of that contempt citation, a Federal court judge in Florida ruled ObamaCare is unconstitutional in its entirety.
In his order the judge held that his ruling was tantamount to an injunction, and he was proceeding on the well-established
presumption that government officials will conform their conduct to rulings. The President, whose oath of office requires
him to "preserve, protect and defend" the Constitution, nevertheless appears to have accorded the Florida judge's ruling the
same level of respect and compliance as he did the order enjoining his "moratorium" on oil and gas drilling in the Gulf.
says Obama cheers for higher gas prices. Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, a potential presidential
contender, accused the Obama administration Wednesday [3/2/2011] of favoring a run-up in gas prices to prod
consumers to buy more fuel-efficient cars.
Obama is AWOL in
Oil Crisis. We have a major oil crisis unfolding now and where's Obama? ... We now, this
week, have oil prices busting through $100 a barrel. This will create major havoc to our already
anemic economy. How did we get here? Our president has a moratorium on nearly all domestic
oil production: we can't drill off our coasts, nor Alaska and certainly not the gulf. We can't
build nuclear power plants, dam rivers, explore for natural gas or mine coal. We're stuck with
windmills and failing solar power companies — companies that can't even stay in business
after billions in taxpayer subsidies. This is an energy policy written by hippies.
Enemies Don't Want U.S. Drilling. With oil prices shooting through the roof, the nation's failure
to ramp up domestic energy production is baffling. But one thing we know for sure: America's enemies are
actively agitating against drilling in the U.S.
The Editor says...
Apparently some of America's enemies work in the White House.
administration 'hostile to oil states,' Alaska Gov. Parnell says. In a speech at the
National Press Club, the Republican governor called the federal government "openly hostile" to
oil-producing states, particularly for the delays in allowing Shell to drill exploratory wells on leases
off Alaska's northern coast that the company purchased in 2008. "If it looks like a moratorium and
walks like a moratorium ... maybe it is," said Parnell, who is in Washington this weekend for the
National Governor's Association winter meeting.
Can We Drill In Alaska? Alaska's governor attacks President Obama's hostility to oil states and
warns that ever-higher oil prices will doom economic recovery. The polar bears are doing fine. The
American economy is not.
disaster is near. Five dollar a gallon gas will shatter the Federal Reserve's tightly constrained
lid on inflation and accelerate the other half our long anticipated "double dip" recession. ... 91% of House
Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of American-made oil and gas, while 86% of House
Democrats have historically voted against increasing the production of American-made oil and gas.
the Deluge. Gas prices in many parts of the country are nearing $4 a gallon; it could get even
worse as unrest spreads throughout the oil-exporting Middle East. Yet the Obama administration once
again seems to see no crisis. It has curtailed new leases for offshore oil exploration for seven years
and exempted thousands of acres in the West from new drilling. It will not reconsider opening up small
areas of Alaska with known large oil reserves.
The left's drive
toward $8 gas. A perfect storm of foreign and domestic policy choices by the Obama administration
has paved the way for European-style energy prices to arrive on these shores. Far from being alarmed,
President Obama sees the prospect of $8 a gallon gas as an opportunity. ... Making energy more expensive is
exactly what the administration's "cap and trade" scheme is meant to do.
Obama's Solar Nightmare:
The Obama administration has tried to kill off the oil industry. Offshore moratoriums have been unilaterally imposed
by executive orders and justified using scientific panel studies that were misrepresented — if not
distorted — by the administration. The drilling permitting process has been afflicted with
sclerosis. Federal lands are becoming less and less available for development. Obama does not
like carbon; he boasted during the campaign that he would bankrupt coal power plants and that his policies
would necessarily boost the price of power. Those words were ignored by much of the media, in thrall to
the man they so wanted to win.
Shale Of A Difference. The brightest hope for America's energy independence has been shut down
by an Interior Department that says it wants to review the rules for leases. It really wants to
kill off oil altogether.
Increased Energy Development
Will Lead to More Jobs, Faster Recovery. Research and consulting firm Wood Mackenzie recently
released a startling new report analyzing the devastating economic impact of the nearly $73 billion in
proposed tax increases upon the nation's oil and gas industry. In contrast, allowing access to energy
resources currently off limits would provide massive boosts to production, employment levels, and government
revenue. Onerous federal regulation currently prevents access to oil and gas reserves in areas of
Alaska, the Eastern Gulf of Mexico, and the Atlantic and Pacific Outer Continental Shelves. The
difference between allowing access to these vast reserves versus continued regulation and following through
with the nearly $73 billion of proposed tax increases could not be more drastic.
Obama's Oil War: Oil
prices are surging to levels that will soon crimp economic growth. And what's our government doing about it?
Just making it worse. ... It's becoming more and more obvious that Obama's energy policy is meant to raise prices by
making fossil fuels harder to produce and use. Indeed, the White House has followed a deliberate policy of
attacking Americans' use of energy, turning it into something of a moral crusade.
US Families Into Poverty. The Obama Administration still hasn't gotten the message voters sent
Washington on November 2. The lame duck session and 111th Congress finally ended, without the
White House getting key items on its wish list. So now, the Environmental Protection Agency and
Interior Department intend to impose costly, job-killing, economy-strangling new rules for power plants and
refineries, and implement more land-grabs that will lock up additional millions of acres and more billions
of dollars of American energy. Their goal is to end the hydrocarbon and nuclear era in
America — and force us to convert to "renewable" energy.
Auditing the President's Oil Spill
Commission. The National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill (the Oil Spill Commission OSC) just
finished its last set of public meetings as it prepares to submit its report to the president, due January 12, 2011.
There is good news and bad news. The good news is that its report will be released after the Republicans take control
of the House of Representatives in January. The bad news is that left to its own devices and predispositions, the
administration will likely do to the offshore oil industry what the Carter administration did to the nuclear power industry
in the wake of the Three-Mile Island accident: effectively destroy a critical energy industry in which America
is the world technology leader.
Oil Producers Bullied.
Department of Interior officials seem to take sadistic pleasure in badgering oil companies. The latest
example involves a new agency created to levy untold millions of dollars in fines if companies don't kowtow to
the new bureaucracy. The agency's head gave the tasteless warning: "If they cut corners they could
end up paying enough to quickly take care of the federal deficit." The oil industry now pays $37 million
a day in royalties. That's over $13 billion a year for our near empty U.S. Treasury and other state and
special accounts. The comment about collecting royalties enough to pay off the federal deficit might have been
said in jest. But petroleum officials aren't laughing.
Starve-The-Beast Plan: Stop Fed Printing Press. Capital Hill has been exploring the potential
for a political backlash against renewed Federal Reserve quantitative easing with a focus on one particular
set of risks: a jump in oil prices even as the economy continues to sputter. Oil prices have
climbed back to $83 a barrel, fueled in part by a Fed-inspired weaker dollar, though demand growth in China
and other emerging markets is the biggest reason.
China's Will To Drill.
The administration lifts the Gulf drilling moratorium in time for the election, but it's not as good as it
sounds. Meanwhile, China buys up Texas oil land to develop the energy reserves we won't.
Very Dangerous Folly of Obamanomics. [Scroll down] From here, then-Senator Obama went on
to introduce his new "energy" proposal. As a remedy for rising gasoline prices, he wanted to raise taxes
on oil companies, and use that "extra" tax revenue to give "working Americans" a thousand-dollar voucher that
they could use to make gasoline purchases. ... Senator Obama simply portrayed the Exxon Mobil company as a
"villain" for earning a "record profit," and he was going to be the "good guy" who would legislate money away
from the oil company and give it to "us."
Barack Obama Secures His Grip on the Oil
Industry. [Scroll down] So why, then, does this country, especially the Obama administration,
continue to play ball with [Hugo] Chavez? And, more interestingly, why was the Chavez rhetoric towards
THIS White House so vanilla by comparison to the vile language hurled at Bush? The obvious answer of
Socialist brotherhood comes to mind; after all, the handshake viewed 'round the world is household news by
now. No, there's something deeper here; something much more complex — even sinister, perhaps.
Suspended. The Obama Administration has done an about face on drilling for oil in the Arctic
Ocean. Just days after its Justice Department defended Shell Oil's plan to drill five exploratory
wells in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas off the coast of Alaska, the Interior Department suspended the
Obama is Strangling Big
Oil. There was no "official" announcement. Not in so many words. Connect the dots
of what has occurred in just the past two weeks to deep-water oil drilling, shallow-water drilling, and oil
refining. The effect is the same. Barack Obama is shutting down Big Oil.
Few Questions for President Obama. [Scroll down] America is not running out of oil.
It is running out of places the government allows us to drill. ... Companies have been drilling in deep
waters, because most onshore and shallow water areas are off limits.
empty gas tanks. The Army Corps of Engineers recently denied ConocoPhillips' permit to construct
a drill pad in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, threatening 400 construction and 100 operating jobs and new
production that could extend the life of the trans-Alaska pipeline. If this shameful abuse of regulatory
power could be used to stop routine oil and gas development of leases already granted by the federal
government — in an area already designated a National Petroleum Reserve — then how optimistic
could anyone be about this administration's new energy policy?
Getting Gas Wrong: In an
economy full of problems there are still a few high points. One of them, as you may have noticed if you
pay attention to your utility bills, is that natural gas prices are relatively low. ... We shouldn't have to
worry about this sector of the economy, but there is a dark cloud looming on the horizon in the form of yet
another environmental initiative that the Obama administration is pushing forward, one that has the potential
to cut domestic natural gas production, cost us jobs and revenue and force energy prices upward.
opens new areas but halts Alaska sales. President Obama's new offshore drilling plan opens up
some new areas for oil and gas exploration but also cancels some Alaska lease sales planned for the next two
years, putting billions of barrels of oil out of reach for now. The long-awaited plan, announced
Wednesday, expands drilling opportunities off the coast of the southern Atlantic seaboard,
in the Gulf of Mexico and some parts of Alaska, but halts other future sales in Alaska's Chukchi and Beaufort
seas that drilling advocates say could account for far more oil than the new areas the president proposes
to open up.
EPA stifles new energy gains. [Scroll down] Last week, it was Interior Secretary Ken Salazar
announcing that no new permits will be issued for outer continental shelf development until 2014 at the earliest.
Salazar has also used bureaucratic obfuscation to delay new energy development on Western lands. There are
billions of recoverable barrels of oil and trillions of cubic feet of natural gas in those areas, enough to put
the United States well on the way to complete energy independence. Obama is instead spending billions of
tax dollars on renewable energy resources that can't possibly supply even a fourth of this nation's critical
energy needs for many decades to come.
'necessarily skyrocket' energy strategy comes to Hawaii. Bright ideas from Hawaii's legislature:
House members introduced House Bill 2421, a "barrel tax" or "carbon tax bill", which will increase the tax on
unrefined petroleum by $1 per barrel. Their reasoning, they want to discourage Hawaii's
"dependence" on fossil fuels through taxation and encourage renewable energy use and creation.
budget reveals true agenda on energy. The budget shows that revenues collected from new offshore
leasing will decline over the next five years — from $1.5 billion in 2009, to only $413 million
in fiscal 2015. If the president planned on expanding offshore drilling, revenues would be increasing,
gulf oil to Moscow. The Obama administration is poised to ban offshore oil drilling on the outer
continental shelf until 2012 or beyond. Meanwhile, Russia is making a bold strategic leap to begin drilling
for oil in the Gulf of Mexico. While the United States attempts to shift gears to alternative fuels to battle
the purported evils of carbon emissions, Russia will erect oil derricks off the Cuban coast.
Obama's a pain at
the pump. Get ready to pay a lot more than $3 a gallon to fill up your car during peak driving
periods this spring and summer. More pain at the pump is the inevitable result of the Obama administration's
carrot-and-stick approach to dealing with America's energy woes. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar last
week announced new leases for offshore oil and gas drilling, which will take effect in 2012. While news
reports characterized the decision as a bold response to the nation's energy needs, reality is quite to the
Obama Moratorium: No offshore drilling while he's in office. The Obama administration's
six-month delay in approving new offshore drilling leases in federal waters will become a new three-year ban,
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar quietly told reporters last Friday [3/5/2010]. Which means that no new
oil and gas leases will be approved during President Obama's term even though two-thirds of the American
public supports such activity, according to a December 2009 Rasmussen poll.
Chortling At Chu.
Our secretary of energy pushes bio-refineries and windmills to oil executives at an energy conference as the
administration announces a three-year offshore drilling ban. This is a policy for economic suicide.
Oil-and-gas drilling bans will cut GDP by $2.36 trillion. This should provide some ammo for
industry groups pushing the White House to allow wider drilling: A new report says U.S. oil-and-gas
drilling bans will increase consumer energy costs and decrease cumulative U.S. GDP by $2.36 trillion
over the next two decades. That's an average annual GDP drop of roughly a half a percent.
Drilling Ban To Cost Trillions.
A new study shows that our reluctance to develop domestic energy will cost the beleaguered U.S. economy trillions
in opportunity costs, reduce our gross domestic product and increase our trade deficit.
Our National No-Energy Policy:
Thomas Pyle, the president of the Institute for Energy Research, recently offered a chilling description of our
national energy focus. "When it comes to paving the way for the responsible development of homegrown,
job-creating energy resources, no administration in history has done more to ensure producers do less."
How to spell Obama energy policy: 'D-e-l-a-y'. The need
to develop America's bountiful fossil fuel resources will only intensify as our economy grows and those of
emerging world economic powers like China and India similarly expand. But President Obama is moving
national energy policy in exactly the opposite direction. Instead of aiding exploration and development
of available fossil fuel resources, the administration appears to be doing everything possible to slow or even
Follow the Money. As we
have noted many times, the United States is the only country in the world that deliberately fails to develop
its own energy resources. Other than instituting price controls, this is the single most destructive
economic policy that a country can pursue, which is why no one does it except us.
The Obama Energy Fiasco.
If the president wishes to free America from dependence on foreign oil, he should be encouraging the production of
reliable energy supplies in this country. What has he done to encourage more production of coal, oil and gas,
and nuclear energy? The answer is that he has done nothing. ... Not only has the president done nothing to
promote new supplies of energy, but he has also done much to impede them.
Alaskan Oil Abundance Versus Washington's Wasted
Billions. Analysts are already forecasting 100-dollar-a-barrel oil within a year. Yet the
Obama administration is still blocking offshore drilling in America — even though it was approved by
Congress last year — and wants to raise taxes on oil companies. Several years are needed to get
major new production on line, even without anticipated environmental lawsuits designed to stymie or at least
harass and delay any drilling of new wells off of America's east and west coasts. In Alaska, we have a
pipeline which could flow another 1.5 million barrels per day — worth nearly $50 billion
per year — from vast oil resources waiting to be drilled.
No Substitute For Fossil Fuels.
Earlier this year, Congress approved a scheme to pour $80 billion — on top of the tens of billions
already spent — into renewables. A government report released last week indicates the money
will be wasted. Renewable energy is the shiny gem that everyone wants but no one can have.
Forget 'Peak Oil' —
Drill, BP, Drill. Ignoring peak-oil Cassandras, BP has made another giant oil find in the Gulf
of Mexico. We're not running out of oil. Our government just doesn't want us to look for it.
Foolishly Choosing Bears Over
Barrels. [Al] Gore is just plain wrong. Yet the myth he perpetuates has dealt a
critical blow to our hopes for true energy independence. Despite ever-increasing numbers and demonstrated
adaptability, the famous Knut the polar bear and his kind are still said to be endangered. That in turn
has prompted the federal government to designate 200,541 square miles off the coast of Alaska as critical
habitat for polar bears, effectively killing hopes to exploit the vast energy riches of the American
Arctic. The world polar bear population is at a modern high and growing.
A Crude Reality. To get
to the bottom of what's wrong with the 1,400-page energy bill passed by the House of Representatives, you have to dig deeper
than Canada's tar sands. ... The greener we are, the less secure we're likely to be. Meaning, we either can be green or
we can be less dependent on oil from terrorist-sponsoring states. But under the current energy bill, we can't be both.
Running on empty.
American energy policy is in limbo. "Drill, baby, drill" still articulates a good policy direction, but the Obama
administration is outsourcing that policy, and our tax dollars, to Brazil. This is all while the White House is
ignoring public opinion by blocking domestic energy production. The mind boggles when trying to figure out why
the energy issue is still at issue at all.
Seeing Chukchi. Back
in July , ... it was thought that Chukchi's waters northwest of Alaska's landmass held 30 billion cubic feet
of natural gas. Today, Science magazine reports that the U.S. Geological Survey now finds it holds more than anyone
thought — 1.6 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered gas, or 30% of the world's supply and 83 billion
barrels of undiscovered oil, 4% of the global conventional resources. That's enough U.S. energy to achieve
self-sufficiency and never worry about it as a national security question again. The only thing left to
do is drill.
blocks drilling on refuge. A federal judge has indefinitely blocked gas and oil drilling on
a wildlife refuge that sits next to the Great Sand Dunes National Park in south-central Colorado.
U.S. District Court Judge Walker Miller on Thursday [9/3/2009] granted a preliminary injunction, ruling
environmental groups presented adequate evidence that drilling would cause irreparable injury to
Colorado's Baca National Wildlife Refuge.
Lost In An Energy Wilderness.
Earlier this year, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar canceled 77 Utah oil and gas leases that had gone through seven
years of studies, negotiations and land-use planning. They were rejected because temporary drilling
operations might be "visible" from several national parks more than a mile away. We are not making
this up. Some of these parcels are in or near the Green River Formation, an oil-rich region in
Colorado, Utah and Wyoming that's been called the "Persia of the West."
Cap and Trade spells disaster.
[Scroll down] To see how extreme HR 2454 is, one need only go to page 106-107 of the bill. "Congress
finds that the status of oil as a strategic commodity which derives from its domination of the transportation
sector presents a clear and present danger to the United States." With this one statement, House
Democrats have declared war on the oil industry. Currently, oil is supplying the vast majority of this
country's energy requirements. While we need to continue to diversify our energy supplies, we cannot
Strangulation. The Green Left must be thrilled with the new Obama/Pelosi/Reid (OPR) troika in
charge of the federal government. Three times already, the troika has blocked the development of domestic
oil resources. During his first week in office, President Obama rescinded his predecessor's executive
order permitting drilling on the continental shelf and in the Green River Formation. Both areas contain
abundant oil — especially Green River (under Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah), which has recoverable
shale-oil reserves three times the oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. Several weeks later, Secretary
of the Interior Ken Salazar unilaterally canceled 77 oil and gas leases in Utah, on the grounds that
(I kid you not) someone might catch a glimpse of temporary drilling equipment from the national park
that sits more than a mile away.
Drill, Drill. Onshore and offshore drilling restrictions for oil and natural gas have to be
removed. Deregulate the energy sector. Open the door to nuclear power. Drill the shale regions
for natural gas. Exploration has dried up in the new Obama environment, which is so very anti-fossil-fuel
and anti-nuke. If we are going to power our way to economic growth, fossil fuels and nuclear energy have
to play key roles. Alternative-fuel technologies may grow up, but that's gonna take several decades.
Right now they're about 2 percent of our power. That's all.
CBS Slams Exxon for Not Drilling
More. After all the media hand-wringing the past few months over imploding financial institutions,
they might praise ExxonMobil for taking care of it shareholders first and keeping ample reserve funds, rather
than running on risky investments and toxic assets. "Consumer advocate" Dan Weiss closed the story
saying, "Big oil is swimming in profits with money drained from the pockets of American families." CBS
mentioned he was a senior fellow at the "Center For American Progress" yet neglected to mention that it is an
avowedly liberal think tank. The founder of CFAP is former Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta.
Ideological Dissonance on Capitol Hill. Speaking of energy, we can't help but give more attention
to a recent press release from some of the Senate's leading liberals. Charles Schumer, Byron Dorgan,
Bernie Sanders, Bob Casey and Mary Landrieu are demanding that President Bush tell OPEC nations to increase
their oil supplies or risk losing arms deals with the United States. The Senators say U.S. consumers need
the price relief that only increased oil production can bring. Yes, that Senator Schumer and that Senator
Dorgan, both of whom voted against increasing U.S. oil production because they couldn't abide drilling across
1% of Alaska's wilderness.
1.5 TRILLION barrels, locked up U.S. Geological Survey ups
estimate of Piceance Basin oil shale by 53%. The Piceance Basin of northwest Colorado probably
holds about 53 percent more oil-shale resources than previously estimated, the U.S. Geological Survey
said Thursday [4/2/2009]. It was the federal geology and mapping agency's first reassessment of
in-place oil-shale resources in the basin in 20 years. In 1989, USGS said the Piceance Basin
held the equivalent of about 1 trillion barrels of oil in its oil-shale resources. Now, it says
the basin has an estimated 1.525 trillion barrels of in-place oil-shale resources.
Big Oil Bites Back. Wednesday
[5/27/2009], Chevron was descended upon by a zoo-full of San Francisco leftists pushing rain forest sentimentalism, Burma,
and other pet causes dear to the no-soap crowd. They journeyed all the way to San Ramon, Calif. to shout "Shame on
you!" and "No blood for oil" and worse yet to make demands on the company. ... The real aim of all these attacks is to end
these companies' world leadership in oil extraction. The green groups want to put an end to what the oil companies
do best, from finding oil in the world's most hostile climates like the Arctic Sea, to extracting oil from abandoned wells,
to drilling oil 12 miles through salt walls under the sea. The ultimate goal is less oil to power American
industry and to maintain the quality of private life.
rescinds oil, gas industry tax breaks. The oil and gas industry is taking a hard hit
in President Barack Obama's proposed budget. According to details released Thursday about the
2010 budget, the plan would rescind tax breaks at a cost to the industry of $52.4 billion over
the next 10 years.
Drill, Ivan, Drill.
Oil prices have risen to a six-month high on the prospect of economic recovery. Russia plans floating
reactors to power Arctic drilling. We plan to do nothing to increase supply.
The Next Oil Shock: The
current recession has wiped out demand growth for the last four years. Oil prices have tumbled $100 a barrel
or more from their high point. Spare production capacity is expected to be 6.5 million barrels per day
through 2009. Anticipating a robust future, other countries such as China and Brazil have continued to look
for oil while we continue to research ... switch grass.
An End to Dependence on
Middle East Oil. Today, America imports two-thirds of its oil at a cost of $300 billion per
year, much of it from politically unstable, Middle East countries which control 45% of the world's oil, overall.
This is occurring despite the existence of bountiful, untapped oil resources within the United States. Developing
these resources could free America from imports, create badly needed, oil-production jobs and meet U.S. energy demand
for the next 200 years. With nearly three-fourths of Americans favoring increased energy exploration, the
only obstacle standing in the way of our energy independence is a lack of political vision and will.
Offshore Oil Drilling Ban Will Be
Restored 'By Any Means Necessary,' Democratic Congressman Says. "When we talk about drilling, the
new thing we have to think about is the Arctic," said [Rep. Jay] Inslee. "There is a dangerous irony occurring.
We are drilling, burning oil, sending CO2 up into the atmosphere, creating global warming — and it's melting
the Arctic making it possible for people to drill." "Now there is this gold rush to start punching oil wells
in a place we just desecrated because of global warming," said Inslee. "That's one place we have to get a
new moratorium where there hasn't been one before, because there has always been ice there before."
anti-oil team. The president-elect is poised to hand environmental policy to people who want to punish
Drill, Baby, Drill? Forget It. For
all the political energy spent on offshore drilling —something that a vast majority of Americans support
but liberals oppose —the courts have spoken and delayed drilling for years, perhaps decades. Last
Friday [4/17/2009], the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit overturned the 2007-2012 plan authored by the
Interior Department because —as the lawyers say, inter alia —its "environmental sensitivity
rankings are irrational." So the matter gets dumped into the hands of the much more sensitive Interior
Secretary Ken Salazar.
Boxer Unwilling to Compromise on ANWR
Drilling. Even if you offer Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., what she's been pushing for — taxpayer
investments in "green" or renewable energy — she's not going to budge in her opposition to opening federal
lands to oil and natural gas exploration.
Santa Barbara County reverses oil drilling
stand. Months after making national headlines for supporting offshore oil drilling, the county famous for
spawning the modern environmental movement reversed course Tuesday [4/7/2009] and voted to oppose the drilling.
The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors, citing a need to preserve its coastline, voted 3-2 for a resolution to
oppose oil exploration and extraction in the county.
Appeals court cancels
offshore drilling program. A federal appeals court ruled Friday [4/17/2009] that the Bush
administration did not properly study the environmental impact of expanding oil and gas drilling off the
Alaska coast and canceled a program to find new reserves. A three-judge panel in Washington found that
the Bush-era Interior Department failed to consider the effect on the environment and marine life before it
began the process in August 2005 to expand an oil and gas leasing program in the Beaufort, Bering, and Chukchi seas.
Obama Is Anti-Oil And Anti-American.
Oil producing nations such as Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states, along with Venezuela, will grow rich while Americans
will be faced with high costs for gasoline, heating oil, and everything else that depends on oil such as asphalt or
even Vaseline. Meanwhile, oil producers in America, large and small, will take a financial beating. If
you don't like living in a modern, advanced and industrialized society, you will favor this. If you think
Americans consume too much, drive too much, and deserve to be punished for it, you will favor this.
Obama Targets U.S. Oil. While Mr. Obama's
original plan was to impose windfall-profit taxes on oil firms, now that windfall profits are gone because energy prices
have fallen, he is pitching in his fiscal 2010 budget proposals to raise at least US$31.5-billion more from the oil-and-gas
sector over 10 years by raising royalties, imposing new taxes and eliminating loopholes. ... Too bad it won't work the
way Mr. Obama envisions, as the Alberta experience with higher oil and gas royalties has shown, and that Mr. Obama's plan
will more likely steer Americans further down a path of dependence on Middle East oil ... .
Strings. President Obama has long promised $150 billion — $15 billion a year over
10 years — in industry subsidies to develop alternative fuels, including Detroit Three production of
alternate-fuel vehicles to meet federal fuel mandates. White House Deputy Budget Director Robert Nabors confirmed
yesterday that that the subsidy is contingent on revenues from the president's cap and trade tax. No cap and trade,
no $150 billion. The White House was not forthcoming with details, but the move points a gun at Detroit's
head: Support our cap and trade scheme or no green subsidIes for you.
Energy-state lawmakers vow to
fight Obama oil tax hikes. Energy-state lawmakers are vowing to do everything they can to block President
Obama's proposed $31.5 billion tax increase on oil and gas producers. Obama's $3.55 trillion budget
blueprint released Thursday [2/26/2009] targeted U.S. energy producers by imposing new taxes and fees, abolishing
existing tax breaks and changing accounting rules. The White House proposals provoked a firestorm of opposition
today from industry allies on Capitol Hill.
Court halts Utah
oil and gas leases. A judge late Saturday [1/17/2009] halted the Bush administration's efforts to
open 110,000 acres of federal land in Utah to oil and gas exploration, ruling that the danger of damaging the
pristine land required further study before leases were awarded. The leases to the parcels had been auctioned
off Dec. 19 in a move that environmental groups said was a last-minute gift to the energy industry before
President Bush left office.
A "gift to the energy industry" is a gift to the energy consumer.
Reid's Land Grab: The 1200-page, pork-laden, $10 billion proposal locks up millions of
acres of energy-rich property by designating it as environmentalist-friendly "federal wilderness" area where
not even as much as a bicycle would be permitted to travel across the land. Many of these areas recently
became available when the ban on domestic drilling in Western states expired last fall and the liberal left
couldn't muster the courage to keep it in place due to rising energy prices. Now Democratic leaders are
using different legislative strategies to put a new kind of ban in place.
US govt cancels leases for Utah oil,
gas drilling. In a sharp reversal of Bush administration policy, the Interior Department
canceled controversial energy leases on Wednesday [2/4/2009] that would have opened lands near national
parks in Utah to oil and natural gas drilling.
Obama's 'Extreme Team' On Energy.
One of them wanted to see Americans paying $8 a gallon for gasoline. Another tried to block access to
domestic oil reserves that could one day exceed those in Saudi Arabia. Another thinks global warming is
a dire crisis justifying a massive crackdown on energy — decades after saying the same thing about
global cooling. Yet another had a position in the one of the world's top socialist organizations.
Meet the Obama administration's energy team.
War On Fossil Fuels.
The new administration has wasted no time in reversing a decision by the Bush White House that let gas and oil
companies explore for new resources. Keep this in mind the next time pump prices take off.
Boxer Unwilling to Compromise
on ANWR Drilling. Even if you offer Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., what she's been pushing
for — taxpayer investments in "green" or renewable energy — she's not going to
budge in her opposition to opening federal lands to oil and natural gas exploration.
Obama Interior Nominee to Consider New Ban on
Oil Drilling in USA. President-elect Barack Obama's secretary of the interior nominee, Sen. Ken Salazar
(D-Colo.), said he will consider restoring parts of an expired federal ban on offshore oil drilling, but told CNSNews.com
that he has "no idea" how much of the drilling restrictions should be reimposed.
(Pelosi-Obama-Reid) Economy: Tanks a Lot. The POR economy kicked in during the latter part
of June, when its architects — Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and Harry Reid — decided
that starving the economy of energy by refusing to allow more offshore drilling in the face of $4 gas
prices was a winning political position. Pelosi claimed that because we couldn't totally "drill
our way out of this," we shouldn't increase drilling at all. Reid put an exclamation point on
Pelosi's stubbornness by insisting that fossil fuels are "making us sick."
In Alaska, The Drill Is Gone.
Remember those 68 million acres House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the oil companies had to use or lose?
According to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, they can't drill there either.
"Use It or Lose It" Is
Not the Way Energy Markets Work. While Republicans have argued for drilling in the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS), Congressional Democrats responded
with a counterclaim: oil companies need to use what they already have. To that end, House
Democrats have proposed "use it or lose it" legislation that would apply to leases on federal land.
Pushing Stealth Renewal of Congressional Energy Embargo. Having failed to pass the required
measures to fund the government for the next fiscal year, Congress must now pass what is known as a
Continuing Resolution (CR) in order to avoid a government shutdown. A draft of the resolution contains
a provision taken from the recently passed House bill, H.R. 6899, to continue the ban on energy
exploration and production on nearly all of the taxpayer owned Outer Continental Shelf in the lower
48 states for another year.
Gasoline, Oil and the
Economy: Despite the current gas price relief, growing numbers of Americans remain wary of domestic gasoline
supply, gas prices, and fear for their economic future. They are wary of the OPEC nations, who can throttle supply
on political whim; and, they fear that, should they lose their job, how will they be able to buy food, gas, and pay for
their home. Their worry is understandable. Perhaps, it is also wise — if their worry serves as a
catalyst for demanding specific action by elected officials.
Stop the War
on Poor Families. As Democratic Party delegates gather in Denver, America is repeatedly being
told that we must transform our economy to "green" energy. Our future is in wind and solar, liberal
Democrats and environmental activists insist. Oil, gas, coal and nuclear must go. American
citizens vigorously disagree. They know fossil and nuclear fuels built this country and created health
and living standards unprecedented in history. Over two-thirds support increased drilling.
Why Americans Can't Get U.S. Oil: At
last report, Democrats decided to allow the quarter-century ban on drilling for oil off the Atlantic and Pacific
coasts to expire. That's not the same as lifting the ban. Moreover, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer
(D-Md) is on record saying that, if the Democrats retain control of Congress, restoring the ban "will be a top
priority for discussion next year." So much for so-called "energy independence." When Democrats say
that, they are talking about wind and solar power, and biofuels, not oil, natural gas, and coal.
The Congressional Oil Embargo.
Congress and America united when we suffered from an Arab Oil Embargo in 1973. Now we're suffering from
a Congressional Oil Embargo. The Arab Oil Embargo only lasted six months. The Congressional Oil
Embargo has lasted for decades and endures to this day.
Democrats to Let Ban on Drilling Expire. Congressional Democrats bowed to political pressure
yesterday [9/23/2008] and agreed to let the ban on offshore oil drilling expire, a decision that would allow
exploration just three miles off the Atlantic and Pacific coastlines unless the next president reinstates an
executive branch order that prohibits drilling.
options. Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives sent a message last week to
hard-working commuters forced to pay historically high prices for gasoline: Ride a bike. The
message was buried on page 255 of a 290-page bill the Democratic leadership introduced at 9:45 p.m.
last Monday night, forced through the Rules Committee at 10:00 p.m., and put up for a "debate" and
final vote — with no amendments allowed — on Tuesday evening [9/16/2008].
Congressional corruption: The
energy crisis comes to rest at the feet of the Democrats. For more than 30 years, the Democrats
have used whatever rules and procedures necessary to block or prevent the energy industry from keeping up
with the growing demand. Democrats have prevented the construction of a single nuclear plant, or a
single oil refinery, and the development of our domestic energy resources. It is the Democrats that
are now preventing even a reasoned debate.
drilling bill that bans drilling. This bill permanently bans all drilling within 50 miles
of the US coast, which just happens to be where most of the recoverable oil and gas reserves are. It
permits drilling between 50 and 100 miles out only if the adjoining states agree — which
they won't, since the bill denies them any share in the royalties the oil companies would have to pay, thereby
eliminating any financial incentive for a state to say yes. Virtually all the oil off the California
coast and beneath the Eastern Gulf of Mexico would be locked up for good.
Policy End Game. In 41 days, the long-imposed moratorium on offshore oil drilling and domestic
oil shale production is set to expire — gone. This happens automatically and can be stopped only if
Congress votes to re-establish the ban. Lifting the moratorium might free up as much as 100 years'
worth of oil and gas for domestic consumption. But keeping domestic energy supplies off limits is
something Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and their environmentalist allies desperately
want to do.
A Country At Mercy Of
Environmentalists. For several decades, environmentalists have managed to get Congress to keep
most of our oil resources off-limits to exploration and drilling. They've managed to have the Congress
enact onerous regulations that have made refinery construction impossible. Similarly, they've used the
courts and Congress to completely stymie the construction of nuclear power plants. As a result, energy
prices are at historical highs and threaten our economy and national security.
the Energy? Locked up, thanks to Speaker Pelosi. With complete disregard to the rights
of the minority party, the Democrat leadership in Congress will not allow a vote on drilling for America's
vast domestic resources. Producers have made great strides in minimizing ecological damage. Over
the past 25 years, 7 billion gallons of oil have been pumped to shore, without a single significant
spill. In fact, the last oil spill of any impact from a drilling rig off our shores occurred 37 years
ago. Yet, congressional Democrats refuse to acknowledge these facts, choosing instead to remain beholden
to the fringe environmental extremists who oppose advancement.
No Excuses For Not Drilling.
About 700 billion U.S. dollars flow out of this country every year for foreign oil and gas. Instead
of this obscene transfer of our wealth and standard of living out of the United States, why don't you let
the "Big Evil Oil Companies" invest their obscene, windfall profits right here in the United States and
then the let the taxpayers' dollars for energy stay here too? Here are the weak excuses I hear,
mostly from Democrats .
Energy Stonewall: Democrats appear ready to sacrifice their whole agenda, even spending, rather
than allow new domestic energy production. Or even a mere debate about energy. The Democratic
leadership is stonewalling any measure that might possibly relax the Congressional ban on offshore drilling.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid know that they would lose if a vote ever came to the floor, and they're desperate
to suppress an insurrection among those Democrats who are pragmatic about one of the top economic issues.
Pelosi won't limit
vote to offshore drilling. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday firmly rejected the idea of
a House vote solely on the issue of offshore oil drilling, calling it "a hoax on the American people" backed
by oil companies. ... "You want to drill? We want the royalties for the American people, and we want
that to pay for renewable energy resources," the San Francisco Democrat said in an interview for KQED television's
weekly news show, "This Week in Northern California." "We want to connect all that together."
The Editor interjects...
But Ms. Pelosi, those royalties are not yours to give away.
Let's See the Votes. Here is
information and a list of votes compiled by Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), ranging from 1995 to 2008, on
off-shore drilling and drilling in ANWR. Take a look and decide for yourself who is to blame for
stopping drilling in the OCS and in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve (ANWR).
Nancy's Phony Energy Plan: Our friends at the Institute for Energy Research (IER) posted a
devastating exposé of the Pelosi plan. As announced last week, the plan would:
• Permanently ban access to about 97 percent of the undersea oil lying within 50 miles
of the California coast.
• Continue the ban on energy production in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico.
• Impose a brand-new ban on oil and gas leases in Alaska's coastal waters out to 50 miles.
• Not allow states that approve new leases beyond 50 miles to share royalties with
the federal government, thus stripping any financial incentive for states to stand up to environmental
pressure groups, who will continue to agitate against any new oil and gas operations offshore.
The Democrats' Sham Energy
Bill: Republicans recognize expanded drilling for oil is a powerful issue working for them in
this election year. Voters paying record high oil prices in a country where long drives to work are
often mandatory favor expanded oil drilling. Speaker Pelosi's ruse was endangering too many of her
Democratic colleagues. Thus she resorted to Plan B.
Pelosi's Drilling Ruse:
When Democrats opposed every measure to increase domestic oil production, they angered millions of Americans.
And when they finally tried to claim they were for new drilling by producing two bills that allowed new
drilling only where there was little or no oil, Americans quickly picked up on the scam. On all of the
major issues of the past two years, the Democrats chose to play political gotcha instead of actually govern.
Democrats Still Aren't Serious About
Drilling. After a five-week paid vacation, Democrats are back in Washington and claiming that
they want to do something about oil prices. But the problem is that their plan, which passed the House
yesterday [9/16/2008] and will likely come up for a vote in the Senate later this week, will not produce a
single drop of oil. Why? Because it does nothing about environmental groups that are suing to
Dems like $10 per Gallon Gasoline.
You have to see this video to believe it. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) was on the Senate
floor earlier today, attempting to get offshore drilling authorized. As you'll see on the YouTube shot, he
tried to get Democrats to agree to a trigger for it, at ever-increasing levels of gas prices. McConnell
was asking for unanimous consent, so the bill could pass immediately. Try as he might, Sen. Ken Salazar
(D-Co) objected no matter how high McConnell raised the ante. $4 a gallon? Salazar objected.
$7.50 a gallon? Again, Salazar objected. Finally, McConnell offers a trigger for offshore drilling
permission at $10 a gallon gasoline prices. And guess what? Salazar objected.
Drill, Drill, Drill — and Oil Drops $9! Democrats keep saying that it will take
10 years or longer to produce oil from the offshore areas. And they say that oil prices won't
decline for at least that long. And they, along with Obama and McCain, bash so-called oil speculators.
And today we had a real-world example as to why they are wrong.
'Rig' The Election. When
President Bush lifted the executive order banning exploration and drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf, two things
happened almost immediately: The world price for oil started to drop and the Democrats panicked. They
could no longer hide under the umbrella the order provided.
Dry Well: President Bush ratcheted up the pressure on Congress this week to open the Outer
Continental Shelf to oil drilling by rescinding the executive order prohibiting such exploration. There's
just one catch: For the president's action to take effect, Congress has to lift its own ban, which has
been in place since 1983. And that's not going to happen.
says majority of Congress wants to drill. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Congress
is ready to lift the ban on offshore drilling but is being blocked by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). "Nancy
Pelosi and the liberals here in the Congress, they worship at the altar radical environmentalism. The
last thing that that group wants is more drilling," said Boehner in an interview with Bloomberg TV Saturday.
Pelosi stands firm against offshore
drilling. Her voice carries considerable weight since, as speaker, Pelosi is in a position to
prevent a vote on expanded drilling from reaching the floor. And she and Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the
majority leader, appear intent on holding the line against calls to approve drilling in areas now off limits.
Pelosi blocks vote on Bush request to lift ban on
offshore oil drilling. A plan to lift the ban on coastal drilling is stalled on Capitol Hill,
for one simple reason: A Californian who opposes President Bush's proposal is calling the shots in the
House of Representatives. Despite growing public support for ending the ban, even in California,
Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco said she won't allow the immediate vote the
blasts Pelosi for not allowing drilling vote. House Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) on Sunday [7/20/2008]
strongly criticized Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for not allowing a vote on a measure that would allow
offshore drilling. While acknowledging that Pelosi can prevent such a vote, Blunt said the Democratic
leader would have to live with that decision, which he argued "does not make sense to the American people."
Energy Held Hostage. A recent CNN poll showed more than 73 percent of Americans in favor
of offshore drilling. But the House Speaker can keep the issue from even reaching a vote, and Pelosi
seems bent on just that. "(In California) We learned the hard way that oil and water do not mix on
our coast," she said back in 1996. Pelosi was referring, of course, to the famous Santa Barbara oil
spill of 1969, an event that serves as the Alamo of the anti-drilling cause.
The Editor says...
Nancy Pelosi has gotten a lot of political mileage out of that one oil spill almost 40 years
ago. The Santa Barbara incident was a blowout. Prior to the development of blow-out
preventers, blowouts were common and were referred to
as gushers.* In
other words, there's so much oil and gas out there, it can hardly wait to get out of the ground.
Against Drilling. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and other liberal leaders on Capitol Hill are gripped
by cold-sweat terror. If they permit a vote on offshore drilling, they know they will lose when Blue
Dogs and oil-patch Democrats defect to the GOP position of increasing domestic energy production. So
the last failsafe is to shut down Congress.
Dems Over a
Domestic Barrel. On September 30 the ban on fossil-fuel drilling off America's Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) and in the oil-shale fields of the West will expire. Democrats, who control
both houses of Congress, must pass an appropriations bill extending the bans. The onus, in other words,
is on them.
Let Us Drill. Now that an executive branch ban on offshore oil exploration has been lifted, the time
has come for Democrats in Washington to lift their own ban on increased domestic supply. Americans are demanding
that Congress do something about record-high gas prices. They recognize that prices will not go down unless
supplies go up. And they also know that the only thing now standing in the way of more domestic supply is the
Democratic refusal to allow it.
The Futile Crusades of Dem Quixote: You
name the issue, and the party led by Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi has diagnosed it incorrectly and applied the wrong
remedy. Let's consider just a few of today's ills: oil prices, Iraq, and obesity.
Doublethink on Drilling: High gasoline prices are good. A high price, imposed through
federal carbon taxes or carbon caps, is precisely the mechanism by which Democrats hope to curb carbon
emissions. [But] High gasoline prices are bad. With constituents irate over gasoline prices
that are pushing $5 a gallon, Democrats complain that high prices are a bad thing.
The Democrats' No-Drill Energy Plan.
When it comes to domestic oil production, the Democrats and their Green/Left supporters are all singing from
the same deranged hymnal. In May, one of the choir leaders, Democratic Senator Richard Durbin of
Illinois declared, "We can't drill our way to lower prices."
Democrats' Energy Charade: Earlier this month the House of Representatives voted on an energy
bill called the Drill Responsibly in Leased Lands (Drill) Act. The good news, for those of us who
actually want to do something to lower gas prices, is that it failed. The problem here came in the fine
print. The bill would have mandated that leasing be done in an undefined, "environmentally responsible"
way. We know from experience that such ambiguous language leads to lawsuits and delays.
How Wrong are
the Democrats on Drilling? A common response of the Democrats when confronted with citizens
advocating for increased offshore drilling is that the results are "years off into the future" and therefore
any relief on gas prices would be unlikely — at least in any sort of time frame that matters to voters
right now. They are wrong on many measures — foremost among them is that the same obstruction
deprived Americans all these years of domestic production which would have been in place but for Democratic
opposition. Also future prices would respond to the prospect of increased oil supplies and this
would have a depressive effect on oil prices — NOW.
and Blissful Ignorance: Consider: 25 years ago, nearly 60 percent of U.S.
petroleum was produced domestically. Today it's 25 percent. From its peak in 1970, U.S.
production has declined a staggering 47 percent. The world consumes 86 million barrels a
day; the United States, roughly 20 million. We need the stuff to run our cars and planes and
economy. Where does it come from?
Shut Up and Produce Some Oil.
Liberals are flailing about looking for some political cover on energy and gas prices. For decades now,
they have supported the policies of extremists who have systematically sought to shut down every major
energy source for our economy. We can't drill for oil offshore, we can't drill in the frozen tundra
of north Alaska, we can't even develop oil shale on the mainland. Liberals are even opposing the
development of new oil discoveries in the Plains states.
Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, the Mr. Magoo of American politics, stumbled onto the truth last week.
He discovered the law of supply and demand. "We want to put [more oil] on the market to increase supply
and lower prices," Reid said. "With oil and gas prices continuing to break record highs every day, much
more needs to be done." Indeed it does. But Reid won't allow it.
Loony Harry Reid. This nation is
in serious trouble because it has people in very powerful elected positions that say crazy things. Take,
for example, Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) who is the Senate Majority Leader: "The one thing we fail to talk
about is those costs that you don't see on the bottom line. That is coal makes us sick. Oil makes
us sick; it's global warming. It's ruining our country, it's ruining our world. We've got to stop
using fossil fuel." [Italics in original]
Position Paper on Drilling: In a recent interview with Fox News Business Channel, Mr. Reid, who was
evidently fed up with questions about drilling, suddenly exclaimed: "Coal makes us sick, oil makes us sick; it's
global warming. It's ruining our country, it's ruining the world. We've got to stop using fossil fuel."
Mr. Reid's rant quickly became the No. 1 video on the Internet, approaching a half-million views.
oblivious on oil. Maybe the quickest way to lower oil and gas prices would be this: Immediately enroll
every Democratic member of Congress in an entry-level economics class. The lack of even a basic grasp of economic
concepts has led Democrats to oppose sensible policies that would begin to lower oil and gas prices. Instead, they
push hair-brained ideas that make no sense.
We're Not Addicts!
It's a confused and confusing debate but it can be boiled down to this: On one side are those who believe
the answer is for us to slash our demand for energy. On the other side are those who believe the answer
is to greatly increase our supply.
What Do The Democrats Take Us For?
The public wants more oil, but Democrats keep offering the same solutions, not one of which includes drilling and all of
which are asinine. Do they think the American people are fools?
Oppose GOP Call for Increased Domestic Drilling. Democratic senators are skeptical about new
efforts by Republicans and the Bush administration to increase offshore drilling, despite a government report
by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Land Management showing that there are 139 billion barrels of
oil in the United States (onshore and offshore combined).
on Drilling: The Democrats have a standardized talking point against any domestic drilling (in
ANWR, the Midwest oil shales and off-shore), settling on the comeback: "It won't help us today." If
the voters see environmentalists, tree-huggers, and their Democratic political minions as causing $4 or
$5 a gallon gasoline, along with the rise in consumer prices across the board because of the increase of
the cost of oil used as an ingredient in many products, they will blame the Democrats. And frustration
with environmentalism is starting to show up in the polls, which are indicating an increasing call for
domestic drilling from the American public.
Domestic Drilling OK, Just
'Not in My State,' Senators Say. "There may be places that make sense, I am not saying, 'Let's not drill
anywhere,'" Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) said in response to the question. "But do I want to drill off the
California coast? No. Do I want to drill in the Arctic in endangered areas? No."
The Editor asks...
Uh, Senator, I have a question: What is an "endangered area?" Is that a place that might disappear
if we drill for oil there?
[Democrats] promised in the 2006 campaign to offer a "common sense" plan to curb gas prices. They have yet to produce
one, and the price per gallon of gas has risen by more than $1.60 since Democrats took control of Congress in January
2007. [But] John McCain is a problem. He opposes drilling for oil in the Alaska National Wildlife Reserve
(ANWR), though he has come around on increased domestic production in other areas (except off the coast of Florida).
to Support New Oil Drilling in U.S.. A recent report by the Interior Department shows that there
are about 139 billion barrels of undiscovered oil on U.S. territory, onshore and offshore combined, much
of it restricted from extraction because of environmental regulations. Further, indications are that
Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) does not support drilling for that oil and would not take steps to do so if
to halt strategic oil stockpiling. Jittery about a political backlash over gasoline costs as
prices set yet another record Tuesday, Congress voted to halt deliveries to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in
defiance of President Bush. The action was expected to have a modest effect on pump prices, saving
motorists from 2 to 5 cents a gallon, backers said.
Democrats and High Oil Prices:
Investor's Business Daily has a continuing series on "Breaking the Back of High Oil", and today's edition
has a fascinating breakdown of some of the actions that the Democrats have taken over the last three decades or
so to ensure that our country has no defense against the effects of rising oil prices. While doing so,
they've made us all captives of OPEC and such tinpot dictatorships such as Venezuela.
Blame Congress for
High Oil Prices. If there is a villain in all of this, it is Congress itself. That
venerable body has made it impossible for U.S. producers of crude oil to tap significant domestic reserves of
oil and gas, and it has foreclosed economically viable alternative sources of energy in favor of unfeasible
alternatives such as wind and solar. In addition, Congress has slapped substantial taxes on gasoline.
not the answer. Exploring new sources of oil in the United States is not the solution to the nation's growing
energy crunch, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton said last week. There are places where
exploration and drilling can take place, such as the Gulf of Mexico, but it doesn't make sense to open up the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, Clinton said during an interview with the Argus Leader on Friday.
The Editor says...
In other words, Hillary Clinton wants to leave the oil in the ground and depend entirely on conservation to
achieve "energy independence." Anyone with an ounce of critical thinking will see immediately that her
plans cannot succeed, and that she will blame someone else when the ideas flop.
Turning Voters Into Morons:
Consider the Democrats' cruel exploitation of their supporters' hopes and fears regarding rising gasoline
prices. Both Clinton and Obama have talked as though those prices can be lowered. Clinton
specifically talks of lowering federal gas taxes during the summer. That will do it, but only for the
summer. The problem is that oil demand worldwide has exceeded supply. Likewise the candidates are
deceiving their supporters when they promise to make the country "independent of foreign oil."
[Scroll down] It should be possible on the straight-talk express to devise some alternative to the patently cynical
promise of "energy independence." No such "independence" is within reach, as the successive failures of Presidents
Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, and two Bushes to attain it should demonstrate.
on Energy. President George W. Bush and Sen. John McCain went to bat on energy policy this
week. And guess what? They both struck out. Mr. Bush went hat in hand to the Saudis to
ask for more oil production in order to bring down world prices. He whiffed. They said no for the
second time this year. ExxonMobil chairman and CEO Rex Tillerson said it's "astonishing" that Mr. Bush
keeps asking Saudi Arabia to pump more oil, rather than working harder for increased oil production at home.
Bush gets oil but no credit for
jawboning Saudis. President George W. Bush walked away from a meeting with Saudi King Abdullah
on Friday with a prize he has been seeking for months: a commitment from the world's big oil exporter to
boost output. But the news — which came the same day that U.S. crude oil futures hit a new record
of $127.82 a barrel — speaks less to Bush's success at "jawboning" the de facto OPEC leader on oil prices
and more to the kingdom's worry that high oil prices will dent demand for their own supplies, analysts said.
Dems 'Oil' Wet About
Gas Prices. Have you noticed that ever since the Democrats took control of Congress, oil and gas prices have
been going through the roof? The Dems won control of the House and Senate last year in part on the notion that sinking
billions of taxpayer dollars into corn-based ethanol would combat global warming; itself a dubious superstition that some
scientists say is part of the Earth's natural environmental changes over many eons.
Democrats Fumble Ball On
Energy. The price of oil has risen sharply since the Democrats, with their government-heavy
energy schemes, took control of the House. Since January 2007, the first month for the Democrats in
office, oil prices are up by more than 113%. Congress, led by Democrats since January 2007, has
steadfastly refused to do anything constructive to bring down the price of oil. What truly is
frightening is Pelosi shows no sign of running out of bad ideas to ruin our energy-dependent economy.
Feckless To Reckless, Pelosi
Should Resign. Any leader with an energy record as derelict as Speaker Pelosi's ought to step
down. Where she once was just incompetent and irresponsible, she has now — with her latest
scheme to fix oil prices — become dangerous. Despite polls showing Americans in favor of
drilling more oil from America's huge untapped supplies, Pelosi won't allow it. She just wants to empty
our Strategic Petroleum Reserve for a short-term fix to get through Election Day.
Ann Coulter is a little sarcastic, but she has a point... This is Not a Drill. [Speaker of
the House Nancy] Pelosi announced that the Democrats also plan to push for "an historic investment in
biofuels, efficiency, conservation and the rest." The "rest" is apparently what she called our
"important and essential" investment in alternative energy. That certainly would be historic: We
would make history by throwing our money away on unproven energy boondoggles that have eaten up untold
billions since the 1960s without producing a single net kilowatt of power while we all starve to death.
Over to You,
Speaker Pelosi. Gas is still at $4 a gallon, but the good news is there's an emerging consensus
on a measure that would help: Drill for more oil here at home. President Bush dropped the
executive ban on offshore oil and natural gas exploration last week, and House GOP leader John Boehner
plans to lead a congressional delegation to Colorado and Alaska to highlight America's abundant energy
resources this week. Polls show more than two-thirds of the public support increased domestic
energy exploration and production. Guess who stands in the way.
Power of one: Pelosi vows
to block offshore drilling vote. A plan to lift the ban on coastal drilling is stalled on Capitol
Hill, for one simple reason: A Californian who opposes President Bush's proposal is calling the shots in the House
of Representatives. Despite growing public support for ending the ban, even in California, Democratic
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she won't allow a vote. "I have no plans to do so," Pelosi said Thursday
Pelosi: 'I'm trying to save the planet'.
After promising fairness and open debate, Pelosi has resorted to hard-nosed parliamentary devices that effectively
bar any chance for Republicans to offer policy alternatives. "I'm trying to save the planet; I'm trying to
save the planet," she says impatiently when questioned. "I will not have this debate trivialized by
their excuse for their failed policy."
Drill Through The Floor.
Led by Reps. Mike Pence, R-Ind., Tom Price, R-Ga., and Lynn Westmoreland, R-Ga., and fully backed by House
Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, this GOP attack could smack unwary Democrats as hard as the blast of a
Texas oil gusher, because what Republicans are demanding is nothing more than a simple up-or-down vote on
drilling for domestic oil in a Democratic-controlled House of Representatives.
Myths About Going It Alone on Energy: The idea that the United States, the world's single largest
energy consumer, can be independent of the $5 trillion-per-year energy business — the world's
single biggest industry — is ludicrous on its face. The push for energy independence is based
on a series of false premises. Here are a few of the most pernicious ones.
An awful oil bill. If you're
wondering why the Democrat-controlled Congress has lower approval ratings than President Bush, then look at the bill
that the House passed on mostly a party-line vote, 236-182. It scraps the tax deductions given to the nation's
oil companies, such as Exxon Mobil Corp. and ChevronTexaco. In light of the record profits these firms have
been racking up, not many folks will shed any tears for them. But perhaps they should.
The U.S. needs a
good oil plan. Americans in both parties need to get on board. That means opening up the
coasts of Florida and California to new offshore drilling for the first time in a quarter-century. That
means tapping into the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. That means easing regulations to allow
the industry to build its first new refinery in three decades. For too long, partisanship and
environmental demagoguery have blocked progress toward easing the nation's ever-growing reliance on
The Oil Dependency Myth: To say that
the people of the United States are "dependent" upon foreign oil is also a misnomer. Individuals choose
to purchase oil from overseas producers because such an action is preferable to other alternatives. I
am "dependent" upon overseas oil in the same way that I am "dependent" upon Proctor & Gamble for my laundry
detergent or the local butcher for my meat. (This is not to absolve the U.S. government for engaging in
bad foreign policy in the hopes of convincing overseas producers to sell oil to Americans at cheap prices.
My purpose is simply to point out the absurdity of saying that voluntary economic exchanges are acts of "dependence.")
A Cartel Worse Than OPEC: This year
a very large reserve was located in the Gulf of Mexico, some distance from the shore line of Texas. There
is no shortage of oil or gas around the coast of the United States. Some 20 years ago, Phillips
Petroleum sought permission to drill wells in the Bridger-Teton National Forest (gasp!) in Wyoming. The
wells were to be capped and used only in case of a national emergency. Wyoming is one of America's
richest states in energy resources. The request was denied.
Mind their own
business. Global energy giant BP has been a leader of the so-called "corporate social
responsibility" movement. … Two weeks ago, the campaign broke down. BP shut down its Prudhoe Bay
oil field in Alaska's North Slope after discovering what a company press release called "unexpectedly severe
corrosion" in the pipeline. The company says it will replace 73 percent of the Prudhoe Bay
pipelines. The shutdown will cost the nation 8 percent of its output — 400,000
barrels of oil a day — at a time when consumer gas prices are hitting record highs and world
oil prices are soaring.
what? The first part of last Tuesday's State of the Union — on national
security — was tough, clear, principled, well reasoned. The second part was a
laundry list, reminiscent of the worst of Bill Clinton. I was nodding off when I heard the
President Bush say, "America is addicted to oil." Addicted to oil! That woke me
up. America is no more addicted to oil than it is addicted to bread, to milk, to paper, to
water, to computers….
America's Oil Weapon: President
Bush has bemoaned what he calls the United States' addiction to oil. He has demonized America's oil
use in speeches, and talked about the need to move beyond the petroleum-based economy. The president
is certainly correct to point out harmful side effects to our use of oil and the need for us to address
them. But in using the expressly negative language of addiction, the President not only cast a dark
cloud over the fuel that presently underpins a huge portion of our economy, he badly confused a set of
issues that demand clear thinking and fair analysis.
That America is "addicted to oil" is something you would
expect Al Gore to say,
not George W. Bush.
Addicted to Regulation. In
his State of the Union Address, President Bush said that "America is addicted to oil." But it would be
more accurate to say that America is addicted to opportunity, and oil and its products help us seize
it. … Some 40% of our oil consumption is for cars and light trucks; 32% for buses, railroads, ships,
trucks and agricultural machinery; and another 17% goes into petrochemicals to produce products
from plastic to paint. These uses represent opportunities, not addictions.
Oil Addiction Fiction: Bush's
"Addiction" May Be Rational Choice. In spite of President Bush's dire warning in his State of
the Union address that America is becoming "addicted to oil" — followed by "rehab" policies to
include renewables, hybrids and now CAFE standards — most Americans do not wish to break the
habit. Far from it: Americans want their government to find new sources of oil to increase
rigs would interfere with military training in Gulf. U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson says the Bush
administration is "hell-bent" on offshore oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, with some gas rigs as
close as 25 miles from Florida's shoreline. But he says the military may prevent
it. Nelson told reporters in Tallahassee that the Pentagon needs restricted air space
south of Eglin and Tyndall Air Force Bases, to test new types of jets and even secret weapons. He
said the Navy also does some weapons testing in the area, and can't have oil rigs in the way.
insecurity — unreliable supply at an unreasonable cost — took
years to create. Solutions will take years as well. In the meantime, working with
the international community, Washington must develop better knowledge, more tools and greater
will to effectively address international petroleum supply issues in foreign and economic
policy. Focused activities, skillfully executed, in producing countries could bring
millions of barrels more to world markets. We would then have less to fear from Iran
or other threats.
21st century Boston Tea Party. On Aug. 1, Speaker Nancy Pelosi — without addressing
gas prices that continue to hover near $4 per gallon — adjourned Congress for five weeks, dimmed
the lights, turned off the microphones and C-SPAN cameras and attempted to remove the press and visitors from
the House chamber. Republicans refuse to leave the chamber because the issue is about much more than gas
prices. It is about much more than energy. It is about the U.S. economy, jobs and national
security. It is about who we are as a people.
How to lower gas prices: Produce more oil!
A Declaration of Energy Independence.
How can we achieve the energy independence which every President since Nixon has said is a matter of national
security? Stop wringing our hands and moaning about our situation, stand up like our ancestors have and
boldly declare our Energy Independence! In practical terms we should: take the shackles off our
domestic oil industry, build new refineries, develop better distribution of natural gas, expand the use of
nuclear, wind, solar and every conceivable form of energy, and drill baby drill!
Given that we're spending billions of stimulus dollars to rebuild our highways, it makes sense to think about
what we'll be driving on them. For years to come, most of what we drive will be powered, at least in part,
by diesel fuel or gasoline. To fuel that driving, we need access to oil. The less use we make of our own
reserves, the more we will have to import, which leads to a number of harmful consequences. That means we
need to drill here and drill now.
Let's Drill Our Way To
Lower Taxes. Opening our vast domestic resources, both on- and off-shore, to responsible oil and gas
development would produce an influx of tax revenue from additional lease sales and royalties, as well as from income
and excise taxes. These additional collections could be used, for example, to offset the alternative minimum
tax (AMT). The Congressional Research Service recently estimated the potential federal revenue from Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) oil development at $191 billion over 30 years — roughly $18.36 per
barrel, based on projections of recoverable reserves.
All Falling Down... [Scroll
down] While Obama was right to stiffen efficiency standards and promote alternate energies, he is
neglecting the only mechanisms that can tide us over for the next 20 years — more natural gas,
domestic oil, shale, tar sands, clean coal, and nuclear energy. We should be on a dash to build nuclear
plants for the coming demand from plug in hybrids and spikes in electricity usage. We should be
leasing as much natural gas lands as possible, to gain the supplies to run energy plants and to power
vehicles. There is plenty of oil in the Dakotas, California, Texas and in the Gulf and we should be
drilling there like mad. Sorry, even Santa Barbara should either ban SUVs or have oil derricks on the
Save, Now. The nation, it seems, now favors developing new sources over "saving the planet" by a hefty
3-2 margin. And get this: The biggest shift came among — yep! — liberals. Seems
sanctimonious tree-huggers and caribou-coddlers have their price: $4 gas.
What Part of 'Drill Now' do they Not
Understand? Out here in West Texas we love our guns, we support our troops, and we treasure
our freedom. We also walk around on top of oil: yes it's far beneath us, but it's there.
And all these aspects of West Texas come together to our astonishment and anger over the fact that our
independence is limited by an intrusive federal government that tells us what oil we can and can't access
through drilling, and ultimately makes us dependent upon other nations for our own fuel supplies.
Most Americans support more U.S. oil
drilling. A push by U.S. President George W. Bush and Republican presidential candidate
Senator John McCain to lift a ban on U.S. offshore oil drilling could find plenty of support from Americans
weary of rising energy costs, according to a Reuters/Zogby poll. Some 59.6 percent of Americans
surveyed in the poll released on Wednesday [6/18/2008] said they would favour government efforts to boost
domestic drilling and refinery construction to cool record prices.
It's Time for Rage. We have a right to be angry,
but anger is no longer enough. It's time for rage — good, old American rage aimed at those elitist
Democrats who prefer to see the folks beggared by soaring fuel prices rather than take the action this very real economic
crisis demands. Drill.
High gas prices are finally curbing America's demand for the open road. Transportation Department statistics for
March indicate that the country just experienced its first year-over-year decline in miles driven since 1979. A
decrease in demand is one natural market response to rising gas prices. The other natural response —
an increase in supply — has not been as forthcoming, and the price of oil continues to rise even though
Americans are driving less.
Drill! Drill! Drill!
At this point in time, is there another country on the face of the earth that would possess the oil and gas
reserves held by the United States and refuse to exploit them? Only technical incompetence, as in Mexico,
would hold anyone back. But not us. We won't drill. California won't drill for the estimated
1.3 billion barrels of recoverable oil off its coast because of bad memories of the Santa Barbara oil
spill — in 1969. We won't drill for the estimated 5.6 billion to 16 billion barrels
of oil in the moonscape known as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) because of — the
A Time to Drill.
In a remarkably short time, the public has changed from supporters of environmentalism to advocates of
drilling for oil and natural gas in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and/or in the ocean.
For the first time since the 1970s, liberals in both parties have found themselves responding to significant
demands for drilling. Their responses are meant to confuse the electorate in order to turn public
opinion back to their position on the environment.
Energy Myths: Many
in Congress seem either disconnected from reality or intentionally disingenuous about our energy crunch.
They have well-honed negative responses to common-sense ideas about solving our energy crisis, particularly
drilling for more oil. These responses are based on a number of widely held myths. Sadly, they've
become the backbone of the Democrats' energy policy. They include: "We can't drill our way out
of our energy crisis." Actually, we can.
wants to help me start drilling for oil? I'm tired of this nonsense. I am not addicted to oil. I'm
not psychologically or compulsively compelled to pump gasoline. If my truck ran on maple syrup I'd use that instead.
But it doesn't. It is not my fault that the automobile runs on gasoline. I didn't invent it. I only bought
one because I need it for work like most of you do. I tolerated paying $2 per gallon, and I could handle $3. But
word came down on Wednesday that $4-a-gallon gas will be the norm through 2009.
Baby' — Governor Palin. Yes, my friends on the left, there are responsible ways to
drill for oil that will help us with our energy needs and not disturb your precious caribou. It's time
we started to look to solutions like this rather than Obama's wind farms .
Oil Crisis is
Solvable. There is only one way to drive down the rising cost of gasoline for the long term:
significantly increase the domestic supply of oil. We are the only nation in the world with access to
known oil deposits on our own land or off our shores that essentially refuses to tap those resources. The
main stumbling block is a lack of political consensus, which is in especially short supply in an election
year. Instead of coming up with real solutions to our growing energy crisis, the Democrats in Congress
would rather rail against the oil companies.
Just Drill, Baby.
Washington politicians will tell you this is an "energy crisis," but America's energy challenges are far more
political than substantive. First, we are not running out of oil. In 1920 it was estimated that
the world supply of oil was 60 billion barrels. By 1950 it was up to 600 billion, and by 1990 to
two trillion. In 2000 the world supply of oil was estimated to be three trillion barrels. The
U.S. has substantial supplies of oil and gas that could be accessed if lawmakers would allow it, but they
Congress goes home. Democrats' insistence on blocking a vote on drilling has more to do with protecting
environmental special interests than really protecting the environment or solving the energy crunch. And for
that, they should pay a political price.
Everything but oil is subsidized.
Fossil Fuel Subsidies. Whenever anyone questions whether wind power and other
renewables, such as solar, should get subsidies, the proponents of wind and solar respond by saying fossil fuels get larger subsidies than renewables. Let's sort out
the facts as best we can.
($23.37) v. Gas (25 Cents). [Scroll down] An even better way to tell the story is by how much
taxpayer money is dispensed per unit of energy, so the costs are standardized. For electricity generation,
the EIA concludes that solar energy is subsidized to the tune of $24.34 per megawatt hour, wind $23.37 and "clean
coal" $29.81. By contrast, normal coal receives 44 cents, natural gas a mere quarter, hydroelectric
about 67 cents and nuclear power $1.59.
D1 Oils says
US subsidies have forced it to shut UK refineries. The enormous damage being done by "splash-and-dash"
imports of American biodiesel was highlighted yesterday when one of the UK's leading operators, D1 Oils, said
it was closing down all its refining operations in Britain after running up a £46m annual loss.
Bernie Sanders Is Brainwashing Our Uneducated Youth. People are fleeing Venezuela at the rate of one million a
year. According to Forbes, the South American country's inflation rate is a staggering 808%! But don't blame the USA for
this. Unlike with Cuba, we are still the number one importer of Venezuelan oil and the number one exporter of goods to that
benighted country. We essentially support Venezuela, even though it has been led sequentially by rancid America-hating despots
like Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro.
'Fractivists' caught in flood of Colorado
lies. Massive storms dumped "biblical rainfall amounts" across nearly 2,000 square miles of Colorado last month, according to the National
Weather Service. The raging floods that followed killed at least eight people, damaged or destroyed nearly 2,000 homes, and wrecked more than
200 miles of state highways and 50 state bridges. The Denver Post ran a front page aerial photo headlined, "Front Range Flooding:
Oil spilling into mix," showing a trashed stream bed with brown stains near a "damaged tank" that "leaks crude." Opportunistic flocks of
Big Green eco-vultures already embroiled in five local anti-fracking ballot measures pounced on the tragedy as a propaganda vehicle. Their
basic strategy was to pose as "mom-and-pop victims with no money to stop this spilling, but Big Bad Oil is putting zillions into the campaign."
Chevron takes shakedown lawyers to
court in RICO trial. [Scroll down] While such tactics have traditionally been successful against big corporations with deep pockets,
choosing to simply pay off the pests rather than spending the time and money to fight them, not so with Chevron. The plaintiffs, led in large part
by Manhattan lawyer Steven Donziger, tried to dig too deep, racking up a $19 B[illion] judgement in an Ecuador court based on what turned out
to be a staggering series of apparently fraudulent ploys. Chevron fought back and refused to cough up a dime.
Demoralize the anti-oil fringe.
It has become a familiar scene at major oil company annual meetings. Protestors, some of whom have purchased token amounts of stock to appear, confound the proceedings
by asking oil companies to exit their business in the name of the environment. According to this fringe, oil companies have a responsibility to protect the planet from
the scourge of fossil fuels. Oil companies are portrayed as pushing their product while the planet overheats. This black-and-white view of energy policy puts the
global warming issue into a moral context. It assumes everyone who believes in catastrophic climate-change theory is good, and those who don't are bad. It also
asserts that replacing fossil fuels will make the world better and "sustainable."
Obama budget would end oil
industry tax breaks, hike royalites. While the tax plans are dead on arrival on Capitol Hill — where lawmakers have
rejected similar proposals many times before — they drew outrage from oil and gas industry leaders who said Obama was seeking to use
the sector as a piggy bank. The fiscal 2014 budget proposal aims to raise $2.5 billion over the next decade by raising the royalty
rates for oil and gas produced on federal lands and waters, with the revenue steered toward a new Energy Security Trust for research in alternative
fuels and vehicles.
Shocker: Oil companies pay the most in
income taxes. President Obama and the Democrats' calls for more revenue are almost never complete without some kind of
shoutout to how we need to end loopholes for those treacherous, evil oil companies, but just a friendly reminder: Oil companies
provide for some of the most handsome portions of federal revenue already.
Big, Evil Oil
Companies Pay Most in Taxes. It's no surprise liberals love taxes. The new Democratic Senate budget calls
for $1 trillion in tax increases in order to offset $1 trillion in new spending. But liberals who constantly demonize
big oil are biting the hand that feeds and fulfills their big govenrment spending dreams. It turns out, big oil companies like
Exxon Mobile and Chevron pay [more] in taxes [than] any other company.
Who really owns Big Oil companies?
Research shows that the bulk of economic rewards reaped by the oil and gas sector are actually flowing back to everyday Americans. Their
success is boosting the financial futures of millions of working families all across the country. Oil and gas companies have broad-based
Israel Silent on Dems' Chevron Cash. After Chevron contributed
$2.5 million to a Republican Super PAC, Rep. Steve Israel (D., N.Y.), chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, accused the oil
company of looking for political payoffs. [...] Israel failed to mention that Chevron has contributed more than $84,000 to Obama. Chevron has
donated at least $16,000 to Senate Democrats and more than $38,000 to Israel's fellow House Democrats.
Obama Will Say and Do Anything.
"Big Oil" has become a favorite Obama target. On March 29, 2012, Obama said, "Congress up until this point has thought it was
a good idea to send billions more of your tax dollars to the oil industry." Obama appealed to Congress to "stand with the American
people" and vote to end subsidies to the oil and gas industry. But there is one problem: "Big Oil" receives tax
incentives. In no sense can what "Big Oil" receives be called a subsidy — the sending of "billions more of
your tax dollars to the oil industry." Further, the incentives (sometimes referred to as tax breaks) are available to any
Progressives Now Blame "Big Oil" for...
Everything. In typical Center for American Progress (CAP) partisan fashion, Daniel Weiss manages to blame oil companies
for the price of gasoline, America's overspending problem, the inefficiency of biofuels, and for not drilling on land the federal
government refuses to lease. But don't let 'em off so easy, Mr. Weiss, oil and natural gas producers are also responsible for
the Iraq war, world hunger, and that time I wrecked my ATV and broke my arm (it was powered by gasoline!).
propose 'Reasonable Profits Board' to regulate oil company profits. Six House Democrats, led by
Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), want to set up a "Reasonable Profits Board" to control gas profits. The
Democrats, worried about higher gas prices, want to set up a board that would apply a "windfall profit tax" as
high as 100 percent on the sale of oil and gas, according to their legislation. The bill provides no
specific guidance for how the board would determine what constitutes a reasonable profit.
big-oil subsidy myth. The late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan used to warn against "semantic
infiltration" — employing less-than-accurate words in an effort to shape the debate. Moynihan's
caution is often ignored, but it's still worth calling out the offenders. Among them is a favorite think
tank of the Obama administration, the Center for American Progress (CAP), which regularly insists that taxpayers
are "subsidizing big oil companies." That's simply not true.
Gasoline and Onions. Oil companies
today are no more greedy or clever than they have been all along. We have to look for a better
explanation — and it isn't hard to find. Demand for oil rises with the growth of China, India
and other developing countries. When poor people get a little richer, they buy cars, computers and
refrigerators. They burn more fuel to make them and to run them. Rising demand, other things
being equal, increases prices. And other things have not been equal.
Administration's Big Oil Lie. The hearing was called ostensibly to support the Democrats' Close
Big Oil Tax Loopholes Act, a bill with no chance of passage. Its purpose was to once again deflect blame
for rising gas prices caused in large part by the Obama administration's ban on increasing domestic supply of
fossil fuels. Shell Oil President Marvin Odum laid the blame for high gas prices at the administration's
feet, where it belongs.
rips oil company congressional 'show trials': 'A disgrace'. Beating up on oil companies has
always been low-hanging fruit for politicians when gasoline prices are high. And as the country is
headed into the summer driving season, gas prices are certain to go higher, giving Democrats the opportunity
to play that card. But such politicking isn't going unnoticed or without criticism.
About Oil and Gas: Instead of facing the reality of his owned failed policies, President Obama
is calling for an end to the "tax giveaways" he claims amount to $4 billion in "subsidies" to the
energy industry. This tactic isn't surprising given the effect that rising gas prices have on the
President's approval ratings and his obsession with re-election. But, less than truthful innuendos
and political spin hardly helps American working families that are getting hammered at the pump.
About Those Oil Subsidies:
Everyone wants to end subsidies to oil companies, from President Obama to John Boehner and Paul Ryan.
My question was "What subsidies?" Remarkably enough, CNN Money provided the answer. It
turns out that they are all tax "breaks." I even hesitate to call them "breaks" because some of them
amount to little more than Congress defining accounting terms such as "capital equipment." And the
total amount of earnings not collected in taxes (which liberals define as a "subsidy") is about $4 billion
Oil industry profits:
[Scroll down to page 7] While large in absolute dollar amounts, oil industry profits are modest when
measured as net income on each dollar of revenue. Over the past five years, the industry's net income
was only 5.7 cents per dollar of revenue, hardly different than the 5.5 cents average for all
industries. Oil industry profits are also highly cyclical. The oil industry goes through repeated
boom and bust cycles as prices vary but high levels of investment in capital and exploration must be
maintained. Today's high profits pay for investments made in the past that did not generate returns
for investors because of low gasoline prices. Finally, the oil industry pays high taxes already.
ExxonMobil reported net after-tax earnings of $40.6 billion in 2007, paid $30 billion in corporate
taxes that year, and had an effective tax rate of about 40 percent, much higher than other industries.
Other oil companies reported similarly high tax rates.
Facts versus Myths about the US Energy Industry.
Most people seem to have a misunderstanding as to the nature of the oil and gas industry, their impression being formed
only by the large multi-national integrated oil companies who make "billions of dollars of profit". In actuality,
the industry consists of thousands of companies ranging from one-person independents to the large multi-national
integrated oil companies. Another long standing misunderstanding is that the 5 super-large companies work
together to control the price of oil. If that were true, then the companies would not have allowed the low prices
of 1996 to 2000, nor would they allow the current unstable oil prices.
Big Oil Democrats: Here is
how you know Republicans are on the winning side of the oil drilling issue. It's not that two-thirds of
the American people support offshore drilling. It's that the Democratic response has been to simply
point at Republicans and shout, "Big Oil!"
Extorting Big Oil. On the surface,
it has all the makings of a classic David vs. Goliath tale — an ostensibly exploitative multinational oil
company plundering the pristine rain forests of impoverished, indigenous inhabitants. ... In short, this
lawsuit is nothing more than a politicized attempt by the Ecuadoran government to extort money from a
deep-pocket, American oil company.
Onion Ringer. Congress is back in session and oil prices are still through the roof, so pointless
or destructive energy legislation is all but guaranteed. Most likely is stiffer regulation of the futures
market, since Democrats and even many Republicans have so much invested in blaming "speculators" for $4 gas.
Congress always needs a political villain, but few are more undeserving.
An Energy Sarbox.
While some kind of crackdown on the U.S. oil futures market is inevitable after so much political agitation, Congress has
begun to believe its own demagoguery. The Senate may vote on a bill this week that will drive commodities trading
overseas and decrease oversight and market transparency. Call it a Sarbanes-Oxley for energy.
Oil Rally Topped Dot-Com Craze
in Speculators' Mania. Crude rose 697 percent since trading at $17.45 a barrel on the New York Mercantile
Exchange in November 2001, and reached 28 record highs this year. The last time a similar pattern was seen in equities
was eight years ago, when Internet-related stocks sent the Nasdaq Composite Index up 640 percent to its highest level
ever, according to data compiled by Bloomberg and Bespoke Investment Group LLC.
In Defense of Oil and Gas Speculators:
Despite Congress' periodic hauling of weak-kneed oil executives before their committees to charge them with
collusion and price-gouging, subsequent federal investigations turn up no evidence to support the charges.
Right now oil company executives are getting a bit of a respite as Congress has turned its attention to crude oil
speculators, blaming them for high oil prices and calling for tighter control over commodity futures trading.
willing to criticize oil despite holding stock. More than a dozen Democratic members of
Congress critical of oil companies have investments in the industry, according to a review of lawmakers'
financial assets. At least 14 Democratic members of the House and one senator have holdings ranging
from several thousand dollars to hundreds of thousands of dollars in companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp. and
Chevron Corp. or partnerships such as Schlumberger and Hornbeck Offshore Services.
Why Big Oil is not to
blame for fuel prices: Anyone with an understanding of basic supply and demand economics knows well enough
that Big Oil is not the big player in the energy market. More often than not the oil majors are just as helpless in
the face of global market forces as any other consumer. Why are energy prices sky-high? In a word:
geopolitics. The rapidly expanding economies of China and India, with a joint population of over 2 billion, have
become increasingly voracious consumers of energy. China's economic growth alone is running at nine percent and, over
coming years, will only accelerate.
Unleash America's Energy Potential.
As any driver can tell you, the pain at the pump is pretty acute right now. It's a simple matter of
supply and demand. Demand is up (thanks, in part, to an increasing appetite for fuel in China and
India), and supply is low. And if there's one thing that makes the pain worse, it's knowing that supply
doesn't have to be this low. Are the ridiculously high prices we're paying the fault of the big, bad oil
companies? No, the lion's share of the blame goes to politicians, who have locked away vast amounts of
American energy — both oil and natural gas.
The 'Idle' Oil Field Fallacy.
Anyone with even the most basic understanding of how oil and natural gas are produced — and this
should include many members of Congress — knows that claims of "idle" leases are a diversionary
feint. A company bids for and buys a lease because it believes there is a possibility that it may yield
enough oil or natural gas to make the cost of the lease, and the costs of exploration and production, commercially
viable. The U.S. government received $3.7 billion from company bids in a single lease sale in March
2008. However, until the actual exploration is complete, a company does not know whether the lease will
Idle Leases —
Or Addled Minds? Sen. Jeff Bingaman, Rep. Nick Rahall, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other members
of Congress who oppose producing more American oil are in a bind. They know voters are hurting from high
gas prices and overwhelmingly want the government to allow more American oil production. But they can't side
with the American people and risk upsetting their left-wing base. So they needed a way to make us think
they support more drilling — while effectively preventing us from ever drilling a single new well.
Dry Hole: "I want you to think about this," Barack Obama said in Las Vegas last week. "The oil
companies have already been given 68 million acres of federal land, both onshore and offshore, to drill.
They're allowed to drill it, and yet they haven't touched it — 68 million acres that have the
potential to nearly double America's total oil production." Wow, how come the oil companies didn't think
of that? Perhaps because the notion is obviously false .
The Editor says...
The oil companies haven't been "given" anything. Oil companies have spent billions of
dollars for those leases.*
Oil Leases on '68
Million Acres' No Guarantee of Oil, Experts Say. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says a
Republican plan to expand domestic oil drilling — instead of forcing oil companies to drill on
the 68 million acres they've already leased — is a "hoax" and "unworthy of serious
debate." But the nation's oil producers say Pelosi is being disingenuous, because federal
regulations restrict their exploration on the leased land, while much of the 68 million
acres is already "tapped out" of oil.
Who's Hoarding America's Oil?
The truth is, over 96% of the lands that belong to the taxpayer haven't even been leased by the government so
that energy exploration might occur. Consumers are paying for this failure at the pump and in utility
bills. Some are even paying for it with their jobs. But instead of opening new areas to energy
exploration and production, some in Congress have taken to diversionary tactics. Take, for example, the
mysterious "68 million acres" myth.
returns to gridlock over oil drilling. Mrs. Pelosi last month said she will introduce energy
legislation in the coming weeks that might include opening portions of the outer continental shelf for
drilling — a provision Democratic leaders previously had opposed. The measure also would
include a "use it or lose it" provision that would force oil companies to surrender oil and gas leases on
federal land they're not drilling on, and prohibit these companies from acquiring new leases.
The Editor says...
In other words, "Find oil on the land you have leased, or you won't be permitted to look
elsewhere." The logic escapes me.
Facts beat talking points. The
problem with the energy debate is that most of the "facts" we hear on the radio and cable news are really just
talking points from folks who mostly don't know what they are talking about. The Democrats — as if
they all received the same e-mail Wednesday — are arguing that the oil companies have plenty of
places to drill, and isn't it very curious that they aren't?
Some wonder if speculators are fueling oil run-up.
With American motorists struggling to pay record-high gasoline prices, a debate rages in the halls of Congress and across the Oil
Patch over the role speculators may be playing in driving up oil prices. Crude prices have rocketed nearly $70 a barrel in
the past year. Some energy experts suggest speculation could account for $20 to $30 of that run-up.
Should the Oil Company
Executives Go on Trial? Obama science guru John Holdren isn't sure. Michael Egnor,
writing for the Science & Public Policy Initiative, reports on a television show last year when Holdren
was asked about trying company executive for "crimes against humanity" for doubting global warming...
profits keep dropping as recession shrinks demand for energy. The world's biggest oil companies
are reporting sharp declines in quarterly profit as the recession continues to weigh on consumer demand,
driving down energy prices. Exxon Mobil, the world's largest oil company by market value, said
Thursday [10/29/2009] that its third-quarter profit slumped 68 percent, to $4.73 billion
(98 cents per share).
"Windfall profit" taxes
Only the stockholders of an oil company are entitled to share its profits.
Is a 'Windfall' Profit? To pay for "stimulus" checks of $1,000 for families and $500 for
individuals, the Senator says government would take "a reasonable share" of oil company profits. Mr.
Obama didn't bother to define "reasonable," and neither did Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Senate Democrat,
when he recently declared that "The oil companies need to know that there is a limit on how much profit
they can take in this economy." Really? This extraordinary redefinition of free-market success
could use some parsing.
define what a "windfall profits" tax is. Liberals like to bleat about the oil companies making
"windfall profits" as if there is some point when making a profit is bad. So the Wall Street Journal
asks what the definition is of a "windfall profit." This is important to know because Senator Obama has
proposed giving each American family a stimulus check of $1000 paid for by a windfall profits tax on the oil
More Taxes Will Mean Less Oil.
Democrats say there should be a limit to the profits oil companies can make. Should there also be a
limit on the taxes government can take? Just who's the profiteer here?
Windfall taxing big oil: how
to make the gas crisis worse. Yes, it's true that Exxon's recent quarterly profits were, at near
$12 billion, big. It's also worth noting that turnover was $138 billion, giving them a margin
on sales of 9 percent: which isn't really, anything much to write home about. The reason the
profits number is a huge one is because the business itself is a huge one.
In Defense of 'Big Oil': Senate
Democrats last week sought to ingratiate themselves with voters, while doing nothing to produce more energy,
with a familiar attack on "big oil." They want to repeal $17 billion in tax breaks for the oil
companies over 10 years and on top of that impose a windfall profit tax on companies that don't invest
in new energy sources. This is political expediency at its worst.
Energy charade: There's no
way to put this politely. Raising taxes on U.S. oil companies and calling it an energy plan is just about
the dumbest idea the Democrats have come up with yet. Democrats call it "a windfall profits" tax, and it
is at the heart of their plan to deal with punishing oil prices nearing $140 a barrel and skyrocketing gas
prices that have crossed the $4-a-gallon threshold at the pump. Their proposed tax increase will not
produce a drop more oil. In fact, it will reduce supplies. And it will not lower oil prices, either.
It will make oil more expensive, because oil company costs would rise as a result of higher taxes.
Things I Don't Believe:
Didn't we try this with the Carter administration at the tag end of the 1970s? The windfall profits tax of the Carter
years was, however, a dandy way to cap every small well in the country. And reduce production in general. (Why
produce more in order to have the profits taxed away?) A tax is a great way to cut down on supply and therefore
increase demand and, with it, prices.
The "Big Oil" Witch
Hunt: [Members of Congress] — themselves guilty of thwarting American energy independence — are
poisoning the minds of gullible Americans against the very oil companies that reliably supply us with essential fuels, and
would be producing even more (resulting in lower prices) if Congress weren't blocking them from doing so. When it comes
to energy, Congress is the problem and Big Oil is part of the solution. The longer it takes Americans to perceive
this, the longer our energy woes will continue.
Dumb or Ill-Informed?
What assumptions do congressmen make about the American people? Do they assume that we're dumb or
ill-informed about the energy problems we are experiencing? Every time there has been a huge spike in
gasoline prices, Congress hauls oil company executives before their committees to accuse them of greed,
obscene profits and price-fixing. One federal investigation after another of supposed oil company
misconduct turns up nothing to substantiate congressional allegations.
Energy. Colorado's $23 billion-a-year oil and gas industry is keeping the state's economy
afloat, but Governor Bill Ritter and his fellow Democrats are promoting new rules and tax hikes that would
drive business elsewhere. Ritter and his allies in the environmental movement are also seeking to raise
taxes on energy producers. In many mineral-rich states, energy producers have to pay what is called a
severance tax on any oil or gas they take out of the ground.
Phony 'Emergency'. [Scroll
down] Sen. Obama seems to be trying to take advantage of reports that Exxon Mobil reported record second-quarter
income — indeed, the highest quarterly profit for any corporation ever. But the reality is
that as Obama and his equally unknowing friends push windfall taxes, Exxon Mobil has already given the U.S. a
massive windfall. As economist Mark Perry has noted, Exxon Mobil will pay more taxes this year to the U.S.
Treasury than the bottom 50% of all taxpayers — combined.
McCain Spout Economic Nonsense. Why should we stop with oil companies? They make about
8.3 cents in gross profit per dollar of sales. Why doesn't Mr. Obama slap a windfall profits
tax on sectors of the economy that have fatter margins? Electronics make 14.5 cents per dollar and
computer equipment makers take in 13.7 cents per dollar, according to the Census Bureau. Microsoft's
margin is 27.5 cents per dollar of sales.
The Wrong Way
to Kick An Oil Habit. High oil prices, like a walk under the summer moon, can drive normally
rational people to do foolish things they later regret. For Barack Obama, it is a fling with a windfall
profits tax on American oil companies — one of the most thoroughly discredited economic policies of
the past few decades. A 2006 Congressional Research Service report found that Jimmy Carter's version of
the tax generated less than one-fourth of expected government revenue while depressing domestic oil output
between 1.2 percent and 8 percent and increasing dependence on imported oil between 3 percent
and 13 percent.
Putting Up The 'For Shale' Sign.
Democrats will say Exxon and its unindicted co-conspirators still make obscene profits. The fact is that American oil
companies in 2007 had an 8.3% profit margin, compared with 8.9% for all U.S. manufacturing. The cigarette and beverage
companies' profit margin was 19.1%. Drug companies made 18.4%.
Thank you, Big Oil. Before you
get all excited about tearing down the energy industry, stop and think for a moment about what makes your comfortable life
possible. Your heat and most of your electricity are provided through the burning of oil and natural gas. The
thousands of plastic items in your home, car and office are all made from crude oil. Much of your clothing is woven of
fibers made from petroleum. Without the hard work and ingenuity of the men and women who work for the energy companies,
we would be living in the 17th century .
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama want to raise the price of oil, as well as most everything else, and lower the value of the pension
and mutual funds that union members and retirees depend on. Of course, they don't describe their plan that way.
Instead, they call for a windfall-profits tax on the oil companies. But it's the same thing. Taxing a "windfall"
sounds appealing, but stock prices are based on expected profits.
GOP nixes Democrat-backed tax on oil
companies. Senate Republicans today successfully blocked a vote on a Democratic- written energy
package intended to slap the major oil companies with a new windfall profits tax and roll back other tax breaks
the industry now enjoys.
Gasbags: Anyone wondering why U.S. energy policy is so dysfunctional need only review Congress's
recent antics. Members have debated ideas ranging from suing OPEC to the Senate's carbon tax-and-regulation
monstrosity, to a windfall profits tax on oil companies, to new punishments for "price gouging" — everything
except expanding domestic energy supplies. Amid $135 oil, it ought to be an easy, bipartisan victory to lift
the political restrictions on energy exploration and production.
Stop Whining And Blaming Oil Companies.
First, the bad news: Nothing — and I mean nothing — the U.S. government does can stop the rise in the
price of oil in the short run. Stopping buys for the emergency stockpile will have no effect at all. These
purchases are less than one-tenth of one percent of daily worldwide demand. Cancelling the purchases is precisely
the same as not paying life insurance premiums when you're worried about money. It is nonsense.
"Problem" Of Human Freedom: Could it be that a foolish and abusive use of governmental power is a causal factor
with our energy woes? Could it be, as [Bill] O'Reilly suggested, that our government's (and Mrs. Clinton's) prohibition
of domestic energy development is part of the reason we are now held hostage to the "monopoly" of OPEC? Not so, for
Hillary. In her leftist world, the problem is that American citizens are enjoying too much freedom. "Consumers"
and "drivers" behave badly, they drive too much, and they drive the "wrong" vehicles; and American oil corporations (just
as President Carter told us in the 1970's) are once again raking in "windfall profits."
Oil companies spend more on
taxes than on oil supply development. Over the last several the major oil companies have been driven away
from investing money in future exploration and production. The so-called Supermajors, Exxon, BP, Shell, Chevron.
Conoco, and Total have paid more in taxes than they have invested in the oil business. For the three year period, 2005 to 2007 these companies have paid $292 billion in
taxes and invested $265 billion in capital projects.
such thing as obscene profits. Profit isn't a shameful accident for corporations — it's
their very reason for being. Big profits help them do more of what they did to make the profit in the
first place. In the case of oil companies, that means more exploration, development, drilling, pumping,
refining, transporting and marketing of the oil that fuels every aspect of our economy. Of course,
at the moment it's frustrating to pay more at the pump, but oil profits aren't the culprit, nor would
punishment of the energy companies help to bring down the cost of fuel.
As any economist will tell you, "price-gouging" per se doesn't exist. There is only supply and
demand. To add more dependable sources, the U.S. should be developing oil in the Alaskan National
Wilderness Reserve (sic) and on the continental shelf, where literally billions of barrels of oil await. But
we aren't. That's the supply side.
The Editor says...
Good article, but ANWR is the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Is Oil the Root of All Evil?Lives
per Gallon gratuitously excoriates the oil companies and places blame for every conceivable ill facing the
world — from air pollution to thievery — on their product. Replete with homilies to past
civilizations, such as the Rapa Nui, and fearsome examples of devastated ecosystems like Pacific
Ocean kelp beds, Tamminen assaults not only petroleum, but modern technological-based life.
politicians. If there is anything worse than partisan demagoguery, it is bipartisan
demagoguery. Republican leaders have now joined the Democrats in blaming the oil companies
for the fact that prices rise when demand expands more than supply. Prices have been rising
under these conditions for thousands of years, long before there were any oil companies. This
has happened with everything from food to furs and it has happened among people in every part of
politicians: Part II. World demand for oil has risen out of all proportion
to the amount of oil supplied. That is the problem and prices are a symptom of that problem.
Oil Is Well. I see that the
media and the left-wing foundations are in a state of hysteria over oil company profits. Exxon Mobil
reported profits of about $10 billion for the last quarter of 2005, and this has driven certain people who
don't really know a lot about the oil business … insane.
Breakdown: Members of Congress, such as Pennsylvania's Arlen Specter, who … manages to
exude split-atom energy when it comes to cheerleading for bad ideas, are calling for a windfall profits
tax on the oil companies. Of course, the tax would be passed on to consumers, but Congress will deal
with that later — it'll be good fodder for calling for the federalization of the oil
industry. In a Beltway culture that confuses motion with action, windfall profits
taxes are but flailing victims in the quicksand of lunacy.
Seeks 'Energy Revolution' Fueled by Tax on Oil Profits. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) Tuesday
[5/23/2006] called for an "energy revolution" based on greater fuel efficiency and a $50 billion
research fund financed largely through higher taxes on oil company profits. A GOP spokesman responded
that the plan is just "partisanship, political pandering and yesterday's mistakes."
Hillary Clinton says our trade deficit and reliance on foreign investors are big problems, and wants to fix
them. But her cure would be far worse than the disease, and should be rejected out of hand.
We are all Marxists
now. National Public Radio's Juan Williams, appearing on Fox News Sunday, insisted repeatedly
that "supply is at an eight year high" as proof that the oil companies are cheating us. He kept
repeating the phrase, as if that would make it a more sensible statement. It didn't. … Frustrated
by his inability to convince others of his nonsense, Williams then insisted that there is no connection
between supply and demand.
Big awl and
gasbags. Though some of the stated bases for the alarmism of the Sixties and Seventies may have
changed (example: from global cooling to global warming), their bogeymen/targets remain the same.
No matter what environmental scare they have sported from time to time, the culprits are always the same.
The foremost villain, of course, is America, home of the rich, greedy, and voracious consumers of the earth's
resources. Next, are big corporations, whose favorite sadistic pastime is to pollute.
You Can't Always
Get What You Want. Calling for a probe of oil companies for possible manipulation of gas
prices is Bush's latest nonconservative position. … He could have said, no, the free market is working
properly. That, while basically true, would no doubt have further injured his political standing.
Instead, he moved to take control of the issue and protect himself politically. Two days later, the
president conceded he had "no evidence that there's any ripoff taking place." Of course he
hadn't. That wasn't the point of his intervention.
big oil: Intended to punish the oil industry for making so much money, the provision
actually would increase American dependency on foreign oil producers.
Senate Approves $5 Billion in New Oil
Company Taxes. The U.S. Senate on November 17, 2005 voted to impose nearly $5 billion
in taxes on oil companies in response to record oil company profits. The Senate rejected three
amendments that would explicitly assess "windfall profits" taxes on the oil industry, but nevertheless
changed longstanding accounting rules in ways that are expected to add $5 billion to the oil
companies' tax burdens over the next two years.
Oil Industry Posts Record Profits
in 2005. "You need to make money to spend money," said oil industry analyst John
Parry, senior vice president of John S. Herold, Inc. of Norwalk, Connecticut. "If we
go back to the 1990s, the oil companies were making less than 5 percent on their
capital. If you were to average profits over about a 10-year period, which
is the cycle of investment, they have not earned excessive amounts. This is a
cyclical industry. You may have seven or eight down years and two or three good years.
MoveOn Targets McCain on Offshore
Drilling and 'Obscene' Oil Profits. MoveOn.org, the liberal grassroots group, has unveiled a
television ad campaign on energy that is an attack on presumptive Republican presidential nominee Sen. John
McCain and his support for offshore drilling. But free-market critics say the ad reflects more about
MoveOn's ignorance of economics than it does politics.
Hess to close last refinery in New Jersey.
This story went mostly under the radar, but it will have some implications for many people on the east coast and for the industry in general further
down the line. Without much fanfare, Hess recently announced that they were selling off their last commercial refinery, located in New Jersey.
Their stated reasons are clear enough, but there's a bit more to the story.
Our Thorny Oil Patch.
When America's biggest oil refiner contemplates putting almost a third of its refineries on the market, Congress
should sit up and take notice. The business climate it has created is hurting our economy.
Blended fuels may spike the price at the
pump. Record crude oil costs are largely responsible for today's $4 gas prices, but regulators
continue to study another factor blamed for regional price spikes in the past — the high number of
unique fuel blends used to fight air pollution. These so-called "boutique" fuels arose from various
federal and state laws enacted since the early 1990s. The blends — more than a dozen
nationwide — are designed to help curb emissions in some of the largest U.S. cities, including
I'm Voting for John McCain: Democrats insist that we shouldn't drill off the Pacific coast or
in Alaska or in the Dakotas because they claim we wouldn't get a drop of oil for at least 10 years.
And that's true, but only if the same left-wing idiots who are more concerned with moose than with people
won't allow the oil companies to build new refineries. Also, even if it were true that we wouldn't be
any better off for an entire decade, what do you suppose they'll be saying in 2018, when gas is going
for 25 bucks a gallon?