The Events of September 11, 2001
and the immediate aftermath

Editor's Note:  Here is a collection of news items, related to the War on Terrorism, which did not fall into one of the many other categories of war-related articles.

Some of the events of September 11, 2001, were under-reported because a lot of things happened that day and the news media focused on the biggest story and let the rest fall into one-sentence headlines.  But since then, there have been several other terrorist attacks (apparently) that have been downplayed in the mainstream news media and passed off as "isolated incidents," misunderstandings, or misinterpretation of the evidence.  Three under-scrutinized events are discussed in subsections below.

Post-9/11 terrorist attacks -- which are routinely being passed off as "isolated incidents" -- are discussed here.



The Mystery of Flight 77 and the Pentagon Impact

Flight 77 – Where is the plane?  I'm not sure what this proves, but it is rather strange.  In all the photographs of the Pentagon after the 9/11/01 explosion, have you ever seen a picture that includes pieces of an airplane?

 Editor's Note:   A 757-200 is 124 feet wide and 155 feet long.

Documentary:
911 In Plane Sight.  Contrary to the video footage shown to the American public, photographs taken only moments after the impact show no wreckage on the lawn of the Pentagon.  Where is the plane?  Where are the wings, the tail, the luggage, the seats, the landing gear, and the engines?  Most importantly, what happened to the passengers who were aboard that plane?

Pentagon Attack:  Some of the clearest proof that 9/11 was an act of United States Sponsored Terrorism comes from a close examination of the Pentagon Attack.  In the above picture by Daryl Donley taken minutes after the attack at the Pentagon, the intense fireball is seen as coming from inside the building, and no wreckage of an airline crash is apparent.

Did Flight 77 Hit the Pentagon?  There is controversy over the question of whether AA Flight 77 actually did hit the Pentagon on Sept 11.  It centers around a large amount of photographic evidence that the damage to the Pentagon is neither big enough, nor of the right shape to have been caused by a 757 jet, that there is insufficient sign of wreckage or bodies, and that power poles which apparently should have been in the path of the jet are still standing.  The damage appears to be more consistent with having been caused by a bomb and/or a missile or small jet.

Flight 77 — So where is the plane?  I have never seen an aircraft accident where the aircraft evaporated upon impact [into] water, land or buildings.

Independent Flight 77 - Pentagon Event Investigation.

9-11 and the Impossible.  The harsh truth of 9-11 is that the "official version" just doesn't stand up, against even elementary scrutiny.  Despite the "official" denials, there were overwhelming warnings of suicide hijackers; but no warnings to the public or airline pilots.

The Five-Sided Fantasy Island.  Earliest reports from the Pentagon indicated that a helicopter explosion or attack took place.  However, during the course of the day, two legends were put into place — the first, that the Pentagon was struck by an airliner; and also an alternative hoax, that a missile was responsible.  But no tangible, verifiable evidence of an airliner crash at the Pentagon has ever been produced.

Update:
Department of Defense Responds to Judicial Watch FOIA Request and Related Lawsuit.  The Department of Defense released a videotape that allegedly shows American Airlines Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

See the video.

The video shows nothing that looks like an airplane.  It was allegedly "part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui."  But after seeing the newly released video, it is difficult to imagine the logic of that explanation.  In my opinion, it was kept from public view simply because the government thrives on secrecy.  The government has had several years to find or manufacture at least one believable frame of video that shows an airplane hitting the Pentagon, and that still hasn't been done.

New Tape Stirs Up 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.  With Tuesday's release of video footage of American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon building, an attack that killed 184 people on Sept. 11, questions rage again.  "It doesn't clarify anything — I don't see a plane in that image," said Michael Berger, spokesman for 911Truth.org.  "In fact, I thought that was underwhelming."

[He's right.]

Photos from the Pentagon Crash Site.  No evidence of a Boeing 757, but the damage is certainly consistent with a cruise missile strike.

On the other hand... this opposing viewpoint is presented as a public service.
Getting the Facts Straight:  A growing number of people have been led to believe that an airliner did not hit the Pentagon on 9/11.  However, in this case the "official version" of events is irrefutable.

Evidence That A Boeing 757 Really Did Impact the Pentagon on 9/11.  Among the many questions lingering after the catastrophic events of 9/11/2001 are the various speculations that the Pentagon attack was by some other means than a hijacked passenger airliner.  This document seeks to put these theories to rest.



Questions about Flight 93

Book Claims Flight 93 'was shot down'.  The absence of any significant debris — including tailplane and wings — bewildered witnesses, relatives and, more importantly, some crash experts.  They found it hard to believe that an airliner up to 155 feet long, with two engines each weighing more than six tons, could have penetrated the ground so completely as to utterly disappear.  Had it, in reality, been blown to pieces in mid-air?  Certainly it is unclear how a single piece of fuselage the size of a dining room table could have been recovered from a marina in Indian Lake, a couple of miles away from the crash site — unless it fell from the sky during an aerial break-up.  But a bigger mystery is why the engines went missing.



The Mysterious and Under-reported Collapse of World Trade Center Building Seven

WTC 7 was a huge office building a few blocks away from the twin towers.  WTC 7 was not hit by an airplane on September 11, 2001, yet it mysteriously collapsed that afternoon, for no apparent reason.  The incident was only briefly mentioned in the news media on September 11 and 12, and was never mentioned again.  It is the most obvious example of a news story going immediately down the "memory hole" into news media oblivion, with no questions asked.

Web page about the collapse of WTC Building 7.  Very interesting.

Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges.  Building 7 became only the third steel building in history before or since 9/11 to collapse from fire damage.  The other two were the North and South towers of the World Trade Center.  Any building that was not owned by Silverstein Properties strangely remained upright.

"Pulling" Building 7:  This statement seems to suggest that the FDNY decided to demolish the building in accordance with [Larry] Silverstein's suggestion, since the phrase "pull it" in this context seems to mean to demolish the building.

WTC 7 'Pulled' By Silverstein, FDNY – Were Towers 'Pulled' Too?  [There are] disturbing correlations between the collapse of WTC 7 and the bombing of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City.  Both buildings were constructed using the same bridge beam system that, in WTC 7's case, allegedly contributed to its demise.  But more importantly WTC 7, like the Murrah building, housed high-level government offices including the FBI, CIA and the Secret Service.  WTC 7 was also the storage facility for millions of files pertaining to active cases involving international drug dealing, organized crime, terrorism and money laundering.

 Editor's Note:   More people are starting to ask questions about Building 7.  And if it's true that Building 7 was imploded, questions arise about the Twin Towers as well.  Keep reading.

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?  In this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges.  I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus impact damage alone caused complete collapses of all three buildings.  And I present evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government.

9/11 We Know is a website that purports to expose how the Twin Towers and Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, were brought down via controlled demolition.  Free downloadable videos lay out the case.

Dam Breaks On 9/11 Truth.  Two more major influential Hollywood stars using their fame to attract attention to 9/11 truth proves the dam is breaking and November's election result has failed to stop the momentum of a growing chorus across the political spectrum demanding answers on inexplicable facets of the 9/11 fraud.

Streisand's hubby publicly questions official 9/11 story.  Actor James Brolin, aka, 'Mr. Barbra Streisand', has joined film director David Lynch in going public with his doubts about the official story behind 9/11. … Brolin offered no reason as to why he waited five years and three months to publicly question the official story behind 9/11, or why he followed in the footsteps of Lynch on the same day.

The Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story of September 11, 2001..

The Investigation of Building 7's Collapse:  What did the government do to investigate the unprecedented collapse of a steel frame building from fires?  It gave FEMA the sole discretion to investigate the collapse, even though FEMA is not an investigative agency.

Building 7.  was the third skyscraper to be reduced to rubble on September 11, 2001.  According to the government, fires, primarily, leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper.  The team that investigated the collapse were kept away from the crime scene.  By the time they published their inconclusive report in May, 2002, the evidence had been destroyed.

Five Years After and We Still Don't Know.  There appears to be a very large energy deficit in the official explanation of the collapse of the two WTC towers, and no explanation for the collapse of WTC 7.

Building 7 Collapse:  At 5:22 p.m. on September 11th, 2001, the 47 story building number 7 of the World Trade Center Plaza came down in slightly over 8 seconds.  The building had not been hit by any plane, nor sustained any significant damage from the "collapse" of the Twin Towers seven hours earlier, nor was there any major fire in the building at the time.  The video clearly show that it was brought down as result of a synchronized demolition.

WTC 7:  Building 7 was the third skyscraper to collapse into rubble on September 11, 2001.  According to the government, small fires leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper.

Indications add up to government conspiracy.  The collapse of steel-frame buildings — such as the World Trade Center Towers — due to fire is unprecedented.  The collapse of Building 7, which was not hit by a plane, is especially inexplicable.  Its collapse late in the afternoon of Sept. 11 exhibited 10 specific features of a controlled demolition, as did the collapse of the Twin Towers.  More important, numerous eyewitnesses attest to hearing multiple explosions at the time.  And, Steven Jones, a professor at Brigham Young University, discovered Thermate, an incendiary compound, in two molten steel samples taken from the site.

BYU Professor on Paid Leave for 9-11 Theory.  Brigham Young University administrators are trying to find out the extent of one professor's involvement in blaming the September 11th terrorist attacks on the government.  According to a copyrighted Deseret Morning News article, Dr. Steven Jones is on paid leave for suggesting the government is responsible for the destruction of the World Trade Center.

On the other hand...
The CIA couldn't have organised this.  Five years after the attack on the World Trade Centre, a group of 75 American academics is claiming that the truth about 9/11 has been covered up.  The leader of the group — Steven E. Jones, a physics professor at a university in Utah — has studied debris from the disaster and concluded that explosives were used to bring down the towers.

Did the Twin Towers Collapse on Demand?  When considering the possibility that the Twin Towers were brought down by explosives there is an interesting variation which is worth considering:  What if the Twin Towers were designed — or re-engineered — so that they could be destroyed in a controlled demolition if circumstances required?

Other WTC Building Collapses:  WTC 6 and WTC 7.  WTC 7, although damaged slightly by falling rubble, stood for about six hours on September 11th, then around 5 p.m. it suddenly fell.  No official explanation for this has ever been given.  This building was completely destroyed, and came down in the manner of a controlled demolition. … [I]t is the manner in which WTC 7 was destroyed that constitutes one of the proofs that 9/11 was an inside job.  Videos of its destruction clearly show that it came down exactly in the manner of a controlled demolition.  This cannot have been the work of 19 Arab hijackers, nor of Osama bin Laden supervising events from his cave in Afghanistan.  The destruction of WTC 7 was brought about by demolition experts — American demolition experts.

The Mysterious Leveling of Building 7.  At 5:20 PM on 9/11/01 the only building with a World Trade Center address that stood on a different block from the rest of the complex, 47-story steel-framed 7 World Trade Center, underwent a sudden total collapse.  Officials and all government reports published since the attack that mention the building blame its collapse on a combination of structural damage and subsequent fires.  However, the available evidence on the condition of Building 7 prior to its collapse fails to document more than superficial structural damage and small isolated fires.

Silverstein, FDNY Razed WTC 7.  Those who argue that the towers were vulnerable in their top-heaviness and verticality cannot then explain the collapse due to fire of WTC 7, a broad-based, 47-story steel-framed building. … In addition, WTC 7 suffered a strangely thorough and complete collapse, leaving only a leveled lot where it once stood. … There [are] also disturbing correlations between the collapse of WTC 7 and the bombing of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City. … WTC 7 was also the storage facility for millions of files pertaining to active cases involving international drug dealing, organized crime, terrorism and money laundering.

9/11 Controlled Demolitions of September 11, 2001.  A 36-minute documentary that's well worth watching.

Robert Fisk:  Even I question the 'truth' about 9/11.  What about the third tower — the so-called World Trade Centre Building 7 (or the Salmon Brothers Building) — which collapsed in 6.6 seconds in its own footprint at 5.20pm on 11 September?  Why did it so neatly fall to the ground when no aircraft had hit it?  The American National Institute of Standards and Technology was instructed to analyse the cause of the destruction of all three buildings.  They have not yet reported on WTC 7.

BBC adds fuel to 9/11 conspiracy theories.  The investigation into the "mysterious" collapse of the third tower of the World Trade Centre will re-examine questions which an official inquiry was designed to answer.  The 47-storey tower collapsed seven hours after the Twin Towers and has become the subject of heated speculation and a host of conspiracy theories which suggest it was brought down by a controlled demolition. … A BBC investigation points out that this would be the first and only skyscraper in the world to collapse solely due to fire.

Bush economist doubts 9-11 story.  Ex-Labor Dept. hand says towers brought down by explosive.

Report Says Fire, Not Explosion, Felled 7 W.T.C..  The collapse of 7 World Trade Center — home at the time to branch offices of the Central Intelligence Agency, the Secret Service and the Giuliani administration's emergency operations center — is cited in hundreds of Web sites and books as perhaps the most compelling evidence that an insider secretly planted explosives, intentionally destroying the tower.

Feds:  Fires took down building next to twin towers.  The building has been the subject of a wide range of conspiracy theories for the last seven years, partly because the collapse occurred about seven hours after the twin towers came down.  That fueled suspicion that someone intentionally blew up the building in a controlled demolition.  Critics like Mike Berger of the group 9/11 Truth said he wasn't buying the government's explanation.  "Their explanation simply isn't sufficient.  We're being lied to," he said, arguing that there is other evidence suggesting explosives were used on the building.

Improbable Collapse:  On September 11, 2001 the World Trade Center Twin Towers disintegrated in a manner that scientists say resembled deliberately calculated implosions.  The facts open for discussion include:  at 5:20 p.m. that same day another building, the 47 story WTC 7, completely collapsed within 70 feet of its footprint in 6.6 seconds.  These three buildings became the first such structures to ever suffer complete collapse due to fire and damage.

The Top 40 Reasons to doubt the official story of September 11th, 2001.  [Reason #14]  All the Signs of a Systematic 9/11 Cover-up:  (a.) Airplane black boxes were found at Ground Zero, according to two first responders and an unnamed NTSB official, but they were "disappeared" and their existence is denied in The 9/11 Commission Report.  (b.) US officials consistently suppressed and destroyed evidence (like the tapes recorded by air traffic controllers who handled the New York flights).  (c.) Whistleblowers (like Sibel Edmonds and Anthony Shaffer) were intimidated, gagged and sanctioned, sending a clear signal to others who might be thinking about speaking out.



 New   An attack on American 612:  The TWA 800 scenario almost happened again!  How many "isolated incidents" can the news media downplay?

What really happened to AA Flight 612.  What makes the evidence particularly compelling is that the pilots apparently saw what the radar was reporting:
      ATC: Flare or a rocket?
      AA 612: It looked more like a rocket.
      ATC: American 612, how far away was it from your position?
      AA 612: It was about half way between us and the coastline when we first called that last center guy.

More on Possible Surface to Air Missile Attempt Against Passenger Aircraft.  Just as suddenly as the story was broadcast, it seemed to have disappeared from the media.



September 11 Analysis:  Numerous articles about unexplained aspects of the events of September 11.

Unanswered questions of September 11:  The killing of nearly 3,000 people on September 11, 2001, is not a "cold case."  But it also is not a closed case, and despite the huge body of evidence collected, unanswered questions remain.  Among them: … What was the Washington target of United Flight 93, which crashed near Shanksville, Pa.?  What motivated 19 relatively well-off Arab men, all Muslims, to become such horrific suicide bombers?

Pressing for the Truth on 9/11:  Within the limits of its 85-minute time frame, 9/11 Press for Truth does an admirable job of effectively presenting some of the most glaring discrepancies, lies, and coverups concerning the deadliest terrorist attack on American soil. ... [It] asks, for instance, why NORAD fighter jets weren't scrambled on that fateful morning. ... The 9/11 Commission Report's explanation, which contradicts four previous explanations by federal officials on this matter (all four of which also contradict each other), is fraught with discrepancies, errors, omissions, and contradictions.

Eye Witness Testimony Is Conclusive That North Tower Collapsed From Controlled Demolition.  William Rodriguez the morning of 9/11 is a miracle.  What happened to his story after-the-fact is a tragedy. ... Declared a hero for saving numerous lives at Ground Zero, he was the janitor on duty the morning of 9/11 who heard and felt explosions rock the basement sub-levels of the north tower just seconds before the jetliner struck the top floors.

9/11 Survivors and Family Members Question the 9/11 Commission Report.  Despite hundreds of eyewitness reports of explosions throughout the Twin Towers by doomed victims, survivors, emergency service personnel, reporters, and bystanders, the 9/11 Commission Report contains virtually no mention of them and entirely ignores them in its conclusions.

9/11 Widows Keep on Asking the Tough Questions.  The widows had high hopes for the 9/11 Commission Report, but when it was published in July of 2004 they were bitterly disappointed. ... "It was a pathetic excuse of a report," says Lorie Van Auken, whose husband Kenneth was killed in WTC I.  "Seventy percent of our questions went unanswered. ... Anyone who appeared for questioning, from Rudy Guliani to George Tenet, was handled with kid gloves and lauded with accolades.  The Commissioners would say, 'You're fabulous, you did a fantastic job on 9/11,' and they would run out the clock.  We couldn't understand what the point was in having a hearing if no substantive questions were being asked or answered."

Read this if you vote or fly.  These documents are documentary proof of a very suspicious long-term relationship between former high-level officials in the federal aviation agencies and an extremely dodgy Israeli company specializing in accessing aircraft computer systems — while in flight.  One needs to remember that the Vigilant Guardian drill that was being run on 9-11 involved computer simulations and false "injects" on the radar monitors of the air traffic controllers at NEADS, NORAD, and the FAA.  When 9-11 happened, the air traffic monitors were thoroughly confused if the attacks were real — or part of the game.

See also 9/11 War Games No Coincidence.

Forewarning:  Willie Brown, former Mayor of San Francisco received a warning about 10 PM on the evening of September 10 to be cautious about air travel.  He was scheduled to fly to into New York City.  Brown refuses to say exactly who gave him the prescient warning, citing only "my security people at the airport."



Other material about the aftermath of 9/11

9/11 Conspiracy Theorists Gather in N.Y..  Polls show that many Americans distrust the government on the subject of Sept. 11.  A Zogby International poll taken in May found that 42% believed the government concealed evidence that contradicts official accounts.

Charges Dropped Against Yee.  Citing national security concerns, the Army on Friday [3/19/2004] dropped all charges against a Muslim chaplain accused of mishandling classified documents at Guantanamo Bay, which houses suspected terrorists.

 Editor's Note:   Because of "national security concerns"?  That's why he was arrested!

'Terrorism' disconnect:  Two international conferences last month wrangled over definitions of terrorism.  The conference in Europe, the Barcelona Euro-Mediterranean Summit, promised to fight terrorism, but couldn't agree on what "terrorism" was.

Propaganda and the eye of the beholder.  Propaganda is sometimes true.  It can be used to advance a policy that is workable, or not, depending on the intent of the one engaging in it.  Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke at the National Defense University last week.  Using truthful propaganda, Gen. Pace said our enemies declared war on us years before September 11, 2001, and have said unequivocally their goal is to "destroy our way of life."

House of God, House of War.  The only way to protect Americans — and, coincidentally, good Iraqis — is to bomb the Najaf mosque into a parking lot, and to announce that any building used for such purposes gets the same treatment.

Nation's Elite AWOL From Military.  A new book expands on a familiar subject:  the absence of America's elite and its governing class — and their children — from the ranks of our nation's military.

U.S. Military Secrets for Sale at Afghan Bazaar.  No more than 200 yards from the main gate of the sprawling U.S. base here, stolen computer drives containing classified military assessments of enemy targets, names of corrupt Afghan officials and descriptions of American defenses are on sale in the local bazaar.  Shop owners at the bazaar say Afghan cleaners, garbage collectors and other workers from the base arrive each day offering purloined goods, including knives, watches, refrigerators, packets of Viagra and flash memory drives taken from military laptops.  The drives, smaller than a pack of chewing gum, are sold as used equipment.

France helped Iraqis escape.  The French government secretly supplied fleeing Iraqi officials with passports in Syria that allowed them to escape to Europe, The Washington Times has learned.

 Supplemental information:   French Products and Companies to Boycott

Update:
French bashing alive and well in parts of America.  Two years after relations between the US and France soured over the Iraq war, French-bashing in America appears alive and well in light of a recent ad campaign by a fast-food chain linking France and cowardice.

ACLJ Letter to the National Education Association:  The purpose of this letter is to formally object to your recommendations to parents and teachers regarding the anniversary of the terrorist attacks of one year ago included on your "Remember September 11th" website.  In particular, we take issue with your advice for parents and teachers:  "Do not suggest any group is responsible."  The problem with this advice is that there is a group responsible, and we know who that group is - an organization of radical Islamic terrorists called al-Qaeda. By advising teachers not to suggest that any group is responsible, you both shortchange our children's education and risk undermining our nation's effort to eradicate terrorists and prevent further terrorist attacks.

Fear and Lockdown in America:  Concerned about potential cyber attacks, business executives and politicians are pushing for more control over information distribution.  In a survey conducted by Business Software Alliance, 82 percent of information technology professionals believe American businesses are ill-equipped to deal with cyber-terrorism.

How to Really Secure the Homeland:  Other than liberating Afghanistan from the Taliban, what has the war accomplished so far?  The routing of the criminal government in Kabul was an excellent thing, but has the threat of a massive terror attack been lessened even slightly?  The Bush administration keeps warning that another September 11 can happen at any time.

We May Not Win This War:  Most people who possess even a moderate degree of political savvy are aware of the axiom that no great civilization was ever defeated from without, unless it was first defeated from within.  In light of this, just how does the United States measure up as it approaches the first anniversary of September 11?  A consideration of U.S. responses to the attacks yields some very disturbing answers.

America Is NOT Winning the War:  To wage a war in self-defense you must know who your enemy is.  But our enemy remains unidentified and, therefore, untargeted. Ours is a war against "terrorism" — a form of violence, not an ideological opponent intent on killing us.  Our enemies, however, are dedicated to a fundamentalist interpretation of Islam, which extols faith, mindless obedience, sacrifice to state and God, primitivism, theocracy.

In Washington, Hindsight is 20/400:  In this context, the current media fetish over "What did Bush know and when did he know it?" back on 9/11 shows neither a left-wing nor a right-wing bias.  Instead, it merely dramatizes the existence of an empty-headed media culture in which our intellectuals and leaders have simply run out of ideas.

Thinking The Unthinkable About Bush:  The media should investigate and report on the seriously flawed intelligence apparatus that could have, and possibly should have prevented 9/11 from happening.  But to suggest, to hint that the President (Bush or Clinton, doesn't matter) allowed it to happen is an outrage of the highest order.

Mailboxes Vanish:  If you've noticed that mailboxes seem harder to find than ever, it's true:  The government has removed almost 7,000 of them since September 11.

U.S. Could Deny GPS to Taliban:  The Defense Department could take steps to limit the usefulness of GPS receivers in the hands of Taliban forces without affecting North American users.

Anti-Radiation Pill In Short Supply:  Here's one bottle of pills you may want to add to your medicine chest — potassium iodide (KI).  If you can find the over the counter drug, it's your only weapon against radiation-induced thyroid cancer should a nuclear explosion or meltdown occur in your city or town.




The Red Cross drifts to the left
... Seems to have slipped out of neutral.

American Red Double Cross:  With a Liberty Fund already filled with a staggering $505 million from average Americans, the ARC has been reluctant to disperse the funds.

 Update:   Red Cross caught red-handed.  Get a Refund!  If you donated to the Red Cross in hopes it would help the WTC victims… they didn't get it!

The neutral politics of the Red Cross:  Somewhere along the way, the Red Cross came out of the field to sit at the table and began taking on the role of rhetoric, seeming no longer content with its long-held status as trusted and neutral guardian of the Geneva conventions around the world.  Indeed, in its self-styled role as a critic of the United States, the Red Cross is giving plenty of competition to the anti-American United Nations.  Its new role is surely most welcome among the anti-war contingent.

Red Cross demands Mid-East action.  The International Committee of the Red Cross has called for immediate political action to contain the "deep crisis" in the West Bank and Gaza.  The statement was an unusual departure from its normally non-political stance.  The ICRC said the measures imposed by Israel had denied the Palestinian population the right to live a normal and dignified life.

Red Cross says global warming caused record disasters in 2007.  Global warming caused a record number of natural disasters across the world in 2007, up nearly 20 percent from a year earlier, the International Federation of the Red Cross said on Thursday [12/13/2007].  "As of 10 October 2007, the Federation had already recorded 410 disasters, 56 percent of which were weather-related, which is consistent with the trend of rising numbers of climate change-related disasters," the IFRC said in its "World Disasters Report".

Red Cross says changing climate worsens disasters.  Climate change is making it harder for many people to access clean water and food, and widening the spread of malaria and dengue fever, the world's largest humanitarian aid agency said on Monday [1/21/2008].  The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) is asking donors for $292 million per year for 2008 and 2009 to help communities steel themselves for the threats of global warming.

Note:  More information about the Red Cross can be found here.



 Related:   Tsunami Relief:  Reconsider the Red Cross.  Laurie Morrow, hostess of a conservative talk radio show in Vermont, cautions against giving your money to Red Cross.  Part of her discontent is with Red Cross's behavior following 9/11.  In November of 2001, "Red Cross officials decided, without the knowledge or consent of most of the donors, that better use of this money could be made than distributing it among the victims.  Acting as if the $564 million were the Red Cross's money rather than donors' money entrusted to them for distribution, the officials decided to spend the money as they saw fit, regardless of the donors' intentions.  They planned to distribute only about 1/3 of the Fund to the victims of September 11th.  $264 million of the $564 million would be set aside for vaguely defined "long-term effects of the disaster."

NRA President's Column by Charlton Heston, December 2001:  "As I write these words, our nation is in a time of great grief and mourning.  A vicious crime, an evil calamity, has been forced upon our union, and the true magnitude of our loss is only beginning to emerge from the destruction."

Iranians linked to bin Laden escape?  Sources say top al-Qaida figures granted safe passage by Tehran.  The conviction is gaining ground in some Western intelligence agencies that Osama bin Laden, his family, Ayman al-Zawahiri and thousands of al-Qaida fighters made good their escape from Afghanistan through the illicit sea route created by Lebanese-Iranian super terrorist Imad Mughniyeh for smuggling operations in the service of terrorist organizations.

The end of an unserious decade:  On Sept. 11, the frivolous era came to an end. Suddenly, for the first time since Gen. Jackson drove the British army out of Louisiana, the enemy was inside the gates, slaughtering thousands.

Hillary Compares Her Critics to Osama bin Laden:  Former first lady, now New York Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton says she knows what it's like to be the victim of the kind of maniacal hatred that cost up to 7,000 of her constituents their lives in the September 11 attacks on Manhattan's Twin Towers.

Senator Clinton's Rhetorical Obscenity:  How Hillary Felt the WTC Pain:  Adversaries of Arkansas's junior Senator from New York should be of good enough cheer.  She will never let them live long without reinforcing their well grounded disdain.

Documentary film:  911:  The Road to Tyranny:  The government needed a crisis to convince the people to willingly give up their liberty in exchange for safety.  911 the Road to Tyranny documents the ruthless history of governments orchestrating terrorist attacks against their own people to scare them into total submission.


Note:  All the material about the UN and the Oil-for-Food scandal has been moved to this page.

Reference  Material

Editor's Note:  Here is a collection of links to other sites worth visiting when gathering information about the War on Terrorism.  Many of these web sites are quite new, as you can imagine.



Rumors of War:  A collection of rumors and hoaxes which have erupted (mostly on the internet) since the World Trade Center incident.  For example, the story about the guy who said he was on the 82nd floor and rode down with the building as it collapsed.  Apparently that has been shown to be false.

Aerial photo of NYC destruction.

The Denied Persons List:  Export Privileges are denied [to each of these people] by written order of the Department of Commerce.

Alphabetical Master List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons [PDF format]


Web sites that have a lot to say about national defense vs. liberty:

Act of War:  As the gruesome bombings of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon demonstrate—and before that, of the USS Cole, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, the U.S. soldiers in Saudi Arabia, the World Trade Center, Pam Am flight 103—America is at war.

In Defense of Freedom

AirSafe dot com:  Useful Information for the Airline Passenger.

9-11 Justice

Project: Safe Skies

America Attacked 9 1 1

Americans to Counter Terrorism

Conservative Truth

Electronic Frontier Foundation

The Center For Democracy and Technology

Newsmax stockpile of War-on-terrorism articles


Other resources:

Usama Bin Laden "Wanted" Poster

FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists Page

Back to The War With No Name
Back to the Media Bias Page
Back to the Home page



War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things.  The decayed and degraded state of morals and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.  The man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight and nothing that he cares more about than his personal safety is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

- John S. Mills (1806-1873)  
English philosopher and economist  



Custom counter developed in-house

Document location http://www.akdart.com/warpage0.html
Updated August 28, 2008.

Page design by Andrew K. Dart  ©2008