News Media Bias
in President Obama's Favor

Note:  You might want to start at the Barack Obama Index Page, especially if you arrived here by using a search engine.

Examples of media bias in Obama's favor are almost too numerous to list — but I'll try.


On the previous page:

Media favoritism in the 2008 presidential campaign

Media favoritism between the November 2008 election and the January 2009 inauguration

Media favoritism in Obama's first term

The Unexpected

ABC is the most obvious about it

The Obama team manipulates the media

"Spontaneous" events and "randomly selected" people

Friday night document dumps


On this page:

The strange case of "Ellie Light"

Barack Obama vs Fox News Channel

And not only Fox News...
White House pressure is applied to all who disagree

Obama and the news media versus Toyota

Using doctors as props on the White House lawn

Using the National Endowment for the Arts as a propaganda tool




The strange case of "Ellie Light"

Is this person a White House employee or just an activist?
Obama has suspicious number of letter-writing fans named 'Ellie Light'.  Ellie Light sure gets around.  In recent weeks, Light has published virtually identical "Letters to the Editor" in support of President Barack Obama in more than a dozen newspapers.  Every letter claimed a different residence for Light that happened to be in the newspaper's circulation area.

Obama-Loving Spammer 'Ellie Light' Dupes 42 Newspapers.  In January, an anonymous person supposedly named "Ellie Light" launched a massive PR campaign on behalf of President Barack Obama.  The goal appears to have been to infiltrate as many newspapers as possible to spread pro-Obama propaganda — as if the press needed the help. ... It seems that lying about your identity is not a big deal if you write gushing praise of Barack Obama — and even if you get caught, the mainstream media will actively keep it covered up.

Is This the President's Fake Letter to the Editor:  The Cleveland Plain Dealer newspaper happened upon a curious letter to the editor in support of President Obama that seems to have suddenly popped up in nearly 40 newspapers across the country all at once. ... The whole thing stinks of an astroturf effort — an effort to carpet the news with a fake grass-roots styled letter.  Who had the power to get this letter placed in so many papers all on the same day?

New Bogus Obama Letter To Editor Writer Turns Up.  The letters are nearly identical in grammar, tone, and gist.  The letters also contain the following closing statement:  "...and a president can't just wave a magic wand and fix everything."  That may be true, but the President's political adviser David Axlerod can wave a magic wand and send letters to a few dozen newspapers all under the same name, after all he is the master of Astroturf.

Ellie Light responds:  Prolific pro-Obama letter writer talks about her online critics.  Ellie Light has responded to her critics, but has kept her location — and perhaps her true identity — a secret.  A well-traveled letter writer who has used dozens of different addresses to publish a pro-Obama letter-to-the-editor in at least 40 newspapers around the country in recent weeks denies allegations that she's secretly a White House official or is part of an organized propaganda campaign.

'I'm Ellie Light,' California man says.  Ellie Light, the ubiquitous letter writer whose name appeared in newspapers nationwide praising President Barack Obama, appears to really be a male health care worker from California.  A man who identified himself as Winston Steward, 51, of Frazier Park, Calif., says he made up the name "Ellie Light" to protect himself from criticism and possible physical attacks, and used fake addresses across the country to get local newspapers to publish his letters.

The lesson of Ellie Light:  Obama's so hard up for advocates these days that this is the best he can do.


Barack Obama vs Fox News Channel

Obama's third war on Fox News.  President Obama is using the Department of Justice to attack the parent company of Fox News as he springs his third War on Fox News.  Barack Obama hates Fox News.  I know not why.  I do know that in August 2007, as a rookie senator, Barack Obama forced cancellation of a Congressional Black Caucus-Fox News presidential debate.  Any reader's guess is as good as mine as to why he is at war with Fox News, but that was his first War on Fox News.

Obama's Fox hunt.  President Obama is targeting critics in the media.  As his poll numbers continue to decline and his re-election chances grow dimmer by the day, he is increasingly resorting to authoritarian tactics.  His latest move:  The Justice Department is preparing subpoenas as part of a preliminary investigation into News Corp.

Obama Press Aide E-Mails: Fox News Anchor Bret Baier 'Is a Lunatic'.  No one expects the White House to like the Fox News Channel — since they expect every media outlet to be obsequious, and so many oblige.  But White House e-mails acquired by the group Judicial Watch demonstrate that the animus gets a little heated in private.

Emails reveal White House calling Fox News host Baier 'a lunatic'.  Back in 2009, the feud between the Fox News Channel and President Barack Obama's administration reached its height.  Then-White House Communications Director Anita Dunn publicly attacked the network on CNN, and former Fox News host Glenn Beck spearheaded an effort that resulted in the resignation of White House "green jobs czar" Van Jones.

E-mails Show Obama Effort to Blackball Fox.  It's not a secret that the Obama White House and media outlets like Fox News have been at odds over the past two years, but new White House E-mails revealed today show how the Fox-administration relationship foundered back in 2009.  Released by watchdog Judicial Watch, the E-mails suggest a bias against Fox News as a whole and one of its anchors, Bret Baier, specifically.  "He's a lunatic," says one of the White House E-mails.

The Left is Hunting Fox News.  With the Obama presidency teetering, the Left needs something on which to latch.  So now that there's been wrongdoing done by a Murdoch run newspaper, the Left smells blood in the water and now wants the Fox News Channel to be investigated.  The Left is hunting Fox News.  As much as the Left loathes the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann and Dick Cheney, they probably despise Fox News even more.

White House:  Fox News 'a wing of the Republican Party'.  The Obama administration declared Fox News — and its owner, reporters and commentators — shills for the President's Republican opponents Sunday [10/11/2009].  "Let's not pretend they're a news network," White House communications director Anita Dunn said on CNN's "Reliable Sources," firing the latest salvo in the long-simmering feud.

Obama has found his oppressor.  Why would President Obama openly challenge the highest rated news channel in existence? ... Many in the media are scratching their heads trying to figure out why a sitting President would do something so foolish.  The answer is simple.  Obama's stock and trade when he was a community organizer was peddling a victimization mentality that blames all manner of bogeymen but never looks at the culture of failure that created the conditions he railed against.  For a every victim our community organizer needs an oppressor.

Why Declaring War on Fox News Could Be a Mistake for Obama.  Over the weekend, White House communications director Anita Dunn announced the official beginning of the Obama administration's war with Fox News.  Of course, the battle has been openly brewing for months now.  Even during the campaign, Obama's team gave up on sending surrogates to the network.  "It was beyond diminishing returns," Dunn told the New York Times.  "It was no returns."  But now the war is out in the open.

How Dare They!  The White House is attacking Fox News again:  it's insufficiently obsequious for the White House's taste.  It's a "research arm" of the Republican party, you see.  And no, it's not just Glenn Beck or Sean Hannity whom the Obama team is miffed at — it's the whole network.

The press should stick up for Fox News.  For the first time since Nixon, we have a president who is so vain and so thin of skin that he has an enemies list.  As the boycott led by the Jones group showed, this administration is not above acting against its enemies, even pursuing economic sanctions.  Obama's juvenile boycott of appearing on Fox News is unpresidential.

Video of Obama Communications Director Claiming Mao One of Her 'Favorite Political Philosophers'.  The feud between the White House and the Fox News Channel took another, thanks to one of Glenn Beck's viewers.  On Beck's Oct. 15 program, the Fox News host played video sent to him of White House Communications Director Anita Dunn, who had previously slammed Fox News and called it an organ of the Republican Party.

Why the White House Picked Anita Dunn to Wage War With Fox.  This weekend, after White House communications director Anita Dunn forthrightly declared war on Fox News, some people thought she might have gone a little too far in explaining a tacit understanding in the Obama administration that they didn't deal directly with the right-leaning network. ... But of course, Dunn's statements had been carefully scripted by the Obama team — as is pretty much everything you hear from them, except things that are supposed to be off the record.

Fox News Locked Out.  On September 20, 2009, Obama appeared on five Sunday morning news shows in one day — Fox News Sunday was not included.  Two weeks later, following what the New York Times referred to as a "Fox Summit" between Roger Ailes, chairman of Fox News, and David Axelrod, senior adviser to President Obama, Fox News was told they wouldn't get to conduct any Obama interviews in the foreseeable future and all members of the administration, from the top down, were ordered to stay off Fox News.

Unlike Nixon, Obama's Media Attacks Generate Little Press Anger.  Is Barack Obama turning into Spiro Agnew?  The White House's attacks on the Fox News smack of the distaste for media opposition espoused by Nixon's vice president almost 40 years ago but are being met with a decidedly different reaction today by the elite media.

White House Cites Opinion Shows as Basis for Fox News Complaints.  White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs on Tuesday [10/20/2009] pointed to two top-rated opinion shows on Fox News as the reason why the Obama administration has castigated the network as an illegitimate news organization.

White House:  Media shouldn't follow Fox.  A White House attempt to delegitimize Fox News — which in past times would have drawn howls of censorship from the press corps — has instead been greeted by a collective shrug.

Media Wars:  White House Crosses the Line.  Every White House complains about its press coverage.  A contentious relationship between the Executive Branch and a free and independent media is part of America's DNA.  Always has been.  But this White House seems to feel they're different. ... Not since Nixon conjured up an "enemies list" have we seen the full weight of the Office of the Presidency brought to bear in such a targeted and deliberate effort to delegitimize a media organization critical of the President.

FCC-Church Conspiracy to Silence Talk Radio and Fox?  What we are documenting here is a full-fledged assault on conservative media.  On talk radio and on Fox News.  An assault by name on some, on others with their names left out, but surely every bit the target as the others.  You can be assured that also in the bull's-eye here is Sean Hannity, Mark Levin and others.  Someone like Levin, who has both a popular talk radio show and a bestselling book, would be of particular concern.  So too those without their own shows but with successful books and websites — the Michelle Malkins, Dick Morrises.  Surely Andrew Breitbart, already in their sites for the ACORN investigation, sits on this enemies list.

Obama Attempts to 'Wag the Fox'.  [Saul] Alinksy, a left-wing community organizer and author, advised his acolytes to "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.  In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities.  One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and 'frozen.'"  Recent comments by White House Communications Director Anita Dunn have done nothing to allay conservatives' suspicion.

Media Matters & President Obama in Lockstep.  Revival of right-wing conspiracy charges are all the rage in the age of Obama, but liberals are just playing the same old shell game.  The real action is on the left, with lockstep collusion by the President with Soros-funded Media Matters.  While the President sends his surrogates onto national network programs to decry Fox News, Media Matters is behind the scenes working its Fight Fox campaign.

Why the White House attack on Fox is backfiring.  A number of mainstream journalists are reacting badly to the attempt to declare a journalistic organization off-limits.  Why the negative reaction?  Is it because of solidarity among reporters?  A reflexive defense of freedom of the press?  Secret sympathy for Fox?  None of the above.  The real reason the White House campaign is backfiring is that it offends journalistic self-esteem.  Most mainstream reporters are already ignoring stories critical of the Obama administration that Fox plays up.

Obama's war on Fox & half the country.  On the one hand, we should celebrate the war between Fox News and the White House.  It is a good thing President Obama & Co. are angry with Fox.  It means Fox is doing its job, you know, holding the Executive Branch accountable, like a real news organization.  This is good news.  Traditionally in America, the Fourth Estate's role has been to challenge those in power, challenge the assumptions, examine the assertions, and check for accuracy, all the while carrying both sides of the story.

Mass media and private liberty.  The spectacle of a White House warring against the single television news network which does not fawn over the president, and attacking his most prominent talk radio show critic, brings home just how bureaucratized information, opinion, and thought have become in America.  In television news a handful of institutions determine what is newsworthy and what is not for those tens of millions who only get news from the video screen.  That decision — what is "news" — decides everything.

The Real Flaw:  Fox Is a No-Fawn Zone.  [Scroll down]  Now, I happen to agree with Obama boosters who argue that the president has no obligation to appear on Fox News shows.  If Obama and his minions don't think they can hold their own with Chris Wallace, they are free to cower in their comfy offices.

'Radio Free America'.  [Scroll down slowly]  It is no mystery why the White House has made Fox News a target.  If its reporting and commentating were not effective in exposing things the administration does not want the public to know, Fox would be ignored.  But it is increasingly effective because the public is sensing that the administration has a lot to hide about its personnel, ideology and objectives.

The Grating Communicator.  I think the administration should have picked someone other than David Axelrod to deliver the claim that Fox News is "not really news," inasmuch as Axelrod was behind the leak of scurrilous allegations in Jack Ryan's sealed divorce papers when he was running for a Senate seat against Obama.  Talk about vicious personal gossip.

White House shows immaturity, thin skin .  By brazenly declaring war on a member of the Fourth Estate, the Obama administration is making a first-rate error in judgment.  Just because White House officials, and maybe even President Barack Obama himself, don't like Fox News doesn't mean they have the right to decide that the network is — in the words of White House Communications Director Anita Dunn — "opinion journalism masquerading as news."

The Editor says...
If the White House staff objects to "opinion journalism masquerading as news", they should boot Helen Thomas out of the daily press briefings at the White House.  She's an opinion writer, not a reporter.

Fox Wars:  The 'post-partisan' president makes an enemies list.  Rahm Emanuel once sent a dead fish to a live pollster.  Now he's put a horse's head in Roger Ailes's bed.  Not very subtle.  And not very smart.  Ailes doesn't scare easily.

Why the White House Bullies Fox.  The Obama team isn't at war with Fox because it's conservative.  They're angry because Fox has embarrassed them.

The White House wages an unworthy media war.  Politicians are sounding a little paranoid about the media these days.  The White House is trying to blockade the largest cable news network.  A House candidate called the police when a reporter asked her about abortion.  Congressional leaders turn to angry media critics as they talk about why support for health care legislation remains tepid.  Lashing out at the press has always been a popular play for politicians in distress, and it's often a precursor to eventual failure.

Obama Manipulates Media to Expel Fox.  Whether the White House's "war" against Fox News is a ruse to divert attention from President Barack Obama's plummeting poll numbers and unfavorable policies, or an all-out attack to exclude Fox News from the White House press pool, the self-proclaimed government "watch dogs" are virtually AWOL or turncoats.

An Open and Transparent Presidency, Complete with an Enemies List.  By October 22 the White House had created a schedule for the White House Press Corps to interview Pay Czar Kenneth Feinberg.  However, to the surprise of all (well maybe not a complete surprise) this interview schedule excluded Fox News.  Fortunately, ABC, NBC, CNN and CBS refused to interview Feinberg unless Fox was also permitted to do so.  Reinstated to the White House Press pool through the heroic efforts of their colleagues, Fox News White House correspondent Major Garrett eventually succeeded in interviewing Mr. Feinberg.

Obama Escalates Feud:  Administration Attempts to Exclude Fox News from White House Pool.  Just when you thought the White House couldn't possibly do anything to make their bizarre feud with the Fox News Channel an even larger spectacle — the administration manages to take it to another level.

Obama a tough guy, at least with Fox News.  The most recent whine — the anti-Fox campaign — is, apart from anything else, unbecoming to the office.  President Obama is the chief of state of one of the oldest free societies in the world, but his official White House Web site runs teasers such as:  "For even more Fox lies, check out the latest 'Truth-O-Meter.'"  It gives off the air of somebody only marginally less paranoid than this week's president-for-life in some basket-case banana republic ranting on the palace balcony because his interior security chief isn't doing a fast-enough job of disappearing his enemies.

Administration Loses Bid to Exclude Fox News From Pay Czar Interview.  The Obama administration on Thursday [10/22/2009] tried to make "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg available for interviews to every member of the White House pool except Fox News.  But the Washington bureau chiefs of the five TV networks decided that none of their reporters would interview Feinberg unless Fox News was included.

FOX and Foes.  President Obama has yet to decide on deploying more troops to fight the Taliban, but his administration is resolved to defeat at least one pressing security threat:  FOX News.  For the past week, the administration has been waging a full-bore political offensive against the cable news network.

Obama's Third World get-the-press rant.  Rush Limbaugh, Matt Drudge and Fox News are big enough to take care of themselves, but the implications of what the Obamanauts are trying to do are scary, indeed.  Brisk and even brutal opposition is something every president must endure; it's a pity that Mr. Obama skipped school the day the class studied American history.

Obama's War on Fox Is Liberalism's War on Dissent.  A handful of liberals, to be fair, have criticized Obama for his war on Fox News and conservative talkers.  But most aren't the least bit troubled by it and are probably secretly relishing it.  Have you ever heard prominent liberal voices go after Keith Olbermann or other extremely liberal and biased MSNBC or CNN hosts as they have Fox and Sean Hannity?

Obama's War on FOX.  [Scroll down]  The assaults sunk to new lows this week when President Obama personally entered the scene.  Illustrating just how thin-skinned our commander-in-chief is, he pronounced that Fox News is "operating basically as talk radio," meaning, talk radio allows people to criticize Obama.  It is particularly telling when a president stoops to the level of criticizing a news organization, because it reveals how desperate, frightened and threatened he truly feels.

Light 'em Up, Fox News.  Obama loves the media as long as it loves him, and not a New York minute longer. ... The first target of Barry O's administration was radio juggernaut Rush Limbaugh. ... Their second target is now Fox News, which Barry O's administration claims is a mouthpiece for the Republican Party and, as such, has imposed a White House blockade against Fox News in hopes of damaging the fair and balanced network.  Bad move.

Maybe Obama will publicly attack akdart.com ...
Ratings for Fox News up 10% since attacks by Obama.  The last couple of days have seen the White House back off a bit — no doubt they realize the mistake they've made.  But the perception is out there that this is a very thin skinned president who will attack those who don't worship at his feet.

Whose Idea Was It To Go After Fox News?  If Fox hadn't covered the specifics about what Obamacare will really cost taxpayers, and covered the growing anti-government tea parties, and the September 12th march on Washington, would the health care reform bill have already passed both houses of Congress without anybody actually reading it?  Isn't that why Democrat-controlled committees in Congress are now hiding behind closed doors and not letting in Republicans or the press?

'Non-news channel' tops in Fort Hood coverage.  Fox News Channel was the cable channel of choice for Americans eager for news about the Fort Hood massacre Thursday night [11/5/2009] according to Bill Gorman of TV by the Numbers.  Similar to election night coverage two days earlier, in overwhelming numbers viewers turned to "the non news network," as President Barack Obama's strategists Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod derisively labeled it, for information and updates on the unfolding tragedy.

The Mao The Merrier.  Anita Dunn may be leaving with her little red book, but her husband enters as the next White House counsel, bringing experience in suppressing dissent, assaulting the First Amendment and limiting speech.  Dunn, whose favorite philosophers include mass murderer Mao Zedong, was expected to leave after a short stint.  She rose to fame as chief strategist for former Senate majority leader, now national health care guru, Tom Daschle.  While serving as White House communications director, she was the commanding general of the administration "war" on Fox News.

Fox and Foes.  Whenever I hear people outside the administration prattle on about how evil and biased Fox News is, I know I am listening to a flock of parrots who have never even tuned in.  As a conservative myself, I have a number of problems with the network.  For one thing, I resent Bill O'Reilly's ridiculing those who merely ask for documentation that their president was born in the United States, and I also wish he'd stop defending Obama against charges that he's a Socialist or worse.

Fox News Making More Money Than All Its Rivals, Combined.  When it comes to Fox News, otherwise rational people — and even some who were irrational to begin with, such as your average progressive — suddenly become deranged and start foaming at the mouth.

Six for Six.  What was the White House thinking when it decided to single out the Fox News Channel for derision?  Sure it might have impressed some of Obama's most ardent followers, but as a general rule it's not a good idea to insult the viewing public.

The dividends keep coming in...
The First Amendment.  Real Clear Politics reports that Fox News audience numbers continue to climb while Air America has declared bankruptcy.  "According to Neilsen, Fox News drew an astonishing 6.2 million total viewers during primetime Tuesday night [1/19/2010], compared to only 1.5 million for CNN and 1.1 million for MSNBC."  But it is not just the shifts within the industry that are tectonic.  The whole scene has been disturbed by a Supreme Court decision.

FOX News' Bret Baier Shows Why Obama Has Been Dodging FOX News.  [Scroll down]  In response, Baier was respectful, but not intimidated.  Unlike most of the legacy media interviewers, Baier understands that he represents more than himself and his network.  He represents the viewing public.

Why the White House Bullies Fox:  The Obama team isn't at war with Fox because it's conservative.  They're angry because Fox has embarrassed them.

Irony:
Look what cable news channel Obama's own Justice Dept. chooses to watch.  The briefing room's main TV's are tuned to the top-rated cable news channel.  Trouble is, that's the dreaded Fox News Channel that Obama aides including David Axelrod so weirdly picked a fight with last fall...

Cavuto Strikes Back At Gibbs For His 'Botched White House Presser'.  Fox News's Neil Cavuto on Wednesday [5/5/2010] struck back at Robert Gibbs for his "botched White House presser."  On Tuesday, the White House press secretary took exception with Cavuto inviting former FEMA director Michael Brown on the previous day's "Your World" to offer a conspiracy theory about the Obama administration's response to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.  As NewsBusters reported, Gibbs badly misstated what Brown said during the interview as he chastised Fox's Wendell Goler who had absolutely nothing to do with it.

Are conservatives suspicions regarding the media justified?  Yes.  Howard Kurtz whines that "[Conservative] candidates seem to regard it as an affront when reporters challenge them on their past statements and inconsistencies, which is a basic function of journalism.  They are avoiding or limiting interviews with all but the friendliest faces as a way of circumventing the press.  And some of them delight in skewering the mainstream media, a tactic that plays well with their base."  It's interesting that Kurtz doesn't mention the Obama administration's attempt to boycott Fox News, and its ongoing complaints about that network.

Somewhat related:
Group Claims FNC Lies, Proceeds to Lie About Fox, Tea Party.  Reading through material from the "Turn Off Fox" campaign, one gets the very clear impression that the folks at the Fox News Channel are bold-faced liars.  They have "no regard for the truth," and uses "half-truths" to push a "stream of misinformation" and "distortions of the truth."  Turn Off Fox is a project started by Color of Change, the far-left political organization founded by neo-Marxist and black liberation theologist Van Jones.

Obama:  Fox News is 'destructive' to America.  President Obama is pulling no punches when it comes to Fox News, declaring the cable news outlet to be "destructive to [America's] long-term growth."  In a more than 8,000-word interview with Rolling Stone Magazine, Obama compared the cable news channel to papers owned by William Randolph Hearst at the turn of the 20th century that unabashedly pushed the media titan's own political views.

Obama Says Fox News 'Destructive' for U.S. Growth.  President Barack Obama on Tuesday [9/28/2010] called Fox News Channel "ultimately destructive for the long-term growth" of the United States, reopening a long-running feud with the conservative cable network that has led the U.S. conservative media's opposition to his administration.

The Editor says...
After everything Mr. Obama has done to this country, [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] he certainly has a lot of nerve to criticize Fox News.

Fox News' Viewpoint "Destructive" for U.S. Growth, Obama Says.  In this month's cover story for Rolling Stone magazine, President Obama weighs in on the cable network Fox News, saying that while he can't object to the network carrying out its constitutional right to freedom of the press, he thinks it promotes a perspective that is "ultimately destructive for the long-term growth" of America.

Is Obama launching a new fall attack on Fox News?  Last year at this time, President Obama and his top White House advisers were about to launch a disastrous campaign against Fox News.  I say disastrous because the acting communications director, Anita Dunn, who sounded the call to arms on Howard Kurtz's "Reliable Sources" show, would resign within weeks.  By then, the president and his innermost circle — after going on every major non-Fox news show to attack TV's highest-rated cable news channel as "not really being a news channel" — were in full retreat.

Obama's War Against Fox News.  If President Barack Obama's television has a V-Chip it's likely set to block Fox News rather than content unsuitable for family viewing.  Obama's latest salvo against the "fair and balanced" network came courtesy of an interview in Rolling Stone magazine, a publication which afflicts the comfortable only when a Republican is lounging in the White House La-Z-Boy recliner.

Obama:  Embattled, Embittered, and Lashing Out.  Barack Obama's recent interview with Rolling Stone magazine paints a portrait of a president under siege and lashing out.  For example, the Tea Party is, according to Obama, the tool of "very powerful, special-interest lobbies" — except for those in the Tea Party whose motivations are "a little darker, that have to do with anti-immigrant sentiment or are troubled by what I represent as the president."  Fox News, the president informs us, "is ultimately destructive for the long-term growth of a country that has a vibrant middle class and is competitive in the world."

Obama and His Enemies.  It's not at all unusual for presidents to have difficulties with the press.  What is unusual is for a president to take on a single news outlet, accuse it of bias, and ignore the opposite bias in most of the other outlets, pretending that the news business itself has no generally capitalist aspect, and that the station that cares about its success is the mercenary exception rather than the rule.

FOX Rocks, CNN Dumps as the Internet Pumps.  While President Obama claims he doesn't pay attention for FOX or talk radio (yet finds time to condemn both) the fact is his advisers are keyed in to every broadcast to take the temperature of the opposition.

Panic sets in on the left.  Two recent headline stories:  1) Chinese police have arrested prominent writer Ran Yunfei for challenging the ruling Communist Party; the latest in a string of arrests in a deepening crackdown on dissent.  2) The George Soros-funded Media Matters has announced open guerilla warfare and sabotage of Fox News and various conservative blog sites.  They plan to intimidate, through character assassination and opposition research, the executives and personalities at all levels of these organizations.


It's not just Fox News.
White House pressure is applied to all who disagree

Crushing the media.  The American media elected Obama.  No presidential candidate's past ever went so deliberately underexposed.  So the attack on Fox may simply have been payback to the networks that are hemorrhaging viewers, the equivalent for the media of a night in the Lincoln bedroom.  Whatever the rationale, Team Obama's apparatchiks were fully in step with the global left's war on freedom of speech.

The White House Stupidly Goes To War With Car Website Edmunds.com.  It is an odd, and we'd say regrettable, pattern of this White House that it lets itself get dragged down into fights with specific media outlets. ... But in addition to Fox News, now The White House is going after highly-respected and influential car site Edmunds.com.

'Clunkers' critique draws fire from White House.  The White House lashed out again Thursday [10/29/2009] at a media outlet, calling the automotive site Edmunds.com "wrong (again)" for saying that the "cash for clunkers" program cost too much money and had little lasting impact on car sales or the economy.

Why Liberal Journalists are Joining the Obama Administration's Attack on Fox News.  While the Obama Administration continues its war against its media critics, well known liberal journalists — instead of defending freedom of the press — are joining the attack on a news network they despise as much as does the Administration.  Gone is any seeming concern for the right of commentators to voice their own opinion, because mainstream liberal editorial writers are sure their opponents are both extremists and wrong.

The Vilification of Rush.  Liberals would prefer no opposition.  Behind the force field of political correctness, there should never be any disagreement once the liberal mind has decided that something is good for society.  There can be no opposition to the "correct" way of thinking, and if you don't think "correctly," you are attacked.  Those who dare to disagree with liberal orthodoxy are punished sooner or later.

New Anti-Limbaugh-Beck Group Tied To Ex-Obama Czar Van Jones.  A new left-wing organization created specifically to attack Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Lou Dobbs, Pat Buchanan, and Paul Brown has ties to ex-Obama green jobs czar Van Jones.

White House's Media Attacks Part of a Troubling Trend.  The White House is taking it upon itself to police the news media.  The trend started of course with the Fox News Channel, but the administration has moved on to bash other organizations, most recently the Associated Press and car site Edmunds.com.  It seems to believe that any criticism of its policies is worth attacking.

This isn't White House pressure, but the effect is the same:
High School student in danger for disagreeing with Obama.  A high percentage of Americans believed race relations would improve with the election of America's first black president.  Today, that percentage has dropped dramatically.  Could it be because the Obama administration, at every turn, has shamelessly exploited race to further its agenda?  The message of the liberal media/Obama administration tag team comes across loud and clear.  If you disagree with Obama, we will brand you a racist and we will hurt you.

Obama will attack anyone who makes him look bad.
White House Attacks Gallup Now.  White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs lashed out at Gallup polling today for releasing poll data that the administration does not like.  The most recent Gallup poll shows President Obama's approval ratings at 47 percent, the lowest rating on record at this point in any presidency.

The Obama 4 year plan to re-make America.  [Scroll down]  President Obama wants more than to just simply remain a favorite of the Media.  He intends to silence the few remaining bastions of free information that countenance any significant opposition to his ideology, if not by excluding them from key press conferences, then by effectively sending his minions to publicly demonize them.

Dems rip Rasmussen.  The pointed attacks reflect a hardening conventional wisdom among prominent liberal bloggers and many Democrats that Rasmussen Reports polls are, at best, the result of a flawed polling model and, at worst, designed to undermine Democratic politicians and the party's national agenda.

The White House resorts to mocking derision:
Talk to the hand.  Say one thing for White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs:  The hypocrite's got chutzpah.  Too bad he's so dumb.  Gibbs took a moment from his Tuesday [2/9/2010] press briefing to mock Sarah Palin for delivering a speech at last weekend's Tea Party convention in Nashville — with notes ("Energy," "Tax cuts," etc.) scribbled on her hand.  Gibbs stood at the podium and showed his press audience that he had jotted down "Eggs," "Milk," "Hope" and "Change" on his hand.

Mr. President, I demand that you attack me.  President Obama attacked Rush Limbaugh — and his ratings went up.  President Obama attacked Fox News — and its ratings went up.  President Obama called for a boycott of Glenn Beck — and his ratings went up.  Now he has attacked Karl Rove.

The Editor says...
I've heard that President Obama secretly harbors a grudge against  akdart.com.


Obama and the news media versus Toyota

One way to pay back the unions for their support in the 2008 presidential campaign -- while propping up the recently nationalized GM and Chrysler -- is to amplify the troubles of the most popular foreign auto makers.  Personally, I don't buy "the floormats make the accelerator stick" when the gas pedal is connected to a computer, and the computer decides whether the gas pedal is up or down.  Nonetheless, it is beginning to appear that the Obama administration is drumming up unnecessary panic.

Gangster government targets Toyota.  What is it about the automotive industry that inspires such thuggish attitudes in the Obama administration? ... Given the Obama administration's catering to one of its favorite special interest groups, the United Auto Workers union, during the government's bailouts of General Motors and Chrysler last year, it is difficult to avoid wondering whether Toyota has become a victim of the Chicago Way of dealing with competitors.

Local Toyota dealer calls LaHood's comments 'ridiculous' and 'irresponsible'.  Kent Newbold could not believe what he was hearing Wednesday [2/3/2010] when the nation's leading transportation official initially warned Toyota drivers to stop driving their cars.  "It was ridiculous," said Newbold, owner of a Toyota dealership in O'Fallon [Illinois]. "It's irresponsible, and it's not necessary."

The war on Toyota:  There can be little doubt that Toyota, the world's greatest automaker in recent years, has become the victim of much more than another typical out-of-control All-American media frenzy. ... The attack on Toyota, at this time of U.S. economic weakness and populist excess, is fast turning into a great American nationalist assault on a foreign corporation, an economic war.  The White House has denied any such motivation on the part of the United States.  But that denial lacks credibility.

Does the Government Pose a Bigger Threat to Toyota Than its Sticky Pedals?  Toyota's bad press has been for its sticky pedal incident certainly isn't surprising, but is all the negative attention warranted?  When asked about the Toyota recalls, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood responded by saying, "My advice to anyone who owns one of these vehicles is stop driving it, and take it to the Toyota dealership because they believe they have the fix for it" and that "we're not finished with Toyota."  Hood later toned down his remarks but immediately after his "stop driving" comment, Toyota's stocks plummeted.

After Toyota's Hit, Why Invest Here?  Now that Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has served notice he's "not finished" with Toyota, how keen will other foreigners be to invest and create jobs here? This political show could cost us.  The grandstanding against Toyota over a safety issue hasn't been limited to LaHood.  House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman also got out front the cameras to announce congressional hearings.

AFP Asks:  'Is US Bullying Toyota on Recall?'  [Scroll down]  If the government hadn't decided to become the controlling owner of two auto companies, the worst suspicion would be that it's picking on a foreign-based competitor of a large U.S. industry.  Now the suspicion is that it's trying to hurt the strongest foreign-based competitor of two companies it controls and from which it hopes (someday) to recover tens of billions of dollars it has thrown at them.  No amount of outwardly professional behavior will negate the existence of that inherent multibillion-dollar conflict.

Toyota and the Union-Backed, Government-Led Witch Hunt.  Toyota, which employs over 35,000 workers in the United States with factories in eight states, is the target of a government-led and union-supported attack due to recent recalls.

DOT Spokesperson's ACORN-y Background 'Very Telling'.  So in Barack Obama's America, what happens to a person who ... In October 2008, registered to vote in the Buckeye State, even though she was not a resident, and apparently obtained an early-voting ballot?  [And] Along with a dozen others, avoided a threatened felony prosecution that month by signing "a form letter asking the Franklin County elections board to pull their names from the rolls."  Why, you get hired by Uncle Sam at what is probably a six-figure salary to be a Transportation Department spokesperson.  Isn't that obvious?

The taint in the Toyota probe:  Regardless whether one loves or hates Toyota, a herd of huge elephants in the living room of this controversy have thus far been completely ignored in news reports and analysis.  These include, first, a pair of related conflicts of interest underlying the government's role, and, second, the disreputable records of several key "expert" witnesses in the mounting crusade against the besieged automaker. ... The other conflict of interest is with the government's major partner in GM ownership, the United Auto Workers union.

Toyota tangled in Washington show trial.  Congress dragged Toyota to Washington to testify in one of the indignant show trials they so love.  I wish they would subpoena themselves and bring Congress before a Senate hearing, under oath and under the hot lights of TV cameras.  Then we might get to the roots of most problems in America:  too much government intervention, confusing rules, and second-guessing politicians.

Sudden Acceleration of Washington Falsehoods.  Overwrought, tort-fed accusations of automakers designing "killing machines" have historically been based on half-baked, even fraudulent, manipulations of data.  When Audi was accused of making runaway cars in the 1980s, 60 Minutes doctored accelerator pedals.  In 1993 NBC used hidden rockets strapped to the bottom of GM trucks to make them explode to "prove" GM's side-saddle gas tank design was unsafe.  Now the other shoe is dropping in the Toyota "sudden acceleration" case.

What are the odds your Prius will kill you?  Prof. Paul Fishbeck of Carnegie-Mellon University, did the calculation on that choice between walking a mile or driving it in a recalled Prius.  Here's his conclusion: ... "Walking a mile is 19 times or 1,900 percent more dangerous than driving a mile in a recalled Toyota."

Is the White House sitting on a report that exonerates Toyota?  With the Obama eager to justify the GM bailout by pushing Chevy's new "electric lemon," Walter Olson at the indispensable Overlawyered blog discusses whether that the White House is sitting on a report that clears Toyota in the sudden acceleration fracas.


Using doctors as props on the White House lawn

3 of 4 doctors flanking Obama at event donated to his campaign.  Not only did the four doctors who flanked President Obama at his White House press event on Monday [10/5/2009] recommend his plan; three out of four of them donated to his presidential campaign.  It could be an ad slogan to put the toothpaste marketers who like to brag that nine out of ten doctors recommend their brand to shame.

White House's botched 'op'.  A sea of 150 white-coated doctors, all enthusiastically supportive of the president and representing all 50 states, looked as if they were at a costume party as they posed in the Rose Garden before hearing Obama's pitch for the Democratic overhaul bills moving through Congress.  The physicians, all invited guests, were told to bring their white lab coats to make sure that TV cameras captured the image.

White Coats at the White House.  With each new day, President Obama seems more and more all show and no substance.  The latest:  a glitzy photo-op to push his health-care plans.  Monday [10/5/2009], the White House assembled 150 hand-picked doctors to tout the "wonders" of ObamaCare.  Alas, not everyone followed the careful instructions to bring their white lab coats.  No problem:  As The Post's Charles Hurt reported, presidential staffers rustled up a whole bunch of them (left over from the set of "ER," no doubt) and gave them out to anyone needing one.

Spin Doctors for Obamacare.  Lights, camera, agitprop!  The curtains opened on yet another artfully staged performance of Obamacare Theater this week.  One hundred and fifty doctors took their places on the plush lawn outside the West Wing — many acting like "Twilight" groupies with cameras instead of credible medical professionals.  The president approved the scenery:  "I am thrilled to have all of you here today, and you look very spiffy in your coats."  White House wardrobe assistants guaranteed the "spiffy."

Those White Coats In The Rose Garden.  Rather than a grass-roots uprising of physicians, this was a classic case of AstroTurfing.  Attendance was by invitation only, and 40 of the 150 were said to be members of Doctors for America, a reincarnation of the Doctors for Obama arm of the Obama campaign that boasts of having more than 15,000 members.  The physicians were told to bring their white lab coats with them to make sure the TV cameras to capture the proper image.  Those who just showed up wearing suits or dresses were provided with lab coats hastily rustled up.

Lipstick On A Pig.  [Scroll down]  It didn't work the first time, when the White House last year assembled enough sympathetic medical professionals to stage a photo-op in the Rose Garden trying to persuade us that, as the commercial goes, three of four doctors really, really support the administration's attempt to nationalize health care.  Rather than a grass-roots uprising of physicians, last year's event was a classic case of astroturfing.  Attendance was by invitation only, and 40 of the 150 physicians were said to be members of Doctors for America, a reincarnation of Doctors for Obama, an arm of the Obama campaign that boasts of having more than 15,000 members.

More about "Spontaneous" events and "randomly selected" people.

I can show you another example of Obama's propaganda team using doctors as props.


Using the National Endowment for the Arts as a propaganda tool

The National Endowment for the Art of Persuasion?  A machine that the NEA helped to create could potentially be wielded by the state to push policy.  Through providing guidelines to the art community on what topics to discuss and providing them a step-by-step instruction to apply their art form to these issues, the "nation's largest annual funder of the arts" is attempting to direct imagery, songs, films, and literature that could create the illusion of a national consensus.  This is what Noam Chomsky calls "manufacturing consent."

Film Producer Accuses NEA of Enlisting Artists to Push Obama's Domestic Agenda.  The National Endowment for the Arts initiated a "call to action" earlier this month for members of the art community to push President Obama's recovery agency through works that focus on health care, energy and the environment — a troubling sign, one artist said.

Politicizing the Arts.  The NEA, along with the White House Office of Public Engagement and United We Serve (the administration's volunteerism initiative), had invited 75 members of the arts community to listen to a discussion supposedly about national service. ... [But apparently] the nation's top funder of the arts was abusing its position as custodian of taxpayer dollars to promote the Obama agenda.  This is unprecedented.

The NEA's partisan work for Obama.  When the Obama administration launched its United We Serve volunteerism program earlier this summer, it was all about building playgrounds, caring for wounded veterans and reading to homeless children.  Weeks later, the Obama White House, the National Endowment for the Arts and United We Serve have revealed the actual agenda — backing the administration's political priorities with coordinated propaganda, perhaps boosted by millions in stimulus cash.

Who Set Up Government 'Propaganda' Conference Call?  Another conference call has materialized, revealing a concerted effort by government to use the arts to address political issues. ... The meeting invitation went out to all "member local, state, and regional arts agencies, community-based arts organizations, and national partners of Americans for Arts."  Americans for Arts is a non-profit arts organization that has received substantial grants from the National Endowment for the Arts.

The NEA's new mission:  Obama's sermon to the children followed on the Obama administration's epistle to the arts community.  Yossi Sergant is the communications director of the National Endowment for the Arts.  On August 10 Sergant held a conference call with 75 members of the community funded by the NEA.  As Abby Wisse Schacter reported, Sergant's sounded "a lot like an effort to get recipients of government grants to lobby for the Obama agenda."

NEA in politics flap.  The communications director for the National Endowment for the Arts is no longer in his job amid a flap over suggestions he suggested artists work to further President Obama's legislative agenda.  A conservative artist writing on the site Big Hollywood first complained that the official, later identified as Yosi Sargent, had been on a conference call with artists aimed at furthering President Obama's legislative agenda — a bit of a no-no for the agency, which does its best to stay apolitical.

High Noon for politicized arts funding.  The National Endowment for the Arts and White House official Buffy Wicks are bracing for the new bombshell coming from Andrew Breitbart and BigGovernment.com.  The website offers a preview this morning on BigGovernment.com, citing the notorious and likely illegal politicization of the NEA, bullying artists receiving grants into works supporting the administration's legislative priorities.

Explosive New Audio Reveals White House Using NEA to Push Partisan Agenda.  Should the National Endowment for the Arts encourage artists to create art on issues being vehemently debated nationally?  That is the question that I set out to discuss a little over three weeks ago when I wrote an article on Big Hollywood entitled The National Endowment for the Art of Persuasion?"  The question still requires debate but the facts do not.

After 'Inappropriate' NEA Conference Call, White House Pushes New Guidelines.  An August 10, 2009 National Endowment for the Arts conference call in which artists were asked to help support President Obama's agenda — a call that at least one good government group called "inappropriate" — has prompted the White House to issue new guidelines to prevent such a call from ever happening again.

At Least 6 Federal Laws and Regulations Violated By the NEA Conference Call.  Yesterday, I posted about the NEA conference call's clear and obvious violations of the Anti-Lobbying Act (19 U.S. Code §1913) ... But that's not all.  The conference call also violates the Hatch Act — in particular, 5 U.S. Code §7323(a)(4)...

The Art of Corruption.  Through the work of artist and blogger Patrick Courrielche, Andrew Breitbart's new website Big Government — reporting the news so the mainstream media won't have to — has just released a sickening transcript of an August 10 conference call jointly hosted by the National Endowment for the Arts, the White House's Office of Public Engagement, and United We Serve, an initiative overseen by the Corporation for National and Community Service, a federal agency.

What Is Yosi Sergant?  Here's how Obama-era "transparency" works in practice:  A government agency is caught in a scandal.  The chairman of the agency issues a statement blaming the scandal on an unnamed "employee," who, the chairman asserts, "has been relieved of his duties."  The statement omits the fact that the offending employee still works for the same agency, in the same office, as he did before.  When a journalist inquires about this, he is told by a colleague in that very same office — the communications office! — that she knows nothing about his new assignment.  It's hard to imagine government being more evasive and opaque.

NEA communications director resigns.  The National Endowment for the Arts said Thursday [9/27/2009] that its communications director, Yosi Sergant, has resigned.  "This afternoon Yosi Sergant submitted his resignation from the National Endowment for the Arts.  His resignation has been accepted and is effective immediately," said a spokeswoman, Sally Gifford, in a statement.

Unanswered questions from the NEA.  National Endowment for the Arts Chairman Rocco Landesman and the White House finally responded to a controversial effort by political appointees of both the White House and the NEA to "leverage" government funding of the arts into cultural support for the administration's legislative agenda.  This is the short version of the Obama administration's position:  Nothing bad happened.

Why Didn't The White House Call Me?  It's not every day that artists are contacted by the White House to do its bidding, so I was somewhat miffed to be left out of its telephone conference hosted by the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA)?  After all, I'm an award-winning artist who designed a domestic violence poster for New York State.  I've also created an anti-smoking poster (seen here) that would have warmed the cockles of our nanny mayor, Michael Bloomberg.  In all seriousness, I hardly expected inclusion because I don't get government funding.  Hmm, but isn't that illegal?

Is Obama Breaking the Law?  The meeting was dedicated to putting community organizers and artists in the same room, with the tacit promise of funding from the NEA ever present.  According to the report, that promise was actually more than tacit:  Garcia Durham allegedly told the assembled crowd that "government and its policies should be shaped by participants' voices in connection with the NEA."  There's only one problem with this:  it's illegal.

Selling White House Policy Through Art.  Were Sergant and Abernathy really working alone on this effort?  Did Buffy Wicks, Deputy Director of the White House Office of Public Engagement, actually have no idea that the goal of the conference call was to encourage artists to create art on politically controversial issues?  Through Wicks' own words during the conference call, she acknowledges the group was a pro-Obama collective and thanks them for their efforts.

Newly disclosed emails link White House directly to NEA politicalization scandal.  Former actor and present White House associate director of public engagement Kalpen Modi was directly involved in planning the controversial conference call hosted by a National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) flack to encourage tax-supported artists to create propaganda for President Obama, according to emails obtained by Judicial Watch via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

Federal Volunteer Agency Misrepresented Involvement in White House, NEA Conference Call.  Recently revealed documents obtained by Judicial Watch from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) show a few interesting facts and supports the claims made in my earlier articles — namely, Yosi Sergant, the former NEA Communications Director, did not work alone in organizing the controversial August 10th conference call; that the White House Office of Public Engagement was fully aware of his efforts; and most importantly, that The Corporation for National and Community Service misrepresented who actually initiated the meeting.

More about the National Endowment for the Arts.




More examples of media bias can be found on a whole series of pages, starting here.



Back to the Barack Obama index page
Back to Barack Obama, Year One
More about Liberals in general
Back to the Home page

Bookmark and Share

Custom counter developed in-house

Document location http://akdart.com/obama152.html
Updated September 26, 2011.

Page design by Andrew K. Dart  ©2011