$

The Pork Page

$

Your tax dollars are going down the drain

This page deals with money set aside for political purposes, for a small and specific part of the country, to benefit only a few people at everyone else's expense.  Another page, called Money Down the Drain, deals with cases where tax dollars have been wasted through government inefficiency and recklessness at the national level.

The problem of wasteful spending and "earmarks" is especially difficult to solve because members of both political parties are equally eager to spend tax dollars on worthless and unnecessary "pet projects."  In this regard, there is no difference between the two political parties.

There is now a new page (here) for the discussion of government money spent on professional sports teams and stadiums, which are some of the most inexcusable corporate welfare projects.

Farm subsidies are another variety of corporate welfare.

There is also a page about Cutting the Federal Budget To Prevent U.S. Bankruptcy:  A series of excellent articles by Jim Grichar about a long list of federal agencies that should be trimmed or eliminated.

Somewhere on this site there is also a Government Waste Page, which lists a number of excellent places to cut federal spending.

Also take a look at the Huge list of government agencies.  There is a bureau and a bureaucrat for every imaginable function of our overgrown government.  And each one has a deputy and a secretary.

This strikes some people as anti-American, but it really is not:  I believe It's Time to Scrap NASA.  NASA spends about $18 billion a year and doesn't really do anything.  Is your life really any better because there is an international space station?  NASA is a pork barrel project that only benefits Houston and Cape Canaveral.

In order to make this page load a little faster, the Pork Page has been chopped (that's a pun), and certain subtopics are now discussed on this page.  Subtopics on the spinoff page include:
The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006.
The Big Dig in Boston.
Senator Lott's Railroad Line — The Railroad to Nowhere.
Sweetheart deal for Boeing.
The National Endowment for the Arts.
Amtrak.
The V-22 Osprey.

 New!   Other specific examples of pork projects are listed on a page of their own.  The page you're reading now is about the problem of congressional favors and pet projects in general.

 Newer!   Pork products in the bailout bill -- the great Wall Street bailout of 2008.

 Newer than that!   Pork products in the so-called stimulus bill -- the Democrats' blank check has finally arrived, if they can just get Congress to endorse it.

---

 Introduction:   If you take home less than your gross pay, it is only because someone has siphoned money out of your paycheck.  The federal government takes money from you under threat of imprisonment, including "contributions" to Social Security, which you will probably never see again, and Medicare taxes, which are not counted as income tax, and FICA, which is just another income tax.  After your income is taxed, you still have to pay state and local sales taxes, gasoline tax, and numerous other taxes on everyday purchases.  (State and federal taxes, on average, are 43 cents per gallon of gasoline.*)

In many cases, your money ends up in the hands of someone else who is too lazy to work.  Or it may end up in any of a hundred unnecessary government agencies, some of which are listed here and here.  Or you may end up buying a new stadium for a professional sports franchise.  Wasted tax money is one of the easiest topics on this web site to write about, because it's not difficult to find places to trim the federal (or state) budget.  Getting a politician interested in solutions is another matter.  Once you read the information on this page, it's up to you to apply pressure to your Congressman to put the brakes on unnecessary spending.

Republicans (theoretically) (used to) believe the money you earn is yours and that government in a free society has the right to take only as much as is needed to perform those limited functions, which are appropriate to it.  Democrats believe government has a right to use your money as it sees fit to fund welfare programs, to redistribute wealth and return to you only that portion of your money which is absolutely necessary.*.

Sooner or later, wasteful spending of tax dollars is bound to result in either a massive tax revolt or the bankruptcy of the United States.  When either one occurs, some of us will be able to look back and point to examples of wasteful spending like the ones on this page.  There is so much government waste and fraud to be found, and there is not only waste, but extravagant pork barrel spending intended to perpetuate the re-election of incumbent politicians.  I can't help but believe that term limits in the U.S. House and Senate would put a stop to much of this.  The items listed below are but a few examples.

---

Citizens Against Government Waste is an excellent source of information about government waste.  Until recently I had so much of their information on this page that it ballooned into quite an enormous production.  To make this page load faster, the CAGW material has been moved here.  If the topic of wasteful spending is important to you — and I hope it is — please check out the CAGW page as well as this one.

---

Read this:
H.R.1: The House's Pig Pen.  The pork-laden American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 passed by Democrats in the House is a huge pig pen.  [Excerpts from the items requested by the Department of Agriculture:]  $5,838,000,000 — Rural Development Programs, Rural Community Advancement Program; $22,129,000,000 — Rural Housing Service, Rural Housing Insurance Fund Program Account; $2,825,000,000 — Rural Utilities Service, Distance Learning, Telemedicine, and Broadband Program; ...

Earmark Nation.  When earlier this week President Obama signed a $410 billion spending bill to keep the government running through the fall, every account of the event noted the 800-pound contradiction in the room.  Mr. Obama had campaigned against earmarks, even saying he would cut them back to levels before 1994, the start of the Gingrich-GOP interregnum.  Now here was Obama as president signing a bill soaked in earmarks.

Pork-barrel spending increases in 2009.  The cost of earmarks increased this year despite lawmakers' claims they're working to reduce pork-barrel spending.  Earmarks, which are inserted in appropriations bills by members in order to fund specific projects, added up to $19.9 billion in 2009, according to an analysis by the Taxpayers for Common Sense and Center for Responsive Politics.  Earmarks in 2008 spending bills were worth $18.3 billion.

Millions in Stimulus Spending Being Doled Out for Questionable Jobs.  [Scroll down]  Take the Napa Valley Wine Train.  The county received $54 million to build a railroad bridge, relocate a half-mile of track and build a flood wall to protect a wine train passenger station.  The no-bid contract went to a minority-owned business operated by an Eskimo tribe outside Anchorage.  The company then hired a real construction company for a fraction of what they were paid by the government to actually do the work.  The tribe's CEO has no construction experience.

Wine Train Stimulus Scam Gets Even Uglier.  The notion that the government was squandering millions of taxpayer dollars to prop up a private tourist attraction seemed to epitomize everything that was wrong with pork-barrel politics masquerading as sober economic policy.  I mean, while we're subsidizing tourist traps, why not give a couple hundred million to Disneyland to build a new "Pirates of the Potomac" ride?

If you think our debt's bad now ...  On day one of his vow to take "meaningful steps to rein in our debt," Barack Obama asked Congress to freeze portions of discretionary domestic spending. ... On Day Two, taking a break from the rigors of austerity, he was in Tampa, Fla., promising $8 billion for high-speed rail projects there and in a dozen other places.  Four days later, he released a $3.8 trillion fiscal year 2011 budget that would add another $1.3 trillion to the national debt.

Off the rails.  The federal government is running annual budget deficits of $1.5 trillion, and the state of Florida is having to cut spending by billions of dollars every year to stay out of the red.  Yet both are willing to commit billions that they don't have to fund high-speed rail service between Orlando and Tampa.  Talk about fiscal discipline jumping the tracks.  This is the equivalent of buying a 50-inch plasma TV while your home is in foreclosure.

Obama boosts funds for historically black colleges.  The leaders of the nation's historically black colleges and universities breathed a sigh of relief this week when they learned that President Barack Obama's fiscal 2011 budget includes a $30 million funding increase for their financially struggling schools.

Change We Can Believe In.  [Let's] Outlaw the naming of federal projects after any living politicians.  Don't laugh.  Without their names on highway stretches, bridges, and "centers", most of these projects would not be built. ... What is the logic behind the notion that we immortalize a senator or congresswoman who uses someone else's money to build a bridge, or lobbies for an earmark for his district, or, at best, simply does his job?

New Report Exposes Special Interests Tied to Cap-and-Trade Bill.  "Classic pork-barrel politics pushed this flawed legislation over the finish line."  Earmarks totaling $5.45 billion went to the districts of four Democratic Representatives: Bobby Rush (D.-Ill.), $1 billion, Alan Grayson (D.-Fla.), $50 million, Mary Kaptur (D.-Ohio), $3.5 billion, and Frank Kratovil (D-Md.), $1 billion.  Minority Leader John Boehner (R.-Ohio) referred to his fellow Ohioan's earmark as pork.

More about the cap and trade boondoggle.

$11 billion in disclosed earmarks expected in fiscal year 2010.  Congress is on pace to spend $11 billion on disclosed earmarks in fiscal year 2010, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense.  That's about $4 billion less than last year's cost of earmarks, which fund projects at the specific request of lawmakers.  Disclosed earmarks totaled nearly $15 billion in fiscal year 2009, the groups said.

U.S. troop funds diverted to pet projects.  Senators diverted $2.6 billion in funds in a defense spending bill to pet projects largely at the expense of accounts that pay for fuel, ammunition and training for U.S. troops, including those fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to an analysis.  Among the 778 such projects, known as earmarks, packed into the bill:  $25 million for a new World War II museum at the University of New Orleans and $20 million to launch an educational institute named after the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat.

Porky defense bill headed for Senate vote.  The Congressional agenda is packed with health care, energy and financial regulatory reform issues, but lawmakers have found plenty of time to stuff earmarks into the defense spending bill, according to the number crunchers at Taxpayers for Common Sense.  The watchdog group analyzed the 2010 defense appropriations bill that will soon make an appearance on the Senate floor and found 778 earmarks totaling $2.65 billion, with many of the big-ticket items credited to members of the appropriations committee, which is typical.

The Bankrupt Party of Porkulus.  Let there be no doubt:  Democrats are the party with two ideas:  borrow and spend. ... The same underhanded, transparency-defying, earmark-stuffing process that marked the porkulus beast is dominating every other pricey piece of legislation hurtling through the Democrat-led Congress. ... The friends and patrons of Obama may be making out like bandits.  But for everyone else, the Democrats' ideological bankruptcy comes at a nauseatingly steep price.

Obama's Toxic Assets:  Ethics may yet become an issue with the Obama Administration which, like the Clinton Administration, came to Washington promising an administration of unparalleled ethical purity.  The $410 billion omnibus spending bill is a cornucopia for graft.  The $787 billion stimulus bill is yet another cornucopia for graft.  Then there is the problem recently editorialized upon by the Wall Street Journal.  It appears that the Treasury Department's plan for toxic-asset purchases is going to be limited to a handful of four or five huge companies bidding on the toxic assets and managing them.

And Now For Something Completely Crazy.  The news is coming so thick and fast these days that it's hard to keep up.  The Supreme Court, socialized medicine, cap and trade, record deficits, foreign policy fecklessness — it's easy to lose track of smaller issues with all that is going on.  Still, H.R. 1018 shouldn't be allowed to pass unnoticed.  H.R. 1018 is the "Restore Our American Mustangs Act."  It can fairly be described as a welfare program for horses.

Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison is CAGW's October Porker of the Month.  Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) today named Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) its October Porker of the Month.  The four-term senator from Texas is loading up her goodie bag just before Halloween as she prepares to leave the Senate to run for governor.  While claiming to be a fiscal conservative, Sen. Hutchison requested 149 projects worth $1.6 billion for authorization and appropriations bills for fiscal year 2010.

Obama expected to talk rail in Tampa.  President Barack Obama, in a visit to Tampa next week, is expected to announce federal funding for one of the biggest transportation projects in state history:  up to $2.6 billion for a high-speed rail system linking Tampa Bay to Orlando.

House Approves $410 Billion Spending Bill.  The Democratic-controlled House approved $410 billion legislation Wednesday that boosted domestic programs, bristled with earmarks and chipped away at policies left behind by the Bush administration.  The vote was 245-178, largely along party lines.

Earmarks:  Online hide and go seek.  Scores of House members are hiding their earmark requests in obscure corners of their official websites — sticking to the letter of their new rule while shunning its spirit.  The lawmakers are interpreting an ambiguous rule liberally, disclosing their requests as required on their official congressional webpages but avoiding any prominent display.

96 senators post their earmarks online.  One of the unsung heroes in the nation's capital is Bill Allison of the Sunlight Foundation.  Bill is a former investigative reporter and has for the past three years at Sunlight been a leader in the trans-partisan movement for greater transparency and accountability in government.

Public Land Mismanagement and Fiscal Irresponsibility.  Every year, U.S. taxpayers spend billions of dollars on public land management, but the way in which these funds are allocated — through the congressional budgeting process — ensures the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service respond to the will of politicians.  The result is what has been called "park barrel politics," which persists while the National Park Service maintains an estimated $9 billion backlog of construction and maintenance projects.

Obama decries earmarks, then signs a law with 9,000 of them.  As a candidate, Barack Obama once said that a president has to be able to do more than one thing at a time.  Wednesday he proved it, though not in the way he had in mind.  He criticized pork barrel spending in the form of "earmarks," urging changes in the way that Congress adopts the spending proposals.  Then he signed a spending bill that contains nearly 9,000 of them, some that members of his own staff shoved in last year when they were still members of Congress.

Dem ties help 'pork park' pass.  Call it the Pork Park: Congress this week passed a bill creating a national historic park in Paterson, N.J., ensuring years of funding for the downtrodden area despite objections by the National Park Service that the park does not deserve federal dollars.  The 40-acre Paterson Great Falls National Historic Park was one of scores of parks and conservation projects that the House approved Wednesday [3/25/2009] as part of the $8 billion omnibus public lands bill.  President Obama is expected to sign the measure soon.

Broken Earmark Promises.  Wednesday — behind closed doors — President Barack Obama signed his 2009 Omnibus spending package, calling it an "imperfect" bill.  With 8,570 disclosed earmarks worth $7.7 billion "imperfect" is an understatement.  It's bad enough that our president was in an irresponsible rush to spend hundreds of billions with his "stimulus" package ($787 billion), and soon $350 million in the second half of the TARP funds, $32 billion — at least — for his new SCHIP program, and now $410 billion in his "imperfect" omnibus bill, but on top of that, he's been dishonest.

Barney Frank Named 'Porker of the Month' by Government Watchdog.  Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, has been named "Porker of the Month" by Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) because of his criticism of bonuses for AIG employees while Frank himself has supported bailouts for failing banks and lenders.

More Pork, Anybody?  There is no exact definition of what an earmark is.  Or even what pork is.  Obama has no objection to pork.  Just as long as it serves the public good.  Which is why in Obama's $787 billion stimulus bill there was plenty of money for a magnetic levitation train between Disneyland and Las Vegas.  This would do a lot of people who like to gamble while wearing mouse ears a lot of good.  Which is the trouble with pork and even earmarks.  Everybody who wants the dough claims it does somebody some good.

Earmark Madness.  Barack Obama was so fed up hearing about the evil earmarks in the $410 billion omnibus spending bill that the president signed it in private.  "Some things are signed in public," said irrepressible White House humorist Robert Gibbs, "and some aren't."  What's to be embarrassed about?

Earmarks and the Federal Budget.  Earmarks are generally associated with "pork-barrel" spending.  Appropriations that are earmarked can be wasteful, excessive, and unconstitutional.  However, as the stimulus and TARP legislation surely demonstrate, appropriations that are not earmarked can also be wasteful, excessive, and unconstitutional.

Robert Byrd's 'Road to Nowhere'.  It is just one of the many pork barrel projects around America that's sucking up your hard-earned taxpayer dollars.  Ainsley Earhardt takes us to West Virginia's Corridor H for a closer look at the road that leads to where?  Nowhere.

BHO Giving Up?  The Wall Street Journal today reported President Barack Obama has decided to give up fighting for "change" in Washington, instead acquiescing to the demands of the Democrat controlled Congress.  During his campaign, BHO promised to curb earmarks.  He promised to end the use of presidential signing statements — a president's way of rejecting parts of a bill without entirely vetoing it — something President George W Bush did very often.  WSJ reports he even promised to open an investigation of Bush's 1,200 signing statements.  But, today, BHO decided to break both promises when he signed the omnibus spending bill into law.  The bill contains more than 8,500 pork barrel earmarks worth over $7.7 billion in tax dollars.

Earmarks, schmearmarks.  Can't tell you how many times I've yelled that at the TV lately as Barack Obama, who sermonized every Sunday about the evils of earmarks, now can't muster the backbone to practice what he preached.  In fewer than 90 days, Obama's signed off on not one, but two monster spending bills with billions of dollars in earmarks in each.  And here's the creepy kicker:  He's not going to stop.  You can bet the good dog that while Obama's in office, he will not enact one spending bill — not a single one — that is earmark-free.

West Virginia Watchdog exposes another Mollohan earmark scam.  West Virginia Watchdog Steve Allen Adams has uncovered another wrinkle in Rep. Alan Mollohan's earmark-based fiefdom — companies that rent office space in the office park named after the Democrat congressman not only have to write that monthly check, they also pay hefty campaign donations to you know who.

Giant Omnibus Bill Includes $7.7 Billion in Earmarks for Bugs, Pigs, Parking — and La Raza.  Termite research, walrus rehabilitation and pig manure are among the more than 8,570 of earmarks in the omnibus spending package currently before the Senate.  Critics charge the bill is stuffed full of so many pork barrel projects — $7.7 billion worth — that President Barack Obama should veto it.

Congress being dishonest with Omnibus, earmarks.  The nation's largest taxpayer group says both political parties in Washington are engaged in a "conspiracy of silence" over what they're actually doing to the Omnibus budget bill.  Meantime, the spending spree is continuing in Washington.

Top 20 Earmarking Senators in the $410 Billion Spending Bill.  Who is the biggest earmarker of them all?  According to Taxpayers for Common Sense, Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., takes the cake, with 60 earmarks worth $123 million in the latest spending bill before the Senate.  But he's hardly alone.  The budget watchdog group has released its latest list breaking down the earmarks, lawmaker-by-lawmaker, in the $410 billion bill set to come up for a vote by the end of the day.  The bill would fund the government through the end of the fiscal year, with an 8.5 percent increase over last year and billions of dollars in pet projects.

Reform Lite:  Obama goes soft on pork.  Pulled between his campaign rhetoric and his own party's congressional barons, President Barack Obama largely sided with his Hill allies in unveiling an earmark proposal Wednesday [3/11/2009] that shies away from any strict crackdown on the practice.  Obama proposed further transparency for the spending goodies prized by many members of Congress — but stopped far short of the kind of serious limits reformers wanted.

Obama tiptoes into battle on earmarks.  President Barack Obama announced new steps Wednesday to rein in pork barrel spending by Congress, but his failure to specify real cuts could come back to haunt him in the larger fight over his ambitious budget plans this spring.  "Nobody's going to believe it's real until they see an example," Rep. Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.) said, urging Obama to follow up soon with specific rescissions singling out wasteful projects to be terminated.

California has enough pork to be in hog heaven.  A massive spending bill expected to be approved by Congress this week is filled with more than 8,500 earmarks — those pet projects that lawmakers love — costing $7.7 billion.  Despite the tough economy, mounting federal budget deficit and pledges by President Obama and members of both parties to crack down on the practice, a number of lawmakers have defended their earmarks as important to the nation's economic recovery.

Two Obama Cabinet Members Added Earmarks to Omnibus Spending Bill.  Two of President Obama's Cabinet members authored a variety of earmarks in the $410 billion omnibus spending bill the House is poised to pass Wednesday to keep the government running through Oct. 1.  Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis were both House members when appropriators began to forge this legislation last year.  However, a stalemate between President Bush and congressional Democrats forced the sides to punt the rest of the spending provisions until now.

Anatomy of an Earmark.  You can't be a Republican on Capitol Hill these days without talking about the 8,000 earmarks in the massive omnibus spending bill.  With somewhere between $5 billion and $8 billion in special spending projects, the bill contains so much questionable spending that no outsider — actually no insider, either — can keep track of it all.

Obama to Sign Spending Bill With Earmarks.  President Barack Obama will sign a $410 billion government-spending bill, even though it includes thousands of the spending "earmarks" that he had criticized on the campaign trail, a top White House aide said.  White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, speaking on CBS's "Face the Nation" Sunday [3/1/2009], said the president wasn't happy with the 9,000-or-so earmarks that lawmakers added to the legislation.  But "this is last year's business," Mr. Emanuel said, adding that Mr. Obama would sign the bill, once it is approved by Congress.

Democrats try to brand earmarks as good.  Capitol Hill's top Democrats are making a full-throated effort to rebrand earmarks as good government, not a dirty word synonymous with pork-barrel hijinks.  With President Obama's vow to clamp down on earmarks putting pressure on lawmakers to change their ways, congressional leaders have set out to educate voters about why they think Congress should direct dollars to districts or states for specific pet projects.

Obama to release new rules on earmarks.  President Obama, who has been criticized for his plans to sign a pork-laden $410 billion omnibus spending package moving through Congress this week, will release new rules for earmarks prior to signing the bill, the White House said Monday [3/2/2009].

The Editor says...
Rules mean nothing to Mr. Obama.  He waives his own rules whenever they become inconvenient.  (Details on this page.)

'Bridge to nowhere' OK'd for Everglades.  A provision buried inside Congress' giant spending bill would overturn a federal court order, discard part of environmental law and reject an Indian tribe's plea, forcing the government to build a bridge in Everglades National Park that a federal judge has declared "a complete waste of taxpayer dollars."

Obama beats early retreat on promise to fight pork.  Despite campaign promises to take a machete to lawmakers' pet projects, President Barack Obama is quietly caving to funding nearly 8,000 of them this year, drawing a stern rebuke Monday from his Republican challenger in last fall's election.  Arizona Sen. John McCain said it is "insulting to the American people" for Obama's budget director to indicate over the weekend that the president will sign a $410 billion spending bill with what Republicans critics say is nearly $5.5 billion in pet projects known as earmarks.

What are "the People" Thinking As 546 Political Pigs Destroy their Nation?  310 million Americans have allowed 546 political pigs in Washington DC to completely destroy the greatest nation ever known to mankind.  The people didn't destroy the nation themselves, even though they will be the ones who will have to pick up the pieces and start all over, once it all comes unhinged... But they have allowed it.

Senate keeps pet projects in spending bill.  The Senate voted overwhelmingly to preserve thousands of earmarks in a $410 billion spending bill on Tuesday, brushing aside Sen. John McCain's claim that President Barack Obama and Congress are merely conducting business as usual in a time of economic hardship.  McCain's attempt to strip out an estimated 8,500 earmarks failed on a vote of 63-32.

Congress' Porky Pols Pig Out On Fine Swine.  Congress went on a pork-a-palooza yesterday, approving a massive spending bill with big bucks for Hawaiian canoe trips, research into pig smells, and tattoo removal — all while the nation faces an economic crisis.  Among the recipients of federal largesse is the Polynesian Voyaging Society of Honolulu, which got a $238,000 "earmark" in the bill.

A Budget Process Hijacked by Selfish Interests.  Yesterday was Budget Day in Washington, that glorious day each February when the federal city comes alive as the political agenda for the coming year is set.  Suddenly everyone — members of Congress, federal employees, contractors, lobbyists, the think tanks and associations — begins to mobilize for and against the thousands of policy decisions and proposals embedded in the president's fiscal plan.

Mayor Daley Seizes Land for Unfunded Project.  Chicago Mayor Richard Daley has kicked hundreds of families out of their homes and relocated a cemetery full of buried bodies to build a whopping $15 billion airport expansion Chicago residents oppose, airlines don't want and he doesn't have the money to build.  The kicker is that Daley stands a solid chance of getting a good chunk of the boondoggle funded in Washington's forthcoming stimulus bill under Barack Obama's pledge to dramatically increase infrastructure spending.

Stimulus plan could shape course of Barack Obama's presidency.  Though no stimulus bill has yet been drafted, Republicans are wary of some of the proposals put forward by groups that are talking to Obama's transition team.  They cite a report by the U.S. Conference of Mayors listing myriad projects cast as vehicles to create jobs and boost the economy.  Those include a dog park in Hercules, Calif.; a bike path in San Diego; and a $1.5-million push to curb prostitution in Dayton, Ohio.

Bridges to Everywhere.  President-elect Obama's transition team is promising that its $700 billion, or $850 billion, or $1 trillion, or whatever it now is "stimulus" won't include pork-barrel spending.  They must not have talked to the nation's mayors, who recently responded to Mr. Obama's request to compile their priority list of "shovel-ready" projects.  By all accounts, the $73 billion wish list may be the largest collection of parochial spending projects in American history.

Paving Projects Won't Boost Economy.  President-elect Obama has announced plans for a new stimulus package containing $500 billion to $700 billion worth of public works projects. ... America's governors already are scrambling to compose lists of "shovel-ready" projects so no bridge or highway is left behind.

Obama's Secretary of Earmarks.  Barack Obama wasn't kidding about the audacity of hope.  In tapping Republican Illinois Congressman Ray LaHood to head the Transportation Department last week, he got more Beltway hosannas for bipartisanship.  At the same time he managed to choose one of the biggest spenders in Congress, of either party, and just the fellow to push $850 billion in "stimulus" out the door.  As a long-time and stalwart Member of the House Appropriations Committee, Mr. LaHood facilitated the incontinent spending that helped Republicans lose their majority in 2006.

LaHood Sponsored Millions in Earmarks.  The former Republican congressman chosen by President-elect Barack Obama to direct billions in federal highway spending has been an unapologetic advocate of earmarks, a practice Obama now opposes, and has used his influence to win funding for projects pushed by some of his largest campaign contributors.

Senator flags $1.3 billion as gov't waste.  As the budget deficit soared, infrastructure crumbled and the economy tanked, the federal government this year spent $300,000 for a California skateboarding park, $188,000 to research Maine lobsters and $3.2 million on a spy blimp the military doesn't want, according to a new report by the Senate's self-styled spending scourge.  The report, to be released today by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., lists more than $1.3 billion of what it calls wasteful projects in 2008.

Santa Claus Government.  Last Monday, the U.S. Conference of Mayors sent its list of wishes to the political equivalent of Santa Claus:  Congress. ... The mayors claim the economy will be stimulated if their wishes are granted.  What do they want?  The National Taxpayers Union (NTU) has analyzed the 72-page list. ... [The projects include] 15 projects with the term "stadium" in them, including a $150 million Metromover extension to the Florida Marlins' baseball stadium; and 81 projects mentioning "landscaping" and/or beautification efforts.  Kristina Rasmussen, NTU's director of government affairs, offers more analysis of the mayors' report on NTU's blog:  "Total cost of the wish list is $73,163,299,303."

On earmarks, nobody wants to admit who's your daddy.  Earmarks like the infamous $223 million "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska are getting lots of public attention these days but The Examiner recently found that uncovering simple facts about them can be nearly impossible.  When we asked questions about three earmarks worth millions of dollars given to local recipients, nobody seemed to know how the earmarks started or which member of Congress was responsible for them.

New book:
Downsizing the Federal Government  by Chris Edwards, who is director of tax policy at the Cato Institute.  He holds an MA in economics from George Mason University in Virginia.

2005 Congressional Pig Book Summary.  The federal government's expanding waistline (a record $427 billion deficit) has resulted from too many members of Congress believing that the United States Treasury is their own personal ATM.  Our elected officials have let themselves go whole hog while letting down every hard-working American taxpayer.  The 2005 Congressional Pig Book is the latest installment of Citizens Against Government Waste's (CAGW) 15-year exposé of pork-barrel spending.  This year's list includes $3,270,000 for the Capitol Visitor Center; $100,000 for the Tiger Woods Foundation; and $75,000 for Onondaga County for the Greater Syracuse Sports Hall of Fame.

Table:   Pork Per Capita by State.

The dried-up veto pen:  Last week, I was asked to testify before the Senate Democratic Policy Committee. … I explained I am not particularly a deficit hawk, nor do the size of the Bush tax cuts bother me.  What really bothers me is the orgy of spending by Republicans.  It is just appalling that the recent highway bill had 5,000 "earmarks" in it, almost without exception, utterly unjustified pork barrel projects.

A History of Earmarks (or rather, the lack thereof).  Just take a look at the history of the Defense Appropriations Bill:  Taxpayers for Common Sense calculated that the 1970 Defense Appropriations Bill had a dozen earmarks; the 1980 bill had 62 earmarks; and by 2005, the defense bill had skyrocketed to 2,671 earmarks.  The most recent bill spends money on anything from the eradication of brown tree snakes in Guam, to a virtual reality spray paint simulator system in Pine City, Minnesota.  (And remember, this is the Defense Appropriations Bill.  What do snakes and spray paint have to do with maintaining our nation's security?)

Earmark Spending Makes a Comeback.  More than a year after Congress pledged to curb pork barrel funding known as earmarks, lawmakers are gearing up for another spending binge, directing billions toward organizations and companies in their home districts.  Earmark spending in the House's defense authorization bill alone soared 29 percent last month, from $7.7 billion last year to $9.9 billion now, according to data compiled by Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group in the District.

The Weight of Government:  In the chaos of defeat Republicans and conservatives feel most ashamed about the profligate spending.  How was it that the conservative President Bush and the Republican Congress of 2001-2006 could have so increased the weight of government on the backs of the American people -- including that most shameful spending of all, earmarks?  The answer is simple.  Republican politicians know that the American people don't really want to cut government.

It's Priceless.  Government budgets, after all, are only projections of what is supposed to happen, not a hard and fast record of what has in fact happened.  And seldom will the public or the media do anything so mean-spirited as go back and compare what the budget said would happen with what actually happened.  Moreover, politicians can put certain large expenditures "off budget" for any number of noble-sounding reasons.  And if you have long experience in using political rhetoric, nothing is easier than coming up with noble-sounding reasons.

Pelosi:  Just Forget the Word 'Earmark'.  The more than 32,000 earmarks requested in the Homeland Security spending bill have roiled the House this week, and now Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) wants the word 'earmark' to just go away.  In a Tuesday press conference about appropriation bills, Pelosi said, "Why don't we leave here today forgetting the word earmark?"  She said they should be called "legislative directives" instead.

The Do-Nothing Congress:  [Scroll down] The Do-Nothing Congress also promised to correct the very real problem of hidden legislative earmarks.  But how was this done?  By changing legislative procedure so that these earmarks do not even show up in subcommittee reports, but are rather hidden even more deeply in conference committee reports of appropriation bills.  That makes the problem of abuse by earmark worse, not better.

Congress forgets ban on pet projects.  Get out the trough, it's feeding time.  Congress has decided that an election year with recession written all over it is not the time to be giving up those job-producing "pork" projects bemoaned by both parties' presidential candidates.

Earmarks After Dark:  Remember those Congressional pledges of earmark reform?  Democrats are hoping you don't, as they try to pull a fast one and evade President Bush's pledge to block these special-interest spending projects slipped into legislation without scrutiny.

$6.6 billion in special projects rides on federal spending bill.  A $630 billion spending bill nearing final approval in Congress includes $6.6 billion for thousands of lawmakers' pet projects, including $51.5 million requested by Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden when both presidential candidates have sworn off seeking any money.  Taxpayers for Common Sense analyzed the 2,321 special-interest items called "earmarks" in the spending bill.

Holds and Hotlines:  The Senate should not routinely pass legislation that spends millions or billions of taxpayer dollars without any debate or opportunities for Senators to offer amendments.  Under this current practice, the lack of a phone call from a staffer constitutes unanimous consent of the 100 members of the Senate. … Most bills that are introduced expand the power, authority and cost of the federal government.

Only ABC Highlights Dem Gluttony on Pork Spending.  Of the three morning shows, only ABC's "Good Morning America" highlighted the implications of a new report on pork barrel spending by the group Citizens Against Government Waste [CAGW].  GMA was the sole network morning program to mention that Democrats broke their campaign promise to cut such pork projects in half.

Distrust Fund:  It's almost a D.C. truism that anytime Congress creates a "trust fund" for a certain policy issue, the money flowing into the fund will be diverted to something else.  Government trust funds are set up with special taxes and fees so that they will be less subject to normal budget constraints.  That makes them desirable for future Congresses to divert their proceeds to spend on pork.  Payroll tax money in the Social Security Trust Fund has for decades been emptied out to fund general government programs.

Bill jeered as omnibus earmark full of pork.  The Senate will soon consider legislation with an impressive-sounding name — Advancing America's Priorities Act.  But the bill being pushed by Democratic leaders includes lots of lawmakers' pet priorities, such as a commission on the "Star-Spangled Banner" and the War of 1812, $1.5 billion for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and $5 million for a museum in Poland.  The legislation lumps nearly 40 separate bills into one and authorizes numerous "earmarks," the targeted spending for projects that Democrats often ridiculed as pork-barrel when they swept into power 18 months ago.

Dr. No strikes again.  Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid tried to shove an $11.3 billion pork-barrel bill past the Republicans last week but was gunned down by Oklahoman Tom Coburn and 39 of his friends.  It was an embarrassing defeat for Mr. Reid, who never met a spending bill he didn't like, and a sweet victory for Mr. Coburn and his fellow Republicans who are trying to regain the trust of the GOP's disillusioned base as the party of fiscal discipline.

An Obamanomics Preview.  The latest ["stimulus"] plan is even worse than the spring round of $100 billion or so in tax rebate checks.  At least rebates allowed taxpayers to spend their own money.  Under this stimulus the government will tax or borrow $150 billion to $300 billion in order to spend the money on social and pork-barrel programs.  The latest draft would direct dollars to food stamps, another expansion in unemployment insurance, home heating subsidies, more aid to states and cities, and "infrastructure" like roads, bridges and public transit.  Because of Davis-Bacon wage requirements on these brick and mortar projects, a portion of the dollars would coincidentally flow to the Democrats' biggest campaign contributors:  unions.  Call it a political "rebate" check.

The Obamessiah Of Pickpocket Politics.  There is no such thing as a free public feeding trough.  Every penny in that trough came from the pockets of fellow Americans who earned them and politicians, who pick those pockets as an expedient means of gaining personal political power, are nothing more than thieves for hire.

Pork For Christmas (For Some People).  Earmarks amount to kickbacks for groups and projects within individual Congressional districts and are well-known for their wastefulness.  They are often, though not always, intended to reward local campaign donors or personal friends.  This year new rules in the House of Representatives would prohibit the addition of earmarks added to a bill in conference, but because the Omnibus spending bill is being treated as an amendment from the Senate, it is exempt from those rules.

Bullies, Muggers, Sneak Thieves, and Con Men.  Government sneak thieves … specialize in legislative riders, budgetary add-ons and earmarks, logrolling, omnibus "Christmas tree" bills, and other gimmicks designed to conceal the size, the beneficiaries, and sometimes even the existence of their theft.  At the end of the day, the taxpayers find there's nothing left in the till, but they have little or no idea where all of their money went.

What has the Democratic congress done?  After taking back the Congress, the Dems made many lofty promises, such as killing "earmark" legislation and ending "pork barrel" politics.  Instead, we got a Congress that was incapable of passing a reasonable budget and instead passed an "Omnibus" bill that supposedly funds the federal government for the next few months.  But the new Democratic Congress actually exceeded the old GOP Congress in earmark spending.

Texas reaps $2.2 billion in earmarks.  Texas corralled $2.2 billion in special projects from the federal government this year, including $294,000 for a Houston zoo program and $22 million for an Army gymnasium near El Paso. … Earmarks are bipartisan.  Sen. Hutchison was the state's most successful proponent of such spending in 2007, bringing home $254 million in projects.  Every other Texas lawmaker in Congress except one, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Dallas, sought them.

U.S. senator wants probe of Coconut Road earmark.  An Oklahoma senator plans is planning to propose legislation next week that would force a special congressional investigation to find out who set aside $10 million in a 2005 transportation bill — after it won final House and Senate passage — to study a possible highway interchange in Southwest Florida.

The Editor says...
How is it possible to add a $10 million spending project anonymously?  As long as any spending bill or amendment can be introduced anonymously, at any level of government, we're all in danger.

Sen. Coburn's Coconut Road Amendment:  The amendment would form a joint committee to investigate the secret $10 million earmark for Florida's Coconut Road.

GOP Senators Opt for Pork.  According to Taxpayers for Common Sense, the five-term [Sen. Thad] Cochran is the new congressional king of pork this year, with $774 million worth of earmarks in 12 spending bills.  He has dethroned his predecessor as the top GOP appropriator, Ted Stevens, a six-termer who is the senior Republican in the Senate and now ranks second, with $502 million in pork.

'Earmark' cash aids Democrat freshmen.  A year ago, Democrats won control of Congress in part by criticizing billions of dollars spent on pet projects.  Now, freshmen Democrats are benefiting from the same kind of spending, a USA TODAY analysis shows.  All 49 of the new Democratic lawmakers sponsored or co-sponsored at least one project — known as an "earmark" — inserted into the House and Senate spending bills, the analysis found.  Freshmen Democrats were the sole sponsors on projects worth $351 million, an average of $7.6 million.  Republicans got approval for projects worth $65 million, or $5 million each.

Everybody will know if it's pork.  The House adopts rules requiring lawmakers to disclose their earmarks.

The new earmark rules won't stop corruption.  Randy Cunningham, the former Republican representative from California who has retired to a prison work camp in Arizona, is dictating the congressional agenda now more than he ever did when he was in office. … Nearly every story about earmark reform, which is supposed to discourage legislators from using narrowly targeted spending to curry favor with donors and constituents, mentions Cunningham.

Congress Oinks its Way to a Spending Bill.  If character is what we do when we think nobody is looking, then congressional leaders responsible for the 3,500-plus-page Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008 have a lot of explaining to do.  They should start by telling us why they posted their "omnibus spending bill" on the Internet only hours before voting on it and in a format that made searching the text laborious, at best.

James Madison to America:  This Is What We Warned You About.  James Madison wrote a pro-constitution editorial (known to history as Federalist 10), that described in prescient terms precisely why political factions are dangerous.  When there is liberty, he argued, some men will create more wealth than others.  Property and class factions are the result.  Members of these different economic classes are tempted to pass laws which help themselves at the expense of the overall public good.  Over time this excessive self-regard distorts the gift of reason and causes people to think and speak in ways that seem strange to the country at large.

Pork Barrel Stonewall:  The Democratic majority came to power in January promising to do a better job on earmarks.  They appeared to preserve our reforms and even take them a bit further.  I commended Democrats publicly for this action.  Unfortunately, the leadership reversed course.  Desperate to advance their agenda, they began trading earmarks for votes, dangling taxpayer-funded goodies in front of wavering members to win their support for leadership priorities.

A wink, a whisper and a pet project is funded.  As federal prosecutors try to dig deeper into the spending practices of New Jersey legislators, they might struggle to identify an elementary piece of any case — the paper trail.  Senators and Assembly members added more than $1.25 billion in last-minute spending to the state budget in the past five years, agreeing to let taxpayers fund pet projects that typically escape public disclosure or debate.

GOP will let Craig keep his earmarks.  Senate Republican leaders have backed off from pressuring Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) to resign his seat, giving the beleaguered lawmaker a glimpse of hope that he may last in Congress long enough to save his career.

Flake still preaching against earmarks.  Although [Congressman Jeff] Flake did prevail against the Christmas-tree funding, he lost by wide margins on votes to cut other earmarks that would seem easy targets for budget hawks.  Take, for example, a $250,000 grant for a wine and culinary center in Prosser, Wash.  Or $100,000 for a hunting and fishing museum in Tionesta, Pa.  Or $628,843 to pay for grape genetics research at Cornell University.

Study:  For Sixth Straight Year, No One in Congress Had Voting Agenda to Cut Federal Spending.  Members of Congress voted to spend an average of more than $150 million of taxpayer funds for every hour they were in session during 2005 and 2006 — just one of many fascinating observations made in the non-partisan National Taxpayers Union Foundation's (NTUF's) latest VoteTally study.  Since 2001, not a single Senator or Representative has cast votes whose net effect would reduce the level of federal outlays.

Earmark Cover-Up:  Voters opted for change in Congress, but on earmarks it looks as if they'll only be getting more smoke and mirrors.  Democrats promised reform and instituted "a moratorium" on all earmarks until the system was cleaned up.  Now the appropriations committees are privately accepting pork-barrel requests again.

The King Of Pork — Part II.  "Earmarks" are better known as "pork."  Basically, they are paybacks to political cronies or ways to bring money to a politico's voters to make sure he or she is re-elected.  They are usually unrelated to the bill to which they are attached, but the porkers won't vote for the necessary parts of the bill unless their payback is included.  The worst part is that most pork is for unnecessary and unwanted projects.

Trimming the fat from pork-barrel politics.  The 109th Republican Congress, in one of its last acts before adjournment, responded to the demands of voters to end the pork-barrel spending madness — at least for now.  A pack of conservative Republican warriors, led by Sens. Jim DeMint of South Carolina, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Jeff Sessions of Alabama, blocked a giant, fat-filled omnibus spending bill that was stuffed with more than 10,000 waste-ridden, earmarked pork projects that would have cost $17 billion.

---

Representative John Murtha (D-PA)

Congress cowers before reigning King of Pork.  In a Congress filled with fiefdoms of special-interest spending, one man is king — Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.  In 2008, Murtha earmarked $192 million for his district.  Thus far this year, he's only managed to earmark $134 million.  But give him time.  The jewel in Murtha's pork crown is the airport in Johnstown, Pa.  That would be the John Murtha Johnstown-Cambria County Airport.

Earmarks and Congressional Corruption:  Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper, recently reported that every private entity [Representative John] Murtha (D-PA) favored with an earmark in this year's defense bill has given money to his campaign in the last two years.  Political Action Committees (PACs) and employees of the 26 groups in Murtha's district that received Federal monies have contributed $413,250 to him, $100,750 of which was donated in the two weeks leading up to March 16, the original deadline for lawmakers to file their earmark requests.  Murtha rewarded these groups for their political contributions by allocating $114.5 million to them.

The Pork King Keeps His Crown.  The new earmark disclosure rules put into effect by Congress confirm the pre-eminence of Representative John Murtha at procuring eye-popping chunks of pork for contractors he helped put in business in Johnstown, Pa.  The Pennsylvania Democrat, a power player on defense appropriations, exudes pride, not embarrassment, for delivering hundreds of millions of dollars in largesse to district beneficiaries.  They, in turn, requite with hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign donations.  Mr. Murtha led all House members this year, securing $162 million in district favors, according to the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense.

Meet Congress' "King Of Pork".  His most notorious project is the government agency that the government doesn't want:  The National Drug Intelligence Center, also in Murtha's hometown.  Every year the White House tries to close it because they already have a Drug Intelligence Center.  But Murtha keeps the duplicate open using half-a-billion dollars in earmarks.  "You want to drive a stake through its heart but you can't," says Leslie Paige for Citizens Against Government Waste.  "Because Congressman Murtha continues to put this in."  Murtha's power plays are no surprise to those who've followed him since the 1980s bribery scandal known as ABSCAM.

How Lawmaker Rebuilt Hometown on Earmarks.  If John Murtha were a businessman, he'd be the biggest employer in this town.  The powerful U.S. congressman has used his clout on Capitol Hill to create thousands of jobs and steer billions of dollars in federal spending to help his hometown in western Pennsylvania recover from devastating floods and the flight of its steelmakers.  More is on the way.  In the massive 2008 military-spending bill now before Congress — which could go to a House-Senate conference as soon as Thursday — Mr. Murtha has steered more taxpayer funds to his congressional district than any other member.

The Murtha Rules:  A simple system to win federal money.  Congressman John Murtha of Pennsylvania has long been one of the biggest porkbarrelers in Congress, and as the chairman of the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee he is also one of the biggest recipients of lobbyists' campaign donations.  Which is no coincidence.  When the Democrats took control of Congress in 2006, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi pledged that porkbarreling would be severely curtailed.  But that hasn't come to pass?no surprise given that old-time hacks like Murtha hold such powerful positions on the Appropriations committees.

Rep. Murtha Dogged By Questions About Earmark Use.  [Murtha, Visclosky and Moran] received huge amounts of political donations from PMA lobbyists and their clients.  Murtha has collected $2.37 million in campaign contributions from PMA's lobbyists and the companies it has represented since 1989, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks political money.  Visclosky has collected $1.36 million; Moran, $997,348.  Those political donations have followed a distinct pattern:  The giving is especially heavy in March, which is prime time for submitting written earmark requests.

Murtha's Nephew Got Millions in Gov't Contracts.  A company owned by a nephew of Rep. John Murtha received $4 million from the Defense Department last year for engineering and warehouse services, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.  Murtha, D-Pa., is chairman of the House Appropriations defense subcommittee.

All in the family.  Powerful Democratic Rep. John P. Murtha of Pennsylvania has long treated defense contractors as if they are a part of a large dysfunctional family he controls.  We are less than surprised he is patriarch of a clan that appears to survive by feeding on the government teat.  The Washington Post reported Tuesday that in 2008, nearly $4 million in no-bid Pentagon logistics contracts went to a Glen Burnie, Md., business owned by Robert C. Murtha Jr., nephew of the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee chairman.

Of shoddy combat helmets and Democratic corruption.  This story may or may not become big news.  But it certainly says a lot about the earmark culture on Capitol Hill.  A contractor, beneficiary of an earmark that the lobbyist group with close ties to John Murtha got for them, produced combat helmets so shoddy that the military has recalled 34,000 of them.

Pelosi's Pork Problem.  Picture a freight train roaring down the tracks.  Picture House Speaker Nancy Pelosi positioning her party on the rails.  Picture a growing stream of nervous souls diving for the weeds.  Picture all this, and you've got a sense of the Democrats' earmark-corruption problem.  This particular choo-choo has the name John Murtha emblazoned on the side, and with each chug is proving that those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.

Murtha's Earmarks Keep Airport Aloft.  The John Murtha airport sits on a windy mountain two hours east of Pittsburgh, a 650-acre expanse of smooth tarmac, spacious buildings, a helicopter hangar and a National Guard training center.  Inside the terminal on a recent weekday, four passengers lined up to board a flight, outnumbered by seven security staff members and supervisors, all suited up in gloves and uniforms to screen six pieces of luggage.

Murtha Airport Got Military Upgrades.  At the behest of Rep. John P. Murtha (D), chairman of the House defense appropriations subcommittee, the Pentagon has spent about $30 million equipping the little-used airport named for him so it can handle behemoth military aircraft and store combat equipment for rapid deployment to foreign battlefields.  Most of the improvements, funded through appropriations approved by Murtha's panel, have not been used for their intended purpose.  The projects delighted National Guard and reserve units based in Murtha's Pennsylvania district that have seen budget cuts, but critics charge that the expenditures have been a waste of taxpayer dollars.

John Murtha's Airport for No One.  You might wonder how the region ever had the air traffic demand to justify such a facility.  It didn't.  But it is located in the district of one of Congress's most unapologetic earmarkers:  Democrat John Murtha.  In 20 years, Mr. Murtha has successfully doled out more than $150 million of federal payments to what is now being called the airport for no one.

Dems retain funding for Murtha airport.  The Senate has rejected an amendment that would have killed funding for the John Murtha Airport in Johnstown, Pa., turning back an effort by fiscal conservatives to yank earmarks from a largely deserted airport named after a controversial lawmaker.

Rep. Murtha's earmarks lead to fewer jobs than promised.  In 2005, Rep. John P. Murtha announced here that a technology firm was moving into an abandoned plate glass factory.  Best of all, he promised, the new firm would generate 140 jobs. ... The firm peaked at 10 employees and then folded in early 2008.  Once its Murtha-engineered Navy contracts ended, the company could not survive.

Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington's "Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians" for 2009.  [Including] Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) and the rest of the PMA Seven:  Rep. John Murtha made headlines in 2009 for all the wrong reasons.  The Pennsylvania congressman is under federal investigation for his corrupt relationship with the now-defunct defense lobbyist PMA Group.  PMA, founded by a former Murtha associate, has been the congressman's largest campaign contributor.  Since 2002, Murtha has raised $1.7 million from PMA and its clients.  And what did PMA and its clients receive from Murtha in return for their generosity?  Earmarks — tens of millions of dollars in earmarks.

Murtha's America.  [Scroll down]  Another company to receive Murtha earmark help was Caracal, Inc.  To great hoopla, Murtha delivered the ton of tax dollars to Caracal, claiming, "Today's ribbon-cutting ceremony is yet another indication that our investment in this region's economic revitalization is paying off."  After receiving more than $150 million in taxpayer help, the company went under.  That's zero sustainable jobs.  With Caracal out of business, the operative question might be, "'Paying off' for whom?"

Murtha-tied Company Wins Sole-Source Vaccine Contract.  Several months ago we warned that Tara O'Toole who recently became Under Secretary for the Science and Technology Directorate at the Department of Homeland Security would reward her friends resulting in millions of dollars in gifts to John Murtha cronies who supported her nomination.  And it now appears the Murtha/O'Toole favor factory has begun production.

---

Budget-cutting Governor Paterson gets rug pulled out from under him.  Gov. Paterson has asked for $2 billion in budget cuts, but he's not cutting the rugs.  The Paterson administration has plunked down $37,741 for rugs at the governor's mansion in Albany, including $21,000 spent on a pair of "Turkish patchwork" rugs at a Manhattan carpet dealer. ... The administration bought the Turkish rugs — a 10-by-15-foot rug and a 10-foot round rug — in July from Stark Carpet on Third Ave.  State records show Stark Carpet has donated $8,000 to former Gov. Eliot Spitzer's campaign organization since 2003.  The organization became known as Spitzer-Paterson 2006 after Paterson became Spitzer's running mate.

Pork becomes 'earmarks' — 11,000 of them.  [Scroll down]  The law forbids using federal grants to lobby, but lobbyists do charge clients fees that often equal 10 percent of the largesse.  Earmark winners and their lobbyists often reward their benefactors with campaign contributions.  For many members of Congress, especially those on the Appropriations committees, such as Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., campaign donations from earmark-seeking lobbyists and corporate executives are the core of their fundraising.

Murtha's Defense Earmarks Draw Questions.  Spring in Washington is "earmark season" — a busy time for Congressman John Murtha.  "That's my business," Murtha said.  "I've been in it for 35 years."  As head of a powerful Defense committee, Murtha controls hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars ...and he's not shy about directing money to those who give generously to his election campaigns.


This definition can be found in Funk & Wagnall's Standard Dictionary of the Rnglish Language,
1964 International Edition, Volume One, page 548.  (Incidentally, this definition was not in the 1949 edition.)


Spending Cuts Even Democrats Can Support:  Although many "bridges to nowhere" are small potatoes, the number of potatoes is large.  A recent accounting by Taxpayers for Common Sense estimated 2005 earmarks at $24 billion; most of this is pure pork.  Adding big ticket items like manned space flight, Amtrak subsidies, mass transit boondoggles like the Big Dig, senseless flood control projects undertaken by the Army Corps of Engineers, and subsidized disaster insurance, not to mention state and local pork, would easily yield substantial savings.  [Approximately] $70 billion.

Did someone mention manned space flight,  Amtrak subsidies,  and  mass transit boondoggles?

A Democrat victory in November would produce even more pork.  If Democrats win back control of the U.S. House of Representatives in November, U.S. Rep. Jim Moran said he would use his position in the majority to help funnel more funds to his Northern Virginia district. … "When I become chairman [of a House appropriations subcommittee], I'm going to earmark the s··· out of it," Moran buoyantly told a crowd of 450 attending the event.

Update:
Pelosi Will Bring 'Speaker Pork' to San Francisco.  Tip O'Neill secured down payments for Boston's Big Dig.  Sam Rayburn sent gushers of cash back to Texas, along with tax breaks that helped its oil industry.  Hospitals, schools and nonprofits in Dennis Hastert's hometown of Aurora, Ill., have seen millions roll in during his reign.  Now Rep. Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco is poised to follow them as speaker of the House — a perch predecessors used to channel big cash to pet projects back home.

Speaker-to-be is no stranger to earmarking.  When the House passed a massive spending bill last November, Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi made sure her constituents knew what they were getting.  "Pelosi Secures $115 Million for San Francisco Transportation, Housing, Science and Arts," she proclaimed in a news release.  It wasn't an unusual announcement.  Like many of her colleagues in Congress, Pelosi for years has celebrated bringing home the bacon to her district.

Some things never change.  Even before the Democrats become the majority party in Congress, there are signs that little of importance will change.  New York Times reporter David Kirkpatrick recently wrote a front-page story in which he quotes Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-HI) on "earmark reform."  Inouye said, "I don't see any monumental changes."  Inouye will take the gavel from the current chairman of the defense appropriations subcommittee, Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK).  The two have what Kirkpatrick calls an "unusual bipartisan camaraderie while divvying up projects."

The Last Frontier.  [Scroll down]  [To Dave] Cuddy, the primary is mostly about Alaska's honor and the Republican brand.  "We're simply spending money that our kids are going to have to pay back," he says.  "We have to get over this idea that federal money is free."  Cuddy also argues that when it comes to earmarks, overspending, and the "culture of corruption," Stevens is an example of the trends that cost the Republicans the 2006 elections.

New Democrats Leaders Love Pork Barrel Spending.  Senators Ted Stevens of Alaska and Daniel K. Inouye of Hawaii are the best of friends in the Senate, so close they call each other brother.  Both are decorated veterans of World War II.  They have worked together for nearly four decades as senators from the two youngest and farthest-flung states.  And they share an almost unrivaled appetite for what some call political pork.

The Real Reason For Federal Corruption:  Federal legislators [have become] expert in the art of misappropriating federal cash.  Senator Robert Byrd, D-West Virginia, single-handedly siphoned almost $3 billion to West Virginia between 1991 and 2006, according to Citizens Against Government Waste.  "They call me 'The Pork King,'" Byrd once bragged.  "They don't know how much I enjoy it."

One Byrd Gets Lion's Share Of Earmarks.  Byrd was the first senator to rack up a total of $1 billion in earmarks for his home state.  That was in 1999.  Today he's past the $3 billion mark.  In his famously colorful Senate speeches, Byrd has repeatedly defended his earmarks.

Shutting Down the Senate's Favor Factory.  It is highly unlikely that Sen. Robert Byrd, a legendary king of pork returning as Appropriations Committee chairman, will reverse the habits of a lifetime and listen to ordinary voters' revulsion over excessive federal spending.  "Voters want the earmark favor factory shut down, not turned over to new management," said [Senator Tom] Coburn.

Yeah, right...
Byrd says no more earmarks.  Sen. Robert Byrd joined the new House Appropriations chairman, David Obey, D-Wis., in announcing a brand new day when it comes to spending federal taxpayer money.  "There will be no congressional earmarks," Obey and Byrd said in a joint statement.  That ends the practice of sneaking appropriations for local projects into federal budget bills, a practice if not invented by Byrd, at least perfected by him in his first eight terms in the Senate.

The Porkbusters Hall of Shame:  If you're a West Virginian, you have to recognize a central truth:  it's Robert Byrd's state -- you're just living in it.  In his over forty-eight years (!) in the United States Senate, Senator Byrd has achieved a pork record that is second to none.  From the Robert C. Byrd Expressway to the Robert C. Byrd Freeway; the Robert C. Byrd Institute to the Robert C. Byrd Federal Building (both of them), Senator Byrd has truly left his mark on West Virginia -- and the federal budget.  It would be appropriate to erect some kind of monument to his century-spanning resume -- except that he already did so himself.

Byrd Gives Rationale for Congressional Earmarks.  "An earmark is an economic need that many times falls between the cracks of the Washington bureaucracy.  When that happens, the people we represent cannot call some unelected bureaucrat in the White House budget office.  They cannot get a Cabinet Secretary on the line.  When they need help, they come to us, their elected representatives."

The Editor says...
I doubt if this was written by a 91-year-old man who just got out of the hospital.*  The newspaper would have us believe that this article was written by Senator Byrd himself.

Following in Byrd's footsteps...
Rep. Rangel Earmarks Funds for His Own Building.  New York Rep. Charles Rangel has been raising funds from taxpayers and corporations for a center in Harlem to be named after a prominent U.S. congressman — Charles Rangel.  The Democrat has quietly raised nearly $25 million for the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at City College, located in a four-story Harlem building and aimed at steering low-income and minority students into politics, the New York Post reports.

Earmark War on the Senate Floor.  Sen. Jim DeMint (R.-S.C.) tried to persuade his fellow Senators to remove a project sponsored by New York Rep. Charles Rangel (D.) that would give $2 million in federal money to the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Policy, the Rangel Conference Center, and the Charles Rangel Library at the City College of New York.  Freshman Rep. John Campbell (R.-Calif.) has sarcastically called the earmark Rangel's "Monument to Me."  Promotional literature describes the project as "kind of like a presidential library, but without the president."

Rangel's Pet Cause Bears His Own Name.  The New York Democrat has penned letters on congressional stationery and has sought meetings to ask for corporate and foundation contributions for the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at the City College of New York, a project that caused controversy last year when he won a $1.9 million congressional earmark to help start it.  Republican critics dubbed the project Rangel's "Monument to Me."

Democrats Can Smell the Pork.  The sterile, confused lame-duck session of the Republican-controlled 109th Congress ended with a quiet victory by reformers that staved off an estimated 10,000 earmarks.  But it could not be called a farewell to pork.  As the House approached adjournment Thursday, Democrats signaled they may countenance a return to free and easy spending ways when they assume the majority Jan. 4.

Better Late Than Never.  It's been years since federal agencies have screamed this loudly about fiscal discipline being imposed on them.  GOP Sens. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Jim DeMint of South Carolina have decided to take a stand against overspending by objecting to the nearly 10,000 earmarks, or member-sponsored pork projects, larded throughout the spending bills Congress is currently considering.

The Dangerous Spread Of Earmarks.  There is no doubt that earmarking has become an overused tool used by Senators and Representatives to fund projects with Federal taxpayers' money.  Citizens Against Government Waste identified nearly 10,000 projects stuffed into appropriations bills this year, representing over $29 billion.

Congress closes with a pork-filled flourish.  Christmas arrived Wednesday for the kidney dialysis industry.  That's when President Bush signed into law the last major piece of legislation approved by the outgoing Congress.  It was a lavish hodgepodge that included a $100 million-a-year boost in the Medicare reimbursement rates for dialysis providers who proved to be generous contributors to important legislators, notably House Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas of Bakersfield.

I found this item at Pork Busters dot org:

Dennis Hastert, Real Estate Tycoon.  Denny Hastert is a real estate investment genius, turning a private real estate trust into a $1.5 million profit (and then some) in just seven months.  Being Speaker of the House and arranging for a new highway to run less than three miles from his isolated parcel had nothing to it.  Of course.  How could one think otherwise?

Democrat's earmark wasted $37 million on a project with no application.  Once begun, promising but speculative programs like Project M are hard to kill, sustained by members of Congress who want to keep jobs in their districts, military officials who want to keep their options open and businesspeople who want to keep their companies afloat.

Trading votes for pork.  It looks like a scene out of an old movie:  one about shady politicians and back-room deals.  You can almost smell the cigar smoke and see the dirty money changing hands.  But unfortunately, it's not an old film.  It's a real-life picture of the United States Congress.  The cigars are gone, but the dirty deal-making is thoroughly up-to-date.  And at the head of it is Rep. John Murtha (D) of Pennsylvania.

Here to Stay.  For $495, an outfit called TheCapitol.Net will teach you how to feed at the trough.  The firm, which does training seminars on how Washington works, is offering a one-day course on how to get an earmark.  If you sign up, the folks at TheCapitol.Net will even teach you how to counter "public criticism of pork."

Don't know how earmarks work?  Neither does anyone else.  Special interest groups – who pay the lobbyists – who hob-knob the Congressmen – who slide in the unauthorized Rock and Roll Hall of Fames and Sea Otter Commissions while the rest of us aren't looking — they all know how earmarks work.  And that's exactly the problem; we the taxpayers are in the dark.  We have no recourse in how our own tax dollars are spent, and that must change.

Don't know how earmarks work?  Neither does anyone else.  (Part 2):  Taxpayer dollars shouldn't be the petty cash from which local and state governments pull to promote projects, especially when those projects don't even benefit the majority of taxpayers, but loopholes in Congressional lobbying rules actually encourage this behavior.

A Primer on Lobbyists, Earmarks, and Congressional Reform.  A growing body of evidence suggests that illegal and questionable lobbying practices are not uncommon and that incidents such as those involving Mr. Abramoff have likely been repeated in similar transactions between other lobbyists and Members.

Senate Earmark Reforms Quietly Gutted.  A three-word rule change quietly made to Congress's newly-enacted lobby reform package was recently discovered that significantly reduces disclosure requirements for the earmarks each senator requests.

The greatest single hypocrisy:  Earmarking, as I've had occasion to remark before, is the modern method of distributing "pork."  The term comes from how one marks a pig's ear, to determine whom it belongs to.  Senators, in adding bits to legislation, mark those bits as their own by helping their own districts.  Well, certain people within their own districts.  You know, spending on indoor jungles, bike paths, and raisin research.

Ready remedy for earmarks?  If earmarks are to be truly solved, rather than simply lamented, they need to be scrutinized, challenged and removed before reaching the president's desk.  Does such a solution exist?  Not only is there one, but it has a proven track record in the Senate.

Pork endangered:  Senators John McCain and Tom Coburn may force their colleagues to make an up-or-down public decision on proposals such as tucking $2 million for a public park in San Francisco into the nation's massive military spending bill.  Last Dec. 20, this bit of pork was passed by Congress without debate and without a vote in the final version of the Defense Appropriations Act.

Congress Goes on a Spending Binge.  Congress just passed and President George W. Bush just signed a highway bill that will spend $286 billion over six years on roads and bridges, rail and bus facilities, bike paths and recreational trails.  The president says the projects will create jobs.  That is baloney.  Employing people to build roads doesn't add jobs.  The money spent on roads would have been spent on something else.  That something else also would have employed people.

Pork-for-Relief Swap:  When Hurricane Katrina wiped out the City of New Orleans, Congress jumped in and did what Congress does best:  Spend money like drunken sailors with no regard for the fiscal consequences. … You'd think a Republican-controlled Congress might show a little fiscal discipline and cut out some "frills" to cover this unexpected major expense.  And you'd be wrong.

Getting a bit carried away?  Keep in mind that $100 billion is one-eighteenth of the federal government's whole operating budget this year.  It is what we have been spending each year on the entire Iraqi war effort.  It is roughly twice as much as America spends each year to operate all its colleges and universities.  It is more than the total passenger revenue of all the major airlines in the United States.  This year.  It is a staggeringly huge amount of money.

Let's be responsible.  The importance of personal responsibility is taught everyday in American classrooms, churches and at dinner tables and ball fields — everywhere, it seems, but Washington, DC.  There, in the shadows of monuments to Washington and Lincoln, responsibility needs to be reinvigorated by politicians who seem to be more intent on lavishing taxpayer dollars on special interest groups than providing for a safe and prosperous American future.

Republican 'Porkers' Urged to Stop Spending.  "The pork has exploded," Chris Edwards, director of tax policy for the Cato Institute declared, pointing the finger at Republicans and Democrats in government for the increase in pet projects using American taxpayer money.

Big spender Bush runs out of credit with conservative allies.  The federal budget has gone up by a third to $2.47 trillion since he came to power.  This summer's $286 billion Transportation Bill was an exercise in indulgence, including 6,371 special favors, known as "pork" and worth $24 billion.  A surplus has turned into a record deficit.

Storm's Costs Threaten Hill Leaders' Pet Projects.  As Congress looks for budget cuts to pay for damage from Hurricane Katrina, lawmakers are facing the fact that many projects on the chopping block are dear to their constituents.

 Translation:   The Congressmen are dear to their constituents because of all the pork projects they bring home.

More information about opportunism and runaway spending in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

The Democrats' Byrd strategy:  To those Americans who follow politics, [Senator Robert] Byrd's pork-barreling feats are legend.  The veteran charlatan has pilfered taxpayers nationwide of billions to place his name on dozens of highways, government programs and public buildings in West Virginia.  While taxpayers despise Byrd, his pork-barreling actually earns him kudos from much of the mainstream press.

From the KKK to 48 years in the Senate.  In West Virginia, Senator Byrd is a living legend.  He has channelled so much federal money into his home state that it seems there is hardly a highway, bridge or government building in West Virginia that is not named after him.

West Virginia Weighs Record Term for Byrd.  Leaning on two canes, Sen. Robert C. Byrd hardly looks like a billion-dollar industry — or "Big Daddy," as the 88-year-old Democrat calls himself.  No matter:  Voters once again are looking beyond Byrd's age to his political guile — and the truckloads of federal dollars he's steered to West Virginia — as they consider whether to give him a record ninth term in the Senate.

Is Pork Barrel Spending Ready to Explode?  The lobbyist is proposing to sell something that is not really his to sell.  That he believes he can deliver it tells us that something is terribly wrong in Congress.  It is one thing for members of Congress to make pork-barrel spending promises to their constituents and deliver on them, but it is quite another that earmarks can be bought and sold like bushels of wheat on the open market by private speculators.

Shocking New Pork Barrel Spending!  One [amendment] by Senator Conrad Burns (R-MO) would bail out farmers even MORE to a tune of $2.4 billion (this is on top of the $180 billion Farm Bill that was recently signed into law).  Another would further increase HIV/AIDS funding overseas by $600 million.  What is even more maddening about this profligate spending is the fact that we are only days away from starting the annual appropriations process, which becomes an annual pork fest in its own right.

Book review
Plowshares & Pork Barrels:  The Political Economy of Agriculture.  Established in 1860, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has grown without cease and is now the most entrenched of all federal agencies.  The Farm Bills signed by Presidents Bill Clinton in 1996 and George W. Bush in 2002 only served to further expand this byzantine system.

Take the Federal Out of Farming.  Here's how the American free enterprise system works.  You have an idea for a business.  You find the money to start it up.  You try to give customers something they want at a price low enough to keep them happy but high enough to earn a profit.  Either your plan works, allowing you to make a living, or it doesn't, indicating you should find a different line of work.  Unless, of course, you are a farmer, in which case all this may sound unfamiliar.

Congress Punts, Public Sacked.  Another winter has come in Washington and brought with it another pork-laden omnibus spending bill.  That's right.  Thanks to Congress's continued inability to do its job, taxpayers are once again left holding the bag as billions of our hard-earned dollars are wasted.

Highway-to-nowhere bill.  In a Statement of Administrative Position, President Bush in March opposed the myriad set-asides and so-called "high-priority" projects that litter the legislation, have little to do with building and refitting critical highway infrastructure and are inserted for political pork.  Bicycle paths, covered bridge restoration and programs designed to encourage people to walk to work are just a few examples of pork, and there are many, many more.

Highways to Porkville.  A lot of those billboards posted at public construction sites that say "Your Tax Dollars At Work" need to be replaced with signs that read "Wasting Your Money."  This is the sad but inescapable conclusion after thumbing through the 2,000-plus pages of the $286 billion transportation bill that President Bush signed [recently] — legislation that Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona correctly called "a monstrosity" stuffed with outrageous, waste-ridden pork barrel projects that often have nothing to do with roads.

Taxpayer Groups Urge a Presidential Veto on Budget Busting Highway Bill.  Congress is nearing completion of a Highway Bill that will surely rank as one of the worst examples of pork-barrel spending of all time.

Passing up highway pork.  Rep. Jeff Flake, an Arizona Republican, was one of only eight House members to vote against the $286.4 billion highway and mass-transit bill, a pork-bloated law that passed with bipartisan gusto on July 29 in the House, 412-8, and in the Senate, 91-4.

Under Bush, Federal Spending Increases at Fastest Rate in 30 Years.  President George W. Bush [became] the first full-term president since John Quincy Adams (1825-1829) to not veto a single bill.  The result is a congress that has been completely unconstrained in satiating its appetite for pork and corporate welfare.

From Wartime Expedient to Permanent Pork Barrel:  WFC to RFC to SBA.  Jesse H. Jones, the Texas wheeler-dealer who became the Reconstruction Finance Corporation's chairman in May 1933 and remained in charge of it until March 1945, observed that the RFC "grew to be America's largest corporation and the world's biggest and most varied banking organization." … Jones was not just huffing and puffing:  $50 billion dollars was a gargantuan amount of money to dole out.  Small wonder that he was widely regarded as the second-most-powerful man in the government.

Line-Item Veto Can Cut Pork.  U.S. taxpayers deserve to have Congress justify how it spends their money.  This is the simple idea behind giving the president a modified, constitutional version of the line-item veto.  By shining the light of day on budgeting in Washington and holding members of Congress accountable for spending they insert into legislation, we can reduce wasteful pork-barrel spending.

On the other hand...
A Spending Eraser is at Hand.  Neither Congress need act nor the president wait if they decided to use the power already provided by the Budget Act's authority to rescind funds.  This law gives the president the ability to single out spending items for repeal and Congress an expedited way to do so by simple majority vote.  While perhaps not as theoretically potent as a line-item veto, rescission has several advantages.  It has worked, it is surgical and it would avoid the adversarial nature of the line-item veto.

Book review:
Plowshares and Pork Barrels.  Established in 1860, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has grown without cease and is now the most entrenched of all federal agencies. … Economists are nearly unanimous in their denunciation of this wasteful and pernicious web of politics.  Subsidies for not growing crops are so notorious that they have been the object of biting political satire since their introduction in the 1930s.  However, few books have critically analyzed government farm programs in their entirety.

Discretionary, mandatory and unconstitutional spending.  Several sections of the Constitution expressly grant Congress the authority to tax and spend money to establish military forces to defend the nation against its enemies.  Not one says anything about buying drugs for retired people.

Base closing gripes.  It's officially called the Department of Defense, but to many politicians, the label misstates its function.  Judging from their reaction to proposed base closures, they'd like to rename it the Department of Jobs, Pork, Community Uplift and Incumbent Protection.  That way, no one would get distracted by the petty business of protecting America.

Do Voters Choose Politicians, or Do Politicians Choose Voters?  Gerrymandering, campaign finance reform, and public subsidies are three ways that government intervention has reduced political competition, according to a new study.

The Oppenheimer-opera-documentary grant:  The 1965 law that created the NEA was passed by a Democratic Congress and signed by Democratic President Lyndon Johnson.  It says nothing about the Constitution.  But it does claim it "is necessary and appropriate for the Federal government to compliment, assist and add to programs for the advancement of the humanities and the arts by local, state, regional, and private agencies and their organizations."  That means it is "necessary" for your family to be taxed so federal bureaucrats can give your money to the Iris Feminist Collective.  Our constitutional republic flourished for 176 years before liberal Democrats discovered this "necessity."

Congress Approves $800 Billion Increase in Debt Ceiling.  The U.S. Congress approved an $800 billion increase in the nation's $7.384 trillion debt limit, the third increase in the government's borrowing limit since President George W. Bush came to office.

Rolling Back Government:  Lessons from New Zealand.  Stopping government growth requires high levels of transparency and significant consequences for bad decisions.

No Member of Congress Voted for a Net Reduction in Federal Spending ...for the third year running.  When it came to controlling deficit spending last year, words were abundant but deeds were in short supply on Capitol Hill.

Red Light on Highway Pork:  Local road projects seem to top most members' agendas, and money is no object.  The House bill would cost $283 billion over six years, almost $50 billion more than what the government is scheduled to collect in gas taxes in that period.  Worse, it's loaded with more than 3,000 "earmarks" totaling $10.7 billion.

Federal Spending Creates Few Jobs, Less Value.  During the recent debate on legislation to reauthorize the federal highway system, many supporters of the program claimed that it would create two million jobs.  But as decades of research demonstrate, such claims are questionable….

Same story —  Highways and Jobs:  The uneven record of federal spending and job creation.

Congress Passes $373 Billion Spending Bill.  The measure has 7,932 so-called earmarks, for local items such as museum upgrades and agricultural research, costing $10.7 billion, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a group that pushes for lower spending.

Why Can't Congress Stop Spending?  Everybody complains about pork, but members of Congress keep spending because voters do not throw them out of office for doing so.  The rotten system in Congress will change only when the American people change their beliefs about the proper role of government in our society.  Too many members of Congress believe they can solve all economic problems, cure all social ills, and bring about worldwide peace and prosperity simply by creating new federal programs.  We must reject unlimited government and reassert the constitutional rule of law if we hope to halt the spending orgy.

A Threat Greater than Terrorism:  Even though many in Washington pledged themselves to fiscal responsibility, federal spending has been skyrocketing in recent years.  At $20,000 per household, federal spending is at its highest levels since World War II.

Our misspent tax dollars:  Why must taxpayers shell out $100,000 to renovate an historic Coca-Cola building in Macon, Ga., when the soft drink company made millions last year and could fund the project itself?

Welfare Turns Into a Suite Deal:  The Bush administration and the Republican-led House have taken steps toward providing an unprecedented taxpayer-funded handout to private companies.  The energy bill, which passed the House and will be taken up again by the Senate in January, contains nearly $30 billion in such benefits, including $11.3 billion in subsidies for oil and gas companies that just had one of their most profitable years on record.

The issue that won't go away.  Stephen Slivinski blasts the big spending Republican Congress and points to what he calls "the curse of incumbency."  A curse, he says, that "can be measured in dollar terms."  Slivinski recites chapter and verse of numerous studies of congressional behavior all demonstrating that politicians vote for evermore spending the longer they stay in office.  The answer, according to Slivinski, is obvious:  term limits.

Money to Burn:  Take the case of Iowa Senator Charles Grassley.  He's served in Congress for 30 years.  According to opponents of term limits, this means he possesses valuable wisdom that we simply can't replace.  And yet he wants to build a rain forest in Iowa.

Shocking New Pork Barrel Spending!  It appears that even after a stern warning from President Bush and the immense pressure of looming deficits, that lawmakers STILL can't keep their fingers out of the cookie jar.

Conservative groups break with Republican leadership:  National leaders of six conservative organizations yesterday [1/15/2004] broke with the Republican majorities in the House and Senate, accusing them of spending like "drunken sailors," and had some strong words for President Bush as well.

The party of big spenders:  Once upon a time a Republican candidate for president named George W. Bush painted his Democratic opponent, Al Gore, as a reckless big spender whose fiscal policies would mean that "the era of big government being over is over."  So where do things stand three years later?

The embarrassing GOP:  This Republican Congress, in addition to increasing spending on entitlements and expanding big government - like the Democrats they once criticized - also dished out $95 billion in tax breaks and pork-barrel projects.

Do the Republicans have the courage to roll back federal spending?  Half of all Americans now receive some form of entitlement, whether Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, unemployment insurance, veterans benefits, federal pensions, food stamps, school lunches, the earned-income tax credit, farm subsidies, or disability payments.  Entitlements consume more than half of the $1.5-trillion budget.

Washington's $782 Billion Spending Spree:  Politicians who want to spend even more money are telling taxpayers that it's time to sacrifice.  To which taxpayers should reply:  "You first."

 Sidebar:   The National Debt, Down To the Penny.  Does anyone care that it is over $9,229,172,659,000?

The Dirty Dozen:  The Twelve Porkiest States 1995-2002. [PDF file]

Congress Accused of Wasting Money as Deficit Mounts:  The energy bill, economic stimulus package and farm bill are all examples of congressional spending gone wild, according to a study released by the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense.

A Long Hot Summer:  History has shown that short deadlines and election-year pressures always lead to "compromises" that grow the size and scope of government.

New Awards For Republicans in Name Only:  They're called RINOs - Republicans in Name Only, and now, they've even got their own awards, dubious to be sure, handed out by the anti-tax Washington group, Club For Growth.  Club For Growth President Stephen Moore said the RINO awards recognize certain Republican office holders around the nation who have advanced what he called "anti-growth, anti-freedom or anti-free market policies."

Tom Daschle's Scam to Help Swindle Taxpayers:  Pork-barrel spending through the Agriculture Department can be discovered and exposed through the use of the Freedom of Information Act.  But that could change if Senator Tom Daschle, D-S.D., gets his way.

If Pork Had Wings:  Word has it that congressional offices are creating lists of lobbyists and corporations who have come knocking to use the Sept. 11 tragedies to cash in for their own narrow benefit.  Such profiteering is troubling, of course, and in this case achieves the amazing feat of setting a new low in the Washington world of brazen corporate welfare.

Welfare State Continues to Grow:  When President Lyndon Johnson launched the War on Poverty more than 30 years ago, he announced it was an investment that would repay its cost to society many times over.  Since that time, the United States has "invested" $7.95 trillion (in constant 1999 dollars) in programs that provide cash, food, housing, and medical and social services to poor and low-income Americans.  By contrast, the cost to the United States of fighting World War II was $3.2 trillion (also in 1999 dollars).  The cost of the War on Poverty has been more than twice the price tag for defeating Germany and Japan in World War II, after adjusting for inflation.

Total Tax Collections Climb to $2.667 Trillion,  ...and that was three years ago!

Cut Out the Pork, Fatten the Economy.

Ten Thousand Commandments:  In the new fiscal year 2002 federal budget, President George W. Bush proposed $1.96 trillion in spending.  While these costs encompass the on-budget scope of the federal government, there is considerably more to the government's reach.  Federal environmental, safety and health, and economic regulations cost hundreds of billions of dollars every year on top of official federal outlays.

The Welfare State on Autopilot Through Current Services Budgeting:  An 11-page expose of the federal budget process, where spending is compared to an inflated current services budget, rather than to last year's spending.  This is how a 4.5% spending increase over the previous year can be characterized as a "draconian cut."

The Department of Embezzlement:  The Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs issued a report, "Government at the Brink," detailing billions of dollars in government waste, loss, and fraud.  It's a measure of the Clinton-Gore legacy - an Executive Branch with core management problems.  The Big Three TV networks and the New York Times ignored it. With the Democratic coup, Joe Lieberman now heads the Committee, and it's back to politics as usual.

Conservatives Mark "Cost Of Government Day":  Several conservative groups proclaimed July 6 as the day at which Americans have earned enough gross income to gain "independence" from having to for the cost of federal, state and local government.

Taxpayers Group Says Congress Didn't Curb Big Government Last Year.




Wisconsin near bottom of pork barrel:
Chart ranks states by per-capita pork

(This chart appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on March 14, 2001.)


Kennedy Exploits Campaign Law Loophole:
The loophole allows politicians to accept flights aboard private and corporate jets, which could run more than $3,000 an hour, as long as they pay what a first-class commercial fare would cost.

Free Lunch:  Title I's formula for determining aid — and its recipe for fraud:  The process to qualify for a free lunch comes down to parents self-reporting their income on a form that is turned in to their local school.  Federal free-lunch program administrators argue that the program has little potential for abuse because "the worst that happens is a kid gets a free lunch."  Federal free-lunch data, however, are used as one of the main poverty indicators for school districts and are linked to many other local, state, and federal funding streams.  So any fraud in the free-lunch program is quickly multiplied.

Bush vs. Pork

Your stolen money... Government out of control

There Ain't No Surplus!

Let's Retire Social Security on its 65th Birthday  A moral way to abolish this destructive scheme.  The system is a massive fraud, one that violates individual rights and breeds insecurity.

Cost of Government Goes Up While Costs of Living Go Down

The High Cost of Government

---

Recommended Reading:  "Not Yours to Give",  an excerpt from The Life of Colonel David Crockett, compiled by Edward S. Ellis (Philadelphia: Porter & Coates, 1884).

---

Editor's Note:  Use your favorite internet search engine and search for the phrase "risk losing federal funds", as in "states (or schools) that do not comply would risk losing federal funds".  You'll be surprised at the number of times this phrase pops up in news stories, because the federal government is taking money out of your paycheck and using it to buy back the Tenth Amendment from the fifty states.  Surprisingly many people believe that federally funded projects cost nothing.  But there are no "federal funds" except the money that has been taken from the taxpayers.  So when you "risk losing federal funds", you only risk lower taxes and smaller government!

---

Continue on to More Pork Barrel Politics
Jump to Specific Examples of Pork Barrel Politics
Back to Money Down the Drain
Jump over to Wasteful Wartime Spending
Back to the Home page

Document location http://www.akdart.com/pork.html Updated February 7, 2010. Page design by Andrew K. Dart  ©2010