More  Pork  Barrel  Politics


This page contains the overflow from the Pork Page, which is a collection of news items about wasteful spending in general, and specific pet projects that certain Members of Congress have created to keep the people at home appeased.

Lately there have been subtopics that have generated a lot of discussion around the country.  In order to make the main page load a little faster, those subtopics have been moved to this page.

Subtopics on this page include:
The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006.
The Big Dig in Boston.
Senator Lott's Railroad Line — The Railroad to Nowhere.
Sweetheart deal for Boeing.
The National Endowment for the Arts.
Amtrak.

On another nearby page, read my opinions about NASA, which was once a peaceful way to fight the Cold War, but has now degenerated into one of the biggest and most completely pointless pork barrel projects ever.



The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006

What's Next for the Spending Database?  Yesterday [9/10/2006], Bill Frist surprised everyone by seizing a propitious moment to demand a floor vote on S. 2590, the Coburn-Obama bill creating a searchable online database for all federal spending.  Taken aback, no senator present objected to a call for unanimous consent to the vote, and the bill passed by acclamation.

Give Us the Spending Database.  The idea of a transparency website — replete with search engines that include subcontractors — was born in May 2005 at a hearing on U.S. efforts to combat malaria.  Officials from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) squirmed as [Senator Tom] Coburn revealed that 93% of the agency's 2004 funding to eradicate malaria had been spent on administrative and advice-giving services.  In addition, not enough of these funds were spent overseas; too much was absorbed by high-paid U.S. consultants.

Who's Blocking the Taxpayer Accountability Bill?  A conservative advocacy group wants to know which U.S. senators are secretly blocking a bill that would make politicians more accountable to taxpayers.  The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (S. 2590) directs the Office of Management and Budget to set up a website that would allow the American public to see which "entities and organizations" are being funded with tax dollars.

Update:
Senator Stevens is 'the secret senator'.  The identity of the blogosphere's "secret senator" has been revealed.  CNN has confirmed that Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, has placed a hold on a bill that would require the government to publish online a database of federal spending.  "He does have a hold on the bill," Stevens' spokesperson Aaron Saunders told CNN.

Senator Ted Stevens' Pork Tally:  It is simply amazing that one man has been responsible for spending this much of our money.

Senator Stevens as 'Secret Holder' is No Surprise.  Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) today [8/30/2006] celebrated the end of a political whodunit with the revelation that it was Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) who placed a hold on the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (S. 2590).  The bipartisan legislation, introduced by Sens. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.), will establish a public database for $800 billion worth of federal grants and contracts.  An anonymous hold had been placed on the legislation, preventing it from moving forward.  Grassroots pressure from a coalition of groups and bloggers from across the political spectrum prompted Sen. Stevens to confirm, through a spokesperson, that he is the one blocking the bill.

Is Congress spending your money in secret?  Congress is considering a bill -- the Labor, Health and Human Services appropriations measure -- that presently contains 1,867 earmarks worth more than a half-billion tax dollars and averaging nearly $268,000 each.  Many are for things that sound like worthy causes such as "hospital facilities and equipment," yet none of the sponsoring congressmen put their names on their earmarks.

The Editor says...
The article above includes a state-by-state list of earmarks.  Earmarks in Texas include $650,000 going to Texas Tech University for a "Virtual Vietnam Archive", whatever that is.  Personally, I'd rather have a few more dollars in my paycheck.

The War on Pork Moves to the Web.  A week after a broad coalition of groups announced an extensive project to track and research the 1,867 pork projects hidden in the 2007 Labor-HHS appropriations bill, I have some good news to report.  Bloggers on the left and right have rallied to the cause.

Secrets in the Senate.  Their arrogance is stunning.  Sens. Ted Stevens (R-Alas.) and Robert Byrd (D-W.V.) are the acknowledged kings of pork-barrel spending.  They bring billons of taxpayer dollars to their states to ensure their hold on power.  But apparently, that's not enough.  They also want to make certain that you and I don't see what they get away with.  So secretly they tried to keep us in the dark.



The Big Dig in Boston
Collosal cost overruns combined with what appears to be shoddy materials and workmanship.

The latest:
Big Dig tunnels spring 237 leaks.  Despite repeated assurances that it had Big Dig leaks under control, the Turnpike Authority has allowed the number of leaks to explode in the last two years and has been forced to launch a fresh effort to plug hundreds of trouble spots, according to an analysis of Big Dig records.

Officials say Big Dig leaks are worse than thought.  Hundreds of Big Dig leaks have festered for years because of infighting and red tape, leading state officials to acknowledge flaws are worse than imagined and could permanently damage project tunnels, the Herald has learned.  "I feel we have inherited a project that is riddled with flaws, and it has become a major preoccupation," state Transportation Secretary Bernard Cohen said yesterday in his first extensive public comments about massive tunnel leaks plaguing the $14.8 billion project.

Glue Maker for Big Dig Is Charged in '06 Death.  The supplier of the epoxy that federal officials have blamed for the collapse of a Big Dig tunnel was indicted Wednesday [8/8/07] in the death of a woman crushed by falling ceiling panels.  The company, Powers Fasteners Inc., was charged with one count of involuntary manslaughter.

Year after tunnel death, motorists relax.  One year after 12 tons of concrete ceiling panels fell in a Big Dig highway tunnel, crushing a car and killing a passenger, Dave Weibe can finally drive his own car through the tunnels without nervously eyeballing the ceiling.

Fore!  Score a bogey for Big Dig.  It has been called a boon doggle, a crime scene, and countless expletives spewed by drivers stuck in traffic.  Now authorities are investigating how the Big Dig — or, more precisely, a structure built for the project — became something else: the site of an unauthorized indoor driving range for state troopers who love golf.

State claims negligence in $ suit vs. Dig bigwigs.  The state is slamming Big Dig designers, builders and contractors with a mega-lawsuit today [11/27/2006] alleging their negligence led to the fatal tunnel collapse this summer and that the state is entitled to millions of dollars to cover the fallout.  Attorney General Tom Reilly is expected to file a civil suit today in Suffolk Superior Court alleging gross negligence, negligence and breach of contract against six companies involved in the "design, installation and oversight of the I-90 tunnel collapse," according to a state official familiar with the suit.

Big Dig's design cuts questioned.  Big Dig project managers persuaded the designer of the Interstate 90 connector tunnel ceiling to reduce by half the number of bolts supporting each ceiling hanger, the Boston Sunday Globe reported [9/17/2006].

Big Dig officials chose not to retest.  Project documents show that officials overseeing the Big Dig chose not to retest most of the bolts in the tunnel, including those that would suddenly fail seven years later, causing last month's fatal ceiling collapse.

Bad Days for the Big Dig.  It's no doubt true that the largest public works project in the nation's history has grown corpulent on federal largesse, soaring from an estimated price tag of $2.2 billion in 1983 to somewhere near $15 billion today.  And $15 billion hasn't yet bought a tunnel system free from hundreds of leaks (including a monster 300-gallon-per-minute gusher), falling debris, collapsing walls, and rampant fraud.

Agency chief quits over Big Dig death.  The chief of the agency overseeing Boston's Big Dig resigned Thursday [7/20/2006] under pressure from the governor, two weeks after falling concrete crushed a woman to death in her car.  The departure of Matthew Amorello, chairman of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, was announced just 90 minutes before a hearing was supposed to begin on Gov. Mitt Romney's effort to remove him from the $14.6 billion highway project.

Poll suggests little confidence in tunnel safety;  Half blame contractors for problems.  The public primarily blames contractors for the fatal ceiling collapse in a Big Dig tunnel, but is deeply skeptical that anyone will be prosecuted, according to a new Boston Globe poll that indicates widespread cynicism and safety concerns about the $14.6 billion project.

Massport rejects parts of Big Dig.  The Massachusetts Port Authority is refusing to take ownership of a 3/4-mile section of the Ted Williams Tunnel and a nearby elevated ramp leading into Logan International Airport, saying the structures are in poor condition and require significant repairs, according to documents obtained by the Globe.

Critics Cite Lack of Big Dig Oversight.  When Boston's Big Dig was still on the drawing board, state and federal transportation officials picked an engineering powerhouse and a smaller, well-established firm to build the forbiddingly complex tangle of tunnels, ramps, bridges and highways.  And then, critics say, the officials stepped back and let the two companies do their job with little or no oversight.

Problems with bolts reported in 1994.  More than 4 percent of ceiling anchor bolts failed strength tests after being installed in the Ted Williams Tunnel in 1994, and the company installing the drop ceiling in the tunnel complained that the problem was at least partly caused by air pockets in the concrete roof.

The crumbling legacy of Tip O'Neill.  All politics is local, Tip O'Neill famously said, and it surely doesn't get any more local than when a 6,000-pound slab from a project championed by the late House speaker falls on a 38-year-old newlywed from the Boston neighborhood of Jamaica Plain, crushing her to death as her husband drives her to the airport.  O'Neill died in 1994, but the political culture he epitomized is alive and well and enshrined in the Big Dig, a slough of corruption, callousness, and cover-ups that had become a synonym for government mismanagement long before it killed Milena Del Valle on July 10.

Dig fixes may cost taxpayers.  When it comes to figuring out who is going to pay for the repairs to the Big Dig tunnels, it's an easy process of elimination. … The feds in 1997 officially cut off funding for the Big Dig at $8.54 billion.

Ceiling collapse is only the tip of Big Dig problems.  Tests conducted in 1999 reportedly showed that bolts holding the ceiling panel in the I-90 connector tunnel, where Milena Del Valle was killed, had a tendency to come loose, and inspections of the I-93 Big Dig tunnels early last year revealed 189 defective wall panels and more than 2,000 water leaks.  "The Big Dig was billed as something far different from what it became," [Gov. Mitt] Romney told The Washington Times on Wednesday [7/19/2006].  "It's been a hugely expensive and wastefully mismanaged project, and no wonder a lot of motorists keep their fingers crossed as they go through it," he said of the most expensive highway project in American history.

Nationwide search begun for other flawed tunnels.  Federal highway officials have sent out a nationwide appeal seeking to identify other tunnels that rely on the same bolt-and-epoxy ceiling fasteners whose failure is now being eyed as the cause of the Big Dig tunnel tragedy.

[This is a variation of the grade school alibi, "See?  Everybody else does it too!"  In this case, the officials are hoping to find at least one other highway tunnel that was built with faulty materials, but how many other tunnels cost $14.6 billion?]

Workers doubted ceiling method.  Field tests by construction workers indicated that bolt-and-epoxy fasteners might not support the multi-ton ceiling panels in the Interstate 90 connector tunnel, but the firm that designed the tunnel persuaded Big Dig officials to use the system anyway, law enforcement officials said yesterday [7/17/2006].

"Big Dig" collapse is a blow to urban dream.  Boston's $15 billion "Big Dig" was meant to inspire awe, an engineering marvel on scale with the Panama Canal that would thrust U.S. cities into a new era.  Instead, it faces a crisis of public confidence after a fatal tunnel collapse that could derail plans for other U.S. urban mega-projects.

[Good!]

Gov. Romney Takes Control of Big Dig Probe.  Gov. Mitt Romney signed legislation Friday [7/14/2006] giving him control of inspections in the Big Dig tunnel system, where falling ceiling panels fatally crushed a woman.  The legislation was passed overwhelmingly by the Legislature late Thursday, which would also give the governor ultimate say on when the tunnels reopen, instead of the Turnpike Authority chairman.

Politics Have Kept the Costly Big Dig Afloat.  The Massachusetts congressional delegation intensely lobbied colleagues to overturn a presidential veto by a single vote in the Senate in 1987, prying open the federal money spigot for the project.  Since then, political maneuvering by lawmakers, state officials and private contractors has kept the problem-plagued project awash in public money — despite critics who brand the Big Dig a $14.6 billion boondoggle.  "Politics created the Big Dig," said Jeffrey Berry, a Tufts University political science professor.  "It was a highly political project from the very beginning."

Massachusetts Tunnel Is Dedicated to Tip O'Neill.  O'Neill, who retired in 1987 and died in 1994, was instrumental in the project's earliest stages, battling a Reagan administration leery of its price tag even when it started at just $2.6 billion.  In the end the Big Dig cost more than $14.6 billion.

Big Dig problems may date back to 1999.  Contractors knew as early as 1999 that there were problems with some of the bolts attaching massive concrete panels to the ceiling of the Big Dig highway tunnel where a woman was crushed by 12 tons of falling concrete, Massachusetts' attorney general said.

Big Dig possible defect count quadrupled.  Inspectors on Thursday [7/13/2006] quadrupled to 240 the number of possible ceiling bolt problems in a Big Dig tunnel where a woman was crushed by falling concrete, a still-closed section at the center of Gov. Mitt Romney's push to oversee the safety of the troubled project.

60 bad fixtures found in ceiling.  Inspectors have found at least 60 faulty bolt fixtures that supported the ceiling of the Interstate 90 connector tunnel in the same section where concrete ceiling panels fell and crushed Milena Del Valle, state officials said yesterday [7/12/2006].

Two Cities, Two Approaches.  Officials say the Big Dig [was] more costly than the Panama Canal, the Alaska Pipeline or the Hoover Dam, if those investments were adjusted for inflation.

Boston's Big Dig Is Finally Completed.  When the clock runs out on 2007, Boston will quietly mark the end of one of the most tumultuous eras in the city's history:  The Big Dig, the nation's most complex and costliest highway project, will officially come to an end.

'Big Dig' Highway Contractor Agrees to $6 Million Settlement.  The family of a woman killed when the ceiling of a Big Dig tunnel collapsed on her car last year has agreed to a $6 million settlement with the company that supplied the epoxy blamed for the accident, an attorney said Monday [12/24/2007].

Big Dig deal criticized by contractor.  Prosecutors reached a $458 million settlement with contractors over tunnel defects that caused a fatal 2006 accident — but a small contractor that isn't involved in the agreement says it unfairly spares the most responsible party from criminal charges.  Under the deal announced Wednesday [1/23/2008], Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff, the multibillion-dollar consortium that oversaw design and construction of the Big Dig, the nation's costliest public works project, agreed to pay $407 million.

The Big Dig:  Links to numerous news items about the project.



Senator Lott's Railroad Line — The Railroad to Nowhere

Railroad to the Casinos — A $700 Million Boondoggle.  If you thought the "bridge to nowhere" was too expensive, take a look at the price tag of the "railroad to the casinos."  The anticipated changing of a railroad route may not be a surefire route to riches for the citizens of Mississippi but it would be a straight flush for the casinos.  Economic conservatives are critical of this deal; social conservatives also should be.

A Lott of Baloney.  Senator Trent Lott wants to tear up a coastal rail line in Mississippi to build a highway.  CSX Railroad and its insurance company just spent $300 million to repair this rail line.  The $700 million Trent wants to turn it into a highway could end up being as much as $2.9 billion.

The CSX line in question seems to be in pretty good shape.

The 'Emergency' Loophole.  One wonders what $3.9 billion for farm and rancher subsidies or $594 million for highway projects unrelated to the Gulf Coast have to do with the war or hurricane relief.  The bill also contains $700 million to move a perfectly functioning rail line a couple of miles to allow private developers build a casino where the line is now.

Derail the Railroad to Nowhere
Derail the "Railroad to Nowhere" Earmark!  The "Railroad to Nowhere" is what budget watchdogs have nicknamed a $700 million earmark in pending Senate "emergency" spending legislation that would be used to rip up a fully functioning railroad that was rebuilt (at a cost of nearly $300 million) after Hurricane Katrina destroyed it last year.

Mississippi Burning Tax Dollars.  Just when you thought Republicans had sworn off pork spending, along comes an emergency appropriations bill that has Capitol Hill engulfed in the unmistakable aroma of bacon.

Sen. Lott's Next Amtrak-Style Boondoggle:  A 'Railroad to Nowhere'.  Today, the Heritage Foundation blog entry Getting Somewhere on the Railroad to Nowhere reports that this has become a much bigger story than Mississippi's Republican Senators Lott and Thad Chochran hoped.  Heritage's Ron Utt was poking around in Mississippi last week and "everybody knows that CSX's freight trains will be shifted off the tracks and the railway will be used for a trolley or some other kind of light rail as part of a New Urbanist scheme to construct a massive, amenity-stuffed Las Vegas knockoff along the Gulf Coast."

Bridge to November.  The inability of a handful of House Republicans to stomach a long-overdue belt-tightening reform is threatening to prevent the House from passing a budget resolution for the first time since 1974.  Fortunately for fiscal conservatives, a pork-laden spending bill has come along just in time to remind the public why this particular reform is so desperately needed.

No Left Turn.  Amnesty is not the most objectionable feature of the president's plan.  It is the combination of amnesty with laxity in enforcement and a new guest-worker program to which we object.

Stop the casino corridor.  First came Alaska's infamous "bridges to nowhere."  Now, an even more outrageous plan is afoot in Congress to blackjack taxpayers for a casino corridor along Mississippi's Gulf Coast.

U.S. spending grows at historic rate.  The Senate added a sister project to last year's failed "Bridges to Nowhere" project in Alaska.  The $700 million for the "Train to Nowhere" would relocate newly rebuilt train tracks near the coast of Mississippi.  The goal?  To develop a new Vegas-style gambling mecca.  Yet we're to believe these funds constitute a budget "emergency."

Desperate Attempt to Save Railroad to Nowhere.  The nationwide uproar over the inclusion of Mississippi's $700 million "railroad to nowhere" into the Senate's war-time and Katrina-relief supplemental spending bill has put the project's proponents on the defensive.

Railroad to Nowhere Scrapped?  Fortunately, some brave lawmakers quashed this notion, and the bill that emerged from conference stayed within the president's limit.  The "railroad to nowhere"?  Gone.

[Not so fast.  It has come back from the dead.]

The Railroad to Nowhere Still Lurks.  Once thought dead, Mississippi's Railroad to Nowhere appears to be back on track.

The railroad to nowhere lives.  An amendment introduced by Senator Tom Coburn challenging the Railroad to Nowhere has been defeated by a 49-48 vote.  Voting against $700 million for the Railroad to Nowhere:  Harry Reid, Senate Democratic Leader.  Voting in favor:  Senator Bill Frist, Senate Republican Leader.

The Railroad to Nowhere Chugs On.  The Senate narrowly missed defeating the so-called "Railroad to Nowhere."  Frist voted to spend the $700 million.  Minority Leader Harry Reid did not.  To be fair, the spending involved more than just the controversial railroad, which critics say is a giveaway to casino interests on the Mississippi gulf coast.  Will Senate Republicans ever get it?  This is precisely the type of thing that will hurt turnout in November.  It's sad that Harry Reid is apparently more reliable than Bill Frist on cutting wasteful spending.

The railroad to nowhere:  You've got to hand it to some Republican appropriators.  Despite swirling political winds that threaten to blow the GOP majority right out of town, they keep on keeping on.  Never mind … that it was only months ago that the Senate debate over the poster child of bad earmarking — the Alaskan Bridge to Nowhere — ignited a firestorm of criticism over the way Congress spends American tax dollars.  No, these considerations are a mere after thought — an annoyance — to many congressional appropriators who remain intent on bringing home the bacon, no matter what the cost.

Mississippi Senators' Rail Plan Challenged.  Critics of the measure call it a gift to coastal developers and the casino industry that would be paid for with money carved out of tight Katrina relief funds and piggybacked onto funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.



Sweetheart deal for Boeing:

Fill 'Er Up:  Back-Door Deal for Boeing Will Leave the Taxpayer on Empty.  Using back-room political tactics, Congress in December 2001 authorized the U.S. Air Force to lease 100 Boeing 767 converted tanker aircraft.  Not only would a lease deal cost the taxpayers billions of dollars more than purchasing the tankers outright, it would likely have the effect of reducing the numbers of tankers in the Air Force.  In a May 2002 report, the GAO concluded that with relatively cheap engine and avionics upgrades, the current fleet of 545 KC-135 tankers would not need to begin being replaced until 2040.

A Boon to Boeing:  Even prior to 9/11, the commercial aircraft line of Boeing, America's second-largest defense contractor, was sputtering.  Politicians, particularly those from Washington State — the home to Boeing's commercial airline division-were trying to help Boeing find a market for their planes.  During the post 9/11 bailout bonanza, someone came up with the brilliant idea of replacing the Air Force's refueling tankers with retrofitted 767s that could be leased from Boeing for billions.

CBO Says Tanker Lease is $6.7 Billion More than Purchase.  This new report further confirms that the current $29.8 billion Boeing tanker proposal will take taxpayers to the cleaners.  The federal government is guaranteeing Boeing the largest sale of 767s in the history of the production line and Boeing's response is to bilk us for billions.  The Air Force has negotiated a lease proposal that is packed full of creative and unique provisions that benefits Boeing's bottom line at the expense of taxpayers.

What is seen and what is obscene:  Boeing, the aerospace company, has been a seasoned recipient of government subsidies.  It was for ample reasons that the U.S. Senator from Washington was commonly called "the Senator from Boeing."

Mrs. Daschle's lucrative lobbying:  Mrs. Daschle's lobbying activities as senior public policy director of the law firm Baker, Donelson, Bearman and Caldwell have received only a small amount of press scrutiny, save for an account in the Washington Monthly earlier this year.  Her lobbying activities surfaced again recently because of a controversial proposal before the Senate to lease military aircraft from Boeing — a client of Mrs. Daschle since 1998, according to federal records.

Against corporate pork:  Early in December, two senior Defense Department officials met to wrap an early Christmas present for U.S. taxpayers.  There was no announcement, no publicity and, on the contrary, a reluctance to reveal what had happened.  They had killed a generous helping of corporate pork for the hard-pressed Boeing Co.

 Update:   Boeing's pay dirt:  Against advice from federal budget officials and its own outside advisers, the Defense Department boosted Boeing's ailing commercial aircraft business with a sweetheart Air Force leasing deal.



The National Endowment for the Arts

If there is one feature of our overgrown government that exemplifies a political hot potato, it must be the National Endowment for the Arts.  Ignoring for a moment the simple fact that it is a complete waste of money, the NEA takes money out of your paycheck to fund various "artistic" undertakings, most of which you'd be very generous to describe as "experimental".  I'm not opposed to artwork, but don't force me to buy it.

Apparently nobody in Washington is able to defend the projects funded by the NEA, yet no politician has the backbone to lead a movement to get rid of it.

The National Endowment for the Arts:  Whose Art?  When the Republicans took over the majority in Congress in 1994, they vowed to phase out the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) by 1998, but it still exists.  The NEA boasts a budget of $99.5 million per year and has spent more than $2.5 billion since its inception.

The Separation of Art and State:  Supporters of the NEA make the point that the agency's current budget of just under $100 million is a pittance in a $37 billion industry.  He's right.  So couldn't the wealthy leaders of that industry come up with enough money to replace the NEA budget?  Then they wouldn't have to worry about Jesse Helms's objections to whatever they fund; the First Amendment well protects privately produced art.

Art and the State:  The United States doesn't have a "National Endowment for Religion," but it does have a "National Endowment for the Arts."  This endowment is a government bureaucracy with an army of bureaucrats supported by taxpayers' money.

Defund The National Endowment for the Arts:  A decision by the NEA to fund any artist implies a hidden decision to tax everyone else.

One of the Issues Tearing Our Nation's Fabric: The NEA:  As if our tax dollars mean less than nothing, the NEA lavishes grants on artists and works whose only purpose is the debasement of life, the imagination, and the soul.



Amtrak

Excellent:
Replacing Amtrak.  Amtrak is a colossal failure.  I was one of the people who worked to create Amtrak in 1970-71.  The railroad today bears little resemblance to what was promised.  Federal subsidies to Amtrak now exceed $30.7 billion (and states have provided several billion more), yet Amtrak remains in dire straits and has yet to launch major reforms. … The more Amtrak "flourishes," the greater taxpayers suffer.  That's because Amtrak is an "enterprise" where the more customers it serves, the more money it loses.

The latest:
Amtrak ticketing system outage:  On Saturday morning, 25 Aug 2007, the nationwide Amtrak ticketing system failed.  It wasn't restored to service until early Sunday afternoon.  During that time, passengers couldn't buy tickets except (sometimes) at a ticket window, query or change reservations, or retrieve previously-purchased tickets.  Some other web functions were also unavailable.

Amtrak to Reevaluate Long-Distance Routes.  Amtrak's chairman on Thursday [3/16/2006] said the railroad will scrutinize all of its long-distance routes this year for efficiency and could scrap, reconfigure or add lines as it tries to prove to Congress and the Bush administration that the rail system is reforming itself. … In its 34-year history, Amtrak has never turned a profit.  It has debt of more than $3.5 billion and its operating loss for 2005 topped $550 million.

Amtrak Should Go to the Movies.  My favorite statistic regarding this ultimate boondoggle is that the per-passenger-mile government subsidy is so high that it would be actually cheaper for the government to give people free plane tickets from New York to California than to underwrite their train ticket.

Amtrak:  On Time for Yesterday.  On-time performance has long been Amtrak's principal strength … not the trains, but the financial crises.  Little seems more predictable than Amtrak's periodic budget crises and calls for more money from those naïve enough to believe that nostalgia should be publicly financed, like defense or welfare.  The latest chapter is a new U.S. Department of Transportation Inspector General report indicating Amtrak is experiencing unsustainably large losses and is deferring needed investment.

Springtime for Amtrak and America.  Despite continued economic expansion and the recovery of the travel market from the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Amtrak's ridership increased by only 1.3 percent in 2005 compared to the 3.6 percent gain recorded by the domestic airlines.  Even among the one-half of one percent of America's intercity travelers who use Amtrak, support seems to be shrinking.

Is Amtrak Cooking the Books on Food and Beverage Services?  With the close scrutiny that it has received in recent months, Amtrak should be working overtime to satisfy the demands of its congressional overseers.  (Well, really it should be working overtime to satisfy its customers but, in a politically-driven enterprise like Amtrak, customers come, at best, third, behind legislators and labor unions.)  One wouldn't think that Congress would be satisfied by being misled by senior Amtrak management, right?

Amtrak's Acelas:  Amtrak and the DOT insisted on a custom, untested design based on a design concept that was out of step with every other high speed train built in modern times.  Had Amtrak simply purchased a modified form of the X-2000 tested in the early 90's, we wouldn't have this fiasco today.

Amtrak is Anti-American.  The irony is that, while the United States preaches free-market economics, it runs a retrograde socialist-style rail system while the rest of the world is privatizing.

Juvenile Logic:  Senators Torticelli and Schumer on Amtrak.  In addition to paying for the nation's roads, highway users pay a nearly 20 percent premium on their gasoline taxes to subsidize mass transit, which carries barely one percent of the nation' travel.

Amtrak:  Don't Let Colorado's Back Door Hit You In the Caboose.  Amtrak, you're just too much.  You've operated at taxpayer expense to the tune of $44 billion since 1971, a black hole for federal funding.

How To Run A Railroad (Or At Least Amtrak):  Many wasteful government programs contribute to the growing federal deficit, but the king of them all is Amtrak.  The national passenger rail service incurs two dollars in costs for every dollar of tickets sold.

Senate Scheduled to Vote for More Wasteful Transportation Spending.  Following a successful vote in favor of Rep. Don Young's $320 million "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska, Sen. Trent Lott has shown that he too can waste taxpayers' money on underutilized transportation projects. … As rewritten for the amendment, Senator Lott's proposal would spend $12.2 billion over the next six years on Amtrak.  At a time of fiscal crisis, boosting federal subsidies to money-losing and mediocre Amtrak makes no sense.

Amtrak — The Railroad to Nowhere.  Nearly five years ago, as Amtrak officials were hailing their new Acela train as "a giant step forward" for America and "the kind of rail system we've all been dreaming about for decades," a former Amtrak official named Joseph Vranich offered another perspective.  "I say without equivocation," he told The Hartford Courant, "that the Acela program is turning into the world's worst high-speed program." … Mr. Vranich has moved beyond all that and reached acceptance.  He now sees that the dream of decent Amtrak service is dead.

How To Run A Railroad (Or At Least Amtrak):  Many wasteful government programs contribute to the growing federal deficit, but the king of them all is Amtrak.  The national passenger rail service incurs two dollars in costs for every dollar of tickets sold.

Amtrak:  The Federal Government's Own Corporate Financial Scandal.  Amtrak has for years used creative accounting to disguise its financial problems, hiding operating expenses as capital costs, as well as misled the public about its effectiveness and performance.  If honest accounting practices had been enforced with Amtrak, it would have gone bankrupt years ago.

Democrats vow fight to protect Amtrak funding.  The leading House Democrat on transportation issues, Minnesota Rep. Jim Oberstar, on Tuesday [2/8/2005] predicted a "test of wills" over the Bush administration's proposal to eliminate subsidies to Amtrak.

Amtrak takes us for a ride:  The scene is a staple of silent movies and TV cartoons -- a damsel tied to the railroad tracks as a train comes hurtling around the bend, while the hero races to free her in time.  But this time, there's a twist:  It's the people running the trains who have bound the victim.

Don't Give a Penny to Amtrak:  Amtrak seized on the Sept. 11 calamities as a chance to lobby Congress for $3.2 billion in "disaster" aid -- even though it suffered no disaster.

Taxing Taxpayers on a Train Ride.  Congress deserves much of the blame for Amtrak's losses.  Under the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997, the same legislation that created the Amtrak Reform Council, Amtrak was required to submit a plan for its own liquidation if it could not achieve operational self-sufficiency by Dec. 2, 2001.  But, after it was clear that Amtrak could not meet this deadline, Congress got cold feet and (in an unpublicized amendment to a defense-spending bill) forbade Amtrak from preparing a liquidation plan.

New Amtrak boondoggle may outdo all othersLegislation now before Congress proposes to dedicate as much as $16 billion of future budget surpluses to prop up Amtrak, America's federally chartered and subsidized passenger rail service.  Members of Congress should view this new proposal with skepticism given Amtrak's record-breaking losses, stagnant ridership, and persistent failure to implement high-speed rail service, promised for 1997 and now delayed for a third straight year.

Congress Should Link Amtrak's Generous Subsidy to Improved Performance.  Amtrak has asked Congress for $1.680 billion for FY 2008 — a significant increase over the FY 2007 subsidy — but unlike the previous year's request, this year's makes no particular commitment to implement major reforms.  Indeed, at a time when it should be attempting to follow the airlines' successful lead and seek reductions in the wages of Amtrak's overpaid workforce ($54,000 per year plus tips for snack car workers), Amtrak's new president announced early this year that he will "Strive to achieve labor agreements providing reasonable wage increases."

This train's not bound to break even.

Silent Rage:  "This is the quiet car!"  The voice belonged to a woman glaring at my kids, ages 5 and 2, standing (quietly, I should add) next to the door.  I ignored her and focused on snagging an empty spot on a packed Amtrak train — a miracle the day before Christmas — for our nuclear family with big luggage.  (Why Amtrak can't figure out how to assign seats on its "reserved trains" like every major European rail company will have to be left for another day.)  In any case, we weren't about to give ours up.  The pitch went up a notch:  "This is the QUIET car!!"  "So be quiet."  Ah, my wife to the rescue.

The feds got away with it at the airports, and now the police state extends to the train station.
New security measures for Amtrak:  Amtrak passengers will have to submit to random screening of carry-on bags in a major new security push that will include officers with automatic weapons and bomb-sniffing dogs patrolling platforms and trains, the railroad planned to announce Tuesday [2/19/2008].  The initiative is a significant shift for Amtrak.  Unlike the airlines, it has had relatively little visible increase in security since the 2001 terrorist attacks, a distinction that has enabled it to attract passengers eager to avoid airport hassles.

More information on mass transit issues can be found here.



The V-22 Osprey

I've seen and heard the Osprey fly.  It's slow, it's very loud, it looks clumsy and sluggish, and it has already killed at least 30 people, none of whom was an enemy soldier.  It is the worst possible aircraft to send into a war, but somehow the Osprey program cannot be scrapped.

The Osprey is particularly useless in wartime conditions because it is so loud.  You can hear it coming long before it arrives.  And apparently it is so completely unstable that it has to land very gently.  It wouldn't surprise me to hear (someday in the near future) that a V-22 was brought down by a guy with a slingshot or a bow and arrow.

The latest:
V-22 Osprey combo-copter hits fresh tech snags.  The famous V-22 "Osprey" tiltrotor plane-chopper combo is back in the news again for unhappy reasons, mere months after it had seemed to be finally putting its troubles behind it.  A US project official has revealed to the press that the Osprey's engines are currently wearing out much too fast, to the point where it may need to be fitted with different powerplants.

US Marines:  Osprey tiltrotor doing OK in Iraq.  The troubled, revolutionary V-22 "Osprey" tiltrotor aircraft — which takes off and lands like a helicopter, but flies from place to place like a fixed-wing plane — appears to have finally left most of its development snags behind it.  The first operational Osprey squadron has been operating in Iraq for three months, initially under a news blackout.  But there have been no mishaps so far, and chuffed military bigwigs have begun to allow reports out.

[To put it another way, the military manipulates the hapless news media, releasing information only when it makes the generals and their pet projects look good.]

Osprey is Iraq-bound.  After years of delays and setbacks, the Marine Corps said yesterday [4/13/2007] that it plans to deploy its unconventional V-22 Osprey aircraft in military operations in Anbar province in Iraq in September.

War of the porkers:  The Marine brass just wants their beloved Osprey hybrid helicopter, which has, in the past decade, done three things well:  crashed, burned and caused its top guys to look like a bunch of liars.

If approved, Osprey program could take years to fixThe fourth fatal crash of the tilt-rotor aircraft in December, 2000, brought to 30 the number of people killed while flying the plane over two decades.

Bell Helicopter replaces CEO.  A news release and e-mail to employees from Textron chairman Lewis Campbell hinted at unhappiness with aspects of Bell's performance. … Doubts about the safety and reliability of the V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft, a joint venture of Bell and Boeing, have swirled for several years.  The V-22 is built in Amarillo.

Study finds design flaws in V-22 Osprey.  Hoping to re-energize congressional opposition to the Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey, critics of the controversial tilt-rotor aircraft released a study Thursday warning that the aircraft is plagued by inherent design flaws and will endanger U.S. lives when it goes into combat later this year.

V-22 Osprey:  Deathtrap or deliverer?  Months away from deployment, the debate surrounding the V-22 Osprey's safety, efficacy and reliability rages on.  It's either the future of military rotorcraft or a $69 million deathtrap, and 23,000 flight hours last year alone have done little to narrow the gap between those two schools of thought.

V-22 Testing Turns up Trouble.  The V-22 Osprey, which may deploy to Iraq with Marines this year, suffered problems that hurt its mission effectiveness when the Air Force tested it for a month in the New Mexico desert, according to a new report from the Pentagon's top weapons tester. ... "Frequent part and system failures, limited supply support, and high false alarm rates in the built-in diagnostic systems caused frequent flight delays and an excessive maintenance workload," the report says.

V-22 Flaws Called 'Lethal'.  Hoping to re-energize congressional opposition to the Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey, critics of the controversial tilt-rotor aircraft released a study Thursday warning that the aircraft is plagued by inherent design flaws and will endanger U.S. lives when it goes into combat this year.

V-22 Engine Fire Caused Major Damage.  Officials have determined that an engine fire in a Marine Corps V-22 Osprey probably caused more than $1 million in damage, putting the incident in the most serious category of mishaps.

November V-22 Incident Under Review.  As the investigation into the V-22 Osprey program's recent mishap on the ground in North Carolina continues, officials are reviewing an unexplained, previously unpublicized incident in November 2005 that also involved an uncommanded engine acceleration, according to Osprey program manager Marine Corps Col. Bill Taylor.

In spite of everything...
Defense OKs plans to buy 202 V-22s.  The Defense Department approved Navy and Air Force plans to buy as many as 36 Bell Helicopter-Boeing V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft each year through 2013, according to internal budget documents. ... The overall V-22 program is to cost $50 billion over its anticipated 20-year life.


Back to Pork Barrel Politics
Jump to Specific examples of Pork Barrel politics
Back to the Home page


Custom counter developed in-house

Document location http://www.akdart.com/pork2.html
Updated March 21, 2008.

Page design by Andrew K. Dart  ©2008